4D radial acquisition contrast-enhanced MR angiography and intracranial arteriovenous malformations: Quickly approaching digital subtraction angiography

Stroke

Volumn 40, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 2749-2753

  Eddleman, Christopher S ^a   Jeong, Hyun J ^a   Hurley, Michael C ^a   Zuehlsdorff, Sven ^b   Dabus, Guilherme ^a   Getch, Christopher G ^a   Batjer, H Hunt ^a   Bendok, Bernard R ^a   Carroll, Timothy J ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SIEMENS CORPORATE RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Angiography; Arteriovenous malformation; DSA; Imaging; MRA; Vascular

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATIONS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; STEREOTAXIC TECHNIQUES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 68749102278     PISSN: 00392499     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.546663     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Hernesniemi JA, Dashti R, Juvela S, Vaart K, Niemela M, Laakso A. Natural history of brain arteriovenous malformations: A long-term follow-up study of risk of hemorrhage in 238 patients. Neurosurgery. 2008;63:823-829; discussion 829-831.
2. Ondra SL, Troupp H, George ED, Schwab K. The natural history of symptomatic arteriovenous malformations of the brain: A 24-year follow-up assessment. J Neurosurg. 1990;73:387-391.
3. Burger IM, Murphy KJ, Jordan LC, Tamargo RJ, Gailloud P. Safety of cerebral digital subtraction angiography in children: Complication rate analysis in 241 consecutive diagnostic angiograms. Stroke. 2006;37: 2535-2539.
4. Dawkins AA, Evans AL, Wattam J, Romanowski CA, Connolly DJ, Hodgson TJ, Coley SC. Complications of cerebral angiography: A prospective analysis of 2,924 consecutive procedures. Neuroradiology. 2007;49:753-759.
5. Kaufmann TJ, Huston J III, Mandrekar JN, Schleck CD, Thielen KR, Kallmes DF. Complications of diagnostic cerebral angiography: evaluation of 19,826 consecutive patients. Radiology. 2007;243:812-819.
6. Duran M, Schoenberg SO, Yuh WT, Knopp MV, van Kaick G, Essig M. Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: Morphologic evaluation by ultrashort 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:2957-2964.
7. Farb RI, McGregor C, Kim JK, Laliberte M, Derbyshire JA, Willinsky RA, Cooper PW, Westman DG, Cheung G, Schwartz ML, Stainsby JA, Wright GA. Intracranial arteriovenous malformations: Real-time autotriggered elliptic centric-ordered 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography-initial assessment. Radiology. 2001;220:244-251.
8. Gauvrit JY, Leclerc X, Oppenheim C, Munier T, Trystram D, Rachdi H, Nataf F, Pruvo JP, Meder JF. Three-dimensional dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography using sensitivity encoding for the evaluation of intracranial arteriovenous malformations: A preliminary study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:1525-1531.
9. Gupta V, Chugh M, Walia BS, Vaishya S, Jha AN. Use of CT angiography for anatomic localization of arteriovenous malformation nidal components. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1837-1840.
10. Hamm KD, Klisch J, Surber G, Kleinert G, Eger C, Aschenbach R Special aspects of diagnostic imaging for radiosurgery of arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery. 2008;62:A44-52; discussion A52.
11. Ozsarlak O, Van Goethem JW, Maes M, Parizel PM. MR angiography of the intracranial vessels: technical aspects and clinical applications. Neuroradiology. 2004;46:955-972.
12. Zhang H, Maki JH, Prince MR. 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25:13-25.
13. Unlu E, Temizoz O, Albayram S, Genchellac H, Hamamcioglu MK, Kurt I, Demir MK. Contrast-enhanced MR 3D angiography in the assessment of brain AVMS. Eur J Radiol. 2006;60:367-378.
14. Tsuchiya K, Katase S, Yoshino A, Hachiya J. MR digital subtraction angiography of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:707-711.
15. Cashen TA, Carr JC, Shin W, Walker MT, Futterer SF, Shaibani A, McCarthy RM, Carroll TJ. Intracranial time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3t. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:822-829.
16. Cashen TA, Jeong H, Shah MK, Bhatt HM, Shin W, Carr JC, Walker MT, Batjer HH, Carroll TJ. 4D radial contrast-enhanced MR angiography with sliding subtraction. Magn Reson Med. 2007;58:962-972.
17. Jeong HJ, Cashen TA, Hurley MC, Eddleman CS, Getch CG, Batjer HH, Carroll TJ. Radial sliding window magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with highly-constrained projection reconstruction (HYPR). Magn Reson Med. 2009;61:1103-1113.
18. Gauvrit JY, Oppenheim C, Nataf F, Naggara O, Trystram D, Munier T, Fredy D, Pruvo JP, Roux FX, Leclerc X, Meder JF. Three-dimensional dynamic magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of radiosurgically treated cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:583-591.
19. Summers PE, Kollias SS, Valavanis A. Resolution improvement in thick-slab magnetic resonance digital subtraction angiography using sense at 3t. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;20:662-673.
20. Taschner CA, Gieseke J, Le Thuc V, Rachdi H, Reyns N, Gauvrit JY, Leclerc X. Intracranial arteriovenous malformation: time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography with combination of parallel imaging, keyhole acquisition, and K-space sampling techniques at 1.5 t. Radiology. 2008;246:871-879.
21. Tsuchiya K, Aoki C, Fujikawa A, Hachiya J. Three-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography using parallel imaging and keyhole data sampling in cerebrovascular diseases: Initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:1494-1497.
22. Hadizadeh DR, von Falkenhausen M, Gieseke J, Meyer B, Urbach H, Hoogeveen R, Schild HH, Willinek WA. Cerebral arteriovenous malformation: Spetzler-martin classification at subsecond-temporal-resolution four-dimensional MR angiography compared with that at dsa. Radiology. 2008;246:205-213.
23. Reinacher P, Reinges MH, Simon VA, Hans FJ, Krings T. Dynamic 3-D contrast-enhanced angiography of cerebral tumours and vascular malformations. Eur Radiol. 2007;17 Suppl 6:F52-F62.
24. Reinacher PC, Stracke P, Reinges MH, Hans FJ, Krings T. Contrastenhanced time-resolved 3-D MRA: Applications in neurosurgery and interventional neuroradiology. Neuroradiology. 2007;49 Suppl 1:S3-S13.
25. Saleh RS, Lohan DG, Villablanca JP, Duckwiler G, Kee ST, Finn JP. Assessment of craniospinal arteriovenous malformations at 3t with highly temporally and highly spatially resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1024-1031.
26. Kumashiro M, Murase K, Oda K, Fukushige M, Ito O, Nagayama M, Watanabe Y. Assessment of time-resolved, dynamic, contrast-enhanced MRDSA using radial sliding-window reconstruction. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2008;7:1-12.
27. d'Arcy JA, Collins DJ, Rowland IJ, Padhani AR, Leach MO. Applications of sliding window reconstruction with Cartesian sampling for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. NMR Biomed. 2002;15:174-183.
28. Perez-Rodriguez J, Lai S, Ehst BD, Fine DM, Bluemke DA. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: incidence, associations, and effect of risk factor assessment-report of 33 cases. Radiology. 2009;250:371-377.
29. Juluru K, Vogel-Claussen J, Macura KJ, Kamel IR, Steever A, Bluemke DA. Mr imaging in patients at risk for developing nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: Protocols, practices, and imaging techniques to maximize patient safety. Radiographics. 2009;29:9-22.
30. St George EJ, Butler P, Plowman PN. Can magnetic resonance imaging alone accurately define the arteriovenous nidus for gamma knife radiosurgery? J Neurosurg. 2002;97:464-470.