Making rounds: The routine work of the teacher during collaborative learning with computers

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 11-42

  Greiffenhagen, Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Classroom management; Collaborative learning; Cooperative learning; Ethnomethodology; Scaffolding; Teacher interventions; Teacher's role

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857994643     PISSN: 15561607     EISSN: 15561615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11412-011-9134-8     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Barnes, D., & Todd, F. (1977). Communication and learning in small groups. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
2. Birmingham, P., Davies, C., & Greiffenhagen, C. (2002). Turn to face the Bard: Making sense of three-way interactions between teacher, pupils and technology in the classroom. Education, Communication & Information, 2(2-3), 139-161.
3. Button, G. (Ed.). (1993). Technology in working order: Studies of work, interaction, and technology. London: Routledge.
4. Button, G., & Sharrock, W. W. (1996). Project work: The organisation of collaborative design and development in software engineering. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 5(4), 369-386.
5. Çakir, M. P., Zemel, A., & Stahl, G. (2009). The joint organization of interaction within a multimodal CSCL medium. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(2), 115-149.
6. Cazden, C., John, V., & Hymes, D. (Eds.). (1972). Functions of language in the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
7. Chiu, M. M. (2004). Adapting teacher interventions to student needs during cooperative learning: How to improve student problem solving and time on-task. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 365-399.
8. Cohen, E. C. (1994 [1986]). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom (2nd Ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
9. Colella, V. (2002). Participatory simulations: Building collaborative understanding through immersive dynamic modelling. In T. Koschmann, R. Hall, & N. Miyake (Eds.), CSCL2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 357-391). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Coulter, J. (2001). Human practices and the observability of the 'macro-social'. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 29-41). London: Routledge.
11. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
12. Dekker, R., & Elshout-Mohr, M. (2004). Teacher interventions aimed at mathematical level raising during collaborative learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56(1), 39-65.
13. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Introduction: What do you mean by 'collaborative learning'? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1-19). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
14. Dillenbourg, P. (2008). Integrating technologies into educational ecosystems. Distance Education, 29(2), 127-140.
15. Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2010). Technology for classroom orchestration. In M. S. Khine & I. M. Saleh (Eds.), New science of learning: Cognition, computers and collaboration in education (pp. 525-552). New York: Springer.
16. Ding, M., Li, X., Piccolo, D., & Kulm, G. (2007). Teacher interventions in cooperative-learning mathematics classes. Journal of Educational Research, 100(3), 162-175.
17. Emerson, R. M., & Pollner, M. (1976). Dirty work designations: Their features and consequences in a psychiatric setting. Social Problems, 23(3), 243-254.
18. Ford, C. E. (1999). Collaborative construction of task activity: Coordinating multiple resources in a high school physics lab. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32(4), 369-408.
19. Garcia, A. C., & Jacobs, J. B. (1999). The eyes of the beholder: Understanding the turn-taking system in quasi-synchronous computer-mediated communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32(4), 337-367.
20. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
21. Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology's program: Working out Durkheim's aphorism. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
22. Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical action. In J. C. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology: Perspectives and developments (pp. 338-366). New York: Appleton.
23. Gibson, R. (1998). Teaching Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Gillies, R. M. (2004). The effects of communication training on teachers' and students' verbal behaviours during cooperative learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 41(3), 257-279.
25. Gillies, R. M., Ashman, A. F., & Terwel, J. (Eds.). (2008). The teacher's role in implementing cooperative learning in the classroom. New York: Springer.
26. Glenn, P. J., Koschmann, T., & Conlee, M. (1999). Theory presentation and assessment in a problem-based learning group. Discourse Processes, 27(2), 119-133.
27. Greiffenhagen, C. (2008). Unpacking tasks: The fusion of new technology with instructional work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 17(1), 35-62.
28. Greiffenhagen, C. (forthcoming). Visual grammar in practice: Negotiating the arrangement of speech bubbles in storyboards. Forthcoming in Semiotica.
29. Greiffenhagen, C., & Sharrock, W. (2008). Where do the limits of experience lie? Abandoning the dualism of objectivity and subjectivity. History of the Human Sciences, 21(3), 70-93.
30. Greiffenhagen, C., & Sharrock, W. (forthcoming). Does mathematics look certain in the front, but fallible in the back? Forthcoming in Social Studies of Science doi: 10. 1177/0306312711424789.
31. Greiffenhagen, C., & Watson, R. (2009). Visual repairables: Analysing the work of repair in human-computer interaction. Visual Communication, 8(1), 65-90.
32. Gumperz, J., & Hymes, D. (Eds.). (1972). Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Hold, Rinehart & Winston.
33. Hammer, D. (2002). Powerful technology and powerful instruction. In T. Koschmann, R. Hall, & N. Miyake (Eds.), CSCL2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 399-403). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Heap, J. L. (1989a). Collaborative practices during word processing in a first grade classroom. In C. Emihovich (Ed.), Locating learning: Ethnographic perspectives on classroom research (pp. 263-288). Norwood: Ablex.
35. Heap, J. L. (1989b). Sociality and cognition in collaborative computer writing. In D. Bloome (Ed.), Classroom and literacy (pp. 135-157). Norwood: Ablex.
36. Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1992). Collaboration and control: Crisis management and multimedia technology in London underground line control rooms. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 1(1-2), 69-94.
37. Heath, C., Jirotka, M., Luff, P., & Hindmarsh, J. (1995). Unpacking collaboration: The interactional organisation of trading in a city dealing room. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 3(2), 147-165.
38. Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, P. (2010). Video in qualitative research: Analysing social interaction in everyday life. London: Sage.
39. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., & Shachar, H. (1990). Teachers' verbal behaviour in cooperative and whole-class instruction. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Cooperative learning: Theory and research (pp. 77-94). New York: Praeger.
40. Hughes, E. C. (1971). The sociological eye: Selected papers. Chicago: Aldine.
41. Ivarsson, J. (2010). Developing the construction sight: Architectural education and technological change. Visual Communication, 9(2), 171-191.
42. Johnson, D. W., & R. T. Johnson (1994 [1975]). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (4th Ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
43. Karlsson, G. (2010). Animation and grammar in science education: Learners' construal of animated educational software. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(2), 167-189.
44. Kelly, G., Crawford, T., & Green, J. L. (2001). Common task and uncommon knowledge: Dissenting voices in the discursive construction of physics across small laboratory groups. Linguistics and Education, 12(2), 135-174.
45. Koschmann, T. (Ed.). (1996). CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46. Koschmann, T. (1999). Computer support for collaboration and learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3 & 4), 495-497.
47. Koschmann, T., Glenn, P. J., & Conlee, M. (2000). When is a problem-based tutorial not a tutorial? Analyzing the tutor's role in the emergence of a learning issue. In D. Evensen & C. Hmelo (Eds.), Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interaction (pp. 53-74). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48. Koschmann, T., Hall, R., & Miyake, N. (Eds.). (2002). CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49. Koschmann, T., Stahl, G., & Zemel, A. (2007). The video analyst's manifesto (or the implications of Garfinkel's policies for studying instructional practice in design-based research). In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 133-143). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50. Lindwall, O., & Lymer, G. (2005). Vulgar competence, ethnomethodological indifference and curricular design. Proceedings of CSCL 2005 (Taipei, Taiwan, May 30-June 4, 2005), pp. 388-397.
51. Lindwall, O., & Lymer, G. (2008). The dark matter of lab work: Illuminating the negation of disciplined perception in mechanics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(2), 180-224.
52. Luff, P., Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C. (Eds.). (2000). Workplace studies: Recovering work practice and informing system design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Lymer, G., Ivarsson, J., & Lindwall, O. (2009). Contrasting the use of tools for presentation and critique: Some cases from architectural education. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(4), 423-444.
54. Lynch, M. (1997 [1979]). Preliminary notes on judges' work: The judge as a constituent of courtroom 'hearings'. In M. Travers & J. F. Manzo (Eds.), Law in action: Ethnomethodological and conversation analytic approaches to Law (pp. 99-130). Aldershot: Dartmouth.
55. Macbeth, D. H. (1990). Classroom order as practical action: The making and un-making of a quiet reproach. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 11(2), 189-214.
56. Macbeth, D. H. (1991). Teacher authority as practical action. Linguistics and Education, 3(4), 281-313.
57. Macbeth, D. H. (1992). Classroom 'floors': Material organizations as a course of affairs. Qualitative Sociology, 15(2), 123-150.
58. Macbeth, D. H. (2003). Hugh Mehan's Learning Lessons reconsidered: On the differences between the naturalistic and critical analysis of classroom discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 239-280.
59. McDermott, R. P., Gospodinoff, K., & Aron, J. (1978). Criteria for an ethnographically adequate description of concerted activities and their contexts. Semiotica, 24(3/4), 245-275.
60. McHoul, A. W. (1978). The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society, 7(1), 183-213.
61. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
62. Mehan, H. (1989). Microcomputers in classrooms: Educational technology or social practice? Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 20(1), 4-22.
63. Mercer, N., & Fisher, E. (1992). How do teachers help children to learn? an analysis of teachers' interventions in computer-based activities. Learning and Instruction, 2(4), 339-355.
64. O'Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1993). Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 24(4), 318-335.
65. Payne, G. C. F. (1976). Making a lesson happen: An ethnomethodological analysis. In M. Hammersley & P. Woods (Eds.), The process of schooling: A sociological reader (pp. 33-40). London: Routledge.
66. Payne, G. C. F., & Cuff, E. C. (Eds.). (1982). Doing teaching: The practical management of classrooms. London: Batsford.
67. Pea, R. D. (1996). Seeing what we build together: Distributed multimedia learning environments for transformative communications. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 171-186). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
68. Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423-451.
69. Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(3), 235-276.
70. Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O'Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69-97). Berlin: Springer.
71. Roth, W.-M. (1995). Affordances of computers in teacher-student interaction: The case of Interactive Physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), 329-347.
72. Sacks, H. (1992). In G. Jefferson (Ed.), Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
73. Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 102(1), 161-216.
74. Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75. Schenkein, J. (1978). Sketch of an analytic mentality for the study of conversational interaction. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 1-6). New York: Academic.
76. Sharrock, W. W., & Anderson, R. J. (1994). The user as a scenic feature of the design space. Design Studies, 15(1), 5-18.
77. Sharrock, W. W., & Watson, D. R. (1988). Autonomy among social theories: The incarnation of social structures. In N. G. Fielding (Ed.), Actions and structure: Research methods and social theory (pp. 56-77). London: Sage.
78. Sørensen, E. (2009). The materiality of learning: Technology and knowledge in educational practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
79. Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for collaborative knowledge building. Cambridge: MIT Press.
80. Stahl, G. (Ed.). (2009). Studying virtual math teams. New York: Springer.
81. Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
82. Urhahne, D., Schanze, S., Bell, T., Mansfield, A., & Holmes, J. (2010). Role of the teacher in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning. International Journal of Science Education, 32(2), 221-243.
83. Watson, R. (2009). Analysing practical and professional texts: A naturalistic approach. Farnham: Ashgate.
84. Webb, N. M., Nemer, K. M., & Ing, M. (2006). Small-group reflections: Parallels between teacher discourse and student behaviour in peer-directed groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 63-119.
85. Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., De, T., Chan, A. G., Freund, D., Shein, P., et al. (2009). 'Explain to your partner': Teachers' instructional practices and students' dialogue in small groups. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 49-70.
86. Zemel, A., Koschmann, T., LeBaron, C., & Feltovich, P. (2008). 'What are we missing?' Usability's indexical ground. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 17(1), 63-85.