Contrasting the use of tools for presentation and critique: Some cases from architectural education

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 423-444

  Lymer, Gustav ^a   Ivarsson, Jonas ^a   Lindwall, Oskar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Architectural education; Design reviews; Ethnomethodology; Presentation practice and technology; Video analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350350555     PISSN: 15561607     EISSN: 15561615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11412-009-9073-9     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Adams, C. (2006). PowerPoint, habits of mind, and classroom culture. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(4), 389-411.
2. Anthony, K. H. (1987). Private reactions to public criticism: Students, faculty, and practicing architects state their views on design juries in architectural education. Journal of Architectural Education, 40(3), 2-11.
3. Baecker, R., Harrison, S., Buxton, B., Poltrock, S., & Churchill, E. (2008). Media spaces: Past visions, current realities, future promise. In M. Czerwinsky, A. M. Lind & D. S. Tan (Eds.), Extended Abstracts CHI 2008 (pp. 2245-2248). New York: ACM.
4. Button, G., & Sharrock, W. (2009). Studies of work and the workplace in HCI: Concepts and techniques. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool.
5. Cakir, M., & Stahl, G. (2009). Interaction analysis of dual-interaction CSCL environments. In C. O'Malley, D. Suthers, P. Reimann & A. Dimitracopoulou (Eds.), Computer-supported collaborative learning practices: CSCL2009 conference proceedings (pp. 3-12). Rhodes, Greece: ISLS.
6. Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T., & Rodden, T. (2003). The social construction of displays: Coordinate displays and ecologically distributed networks. In K. O'Hara, M. Perry, E. Churchill & D. Russell (Eds.), Public and situated displays: Social and interactional aspects of shared display technologies (pp. 170-190). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
7. Ekström, A., Lindwall, O., & Säljö, R. (2009). Questions, instructions, and modes of listening in the joint production of guided action: A study of student-teacher collaboration in handicraft education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53(5), 497-514.
8. Gaver, W. W. (1992). The affordances of media spaces for collaboration. In J. Turner & R. Kraut (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCW 1992 (pp. 17-24). New York: ACM.
9. Good, L., & Bederson, B. B. (2002). Zoomable user interfaces as a medium for slide show presentations. Information Visualization, 1(1), 35-49.
10. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606-633.
11. Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489-1522.
12. Goodwin, C. (2007). Environmentally coupled gestures. In S. Duncan, J. Cassel & E. Levy (Eds.), Gesture and the dynamic dimensions of language (pp. 195-212). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
13. Gutwin, C., & Penner, R. (2002). Improving interpretation of remote gestures with telepointer traces. In L. Terveen & D. Wixon (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCW 2002 (pp. 49-57). New York: ACM.
14. Hanks, W. F. (1992). The indexical ground of deictic reference. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 209-246). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
15. Heath, C., & Luff, P. K. (1992). Media space and communicative asymmetries: Preliminary observations of video mediated interaction. Human Computer Interaction, 7(3), 315-346.
16. Heath, C., & Luff, P. (2000). Technology in action. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
17. Heath, C., Knoblauch, H., & Luff, P. (2000). Technology and social interaction: The emergence of workplace studies. British Journal of Sociology, 51(2), 299-320.
18. Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C. (2000). Sharing the tools of the trade: The interactional constitution of workplace objects. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 29(5), 523-562.
19. Holman, D., Stojadinovic, P., Karrer, T., & Borchers, J. (2006). Fly: An organic presentation tool. In G. Olson & R. Jeffries (Eds.), Extended abstracts CHI 2006 (pp. 863-868). New York: ACM.
20. Ivarsson, J., Linderoth, J., & Säljö, R. (2009). Representations in practices. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), Handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 201-212). London: Routledge.
21. Jefferson, G. (1984). Transcription notation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. ix-xvi). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
22. Jurow, S. A., Hall, R., & Ma, J. Y. (2008). Expanding disciplinary expertise of a middle school mathematics classroom: Re-contextualizing student models in conversations with visiting specialists. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(3), 338-380.
23. Kjeldsen, J. E. (2006). The rhetoric of powerpoint. International Journal of Media, Technology, and Lifelong Learning, 2(1), 1-17.
24. Knoblauch, H. (2008). The performance of knowledge: Pointing and knowledge in powerpoint presentations. Cultural Sociology, 2(1), 75-97.
25. Kuzuoka, H., Kosaka, J., Yamazaki, K., Suga, Y., Yamazaki, A., Luff, P., et al. (2004). Mediating dual ecologies. In J. D. Herbsleb & G. M. Olson (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCW 2004 (pp. 477-486). New York: ACM.
26. LeBaron, C. (1998). Building communication: Architectural gestures and the embodiment of new ideas. Unpublished dissertation. University of Texas, Austin, TX.
27. LeBaron, C., & Streeck, J. (2000). Gestures, knowledge, and the world. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Gestures in action, language, and culture (pp. 118-138). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
28. Lindwall, O., Lymer, G., & Ivarsson, J. (2008). Att ge och ta kritik: Examination i arkitektutbildning som hybrid aktivitet [Delivering and receiving criticism: Assessment in architectural education as a hybrid activity]. In K. Borg & V. Lindberg (Eds.), Kunskapande, kommunikation och bedömning i gestaltande utbildning [Knowing, communication and assessment in aesthetic education] (pp. 199-211). Stockholm: Stockholm University Press.
29. Luff, P., Heath, C., Kuzuoka, H., Yamazaki, K., & Yamashita, J. (2006). Handling documents and discriminating objects in hybrid spaces. In R. Grinter, T. Rodden, P. Aoki, E. Cutrell, R. Jeffries & G. Olson (Eds.), Proceedings of CHI 2006 (pp. 561-570). New York: ACM.
30. Lymer, G. (2009). Demonstrating professional vision: The work of critique in architectural education. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 16(2), 145-171.
31. Mitchell, S. E. (1996). Institutions, individuals and talk: The construction of identity in fine art. Journal of Art and Design Education, 15(2), 143-153.
32. Mondada, L. (2006). Participants' online analysis and multimodal practices: Projecting the end of the turn and the closing of the sequence. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 117-129.
33. Murphy, K. M. (2004). Imagination as joint activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 11(4), 267-278.
34. Murphy, K. M. (2005). Collaborative imagining: The interactive use of gestures, talk, and graphic representation in architectural practice. Semiotica, 156(1), 113-145.
35. Phillabaum, S. (2005). Calibrating photographic vision through multiple semiotic resources. Semiotica, 156(1-4), 147-175.
36. Roth, W.-M. (2001). Gestures: Their role in teaching and learning. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 365-392.
37. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
38. Shaffer, D. W. (2002). Design, collaboration, and computation: The design studio as a model for computer-supported collaboration in mathematics. In T. Koschmann, R. Hall & N. Miyake (Eds.), CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 197-222). Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Stark, D., & Paravel, V. (2008). PowerPoint in public: Digital technologies and the new morphology of presentation. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(5), 30-55.
40. Stevens, R. (2002). Divisions of labor in school and in the workplace: Comparing computer- and paper-supported activities across settings. In T. Koschmann, R. Hall & N. Miyake (Eds.), CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 229-258). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41. Tufte, E. R. (2003). The cognitive style of powerpoint. Cheshire, CT: Graphics.
42. Vallance, M., & Towndrow, P. A. (2007). Towards the "informed use" of information and communication technology in education: A response to Adams' "Powerpoint, habits of mind, and classroom culture." Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(2), 219-227.
43. Wilkin, M. (2000). Reviewing the review: An account of a research investigation of the "crit." In D. Nicol & S. Pilling (Eds.), Changing architectural education: Towards a new professionalism (pp. 100-107). London & New York: Spon.
44. Zemel, A., Koschmann, T., LeBaron, C., & Feltovich, P. (2008). "What are we missing?" Usability's indexical ground. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 17(1), 63-85.