Cerebral arteriovenous malformation: Spetzler-Martin classification at subsecond-temporal-resolution four-dimensional MR angiography compared with that at DSA

Radiology

Volumn 246, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 205-213

  Hadizadeh, Dariusch R ^a   Von Falkenhausen, Marcus ^a   Gieseke, Jürgen ^a,b   Meyer, Bernhard ^a   Urbach, Horst ^a   Hoogeveen, Romhild ^b   Schild, Hans H ^a   Willinek, Winfried A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^b PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPETZLER MARTIN CLASSIFICATION;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATIONS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 37348998523     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2453061684     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Huston J 3rd, Fain SB, Wald JT, et al. Carotid artery: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography compared with conventional angiography. Radiology 2001;218:138-143.
2. Willinek WA, von Falkenhausen M, Born M, et al. Noninvasive detection of steno-occlusive disease of the supra-aortic arteries with three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: a prospective, intra-individual comparative analysis with digital subtraction angiography. Stroke 2005;36:38-43.
3. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. Lancet 1991;337:1235-1243.
4. Robless P, Halliday A. Vascular surgical society of Great Britain and Ireland: carotid angiography is used more selectively in the asymptomatic carotid surgery trial. Br J Surg 1999;86:690-691.
5. Johnston DC, Chapman KM, Goldstein LB. Low rate of complications of cerebral angiography in routine clinical practice. Neurology 2001;57:2012-2014.
6. Komiyama M, Yamanaka K, Nishikawa M, Izumi T. Prospective analysis of complications of catheter cerebral angiography in the digital subtraction angiography and magnetic resonance era. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1998;38:534-539.
7. Earnest F, Forbes G, Sandok BA, et al. Complications of cerebral angiography: prospective assessment of risk. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984;142:247-253.
8. Dion JE, Gates PC, Fox AJ, Barnett HJ, Blom RJ. Clinical events following neuroangiography: a prospective study. Stroke 1987;18:997-1004.
9. Heiserman JE, Dean BL, Hodak JA, et al. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:1401-1407.
10. Willinsky RA, Taylor SM, TerBrugge K, Farb RI, Tomlinson G, Montanera W. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 2003;227:522-528.
11. Han PP, Ponce FA, Spetzler RF. Intention-to-treat analysis of Spetzler-Martin grades IV and V arteriovenous malformations: natural history and treatment paradigm. J Neurosurg 2003;98:3-7.
12. Spetzler RF, Martin NA. A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 1986;65:476-483.
13. Duran M, Schoenberg SO, Yuh WT, Knopp MV, van Kaick G, Essig M. Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: morphologic evaluation by ultrashort 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Eur Radiol 2002;12:2957-2964.
14. Hartmann A, Stapf C, Hofmeister C, et al. Determinants of neurological outcome after surgery for brain arteriovenous malformation. Stroke 2000;31:2361-2364.
15. Lawton MT. Spetzler-Martin Grade III arteriovenous malformations: surgical results and a modification of the grading scale. Neurosurgery 2003;52:740-748.
16. Spetzler RF, Martin NA, Carter LP, Flom RA, Raudzens PA, Wilkinson E. Surgical management of large AVM's by staged embolization and operative excision. J Neurosurg 1987;67:17-28.
17. Meder JF, Oppenheim C, Blustajn J, et al. Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: the value of radiologic parameters in predicting response to radiosurgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1473-1483.
18. Oppenheim C, Meder JF, Trystram D, et al. Radiosurgery of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: is an early angiogram needed? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:475-481.
19. Pollock BE, Flickinger JC. A proposed radiosurgery-based grading system for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 2002;96:79-85.
20. Hartmann A, Pile-Spellman J, Stapf C, et al. Risk of endovascular treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations. Stroke 2002;33:1816-1820.
21. Gobin YP, Laurent A, Merienne L, et al. Treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations by embolization and radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 1996;85:19-28.
22. Fasulakis S, Androuikou S. Comparison of MR angiography and conventional angiography in the investigation of intracranial arteriovenous malformations and aneurysms in children. Pediatr Radiol 2003;33:378-384.
23. Wintermark M, Dillon WP. Advanced CT and MR imaging techniques: an academic whim or a clinical standard in the making? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1257.
24. Todaka T, Hamada J, Kai Y, Morioka M, Ushio Y. Analysis of mean transit time of contrast medium in ruptured and unruptured arteriovenous malformations: a digital subtraction angiographic study. Stroke 2003;34:2410-2414.
25. Willinek WA, Gieseke J, Conrad R, et al. Randomly segmented central k-space ordering in high-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supraaortic arteries: initial experience. Radiology 2002;225:583-588.
26. van Vaals JJ, Brummer ME, Dixon WT, et al. "Keyhole" method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:671-675.
27. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:952-962.
28. Willinek WA, Gieseke J, von Falkenhausen M, et al. CE-3D MRA of the supraaortic arteries at 512 and 1024 matrix: the use of randomly segmented central k-space ordering (CENTRA) [abstr]. In: Proceedings of the 10th Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley. Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2002.
29. Farb RI, McGregor C, Kim JK, et al. Intracranial arteriovenous malformations: real-time auto-triggered elliptic centric-ordered 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography-initial assessment. Radiology 2001;220:244-251.
30. Gauvrit JY, Oppenheim C, Nataf F, et al. Three-dimensional dynamic magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of radiosurgically treated cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Eur Radiol 2006;16:583-591.
31. Tsuchiya K, Aoki C, Fujikawa A, Hachiya J. Three-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography using parallel imaging and keyhole data sampling in cerebrovascular diseases: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2004;14:1494-1497.
32. Wu Y, Goodrich KC, Buswell HR, Katzman GL, Parker DL. High-resolution time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MRA by combining SENSE with keyhole and SLAM strategies. Magn Reson Imaging 2004;22:1161-1168.
33. Ziyeh S, Strecker R, Berlis A, Weber J, Klisch J, Mader I. Dynamic 3D MR angiography of intra- and extracranial vascular malformations at 3T: a technical note. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:630-634.
34. Hans FJ, Reinges MH, Reipke P, Reinacher P, Krings T. Clinical applications of 2-D dynamic contrast-enhanced MR subtraction angiography in neurosurgery: preliminary results. Zentralbl Neurochir 2005;66:170-179.
35. Mori H, Aoki S, Okubo T, et al. Two-dimensional thick-slice MR digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of small to medium-size intracranial arteriovenous malformations. Neuroradiology 2003;45:27-33.
36. Nagaraja S, Capener D, Coley SC, et al. Brain arteriovenous malformations: measurement of nidal volume using a combination of static and dynamic magnetic resonance angiography techniques. Neuroradiology 2005;47:387-392.
37. Summers PE, Kollias SS, Valavanis A. Resolution improvement in thick-slab magnetic resonance digital subtraction angiography using SENSE at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:662-673.
38. Warren DJ, Hoggard N, Walton L, et al. Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: comparison of novel magnetic resonance angiographic techniques and conventional catheter angiography. Neurosurgery 2001;48:973-982.
39. Anzalone N, Scomazzoni F, Castellano R, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading. Radiology 2005;236:204-213.
40. Elgersma OE, Wust AF, Buijs PC, van der GY, Eikelboom BC, Mali WP. Multidirectional depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 2000;216:511-516.
41. Du R, Dowd CF, Johnston SC, Young WL, Lawton MT. Interobserver variability in grading of brain arteriovenous malformations using the Spetzler-Martin system. Neurosurgery 2005;57:668-675.
42. Griffiths PD, Hoggard N, Warren DJ, Wilkinson ID, Anderson B, Romanowski CA. Brain arteriovenous malformations: assessment with dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1892-1899.
43. Bos C, Smits HF, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA. Selective contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:575-582.
44. Golay X, Petersen ET, Hui F. Pulsed star labeling of arterial regions (PULSAR): a robust regional perfusion technique for high field imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:15-21.
45. Prince MR, Yucel EK, Kaufman JA, Harrison DC, Geller SC. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional abdominal MR arteriography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:877-881.
46. Born M, Willinek WA, Gieseke J, von Falkenhausen M, Schild H, Kuhl CK. Sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the abdominal arteries. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:559-565.
47. Weiger M, Pruessmann KP, Kassner A, et al. Contrast-enhanced 3D MRA using SENSE. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:671-677.
48. Maki JH, Wilson GJ, Eubank WB, Hoogeveen RM. Utilizing SENSE to achieve lower station sub-millimeter isotropic resolution and minimal venous enhancement in peripheral MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;15:484-491.
49. Michaely HJ, Herrmann KA, Kramer H, et al. High-resolution renal MRA: comparison of image quality and vessel depiction with different parallel imaging acceleration factors. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:95-100.
50. Fink C, Ley S, Kroeker R, Requardt M, Kauczor HU, Bock M. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of the chest: combination of parallel imaging with view sharing (TREAT). Invest Radiol 2005;40:40-48.
51. Willinek WA, Gieseke J, Hadizadeh DR, et al. Contrast-enhanced supraaortic MRA at 3.0T using 8-channel and 16-channel neurovascular coils and parallel acquisition with acceleration factors ranging from 1 to 9 [abstr]. In: Proceedings of the 14th Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2006; 567.
52. Cashen TA, Carr JC, Shin W, et al. Intracranial time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:822-829.
53. Mazaheri Y, Carroll TJ, Du J, et al. Combined time-resolved and high-spatial-resolution 3D MRA using an extended adaptive acquisition. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;15:291-301.
54. Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, Mistretta CA. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:343-351.
55. Madore B, Pelc NJ. New approach to 3D time-resolved angiography. Magn Reson Med 2002;47:1022-1025.
56. Karlsson B, Lindquist C, Steiner L. Prediction of obliteration after gamma knife surgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 1997;40:425-430.
57. Shim YW, Chung TS, Kang WS, Joo JY, Strecker R, Hennig J. Non-invasive follow-up evaluation of post-embolized AVM with time-resolved MRA: a case report. Korean J Radiol 2002;3:271-275.