Intracranial arteriovenous malformation: Time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography with combination of parallel imaging, keyhole acquisition, and k-space sampling techniques at 1.5 T

Radiology

Volumn 246, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 871-879

  Taschner, Christian A ^a   Gieseke, Jürgen ^b   Le Thuc, Vianney ^a   Rachdi, Henda ^a   Reyns, Nicolas ^a   Gauvrit, Jean Yves ^a   Leclerc, Xavier ^a  

^a LILLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; GAMMA KNIFE RADIOSURGERY; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOTERATE MEGLUMINE; MEGLUMINE; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INTRACRANIAL ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATIONS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MEGLUMINE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS;

EID: 40949158392     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2463070293     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Marchal G, Bosmans H, Van Fraeyenhoven L, et al. Intracranial vascular lesions: optimization and clinical evaluation of three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 1990;175:443-448.
2. Mehta MP, Petereit D, Turski P, Gehring M, Levin A, Kinsella T. Magnetic resonance angiography: a three-dimensional database for assessing arteriovenous malformations - technical note. J Neurosurg 1993;79:289-293.
3. Bednarz G, Downes B, Werner-Wasik M, Rosenwasser RH. Combining stereotactic angiography and 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography in treatment planning for arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000;46:1149-1154.
4. Wang Y, Johnston DL, Breen JF, et al. Dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography using contrast enhancement, fast data acquisition, and complex subtraction. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:551-556.
5. Griffiths PD, Hoggard N, Warren DJ, Wilkinson ID, Anderson B, Romanowski CA. Brain arteriovenous malformations: assessment with dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1892-1899.
6. Wetzel SG, Bilecen D, Lyrer P, et al. Cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas: detection by dynamic MR projection angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1293-1295.
7. Aoki S, Yoshikawa T, Hori M, et al. MR digital subtraction angiography for the assessment of cranial arteriovenous malformations and fistulas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:451-453.
8. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:952-962.
9. Weiger M, Pruessmann KP, Kassner A, et al. Contrast-enhanced 3D MRA using SENSE. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:671-677.
10. Tsuchiya K, Aoki C, Fujikawa A, Hachiya J. Three-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography using parallel imaging and keyhole data sampling in cerebrovascular diseases: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2004;14:1494-1497.
11. Summers PE, Kollias SS, Valavanis A. Resolution improvement in thick-slab magnetic resonance digital subtraction angiography using SENSE at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:662-673.
12. Gauvrit JY, Leclerc X, Oppenheim C, et al. Three-dimensional dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography using sensitivity encoding for the evaluation of intracranial arteriovenous malformations: a preliminary study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1525-1531.
13. Meckel S, Mekle R, Taschner C, et al. Time-resolved 3D contrast-enhanced MRA with GRAPPA on a 1.5-T system for imaging of craniocervical vascular disease: initial experience. Neuroradiology 2006;48:291-299.
14. van Vaals JJ, Brummer ME, Dixon WT, et al. "Keyhole" method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:671-675.
15. Farb RI, McGregor C, Kim JK, et al. Intracranial arteriovenous malformations: realtime auto-triggered elliptic centric-ordered 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography-initial assessment. Radiology 2001;220:244-251.
16. Willinek WA, Gieseke J, Conrad R, et al. Randomly segmented central k-space ordering in high-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supraaortic arteries: initial experience. Radiology 2002;225:583-588.
17. Hoogeveen RM, von Falkenhausen M, Gieseke J. Fast, dynamic high resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography with CENTRA keyhole and SENSE [abstr]. In: Proceedings of the 12th Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2004.
18. Taschner CA, Le Thuc V, Reyns N, et al. Gamma knife surgery for arteriovenous malformations in the brain: integration of timeresolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography into dosimetry planning. J Neurosurg 2007;107(4):854-859.
19. Krapf H, Siekmann R, Freudenstein D, Küker W, Skalej M. Spontaneous occlusion of a cerebral arteriovenous malformation: angiography and MR imaging follow-up and review of the literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1556-1560.
20. Berman MF, Sciacca RR, Pile-Spellman J, et al. The epidemiology of brain arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 2000;47:389-396.
21. Fleetwood IG, Steinberg GK. Arteriovenous malformations. Lancet 2002;359:863-873.
22. Heiserman JE, Dean BL, Hodak JA, et al. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:1401-1407.
23. Cloft HJ, Joseph GJ, Dion JE. Risk of cerebral angiography in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, cerebral aneurysm, and arteriovenous malformation: a meta-analysis. Stroke 1999;30:317-320.
24. Willinsky RA, Taylor SM, TerBrugge K, Farb RI, Tomlinson G, Montanera W. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 2003;227:522-528.
25. Derdeyn CP, Moran CJ, Eichling JO, Cross DT 3rd. Radiation dose to patients and personnel during intraoperative digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:300-305.
26. Ron E. Cancer risks from medical radiation. Health Phys 2003;85:47-59.
27. Berrington de González A, Darby S. Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet 2004;363:345-351.