Template-free protein structure prediction and quality assessment with an all-atom free-energy model

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 330-341

  Gopal, Srinivasa Murthy ^a   Klenin, Konstantin ^b   Wenzel, Wolfgang ^a,b  

^a KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Force field; Model refinement; Molecular simulation; Protein structure prediction; Quality assessment

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; CASPASE 7;

ARTICLE; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; QUALITY CONTROL; SCORING SYSTEM; SIMULATION;

CASPASE 7; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING;

EID: 70349472977     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22438     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Moult J. A decade of CASP: progress, bottlenecks and prognosis in protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2005;15:285-289. (Pubitemid 40826447)
2. Moult J. Comparative modeling in structural genomics. Structure 2008;16:14-16.
3. Baker D, Sali A. Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science 2001;294:93-96. (Pubitemid 32952955)
4. Sanchez R, Pieper U, Melo F, Eswar N, Marti-Renom MA, Madhusudhan MS, Mirkovic N, Sali A. Protein structure modeling for structural genomics. Nat Struct Biol 2000;7:986-990. (Pubitemid 30823284)
5. Kryshtafovych A, Fidelis K, Moult J. Progress from CASP6 to CASP7. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinfo 2007;69(S8):194-207.
6. Kryshtafovych A, Venclovas C, Fidelis K, Moult J. Progress over the first decade of CASP experiments. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinfo 2005;61(S7):225-236. (Pubitemid 43069977)
7. Das R, Qian B, Raman S, Vernon R, Thompson J, Bradley P, Khare S, Tyka MD, Bhat D, Chivian D, Kim DE, Sheffler WH, Malmstrom L, Wollacott AM, Wang C, Andre I, Baker D. Structure prediction for CABP7 targets using extensive all-atom refinement with Rosetta@home. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinfo 2007;69:118-128. (Pubitemid 350210119)
8. Fitzgerald JE, Jha AK, Colubri A, Sosnick TR, Freed KF. Reduced Cbeta statistical potentials can outperform all-atom potentials in decoy identification. Protein Sci 2007;16:2123-2139. (Pubitemid 47481648)
9. Wang K, Fain B, Levitt M, Samudrala R. Improved protein structure selection using decoy-dependent discriminatory functions. BMC Struct Biol 2004;4:8. (Pubitemid 39258970)
10. Zhou H, Pandit SB, Lee SY, Borreguero J, Chen H, Wroblewska L, Skolnick J. Analysis of TASSER-based CASP7 protein structure prediction results. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinfo 2007;69(S8):90-97. (Pubitemid 350210116)
11. Zhou H, Zhou Y. What is a desirable statistical energy function for proteins and how can it be obtained. Cell Biochem Biophys 2006;46:165-174. (Pubitemid 44484822)
12. Herges T, Wenzel W. An all-atom force field for tertiary structure prediction of helical proteins. Biophys J 2004;87:3100-3109. (Pubitemid 40468568)
13. Read RJ, Chavali G. Assessment of CASP7 predictions in the high accuracy template-based modeling category. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinfo 2007;69(S8):27-37. (Pubitemid 350210111)
14. Jauch R, Yeo HC, Kolatkar PR, Clarke ND. Assessment of CASP7 structure predictions for template free targets. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinfo 2007;69(S8):57-67. (Pubitemid 350210113)
15. Zhang Y. Template-based modeling and free modeling by I-TASSER in CASP7. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinfo 2007;69(S8):108-117. (Pubitemid 350210118)
16. Bradley P, Misura KMS, Baker D. Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins. Science 2005;309:1868-1871. (Pubitemid 41325099)
17. Gopal SM, Wenzel W. De novo folding of the DNA-binding ATF-2 zinc finger motif in an all-atom free-energy forcefield. Angew Chem Int Ed 2006;45:7726-7728. (Pubitemid 44871327)
18. Herges T, Schug A, Wenzel W. Exploration of the free-energy surface of a three-helix peptide with stochastic optimization methods. Int J Quantum Chem 2004;99:854-863.
19. Schug A, Wenzel W. Predictive in silico all-atom folding of a four-helix protein with a free-energy model. J Am Chem Soc 2004;126:16736-16737. (Pubitemid 40069488)
20. Tsai J, Bonneau R, Morozov AV, Kuhlman B, Rohl CA, Baker D. An improved protein decoy set for testing energy functions for protein structure prediction. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinfo 2003;53:76-87. (Pubitemid 37059546)
21. Verma A, Wenzel W. Protein structure prediction by all-atom free-energy refinement. BMC Struct Biol 2007;7:12. (Pubitemid 46486639)
22. Verma A, Wenzel W. Towards a universal free-energy approach to all-atom protein folding and structure prediction. Biophys J DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2008.12. 3921.
23. Battey JND, Kopp J, Bordoli L, Read RJ, Clarke ND, Schwede T. Automated server predictions in CASP7. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinfo 2007;69:68-82.
24. Zhang Y. Progress and challenges in protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2008;18:342-348.
25. Rohl CA, Strauss CEM, Misura KMS, Baker D. Protein structure prediction using rosetta. Methods Enzymol 2004;383:66-93. (Pubitemid 38401787)
26. Simons KT, Kooperberg C, Huang E, Baker D. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and bayesian scoring functions. J Mol Biol 1997;268:209-225. (Pubitemid 27192690)
27. Simons KT, Ruczinski I, Kooperberg C, Fox BA, Bystroff C, Baker D. Improved recognition of native-like protein structures using a combination of sequence-dependent and sequence-independent features of proteins. Proteins: Struct Funct Genet 1999;34:82-95. (Pubitemid 29019533)
28. Jones DT. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol 1999;292:195-202. (Pubitemid 29435759)
29. Karplus K, Karchin R, Barrett C, Tu S, Cline M, Diekhans M, Grate L, Casper J, Hughey R. What is the value added by human intervention in protein structure prediction? Proteins: Struct Funct Genet 2001;45(S5):86-91.
30. Meiler J, Müller M, Zeidler A, Schmäschke F. Generation and evaluation of dimension-reduced amino acid parameter representations by artificial neural networks. J Mol Model 2001;7:360-369. (Pubitemid 36153544)
31. Herges T, Wenzel W. In silico folding of a three helix protein and characterization of its free-energy landscape in an all-atom force field. Phys Rev Lett 2005;94:018101.
32. Schug A, Wenzel W. An evolutionary strategy for all-atom folding of the 60-amino-acid bacterial ribosomal protein L20. Biophys J 2006;90:4273-4289. (Pubitemid 43830876)
33. Feig M, Karanicolas J, Brooks CL. MMTSB tool set: enhanced sampling and multiscale modeling methods for applications in structural biology. J Mol Graph Model 2004;22:377-395. (Pubitemid 38510304)
34. Kurita T. An efficient agglomerative clustering algorithm using a heap. Pattern Recognit 1991;24:205-209.
35. Xu S, Kamath MV, Capson DW. Selection of partitions from a hierarchy. Pattern Recognit Lett 1993;14:7-15.
36. Herges T, Wenzel W. Free-energy landscape of the villin headpiece in an all-atom force field. Structure 2005;13:661-668. (Pubitemid 40503329)
37. Rueda M, Ferrer-Costa C, Meyer T, Perez A, Camps J, Hospital A, Gelpi JL, Orozco M. A consensus view of protein dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104:796-801.
38. Ginalski K, Elofsson A, Fischer D, Rychlewski L. 3D-Jury: a simple approach to improve protein structure predictions. Bioinformatics 2003;19:1015-1018. (Pubitemid 36675823)
39. Kurowski MA, Bujnicki JM. GeneSilico protein structure prediction meta-server. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3305-3307. (Pubitemid 37442145)
40. Wu S, Zhang Y. LOMETS: a local meta-threading-server for protein structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 2007;35:3375-3382. (Pubitemid 47073600)