Three-dimensional dynamic time-resolved contrast-enhanced MRA using parallel imaging and a variable rate k-space sampling strategy in intracranial arteriovenous malformations

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 7-12

  Petkova, Mina ^a   Gauvrit, Jean Yves ^b   Trystram, Denis ^a   Nataf, François ^a   Godon Hardy, Sylvie ^a   Munier, Thierry ^c   Oppenheim, Catherine ^a   Meder, Jean François ^a  

^a CENTRE HOSPITALIER SAINTE ANNE   (France)

^b PONTCHAILLOU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^c GE HEALTHCARE   (France)

Author keywords

3D dynamic time resolved contrast enhanced MRA; Digital subtraction angiography; Intracranial arteriovenous malformation; TRICKS

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARRAY SPATIAL SENSITIVITY ENCODING TECHNIQUE; ARTICLE; BRAIN ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL DYNAMIC TIME RESOLVED CONTRAST ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VEIN BLOOD FLOW;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALGORITHMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INTRACRANIAL ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATIONS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SAMPLE SIZE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 60349122061     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21483     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Earnest F, Forbes G, Sandok BA, et al. Complications of cerebral angiography: prospective assessment of risk. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984;142:247-253.
2. Heiserman JE, Dean BL, Hodak JA, et al. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:1401-1407; discussion 1408-1411.
3. Willinsky RA, Taylor SM, TerBrugge K, Farb RI, Tomlinson G, Montanera W. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 2003;227:522-528.
4. Tsuchiya K, Katase S, Yoshino A, Hachiya J. MR digital subtraction angiography of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:707-711.
5. Klisch J, Strecker R, Hennig J, Schumacher M. Time-resolved projection MRA: clinical application in intracranial vascular malformations. Neuroradiology 2000;42:104-107.
6. Griffiths PD, Hoggard N, Warren DJ, Wilkinson ID, Anderson B, Romanowski CA. Brain arteriovenous malformations: assessment with dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1892-1899.
7. Wetzel SG, Bilecen D, Lyrer P, et al. Cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas: detection by dynamic MR projection angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1293-1295.
8. Aoki S, Yoshikawa T, Hori M, et al. MR digital subtraction angiography for the assessment of cranial arteriovenous malformations and fistulas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:451-453.
9. Warren DJ, Hoggard N, Walton L, et al. Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: comparison of novel magnetic resonance angiographic techniques and conventional catheter angiography. Neurosurgery 2001;48:973-982; discussion 982-983.
10. Coley SC, Romanowski CA, Hodgson TJ, Griffiths PD. Dural arteriovenous fistulae: noninvasive diagnosis with dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:404-407.
11. Mori H, Aoki S, Okubo T, et al. Two-dimensional thick-slice MR digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of small to medium-size intracranial arteriovenous malformations. Neuroradiology 2003;45:27-33.
12. Evans AL, Coley SC, Wilkinson ID, Griffiths PD. First-line investigation of acute intracerebral hemorrhage using dynamic magnetic resonance angiography. Acta Radiol 2005;46:625-630.
13. Coley SC, Wild JM, Wilkinson ID, Griffiths PD. Neurovascular MRI with dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction angiography. Neuroradiology 2003;45:843-850.
14. Reinacher PC, Stracke P, Reinges MH, Hans FJ, Krings T. Contrast-enhanced time-resolved 3-D MRA: applications in neurosurgery and interventional neuroradiology. Neuroradiology. 2007;49(suppl 1):S3-S13.
15. Muthupillai R, Vick GW, Flamm SD, et al. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in pediatric patients using sensitivity encoding. On improving temporal and spatial resolution of 3D contrast-enhanced body MR angiography with parallel imaging. Radiology 2004;231:893-899.
16. Mori H, Aoki S, Masumoto T, et al. Two-dimensional magnetic resonance digital subtraction angiography using array spatial sensitivity encoding techniques in the assessment of intracranial hemodynamics. Radiat Med 2002;20:223-229.
17. van den Brink JS, Watanabe Y, Kuhl CK, et al. Implications of SENSE MR in routine clinical practice. Eur J Radiol 2003;46:3-27.
18. Paschal CB, Morris HD. K-space in the clinic. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19:145-159.
19. Tsuchiya K, Aoki C, Fujikawa A, Hachiya J. Three-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography using parallel imaging and keyhole data sampling in cerebrovascular diseases: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2004;14:1494-1497.
20. Gauvrit JY, Leclerc X, Oppenheim C, et al. Three-dimensional dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography using sensitivity encoding for the evaluation of intracranial arteriovenous malformations: a preliminary study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1525-1531.
21. Ziyeh S, Strecker R, Berlis A, Weber J, Klisch J, Mader I. Dynamic 3D MR angiography of intra- and extracranial vascular malformations at 3T: a technical note. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:630-634.
22. Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, Mistretta CA. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:345-351.
23. Mistretta CA, Grist TM, Korosec FR, et al. 3D time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR DSA: advantages and tradeoffs. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:571-581.
24. Carroll TJ, Korosec FR, Petermann GM, Grist TM, Turski PA. Carotid bifurcation: evaluation of time-resolved three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 2001;220:525-532.