Assessment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations with high temporal and spatial resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: A review from protocol to clinical application

Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 251-257

  Saleh, Roya S ^a   Singhal, Aparna ^a   Lohan, Derek ^a   Duckwiler, Gary ^a   Finn, Paul ^a   Ruehm, Stefan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Angiography; Arteriovenous malformations; Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography; Head and neck angiography

Indexed keywords

BRAIN ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SCREENING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INTRACRANIAL ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATIONS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY;

EID: 68049143051     PISSN: 08993459     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RMR.0b013e3181a98d5f     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. Byrne JV. Cerebrovascular malformations. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:448-452.
2. Mast H, Mohr JP, Osipov A, et al. 'Steal' is an unestablished mechanism for the clinical presentation of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Stroke. 1995;26:1215-1220.
3. Mast H, Young WL, Koennecke HC, et al. Risk of spontaneous haemorrhage after diagnosis of cerebral arteriovenous malformation. Lancet. 1997;350:1065-1068.
4. Spetzler RF, Martin NA. A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg. 1986;65:476-483.
5. Han PP, Ponce FA, Spetzler RF. Intention-to-treat analysis of Spetzler-Martin grades IV and Varteriovenous malformations: natural history and treatment paradigm. J Neurosurg. 2003;98:3-7.
6. Hartmann A, Stapf C, Hofmeister C, et al. Determinants of neurological outcome after surgery for brain arteriovenous malformation. Stroke. 2000;31:2361-2364.
7. Lawton MT. Spetzler-Martin grade III arteriovenous malformations: surgical results and a modification of the grading scale. Neurosurgery. 2003;52:740-748; discussion 748-749.
8. Spetzler RF, Martin NA, Carter LP, et al. Surgical management of large AVM's by staged embolization and operative excision. J Neurosurg. 1987;67:17-28.
9. Kader A, Young WL, Pile-Spellman J, et al. The influence of hemodynamic and anatomic factors on hemorrhage from cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery. 1994;34:801-807; discussion 807-808.
10. Langer DJ, Lasner TM, Hurst RW, et al. Hypertension, small size, and deep venous drainage are associated with risk of hemorrhagic presentation of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery. 1998;42: 481-486; discussion 487-489.
11. Miyasaka Y, Yada K, Ohwada T, et al. An analysis of the venous drainage system as a factor in hemorrhage from arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg. 1992;76:239-243.
12. Miyasaka Y, Kurata A, Irikura K, et al. The influence of vascular pressure and angiographic characteristics on haemorrhage from arteriovenous malformations. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2000;142:39-43.
13. Spetzler RF, Hargraves RW, McCormick PW, et al. Relationship of perfusion pressure and size to risk of hemorrhage from arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg. 1992;76:918-923.
14. Marks MP, Lane B, Steinberg GK, et al. Hemorrhage in intracerebral arteriovenous malformations: angiographic determinants. Radiology. 1990;176:807-813.
15. Willinsky R, Lasjaunias P, Terbrugge K, et al. Brain arteriovenous malformations: analysis of the angio-architecture in relationship to hemorrhage (based on 152 patients explored and/or treated at the hopital de Bicetre between 1981 and 1986). J Neuroradiol. 1988;15:225-237.
16. Redekop G, TerBrugge K, Montanera W, et al. Arterial aneurysms associated with cerebral arteriovenous malformations: classification, incidence, and risk of hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 1998;89:539-546.
17. Stefani MA, Porter PJ, terBrugge KG, et al. Angioarchitectural factors present in brain arteriovenous malformations associated with hemorrhagic presentation. Stroke. 2002;33:920-924.
18. Hademenos GJ, Massoud TF. Risk of intracranial arteriovenous malformation rupture due to venous drainage impairment. A theoretical analysis. Stroke. 1996;27:1072-1083.
19. Warren DJ, Hoggard N, Walton L, et al. Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: comparison of novel magnetic resonance angiographic techniques and conventional catheter angiography. Neurosurgery. 2001;48:973-982; discussion 982-1973
20. Hankey GJ, Warlow CP, Sellar RJ. Cerebral angiographic risk in mild cerebrovascular disease. Stroke. 1990;21:209-222.
21. Heiserman JE, Dean BL, Hodak JA, et al. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994;15:1401-1407; discussion 1408-1411.
22. Willinsky RA, Taylor SM, TerBrugge K, et al. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology. 2003;227:522-528.
23. Earnest F 4th, Forbes G, Sandok BA, et al. Complications of cerebral angiography: prospective assessment of risk. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984;142:247-253.
24. Dion JE, Gates PC, Fox AJ, et al. Clinical events following neuroangiography: a prospective study. Stroke. 1987;18:997-1004.
25. Cloft HJ, Joseph GJ, Dion JE. Risk of cerebral angiography in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, cerebral aneurysm, and arteriovenous malformation: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 1999;30:317-320.
26. Saleh RS, Lohan DG, Villablanca JP, et al. Assessment of craniospinal arteriovenous malformations at 3T with highly temporally and highly spatially resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1024-1031.
27. Reinacher PC, Stracke P, Reinges MH, et al. Contrast-enhanced time-resolved 3-D MRA: applications in neurosurgery and interventional neuroradiology. Neuroradiology. 2007;49(suppl 1):S3-S13.
28. Hadizadeh DR, von Falkenhausen M, Gieseke J, et al. Cerebral arteriovenous malformation: Spetzler-Martin classification at subsecond-temporal-resolution four-dimensional MR angiography compared with that at DSA. Radiology. 2008;246:205-213.
29. Yang CW, Carr JC, Futterer SF, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid and vertebrobasilar circulations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:2095-2101.
30. Levy RA, Prince MR. Arterial-phase three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid arteries. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996; 167:211-215.
31. Nael K, Villablanca JP, Saleh R, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3T in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: a comparison with time-of-flight MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27: 2118-2121.
32. Remonda L, Senn P, Barth A, et al. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23:213-219.
33. Leclerc X, Gauvrit JY, Nicol L, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the craniocervical vessels: a review. Neuroradiology. 1999;41: 867-874.
34. Randoux B, Marro B, Koskas F, et al. Proximal great vessels of aortic arch: comparison of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Radiology. 2003;229: 697-702.
35. Bernstein MA, Huston J 3rd, Lin C, et al. High-resolution intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0 T: technical considerations and initial experience. Magn Reson Med. 2001;46:955-962.
36. Carr JC, Laub G, Zheng J, et al. Time-resolved three-dimensional pulmonary MR angiography and perfusion imaging with ultrashort repetition time. Acad Radiol. 2002;9:1407-1418.
37. Campeau NG, Huston J 3rd, Bernstein MA, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 tesla: initial clinical experience. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;12:183-204.
38. Leclerc X, Nicol L, Gauvrit JY, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of supraaortic vessels: the effect of voxel size on image quality. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:1021-1027.
39. Fenchel M, Nael K, Ruehm S, et al. Isotropic high spatial resolution magnetic resonance angiography of the supra-aortic arteries using two-dimensional parallel imaging (iPAT2) at 3 tesla: a feasibility study. Invest Radiol. 2006;41:545-552.
40. Nael K, Fenchel M, Salamon N, et al. Three-dimensional cerebral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance venography at 3.0 tesla: initial results using highly accelerated parallel acquisition. Invest Radiol. 2006;41:763-768.
41. Nael K, Michaely HJ, Villablanca P, et al. Time-resolved contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the head and neck at 3.0 tesla: initial results. Invest Radiol. 2006;41:116-124.
42. Nael K, Ruehm SG, Michaely HJ, et al. High spatial-resolution CE-MRA of the carotid circulation with parallel imaging: comparison of image quality between 2 different acceleration factors at 3.0 tesla. Invest Radiol. 2006;41:391-399.
43. Sodickson DK, McKenzie CA, Li W, et al. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography with simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics: a pilot study. Radiology. 2000;217:284-289.
44. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, et al. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med. 1999;42:952-962.
45. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med. 2002;47:1202-1210.
46. Pruessmann KP. Parallel imaging at high field strength: synergies and joint potential. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;15:237-244.
47. Habibi R, Krishnam MS, Lohan DG, et al. High-spatial-resolution lower extremity MR angiography at 3.0 T: contrast agent dose comparison study. Radiology. 2008;248:680-692.
48. Ganguli S, Pedrosa I, Smith MP, et al. Low dose pedal magnetic resonance angiography at 3 tesla with time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics: a feasibility study. Invest Radiol. 2008;43:650-655.
49. Saleh RS, Ruehm SG, Finn JP, et al. Time resolved TWIST MR angiography of the head and neck: the use of parallel imaging with a higher acceleration factor to increase temporal resolution. In: 15th Annual ISMRM Meeting. Berlin, Germany: 2007; 447.
50. Willinek WA, Hadizadeh DR, von Falkenhausen M, et al. 4D time-resolved MR angiography with keyhole (4D-TRAK): more than 60 times accelerated MRA using a combination of CENTRA, keyhole, and SENSE at 3.0T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;27:1455-1460.
51. Mukundan S, Fuchs H, Alexander MJ, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of vascular malformations in pediatric patients. Case report. J Neurosurg. 2007;107:228-231.
52. Kumashiro M, Murase K, Oda K, et al. Assessment of time-resolved, dynamic, contrast-enhanced MRDSA using radial sliding-window reconstruction. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2008;7:1-12.
53. Anderson RM, Blackwood W. The association of arteriovenous angioma and saccular aneurysm of the arteries of the brain. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1959;77:101-110.
54. Batjer H, Suss RA, Samson D. Intracranial arteriovenous malformations associated with aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 1986;18:29-35.
55. Cronqvist S, Troupp H. Intracranial arteriovenous malformation and arterial aneurysm in the same patient. Acta Neurol Scand. 1966;42:307-316.
56. Perret G, Nishioka H. Report on the cooperative study of intracranial aneurysms and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Section VI. Arteriovenous malformations. An analysis of 545 cases of cranio-cerebral arteriovenous malformations and fistulae reported to the cooperative study. J Neurosurg. 1966;25:467-490.
57. Meckel S, Maier M, Ruiz DS, et al. MR angiography of dural arteriovenous fistulas: diagnosis and follow-up after treatment using a time-resolved 3D contrast-enhanced technique. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:877-884.
58. Unlu E, Temizoz O, Albayram S, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR 3D angiography in the assessment of brain AVMs. Eur J Radiol. 2006;60: 367-378.
59. Kirchhof K, Welzel T, Jansen O, et al. More reliable noninvasive visualization of the cerebral veins and dural sinuses: comparison of three MR angiographic techniques. Radiology. 2002;224:804-810.
60. Reinacher P, Reinges MH, Simon VA, et al. Dynamic 3-D contrast-enhanced angiography of cerebral tumours and vascular malformations. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(suppl 6):F52-F62.