Spatial and temporal crowding in amblyopia

Vision Research

Volumn 47, Issue 14, 2007, Pages 1950-1962

  Bonneh, Yoram S ^a   Sagi, Dov ^a   Polat, Uri ^b  

^a WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Amblyopia; Anisometropia; Crowding; Masking; Spatial interactions; Strabismus; Temporal; Visual acuity

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMBLYOPIA; ANISOMETROPIA; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRABISMUS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL MASKING; VISUAL THRESHOLD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMBLYOPIA; ANISOMETROPIA; ATTENTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; SPACE PERCEPTION; STRABISMUS; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 34249726669     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.02.015     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Asper L.J. Do different amblyopes have different attentional blinks. ARVO 5 (2003)
2. Asper L., Crewther D., and Crewther S.G. Strabismic amblyopia. Part 1. Psychophysics. Clinical & Experimental Optometry 83 (2000) 49-58
3. Bedell H.D., and Flom M.C. Monocular spatial distortion in strabismic amblyopia. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 20 (1981) 263-268
4. Bedell H.E., and Flom M.C. Normal and abnormal space perception. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics 60 (1983) 426-435
5. Bonneh Y.S., Polat U., and Sagi D. Spatial and temporal crowding in amblyopia [Abstract]. Journal of Vision 4 (2004) 761a
6. Bonneh Y.S., Polat U., and Tsodyks M. Why do we see binocular rivalry? Evidence from people who see it fused [Abstract]. Journal of Vision 6 (2006) 42a
7. Bonneh Y., and Sagi D. Effects of spatial configuration on contrast detection. Vision Research 38 (1998) 3541-3553
8. Bonneh Y.S., Sagi D., and Polat U. Local and non-local deficits in amblyopia: acuity and spatial interactions. Vision Research 44 (2004) 3099-3110
9. Bouma H., and Andriessen J.J. Induced changes in the perceived orientation of line segments. Vision Research 10 (1970) 333-349
10. Bradley A., and Freeman R.D. Contrast sensitivity in anisometropic amblyopia. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 21 (1981) 467-476
11. Breitmeyer B. Visual masking: An integrative approach (1984), Oxford University Press, New York
12. Breitmeyer B.G., and Ogmen H. Recent models and findings in visual backward masking: A comparison, review, and update. Perception & Psychophysics 62 (2000) 1572-1595
13. Chung S.T. Reading speed benefits from increased vertical word spacing in normal peripheral vision. Optometry & Vision Science 81 (2004) 525-535
14. Chung S.T., Levi D.M., and Legge G.E. Spatial-frequency and contrast properties of crowding. Vision Research 41 (2001) 1833-1850
15. Ciuffreda K.J., Kenyon R.V., and Stark L. Increased saccadic latencies in amblyopic eyes. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 17 (1978) 697-702
16. Ciuffreda K.J., Levi D.M., and Selenow A. Amblyopia: Basic and clinical aspects (1991), Butterworth-Heinemann, Stoneham
17. Davis A.R., Sloper J.J., Neveu M.M., Hogg C.R., Morgan M.J., and Holder G.E. Electrophysiological and psychophysical differences between early- and late-onset strabismic amblyopia. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 44 (2003) 610-617
18. Ellemberg D., Hess R.F., and Arsenault A.S. Lateral interactions in amblyopia. Vision Research 42 (2002) 2471-2478
19. Enns J.T., and Di Lollo V. What's new in visual masking?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (2000) 345-352
20. Flom M.C. Contour interaction and the crowding effect. Problems in Optometry 3 (1991) 237-257
21. Flom M.C., Weymouth F.W., and Kahneman D. Visual resolution and contour interaction. Journal of the Optical Society of America 53 (1963) 1026-1032
22. Francis G. Quantitative theories of metacontrast masking. Psychological Review 107 (2000) 768-785
23. Genovese C.R., Lazar N.A., and Nichols T. Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage 15 (2002) 870-878
24. Gilbert C.D. Adult cortical dynamics. Physiological Reviews 78 (1998) 467-485
25. Gorea A. Masking efficiency as a function of stimulus onset asynchrony for spatial-frequency detection and identification. Spatial Vision 2 (1987) 51-60
26. Hamasaki D.I., and Flynn J.T. Amblyopic eyes have longer reaction times. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 21 (1981) 846-853
27. Hariharan S., Levi D.M., and Klein S.A. "Crowding" in normal and amblyopic vision assessed with Gaussian and Gabor C's. Vision Research 45 (2005) 617-633
28. Hess R.F., Dakin S.C., Tewfik M., and Brown B. Contour interaction in amblyopia: Scale selection. Vision Research 41 (2001) 2285-2296
29. Hess R.F., and Howell E.R. The threshold contrast sensitivity function in strabismic amblyopia: Evidence for a two type classification. Vision Research 17 (1977) 1049-1055
30. Hess R.F., and Jacobs R.J. A preliminary report of acuity and contour interactions across the amblyope's visual field. Vision Research 19 (1979) 1403-1408
31. Keysers C., and Perrett D.I. Visual masking and RSVP reveal neural competition. Trends in Cognitive Science 6 (2002) 120-125
32. Kooi F.L., Toet A., Tripathy S.P., and Levi D.M. The effect of similarity and duration on spatial interaction in peripheral vision. Spatial Vision 8 (1994) 255-279
33. Kovacs I., Polat U., Pennefather P.M., Chandna A., and Norcia A.M. A new test of contour integration deficits in patients with a history of disrupted binocular experience during visual development. Vision Research 40 (2000) 1775-1783
34. Kristjansson A., and Nakayama K. The attentional blink in space and time. Vision Research 42 (2002) 2039-2050
35. Lee S.H., Blake R., and Heeger D.J. Traveling waves of activity in primary visual cortex during binocular rivalry. Nature Neuroscience 8 (2005) 22-23
36. Levi D.M., Hariharan S., and Klein S.A. Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in amblyopic vision. Vision Research 42 (2002) 1379-1394
37. Levi D.M., Hariharan S., and Klein S.A. Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in peripheral vision: Peripheral crowding is neither size invariant nor simple contrast masking. Journal of Vision 2 (2002) 167-177
38. Levi M., and Harwerth R.S. Spatio-temporal interactions in anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 16 (1977) 90-95
39. Levi D.M., and Harwerth R.S. Contrast evoked potentials in strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 17 (1978) 571-575
40. Levi D.M., and Klein S. Differences in vernier discrimination for grating between strabismic and anisometropic amblyopes. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 23 (1982) 398-407
41. Levi D.M., and Klein S. Hyperacuity and amblyopia. Nature 298 (1982) 268-270
42. Levi D.M., and Klein S. Differences in vernier discrimination for grating between strabismic and anisometropic amblyopes. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 23 (1982) 398-407
43. Levi D.M., and Klein S.A. Vernier acuity, crowding and amblyopia. Vision Research 25 (1985) 979-991
44. Levi D.M., Klein S.A., and Aitsebaomo A.P. Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification. Vision Research 25 (1985) 963-977
45. Levi D.M., Klein S.A., and Hariharan S. Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in foveal vision: Foveal crowding is simple contrast masking. Journal of Vision 2 (2002) 140-166
46. Levi D.M., Klein S.A., and Yap Y.L. Positional uncertainty in peripheral and amblyopic vision. Vision Research 27 (1987) 581-597
47. Livne T., and Sagi D. Configuration influence on crowding. Journal of Vision 7 2 (2007) 1-12
48. Loshin D.S., and Levi D.M. Suprathreshold contrast perception in functional amblyopia. Documenta Ophthalmologica 55 (1983) 213-236
49. McKee S.P., Levi D.M., and Movshon J.A. The pattern of visual deficits in amblyopia. Journal of Vision 3 (2003) 380-405
50. Mussap A.J., and Levi D.M. Amblyopic deficits in detecting a dotted line in noise. Vision Research 40 (2000) 3297-3307
51. Parkes L., Lund J., Angelucci A., Solomon J.A., and Morgan M. Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision. Nature Neuroscience 4 (2001) 739-744
52. Pelli D.G., Palomares M., and Majaj N.J. Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: Distinguishing feature detection and integration. Journal of Vision 4 (2004) 1136-1169
53. Petrov Y., and McKee S.P. The effect of spatial configuration on surround suppression of contrast sensitivity. Journal of Vision 6 (2006) 224-238
54. Polat U., Bonneh Y., Ma-Naim T., Belkin M., and Sagi D. Spatial interactions in amblyopia: Effects of stimulus parameters and amblyopia type. Vision Research 45 (2005) 1471-1479
55. Polat U., Ma-Naim T., Belkin M., and Sagi D. Improving vision in adult amblyopia by perceptual learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101 (2004) 6692-6697
56. Polat U., Mizobe K., Pettet M.W., Kasamatsu T., and Norcia A.M. Collinear stimuli regulate visual responses depending on cell's contrast threshold. Nature 391 (1998) 580-584
57. Polat U., and Sagi D. Lateral interactions between spatial channels: Suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments. Vision Research 33 (1993) 993-999
58. Polat U., and Sagi D. Spatial interactions in human vision: From near to far via experience-dependent cascades of connections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 91 (1994) 1206-1209
59. Polat U., and Sagi D. Temporal asymmetry of collinear lateral interactions. Vision Research 46 (2006) 953-960
60. Polat U., Sagi D., and Norcia A.M. Abnormal long-range spatial interactions in amblyopia. Vision Research 37 (1997) 737-744
61. Popple A.V., and Levi D.M. Amblyopes see true alignment where normal observers see illusory tilt. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97 (2000) 11667-11672
62. Popple A., Polat U., and Bonneh Y. Collinear effects on 3-Gabor alignment as a function of spacing, orientation and detectability. Spatial Vision 14 (2001) 139-150
63. Raymond J.E., Shapiro K.L., and Arnell K.M. Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 18 (1992) 849-860
64. Regan D., Giaschi D.E., Kraft S.P., and Kothe A.C. Method for identifying amblyopes whose reduced line acuity is caused by defective selection and/or control of gaze. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 12 (1992) 425-432
65. Sharma V., Levi D.M., and Klein S.A. Undercounting features and missing features: Evidence for a high-level deficit in strabismic amblyopia. Nature Neuroscience 3 (2000) 496-501
66. Simmers A.J., Gray L.S., McGraw P.V., and Winn B. Contour interaction for high and low contrast optotypes in normal and amblyopic observers. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 19 (1999) 253-260
67. Sireteanu R., Lagreze W.D., and Constantinescu D.H. Distortions in two-dimensional visual space perception in strabismic observers. Vision Research 33 (1993) 677-690
68. Steinman S.B., Levi D.M., and McKee S.P. Discrimination of time and velocity in the amblyopic visual system. Clinical Vision Science 2 (1988) 265-276
69. Stuart J.A., and Burian H.M. A study of separation difficulty and its relationship to visual acuity in normal and amblyopic eyes. American Journal of Ophthalmology 53 (1962) 471-477
70. Tripathy S.P., and Cavanagh P. The extent of crowding in peripheral vision does not scale with target size. Vision Research 42 (2002) 2357-2369