The predictive value of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography in assessment of brain arteriovenous malformation obliteration after radiosurgery

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 232-238

  Buis, D R ^a   Bot, J C J ^a   Barkhof, F ^a   Knol, D L ^a   Lagerwaard, F J ^a   Slotman, B J ^a   Vandertop, W P ^a   Van Den Berg, R ^b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL EMBOLISM; BRAIN ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RADIOSURGERY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; THREE DIMENSIONAL TIME OF FLIGHT MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INTRACRANIAL ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATIONS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOSURGERY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84857268662     PISSN: 01956108     EISSN: 1936959X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2744     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Friedlander RM. Clinical practice: arteriovenous malformations of the brain. N Engl J Med 2007;356:2704-12 (Pubitemid 47001039)
2. Maruyama K, Kawahara N, Shin M, et al. The risk of hemorrhage after radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations. N Engl J Med 2005;352:146-53 (Pubitemid 40096611)
3. Heiserman JE, Dean BL, Hodak JA, et al. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:1401-07
4. Dion JE, Gates PC, Fox AJ, et al. Clinical events following neuroangiography: a prospective study. Stroke 1987;18:997-1004 (Pubitemid 18014464)
5. Earnest F, Forbes G, Sandok BA, et al. Complications of cerebral angiography: prospective assessment of risk. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984;142:247-53 (Pubitemid 14182070)
6. Komiyama M, Yamanaka K, Nishikawa M, et al. Prospective analysis of complications of catheter cerebral angiography in the digital subtraction angiography and magnetic resonance era. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1998;38:534-39
7. Dawkins AA, Evans AL, Wattam J, et al. Complications of cerebral angiography: a prospective analysis of 2,924 consecutive procedures. Neuroradiology 2007;49:753-59 (Pubitemid 47382115)
8. Grzyska U, Freitag J, Zeumer H. Selective cerebral intraarterial DSA. Complication rate and control of risk factors. Neuroradiology 1990;32:296-99 (Pubitemid 20264492)
9. Bendszus M, Koltzenburg M, Burger R, et al. Silent embolism in diagnostic cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures: a prospective study. Lancet 1999;354:1594-97 (Pubitemid 29515951)
10. Morcos SK, Thomsen HS. Adverse reactions to iodinated contrast media. Eur Radiol 2001;11:1267-75 (Pubitemid 32755608)
11. Ketkar M, Shrier D. An allergic reaction to intraarterial nonionic contrast material. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:292 (Pubitemid 36237188)
12. King-Im JM, Trivedi R, Cross J, et al. Conventional digital subtraction x-ray angiography versus magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of carotid disease: patient satisfaction and preferences. Clin Radiol 2004;59:358-63 (Pubitemid 38404620)
13. Thierry-Chef I, Simon S, Miller D. Radiation dose and cancer risk among pediatric patients undergoing interventional neuroradiology procedures. Pediatr Radiol 2006;36:159-62
14. Swoboda NA, Armstrong DG, Smith J, et al. Pediatric patient surface doses in neuroangiography. Pediatr Radiol 2005;35:859-66 (Pubitemid 41236341)
15. Raelson CA, Kanal KM, Vavilala MS, et al. Radiation dose and excess risk of cancer in children undergoing neuroangiography. Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:1621-28
16. Stein SC, Burnett MG, Zager EL, et al. Completion angiography for surgically treated cerebral aneurysms: an economic analysis. Neurosurgery 2007;61:1162-67
17. Giesel FL, Essig M, Zabel-Du-Bois A, et al. High-contrast computed tomographic angiography better detects residual intracranial arteriovenous malformations in long-term follow-up after radiotherapy than 1.5-Tesla time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography. Acta Radiol 2010;51:64-70
18. Eddleman CS, Jeong HJ, Hurley MC, et al. 4D radial acquisition contrast-enhanced MR angiography and intracranial arteriovenous malformations: quickly approaching digital subtraction angiography. Stroke 2009;40:2749-53
19. Hadizadeh DR, von Falkenhausen M, Gieseke J, et al. Cerebral arteriovenous malformation: Spetzler-Martin classification at subsecond-temporal-resolution four-dimensional MR angiography compared with that at DSA. Radiology 2008;246:205-13. Epub 2007 Oct 19
20. Reinacher PC, Stracke P, Reinges MH, et al. Contrast-enhanced time-resolved 3-D MRA: applications in neurosurgery and interventional neuroradiology. Neuroradiology 2007;49(suppl 1):S3-13
21. Taschner CA, Gieseke J, Le Thuc V, et al. Intracranial arteriovenous malformation: time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography with combination of parallel imaging, keyhole acquisition, and k-space sampling techniques at 1.5 T. Radiology 2008;246:871-79. Epub 2008 Jan 14
22. Weintraub MI, Khoury A, Cole SP. Biologic effects of 3 Tesla (T) MR imaging comparing traditional 1.5 T and 0.6 T in 1023 consecutive outpatients. J Neuroimaging 2007;17:241-45 (Pubitemid 47019901)
23. Han JH, Kim DG, Chung HT, et al. Clinical and neuroimaging outcome of cerebral arteriovenous malformations after gamma knife surgery: analysis of the radiation injury rate depending on the arteriovenous malformation volume. J Neurosurg 2008;109:191-98
24. Douglas JG, Goodkin R. Treatment of arteriovenous malformations using gamma knife surgery: the experience at the University of Washington from 2000 to 2005. J Neurosurg 2008;109(suppl):51-56
25. Kasliwal MK, Kale SS, Gupta A, et al. Outcome after hemorrhage following gamma knife surgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 2009;110:1003-09
26. Kiran N, Kale S, Kasliwal M, et al.Gammaknife radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations of basal ganglia, thalamus and brainstem: a retrospective study comparing the results with that for AVMs at other intracranial locations. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2009;151:1575- 82. Epub 2009 May 5
27. Buis DR, Dirven CM, Lagerwaard FJ, et al. Radiosurgery of brain arteriovenous malformations in children. J Neurol 2008;255:551-60
28. Lindquist C, Steiner L. Stereotactic radiosurgical treatment of arteriovenous malformations. In: Lunsford LD, ed. Modern Stereotactic Neurosurgery. Boston, Massachusetts: Martinus Nijhoff; 1988:491-505
29. Steinberg GK, Fabrikant JI, Marks MP, et al. Stereotactic heavy-charged-particle Bragg-peak radiation for intracranial arteriovenous malformations. N Engl J Med 1990;323:96-101 (Pubitemid 20221646)
30. Spetzler RF, Martin NA. A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 1986;65:476-83 (Pubitemid 16000693)
31. Petkova M, Gauvrit JY, Trystram D, et al. Three-dimensional dynamic time-resolved contrast-enhanced MRA using parallel imaging and a variable rate k-space sampling strategy in intracranial arteriovenous malformations. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;29:7-12
32. Kunishima K, Mori H, Itoh D, et al. Assessment of arteriovenous malformations with 3-Tesla time-resolved, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography. J Neurosurg 2009;110:492-99
33. Saleh RS, Lohan DG, Villablanca JP, et al. Assessment of craniospinal arteriovenous malformations at 3T with highly temporally and highly spatially resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1024-31 (Pubitemid 351684988)
34. Heidenreich JO, Schilling AM, Unterharnscheidt F, et al. Assessment of 3DT-OF-MRA at 3.0 Tesla in the characterization of the angioarchitecture of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a preliminary study. Acta Radiol 2007;48:678-86 (Pubitemid 47147762)
35. Pollock BE, Flickinger JC. Modification of the radiosurgery-based arteriovenous malformation grading system. Neurosurgery 2008;63:239-43
36. Metz C. ROC analysis in medical imaging: a tutorial review of the literature. Radiol Phys Technol 2008;1:2-12
37. Spetzler RF, Hargraves RW, McCormick PW, et al. Relationship of perfusion pressure and size to risk of hemorrhage from arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 1992;76:918-23
38. Oppenheim C, Meder JF, Trystram D, et al. Radiosurgery of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: is an early angiogram needed? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:475-81 (Pubitemid 30429055)
39. Buis DR, Lagerwaard FJ, Dirven CM, et al. Delineation of brain AVMs on MR-angiography for the purpose of stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;67:308-16 (Pubitemid 44959505)
40. Pollock BE, Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging: an accurate method to evaluate arteriovenous malformations after stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 1996;85:1044-49 (Pubitemid 26396557)
41. Gauvrit JY, Oppenheim C, Nataf F, et al. Three-dimensional dynamic magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of radiosurgically treated cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Eur Radiol 2006;16:583-91 (Pubitemid 44149370)
42. Mukherji SK, Quisling RG, Kubilis PS, et al. Intracranial arteriovenous malformations: quantitative analysis of magnitude contrast MR angiography versus gradient-echo MR imaging versus conventional angiography. Radiology 1995;196:187-93
43. Stock KW, Wetzel S, Kirsch E, et al. Anatomic evaluation of the circle of Willis: MR angiography versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:1495-99 (Pubitemid 26336815)
44. Buis DR, van den Berg R, Lagerwaard FJ, et al. Brain arteriovenous malformations: from diagnosis to treatment. J Neurosurg Sci 2011;55:39-56
45. Nowinski WL, Puspitasaari F, Volkau I, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography scans on 1.5, 3, and 7 Tesla units: a quantitative study of 3-dimensional cerebrovasculature. J Neuroimaging 2011 Mar 29. [Epub ahead of print]
46. Saleh RS, Singhal A, Lohan D, et al. Assessment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations with high temporal and spatial resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: a review from protocol to clinical application. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2008;19:251-57
47. Lee KE, Choi CG, Choi JW, et al. Detection of residual brain arteriovenous malformations after radiosurgery: diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional time of flight MR angiography at 3.0 Tesla. Korean J Radiol 2009;10:333-39
48. Ozsarlak O, Van Goethem JW, Maes M, et al. MR angiography of the intracranial vessels: technical aspects and clinical applications. Neuroradiology 2004;46:955-72 (Pubitemid 40823320)
49. Unlu E, Temizoz O, Albayram S, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR 3D angiography in the assessment of brain AVMs. Eur J Radiol 2006;60:367-78
50. Parmar H, Ivancevic MK, Dudek N, et al. Neuroradiologic applications of dynamic MR angiography at 3 T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2009;17:63-75
51. Yen CP, Varady P, Sheehan J, et al. Subtotal obliteration of cerebral arteriovenous malformations after gamma knife surgery. J Neurosurg 2007;106:361-69 (Pubitemid 46354287)
52. Buis DR, van den Berg R, Lycklama G, et al. Spontaneous regression of brain arteriovenous malformations: a clinical study and a systematic review of the literature. J Neurol 2004;251:1375-82 (Pubitemid 40163978)
53. van den Berg R, Buis DR, Lagerwaard FJ, et al. Extensive white matter changes after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations: a prognostic sign for obliteration? Neurosurgery 2008;63:1064-69
54. Schaller C, Schramm J. Arteriovenous malformations and magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 1997;87:647-49 (Pubitemid 27430413)
55. Buis DR, Meijer OW, van den Berg R, et al. Clinical outcome after repeated radiosurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations. Radiother Oncol 2010;95:250-56