Delineation of brain AVMs on MR-Angiography for the purpose of stereotactic radiosurgery

International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 308-316

  Buis, Dennis R ^a   Lagerwaard, Frank J ^a   Dirven, Clemens M F ^a   Barkhof, Frederik ^a   Knol, Dirk L ^a   van den Berg, René ^a   Slotman, Ben J ^a   Vandertop, W Peter ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Intracranial arteriovenous malformations; Magnetic resonance angiography; Observer variation; Radiosurgery; Stereotaxic techniques

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; BRAIN; MEDICAL IMAGING; NEUROSURGERY; PATIENT TREATMENT; RADIOTHERAPY;

INTRACRANIAL ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATIONS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOSURGERY; STEREOTAXIC TECHNIQUES;

DOSIMETRY;

ARTICLE; BRAIN ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATION; BRAIN TISSUE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DOSIMETRY; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOSURGERY; RELIABILITY; STEREOTAXIC SURGERY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT PLANNING;

HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATIONS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOSURGERY; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE;

EID: 33845655562     PISSN: 03603016     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.08.075     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Leffers A.M., and Wagner A. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. A retrospective study of complication rate and patient risk factors. Acta Radiol 41 (2000) 204-210
2. Willinsky R.A., Taylor S.M., TerBrugge K., et al. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: Prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 227 (2003) 522-528
3. Leclerc X., Gauvrit J.Y., Trystram D., et al. [Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: Value of the non invasive vascular imaging techniques.]. J Neuroradiol 31 (2004) 349-358
4. Niranjan A., Maitz A., Kondziolka D., et al. Radiosurgery: Current techniques. Tech Neurosurg 9 (2003) 119-127
5. Sohn C.H., Sevick R.J., and Frayne R. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the intracranial circulation. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 11 (2003) 599-614
6. Berenstein A., Lasjaunias P., and TerBrugge K.G. Cerebral vascular malformations: Incidence, classification, angioarchitecture, and symptomatology of brain arteriovenous and venous malformations. In: Berenstein A., Lasjaunias P., and TerBrugge K.G. (Eds). Surgical neuroangiography (2003), Springer, Berlin 609-694
7. Shaw E., Kline R., Gillin M., et al., Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Radiosurgery quality assurance guidelines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 27 (1993) 1231-1239
8. Lin L.I. A concordance correlation-coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45 (1989) 255-268
9. Carrasco J.L., and Jover L. Estimating the generalized concordance correlation coefficient through variance components. Biometrics 59 (2003) 849-858
10. Brennnan R.L. Generalizability theory (2001), Springer Verlag, New York
11. Shavelson R.J., and Webb N.M. Generalizability theory: A primer (measurement methods for the social science) (1991), SAGE Publications, Newbury Park, CA
12. Aoyama H., Shirato H., Katoh N., et al. Comparison of imaging modalities for the accurate delineation of arteriovenous malformation, with reference to stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62 (2005) 1232-1238
13. Bednarz G., Downes B., Werner-Wasik M., et al. Combining stereotactic angiography and 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography in treatment planning for arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 46 (2000) 1149-1154
14. Kondziolka D., Lunsford L.D., Kanal E., et al. Stereotactic magnetic resonance angiography for targeting in arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 35 (1994) 585-590
15. St George E.J., Butler P., and Plowman P.N. Can magnetic resonance imaging alone accurately define the arteriovenous nidus for gamma knife radiosurgery?. J Neurosurg 97 Suppl. (2002) 464-470
16. Yu C., Petrovich Z., Apuzzo M.L., et al. Study of magnetic resonance imaging-based arteriovenous malformation delineation without conventional angiography. Neurosurgery 54 (2004) 1104-1110
17. Guo W.Y., Nordell B., Karlsson B., et al. Target delineation in radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Assessment of the value of stereotaxic MR imaging and MR angiography. Acta Radiol 34 (1993) 457-463
18. Krings T., and Hans F. New developments in MRA: Time-resolved MRA. Neuroradiology 46 Suppl. 2 (2004) s214-s222
19. Kubo H.D., Wilder R.B., and Pappas C.T. Impact of collimator leaf width on stereotactic radiosurgery and 3D conformal radiotherapy treatment plans. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44 (1999) 937-945
20. Buis D.R., Lagerwaard F.J., Barkhof F., et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain AVMs: Role of interobserver variation in target definition on digital subtraction angiography. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62 (2005) 246-252
21. Prince M.R. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography: Theory and optimization. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 6 (1998) 257-267
22. Duran M., Schoenberg S.O., Yuh W.T., et al. Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: Morphologic evaluation by ultrashort 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Eur Radiol 12 (2002) 2957-2964
23. Gauvrit J.Y., Leclerc X., Oppenheim C., et al. Three-dimensional dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography using sensitivity encoding for the evaluation of intracranial arteriovenous malformations: A preliminary study. Am J Neuroradiol 26 (2005) 1525-1531