The effect of sensory uncertainty due to amblyopia (lazy eye) on the planning and execution of visually-guided 3D reaching movements

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2012, Pages

  Niechwiej Szwedo, Ewa ^a   Goltz, Herbert C ^a,b   Chandrakumar, Manokaraananthan ^a   Wong, Agnes M F ^a,b  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMBLYOPIA; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; EYE HAND COORDINATION; EYE MOVEMENT CONTROL; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIMB MOVEMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ONLINE SYSTEM; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; TASK PERFORMANCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FEEDBACK; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION; ARM; BINOCULAR VISION; BIOMECHANICS; MONOCULAR VISION; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SENSATION; UNCERTAINTY;

ADULT; AMBLYOPIA; ARM; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOVEMENT; SENSATION; UNCERTAINTY; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 84857179578     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031075     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Bernstein NA, (1967) The coordination and regulation of movements London Pergamon Press.
2. Latash ML, Scholz JP, Schoner G, (2002) Motor control strategies revealed in the structure of motor variability. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 30: 26-31.
3. van Beers RJ, Baraduc P, Wolpert DM, (2002) Role of uncertainty in sensorimotor control. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 357: 1137-1145.
4. Bays PM, Wolpert DM, (2007) Computational principles of sensorimotor control that minimize uncertainty and variability. J Physiol 578: 387-396.
5. Frisen L, Glansholm A, (1975) Optical and neural resolution in peripheral vision. Invest Ophthalmol 14: 528-536.
6. Merigan WH, Katz LM, (1990) Spatial resolution across the macaque retina. Vision Res 30: 985-991.
7. Redon C, Hay L, (2005) Role of visual context and oculomotor conditions in pointing accuracy. Neuroreport 16: 2065-2067.
8. Conti P, Beaubaton D, (1980) Role of structured visual field and visual reafference in accuracy of pointing movements. Percept Mot Skills 50: 239-244.
9. Krigolson O, Heath M, (2006) A lower visual field advantage for endpoint stability but no advantage for online movement precision. Exp Brain Res 170: 127-135.
10. Khan MA, Lawrence GP, (2005) Differences in visuomotor control between the upper and lower visual fields. Exp Brain Res 164: 395-398.
11. Danckert J, Goodale MA, (2001) Superior performance for visually guided pointing in the lower visual field. Exp Brain Res 137: 303-308.
12. van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, Denier van der Gon JJ, (1998) The precision of proprioceptive position sense. Exp Brain Res 122: 367-377.
13. Crawford JD, Medendorp WP, Marotta JJ, (2004) Spatial transformations for eye-hand coordination. J Neurophysiol 92: 10-19.
14. Desmurget M, Pelisson D, Rossetti Y, Prablanc C, (1998) From eye to hand: planning goal-directed movements. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 22: 761-788.
15. Snyder LH, (2000) Coordinate transformations for eye and arm movements in the brain. Curr Opin Neurobiol 10: 747-754.
16. Desmurget M, Rossetti Y, Prablanc C, Stelmach GE, Jeannerod M, (1995) Representation of hand position prior to movement and motor variability. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 73: 262-272.
17. Rossetti Y, Stelmach G, Desmurget M, Prablanc C, Jeannerod M, (1994) The effect of viewing the static hand prior to movement onset on pointing kinematics and variability. Exp Brain Res 101: 323-330.
18. McIntyre J, Stratta F, Lacquaniti F, (1997) Viewer-centered frame of reference for pointing to memorized targets in three-dimensional space. J Neurophysiol 78: 1601-1618.
19. McIntyre J, Stratta F, Lacquaniti F, (1998) Short-term memory for reaching to visual targets: psychophysical evidence for body-centered reference frames. J Neurosci 18: 8423-8435.
20. Churchland MM, Afshar A, Shenoy KV, (2006) A central source of movement variability. Neuron 52: 1085-1096.
21. van Beers RJ, Haggard P, Wolpert DM, (2004) The role of execution noise in movement variability. J Neurophysiol 91: 1050-1063.
22. Schmidt RA, Zelaznik H, Hawkins B, Frank JS, Quinn JT, (1979) Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychol Rev 47: 415-451.
23. Apker GA, Darling TK, Buneo CA, (2010) Interacting noise sources shape patterns of arm movement variability in three-dimensional space. J Neurophysiol 104: 2654-2666.
24. McKee SP, Levi DM, Movshon JA, (2003) The pattern of visual deficits in amblyopia. J Vis 3: 380-405.
25. Hess RF, Wang YZ, Demanins R, Wilkinson F, Wilson HR, (1999) A deficit in strabismic amblyopia for global shape detection. Vision Res 39: 901-914.
26. Sireteanu R, Baumer CC, Sarbu C, Iftime A, (2007) Spatial and temporal misperceptions in amblyopic vision. Strabismus 15: 45-54.
27. Barrett BT, Pacey IE, Bradley A, Thibos LN, Morrill P, (2003) Nonveridical visual perception in human amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44: 1555-1567.
28. Bonneh YS, Sagi D, Polat U, (2007) Spatial and temporal crowding in amblyopia. Vision Res 47: 1950-1962.
29. Simmers AJ, Ledgeway T, Hess RF, McGraw PV, (2003) Deficits to global motion processing in human amblyopia. Vision Res 43: 729-738.
30. Simmers AJ, Ledgeway T, Mansouri B, Hutchinson CV, Hess RF, (2006) The extent of the dorsal extra-striate deficit in amblyopia. Vision Res 46: 2571-2580.
31. Ho CS, Giaschi DE, Boden C, Dougherty R, Cline R, et al. (2005) Deficient motion perception in the fellow eye of amblyopic children. Vision Res 45: 1615-1627.
32. Woo GC, Irving EL, (1991) The non-amblyopic eye of a unilateral amblyope: a unique entity. Clinical and Experimental Optometry 74: 1-5.
33. Mirabella G, Hay S, Wong AM, (2011) Deficits in perception of real-world scenes in patients with a history of amblyopia. Archives of Ophthalmology 129: 176-183.
34. Movshon JA, Eggers HM, Gizzi MS, Hendrickson AE, Kiorpes L, et al. (1987) Effects of early unilateral blur on the macaque's visual system. III. Physiological observations. J Neurosci 7: 1340-1351.
35. Wiesel TN, Hubel DH, (1963) Single-Cell Responses in Striate Cortex of Kittens Deprived of Vision in One Eye. J Neurophysiol 26: 1003-1017.
36. Kiorpes L, Kiper DC, O'Keefe LP, Cavanaugh JR, Movshon JA, (1998) Neuronal correlates of amblyopia in the visual cortex of macaque monkeys with experimental strabismus and anisometropia. J Neurosci 18: 6411-6424.
37. Hess RF, Thompson B, Gole G, Mullen KT, (2009) Deficient responses from the lateral geniculate nucleus in humans with amblyopia. Eur J Neurosci 29: 1064-1070.
38. Barnes GR, Hess RF, Dumoulin SO, Achtman RL, Pike GB, (2001) The cortical deficit in humans with strabismic amblyopia. J Physiol 533: 281-297.
39. Hess RF, Mansouri B, Thompson B, (2010) A binocular approach to treating amblyopia: antisuppression therapy. Optom Vis Sci 87: 697-704.
40. Sharma V, Levi DM, Klein SA, (2000) Undercounting features and missing features: evidence for a high-level deficit in strabismic amblyopia. Nat Neurosci 3: 496-501.
41. El-Shamayleh Y, Kiorpes L, Kohn A, Movshon JA, (2010) Visual motion processing by neurons in area MT of macaque monkeys with experimental amblyopia. J Neurosci 30: 12198-12209.
42. Popple AV, Levi DM, (2008) The attentional blink in amblyopia. J Vis 8: 12 11-19.
43. Kiorpes L, (2006) Visual processing in amblyopia: animal studies. Strabismus 14: 3-10.
44. Levi DM, (2006) Visual processing in amblyopia: human studies. Strabismus 14: 11-19.
45. Hrisos S, Clarke MP, Kelly T, Henderson J, Wright CM, (2006) Unilateral visual impairment and neurodevelopmental performance in preschool children. Br J Ophthalmol 90: 836-838.
46. Webber AL, Wood JM, Gole GA, Brown B, (2008) The effect of amblyopia on fine motor skills in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49: 594-603.
47. Webber AL, Wood JM, Gole GA, Brown B, (2009) Effect of amblyopia on the Developmental Eye Movement test in children. Optom Vis Sci 86: 760-766.
48. O'Connor AR, Birch EE, Anderson S, Draper H, (2010) Relationship between binocular vision, visual acuity, and fine motor skills. Optom Vis Sci 87: 942-947.
49. Grant S, Melmoth DR, Morgan MJ, Finlay AL, (2007) Prehension deficits in amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48: 1139-1148.
50. Suttle CM, Melmoth DR, Finlay AL, Sloper JJ, Grant S, (2011) Eye-hand coordination skills in children with and without amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52: 1851-1864.
51. Khan MA, Franks IM, Elliott D, Lawrence GP, Chua R, et al. (2006) Inferring online and offline processing of visual feedback in target-directed movements from kinematic data. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 30: 1106-1121.
52. Messier J, Kalaska JF, (1999) Comparison of variability of initial kinematics and endpoints of reaching movements. Exp Brain Res 125: 139-152.
53. Gordon J, Ghez C, (1987) Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. III. Compensatory adjustments for initial errors. Exp Brain Res 67: 253-269.
54. Heath M, (2005) Role of limb and target vision in the online control of memory-guided reaches. Motor Control 9: 281-311.
55. Neely KA, Tessmer A, Binsted G, Heath M, (2008) Goal-directed reaching: movement strategies influence the weighting of allocentric and egocentric visual cues. Exp Brain Res 186: 375-384.
56. Heath M, Neely KA, Krigolson O, (2008) Response modes influence the accuracy of monocular and binocular reaching movements. Motor Control 12: 252-266.
57. Niechwiej-Szwedo E, Goltz H, Chandrakumar M, Hirji ZA, Crawford JD, et al. (2011) Effects of Anisometropic Amblyopia on Visuomotor Behaviour: II. Visually-Guided Reaching. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52: 795-803.
58. Hess RF, Holliday IE, (1992) The spatial localization deficit in amblyopia. Vision Res 32: 1319-1339.
59. Fronius M, Sireteanu R, (1989) Monocular geometry is selectively distorted in the central visual field of strabismic amblyopes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 30: 2034-2044.
60. Bedell HE, Flom MC, (1983) Normal and abnormal space perception. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 60: 426-435.
61. Bedell HE, Flom MC, Barbeito R, (1985) Spatial aberrations and acuity in strabismus and amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 26: 909-916.
62. Levi DM, Klein SA, (1983) Spatial localization in normal and amblyopic vision. Vision Res 23: 1005-1017.
63. Thiel A, Sireteanu R, (2009) Strabismic amblyopes show a bilateral rightward bias in a line bisection task: evidence for a visual attention deficit. Vision Res 49: 287-294.
64. Levi DM, Klein SA, Wang H, (1994) Discrimination of position and contrast in amblyopic and peripheral vision. Vision Res 34: 3293-3313.
65. Mansouri B, Hansen BC, Hess RF, (2009) Disrupted retinotopic maps in amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50: 3218-3225.
66. Hess RF, Pointer JS, (1985) Differences in the neural basis of human amblyopia: the distribution of the anomaly across the visual field. Vision Res 25: 1577-1594.
67. Mishkin M, Ungerleider LG, (1982) Contribution of striate inputs to the visuospatial functions of parieto-preoccipital cortex in monkeys. Behav Brain Res 6: 57-77.
68. Goodale MA, Milner AD, (1992) Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci 15: 20-25.
69. Kravitz DJ, Saleem KS, Baker CI, Mishkin M, (2011) A new neural framework for visuospatial processing. Nat Rev Neurosci 12: 217-230.
70. Fronius M, Sireteanu R, (1994) Pointing errors in strabismics: complex patterns of distorted visuomotor coordination. Vision Res 34: 689-707.
71. Hillis JM, Watt SJ, Landy MS, Banks MS, (2004) Slant from texture and disparity cues: optimal cue combination. J Vis 4: 967-992.
72. Jacobs RA, (1999) Optimal integration of texture and motion cues to depth. Vision Res 39: 3621-3629.
73. Ernst MO, Banks MS, (2002) Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415: 429-433.
74. van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, Denier van der Gon JJ, (1996) How humans combine simultaneous proprioceptive and visual position information. Exp Brain Res 111: 253-261.
75. Sober SJ, Sabes PN, (2003) Multisensory integration during motor planning. J Neurosci 23: 6982-6992.
76. Knill DC, Bondada A, Chhabra M, (2011) Flexible, task-dependent use of sensory feedback to control hand movements. J Neurosci 31: 1219-1237.
77. Harris CM, Wolpert DM, (1998) Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 394: 780-784.
78. Trommershauser J, Gepshtein S, Maloney LT, Landy MS, Banks MS, (2005) Optimal compensation for changes in task-relevant movement variability. J Neurosci 25: 7169-7178.
79. Battaglia PW, Schrater PR, (2007) Humans trade off viewing time and movement duration to improve visuomotor accuracy in a fast reaching task. J Neurosci 27: 6984-6994.
80. Faisal AA, Wolpert DM, (2009) Near optimal combination of sensory and motor uncertainty in time during a naturalistic perception-action task. J Neurophysiol 101: 1901-1912.
81. Wolpert DM, (2007) Probabilistic models in human sensorimotor control. Hum Mov Sci 26: 511-524.
82. Diedrichsen J, Shadmehr R, Ivry RB, (2009) The coordination of movement: optimal feedback control and beyond. Trends Cogn Sci 14: 31-39.
83. Desmurget M, Grafton S, (2000) Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cogn Sci 4: 423-431.
84. O'Connor AR, Birch EE, Anderson S, Draper H, (2009) The functional significance of stereopsis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51: 2019-2023.
85. Melmoth DR, Finlay AL, Morgan MJ, Grant S, (2009) Grasping deficits and adaptations in adults with stereo vision losses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50: 3711-3720.
86. Servos P, Goodale MA, (1998) Monocular and binocular control of human interceptive movements. Exp Brain Res 119: 92-102.
87. Servos P, Goodale MA, (1994) Binocular vision and the on-line control of human prehension. Exp Brain Res 98: 119-127.
88. Loftus A, Servos P, Goodale MA, Mendarozqueta N, Mon-Williams M, (2004) When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance. Exp Brain Res 158: 317-327.
89. Knill DC, Kersten D, (2004) Visuomotor sensitivity to visual information about surface orientation. J Neurophysiol 91: 1350-1366.
90. Knill DC, (2005) Reaching for visual cues to depth: the brain combines depth cues differently for motor control and perception. J Vis 5: 103-115.
91. Hu B, Knill DC, (2011) Binocular and monocular depth cues in online feedback control of 3D pointing movement. J Vis 11.
92. Greenwald HS, Knill DC, (2009) A comparison of visuomotor cue integration strategies for object placement and prehension. Vis Neurosci 26: 63-72.
93. Bradshaw MF, Elliott KM, Watt SJ, Hibbard PB, Davies IR, et al. (2004) Binocular cues and the control of prehension. Spat Vis 17: 95-110.
94. Bradshaw MF, Elliott KM, (2003) The role of binocular information in the 'on-line' control of prehension. Spat Vis 16: 295-309.
95. Brenner E, Smeets JB, (2006) Two eyes in action. Exp Brain Res 170: 302-311.
96. Melmoth DR, Grant S, (2006) Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping. Exp Brain Res 171: 371-388.
97. Brenner E, Smeets JB, (2000) Comparing extra-retinal information about distance and direction. Vision Res 40: 1649-1651.
98. Greenwald HS, Knill DC, Saunders JA, (2005) Integrating visual cues for motor control: a matter of time. Vision Res 45: 1975-1989.
99. Grant S, Moseley MJ, (2011) Amblyopia and real-world visuomotor tasks. Strabismus 19: 119-128.