Conformational sampling in structure prediction and refinement with atomistic and coarse-grained models

Multiscale Approaches to Protein Modeling: Structure Prediction, Dynamics, Thermodynamics and Macromolecular Assemblies

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 85-109

  Feig, Michael ^a,b   Gopal, Srinivasa M ^a   Vadivel, Kanagasabai ^a   Stumpff Kane, Andrew ^a  

^a Michigan State University   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859888665     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6889-0_4     Document Type: Chapter

References (52)

1. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyal IN, Bourne PE (2000) The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28:235-242
2. Best RB, Buchete NV, Hummer G (2008) Are current molecular dynamics force fields too helical? Biophys J 95:L7-L9
3. Bonneau R, Baker D (2001) Ab initio protein structure prediction: progress and prospects. Ann Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 30:173-189
4. Bower MJ, Cohen FE, Dunbrack RL (1997) Prediction of protein side-chain rotamers from a backbone-dependent rotamer library: a new homology modeling tool. J Mol Biol 267:1268-1282
5. Brooks BR, Brooks III CL, Mackerell Jr AD, Nilsson L, Petrella RJ, Roux B, Won Y, Archontis G, Bartels C, Boresch S, Caflisch A, Caves L, Cui Q, Dinner AR, Feig M, Fischer S, Gao J, Hodoscek M, Im W, Kuczera K, Lazaridis T, Ma J, Ovchinnikov V, Paci E, Pastor RW, Post CB, Pu JZ, Schaefer M, Tidor B, Venable RM, Woodcock HL, Wu X, Yang W, York DM and Karplus M (2009). CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program. J Comput Chem 30:1545-1614
6. Cheng XL, Hornak V, Simmerling C (2004) Improved conformational sampling through an efficient combination of mean-field simulation approaches. J Phys Chem B 108:426-437
7. Chinchio M, Czaplewski C, Oldziej S, Scheraga HA, (2006) A hierarchical multiscale approach to protein structure prediction: production of low-resolution packing arrangements of helices and refinement of the best models with a united-residue force field. Multiscale Model Sim 5:1175-1195
8. Chocholousova J, Feig M (2006) Balancing an accurate representation of the molecular surface in generalized Born formalisms with integrator stability in molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem 27:719-729
9. Crippen GM, Snow ME (1990) A 1.8 Å resolution potential function for protein folding. Biopolymers 29:1479-1489
10. Fan H, Mark AE (2004). Refinement of homology-based protein structures by molecular dynamics simulation techniques. Protein Sci 13:211-220
11. Feig M, Brooks CL III (2004) Recent advances in the development and application of implicit solvent models in biomolecular simulations. Curr Opin Struct Biol 14:217-224
12. Feig M, Karanicolas J, Brooks III CL (2004a) MMTSB tool set: enhanced sampling and multiscale modeling methods for applications in structural biology. J Mol Graph Model 22:377-395
13. Feig M, MacKerell AD, Brooks CL (2003) Force field influence on the observation of p-helical protein structures in molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem B 107:2831-2836
14. Feig M, Onufriev A, Lee MS, Im W, Case DA, Brooks III CL (2004b) Performance comparison of generalized Born and Poisson methods in the calculation of electrostatic solvation energies for protein structures. J Comput Chem 25:265-284
15. Feig M, Rotkiewicz P, Kolinski A, Skolnick J, Brooks CLI (2000) Accurate reconstruction of allatom protein representations from side-chain-based low-resolution models. Proteins 41:86-97
16. Freddolino PL, Park S, Roux B, Schulten K (2009) Force field bias in protein folding simulations. Biophys J 96:3772-3780
17. Gopal SM, Klenin K, Wenzel W (2009) Template-free protein structure prediction and quality assessment with an all-atom free-energy model. Proteins-Struct Funct Bioinformatics 77:330-341
18. Gopal SM, Mukherjee S, Cheng Y-M, Feig M (2010) Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 78:1266-1281
19. Graf J, Nguyen PH, Stock G, Schwalbe H (2007) Structure and dynamics of the homologous series of alanine peptides: a joint molecular dynamics/NMR study. J Am Chem Soc 129:1179-1189
20. Hamelberg D, Mongan J, McCammon JA (2004) Accelerated molecular dynamics: a promising and efficient simulation method for biomolecules. J Chem Phys 120:11919-11929
21. Hornak V, Abel R, Okur A, Strockbine B, Roitberg A, Simmerling C (2006) Comparison of multiple amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters. Proteins-Struct Funct Bioinform 65:712-725
22. Jorgensen WL, Maxwell DS, Tirado-Rives J (1996) Development and testing of the OPLS allatom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J Am Chem Soc 118:11225-11236
23. Kolinski A, Skolnick J (1994) Monte Carlo simulations of protein folding. I. Lattice model and interaction scheme. Proteins 18:338-352
24. Kyte J, Doolittle RF (1982) A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of protein. J Mol Biol 157:105-132
25. Lazaridis T, Karplus M (1999) Effective energy function for proteins in solution. Proteins 35:133-152
26. Lee MS, Feig M, Salsbury FR Jr, Brooks CL III (2003) New analytical approximation to the standard molecular volume definition and its application to generalized Born calculations. J Comput Chem 24:1348-1356
27. Mackerell AD (2004) Empirical force fields for biological macromolecules: overview and issues. J Comput Chem 25:1584-1604
28. MacKerell AD Jr, Bashford D, Bellott M, Dunbrack JD, Evanseck MJ, Field MJ, Fischer S, Gao J, Guo H, Ha S, Joseph-McCarthy D, Kuchnir L, Kuczera K, Lau FTK, Mattos C, Michnick S, Ngo T, Nguyen DT, Prodhom B, Reiher WE, Roux B, Schlenkrich M, Smith JC, Stote R, Straub J, Watanabe M, Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera J, Yin D, Karplus M (1998) All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B 102:3586-3616
29. MacKerell AD Jr, Feig M, Brooks III CL (2004a) Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem 25:1400-1415
30. MacKerell AD Jr, Feig M, Brooks III CL (2004b) Improved treatment of the protein backbone in empirical force fields. JAm Chem Soc 126:698-699
31. Maiorov VN, Crippen GM (1995) Size-independent comparison of protein. 3-Dimensional Structures. Proteins-Struct Funct Genet 22:273-283
32. Micheletti C, Laio A, Parrinello M (2004) Reconstructing the density of states by historydependent metadynamics. Phys Rev Lett 92 (170601)
33. Moult J, Fidelis K, Kryshtafovych A, Rost B, Tramontano A (2009) Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction - Round VII. Proteins: Structure, Funct Bioinform 77:1-4
34. Neria E, Fischer S, Karplus M (1996) Simulation of activation free energies in molecular systems. J Chem Phys 105:1902-1921
35. Norberg J, Nilsson L (2000) On the truncation of long-range electrostatic interactions in DNA. Biophys J 79:1537-1553
36. Okamoto Y (2004) Generalized-ensemble algorithms: enhanced sampling techniques for Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics simulations. J Mol Graph Model 22:425-439
37. Onufriev A, Case DA, Bashford D (2002) Effective born radii in the generalized born approximation: the importance of being perfect. J Comput Chem 23:1297-1304
38. Oostenbrink C, Villa A, Mark AE, Van Gunsteren WF (2004) A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: the GROMOS force-field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6. J Comput Chem 25:1656-1676
39. Osguthorpe DJ (2000) Ab initio protein folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 10:146-152
40. Reva BA, Finkelstein AV, Skolnick J (1998) What is the probability of a chance prediction of a protein structure with an RMSD of 6 Ångstrom? Fold Des 3:141-147
41. Rohl CA, Strauss CE, Misura KM, Baker D (2004) Protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Methods Enzymol 383:66-93
42. Schaefer M, Bartels C, Karplus M (1999) Solution conformations of structured peptides: continuum electrostatics versus distance-dependent dielectric functions. Theor Chem Acc 101:194-204
43. Schreiber H, Steinhauser O (1992) Cutoff size does strongly influence molecular dynamics results on solvated polypeptides. Biochemistry 31:5856-5860
44. Simons KT, Bonneau R, Ruczinski I, Baker D (1999) Ab initio protein structure prediction of CASP III targets using ROSETTA. Proteins 37(Suppl 3):171-176
45. Sitkoff D, Sharp KA, Honig B (1994) Accurate calculation of hydration free-energies using macroscopic solvent models. J Phys Chem 98:1978-1988
46. Skolnick J, Kolinski A, Ortiz AR (1997) MONSSTER: a method for folding globular proteins with a small number of distance restraints. J Mol Biol 265:217-241
47. Still WC, Tempczyk A, Hawley RC, Hendrickson T (1990) Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics. J Am Chem Soc 112:6127-6129
48. Stumpff-Kane AW, Maksimiak K, Lee MS, Feig M (2008) Sampling of near-native protein conformations during protein structure refinement using a coarse-grained model, normal modes, and molecular dynamics simulations. Proteins 70:1345-1356
49. Tanizaki S, Feig M (2005) A generalized Born formalism for heterogeneous dielectric environments: application to the implicit modeling of biological membranes. J Chem Phys 122:124706
50. Wesson L, Eisenberg D (1992) Atomic solvation parameters applied to molecular dynamics of proteins in solution. Protein Sci 1:227-235
51. Zhang Y, Arakaki AK, Skolnick JR (2005) TASSER: an automated method for the prediction of protein tertiary structures in CASP6. Proteins-Struct Funct Bioinform 61:91-98
52. Zhang Y, Skolnick J (2005) The protein structure prediction problem could be solved using the current PDB library. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 102:1029-1034