MMTSB Tool Set: Enhanced sampling and multiscale modeling methods for applications in structural biology

Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 377-395

  Feig, Michael ^a   Karanicolas, John ^a   Brooks III, Charles L ^a  

^a SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Ensemble computing; Protein structure prediction; Replica exchange

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; INTEGRATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROTEINS; SAMPLING;

MULTISCALE MODELING; STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY;

MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

AROMA; ATOM; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONFORMATION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NUCLEIC ACID STRUCTURE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NUCLEIC ACIDS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 1942423619     PISSN: 10933263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2003.12.005     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (56)

1. Brooks B.R.et al. CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 4:1983;187-217.
2. Pearlman D.A.et al. AMBER, a package of computer programs for applying molecular mechanics, normal mode analysis, molecular dynamics and free energy calculations to simulate the structural and energetic properties of molecules. Comput. Phys. Commun. 91:1995;1-41.
3. M.J. Frisch, et al., Gaussian 98. Gaussian, Inc, Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
4. Siepel A.C.et al. An integration platform for heterogeneous bioinformatics software components. IBM Syst. J. 40:2001;570-591.
5. Hansmann U.H.E. Generalized ensemble techniques and protein folding simulations. Comput. Phys. Commun. 147:2002;604-607.
6. Hansmann U.H.E. New algorithms and the physics of proteins. Phys. A. 321:2003;152-163.
7. Nagasima T.et al. Generalized ensemble simulations of spin systems and protein systems. Comput. Phys. Commun. 146:2002;69-76.
8. Sanbonmatsu K.Y., Garcia A.E. Structure of met-enkephalin in explicit aqueous solution using replica exchange molecular dynamics. Proteins. 46:2002;225-234.
9. Zhou R., Berne B.J., Germain R. The free energy landscape for β hairpin folding in explicit water. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98:2001;14931-14936.
10. Garcia A.E., Sanbonmatsu K.Y. Exploring the energy landscape of a β hairpin in explicit solvent. Proteins. 42:2001;345-354.
11. Rhee Y.M., Pande V.S. Multiplexed-replica exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding simulation. Biophys. J. 84:2003;775-786.
12. Sugita Y., Okamoto Y. Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding. Chem. Phys. Lett. 314:1999;141-151.
13. Gront D., Kolinski A., Skolnick J. A new combination of replica exchange Monte Carlo and histogram analysis for protein folding and thermodynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 115:2001;1569-1574.
14. Skolnick J., Koliniski A. A unified approach to the prediction of protein structure and function. Adv. Chem. Phys. 120:2002;131-192.
15. Lu H., Skolnick J. A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection. Proteins. 44:2001;223-232.
16. Feig M.et al. Accurate reconstruction of all-atom protein representations from side-chain-based low-resolution models. Proteins. 41:2000;86-97.
17. M. Feig, C.L. Brooks, III, Evaluating CASP4 predictions with physical energy functions, Proteins 49 (2002) 232-245.
18. Simmerling C.et al. Combining MONSSTER and LES/PME to predict protein structure from amino acid sequence: application to the small protein CMTI-1. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122:2000;8402-8932.
19. Skolnick J., Kolinski A., Ortiz A.R. MONSSTER: a method for folding globular proteins with a small number of distance restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 265:1997;217-241.
20. D.M. Beazley, An extensible compiler for creating scritable scientific software, in: Proceedings of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Computational Science-ICCS 2002, Part II, vol. 2330, 2002, pp. 824-833.
21. Hinsen K. The molecular modeling tool kit: a new approach to molecular simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 21:2000;79-85.
22. Stajich J.E.et al. The bioperl toolkit: Perl modules for the life sciences. Genome Res. 12:2002;1611-1618.
23. Roux B., Simonson T. Implicit solvent models. Biophys. Chem. 78:1999;1-20.
24. Cramer C.J., Truhlar D.G. Implicit solvation models: equilibria, structure, spectra, and dynamics. Chem. Rev. 99:1999;2161-2200.
25. M.P. Allen, D.J. Tildesley, Computer Simulation of Liquids, first ed., Oxford University Press, New York, 1987.
26. Darden T.A., York D., Pedersen L.G. Particle mesh Ewald: an Nlog(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 98:1993;10089-10092.
27. Bashford D., Case D.A. Generalized Born models of macromolecular solvation effects. Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 51:2000;129-152.
28. Kolinski A., Skolnick J. Assembly of protein structure from sparse experimental data: an efficient Monte Carlo model. Proteins. 32:1998;475-494.
29. Huang E.S.et al. Accuracy of side-chain prediction upon near-native protein backbones generated by ab initio folding methods. Proteins. 33:1998;204-217.
30. Dunbrack R.L. Jr., Karplus M. Backbone-dependent Rotamer library for proteins: application to side-chain prediction. J. Mol. Biol. 230:1993;543-574.
31. Jacobson M.P.et al. Force field validation using protein side chain prediction. J. Phys. Chem. B. 106:2002;11673-11680.
32. Xiang Z.X., Honig B. Extending the accuracy limits of prediction for side-chain conformations. J. Mol. Biol. 311:2001;421-430.
33. D. Comer, Internetworking with TCP/IP: Principles, Protocols, and Architecture, vol. 1, fourth ed., Prentice Hall, 2000.
34. Hansmann U.H.E. Parallel tempering algorithm for conformational studies of biological molecules. Chem. Phys. Lett. 281:1997;140-150.
35. Garcia A.E., Sanbonmatsu K.Y. α-Helical stabilization by side chain shielding of backbone hydrogen bonds. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99:2002;2782-2787.
36. Sugita Y., Kitao A., Okamoto Y. Multidimensional replica-exchange method for free-energy calculations. J. Chem. Phys. 113:2000;6042-6051.
37. Kresge N., Vacquier V.D., Stout C.D. The crystal structure of a fusagenic sperm protein reveals extreme surface properties. Biochemistry. 40:2001;5407-5413.
38. Bower M.J., Cohen F.E., Dunbrack R.L. Prediction of protein side-chain Rotamers from a backbone-dependent Rotamer library: a new homology modeling tool. J. Mol. Biol. 267:1997;1268-1282.
39. M.S. Lee, F.R. Salsbury, Jr., C.L. Brooks, III., Novel generalized Born methods, J. Chem. Phys. 116 (2002) 10606-10614.
40. M.S. Lee, et al., A new analytical approximation to the standard molecular volume definition and its application to generalized Born calculations, J. Comput. Chem. 24 (2003) 1348-1356.
41. Berman H.M.et al. The protein data bank. Nucl. Acids Res. 28:2000;235-242.
42. Zagrovic B., Sorin E.J., Pande V. β-hairpin folding simulations in atomistic detail using an implicit solvent model. J. Mol. Biol. 313:2001;151-169.
43. Daura X.et al. Reversible peptide folding in solution by molecular dynamics simulation. J. Mol. Biol. 280:1998;925-932.
44. 6. J. Phys. Chem. B. 104:2000;10080-10086.
45. Pak Y., Wang S. Folding of a 16-residue helical peptide using molecular dynamics simulation with Tsallis effective potential. J. Chem. Phys. 111:1999;4359-4361.
46. Jang S., Shin S., Pak Y. Molecular dynamics study of peptides in implicit water: ab inito folding of β-hairpin, β-sheet, and ββα-motif. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124:2002;4976-4977.
47. Pak Y., Jang S., Shin S. Prediction of helical peptide folding in an implicit water by a new molecular dynamics scheme with generalized effective potential. J. Chem. Phys. 116:2002;6831-6835.
48. 3 amide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116:1994;8288-8293.
49. Cochran A.G., Skelton N.J., Staovasnik M.A. Tryptophan zippers: stable, monomeric β-hairpins. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98:2001;5578-5583.
50. Nina M., Beglov D., Roux B. Atomic radii for continuum electrostatics calculations based on molecular dynamics free energy simulations. J. Phys. Chem. 101:1997;5239-5248.
51. M. Feig, A.D. MacKerell, Jr., C.L. Brooks, III, Force field influence on the observation of π-helical protein structures in molecular dynamics simulations, J. Phys. Chem. B 107 (2003) 2831-2836.
52. Brünger A.T., Brooks C.L. III, Karplus M. Active-site dynamics of ribonuclease. Proc. Nat. Aacd. Sci. U.S.A. 82:1985;8458-8462.
53. Fiser A.et al. Evolution and physics in comparative protein structure modeling. Accounts Chem. Res. 35:2002;413-421.
54. Rathore N., de Pablo J.J. Monte Carlo simulation of proteins through a random walk in energy space. J. Chem. Phys. 116:2002;7225-7230.
55. Kabsch W., Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers. 22:1983;2577-2637.
56. MacKerell A.D. Jr. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B. 102:1998;3586-3616.