Two eyes in action

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 170, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 302-311

  Brenner, Eli ^a   Smeets, Jeroen B J ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Binocular vision; Disparity; Distance; Human; Latency; Motor control; Prehension; Stereopsis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; DIRECTIONAL VISION; EYE; EYE MOVEMENT CONTROL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELATIVE RETINAL DISPARITY; RETINA; RETINA DISPARITY; SIMULATION; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ADULT; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 33645454766     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0213-9     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bradshaw MF, Elliott KM (2003) The role of binocular information in the 'on-line' control of prehension. Spat Vis 16:295-309
2. Bradshaw MF, Hibbard PB (2003) Reaching for virtual objects: binocular disparity, retinal motion and the control of prehension. Arq Bras Oftalmol 66:53-61
3. Bradshaw MF, Elliott KM, Watt SJ, Hibbard PB, Davies IR, Simpson PJ (2004) Binocular cues and the control of prehension. Spat Vis 17:95-110
4. Brenner E, van Damme W (1999) Perceived distance, shape and size. Vis Res 39:975-986
5. Brenner E, Smeets JBJ (1997) Fast responses of the human hand to changes in target position. J Motor Behav 29:297-310
6. Brenner E, Smeets JBJ (2000) Comparing extra-retinal information about distance and direction. Vis Res 40:1649-1651
7. Brenner E, Smeets JBJ (2001) We are better off without perfect perception. Behav Brain Sci 24:215
8. Brenner E, Smeets JBJ (2003) Fast corrections of movements with a computer mouse. Spat Vis 16:365-376
9. Brenner E, van den Berg AV, van Damme WJ (1996) Perceived motion in depth. Vis Res 36:699-706
10. Brenner E, Smeets JBJ, de Lussanet MHE (1998) Hitting moving targets: continuous control of the acceleration of the hand on the basis of the target's velocity. Exp Brain Res 122:467-474
11. Brenner E, Smeets JBJ, Landy MS (2001) How vertical disparities assist judgements of distance. Vis Res 41:3455-3465
12. Cutting JE, Vishton PM (1995) Perceiving layout and knowing distances: the integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In: Epstein W, Rogers S (eds) Perception of space and motion. Academic, New York, pp 69-117
13. Dijkerman HC, Milner AD (1998) The perception and prehension of objects oriented in the depth plane II Dissociated orientation functions in normal subjects. Exp Brain Res 118:408-414
14. Dijkerman HC, Milner AD, Carey DP (1999) Motion parallax enables depth processing for action in a visual form agnosic when binocular vision is unavailable. Neuropsychologia 37:1505-1510
15. Gardner PL, Mon-Williams M (2001) Vertical gaze angle: absolute height-in-scene information for the programming of prehension. Exp Brain Res 136:379-385
16. Glennerster A, Rogers BJ, Bradshaw MF (1996) Stereoscopic depth constancy depends on the subject's task. Vis Res 36:3441-3456
17. Goodale MA, Milner AD (1992) Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci 15:20-25
18. Hibbard PB, Bradshaw MF (2003) Reaching for virtual objects: binocular disparity and the control of prehension. Exp Brain Res 148:196-201
19. Jackson SR, Jones CA, Newport R, Pritchard C (1997) A kinematic analysis of goal-directed prehension movements executed under binocular, monocular, and memory-guided viewing conditions. Vis Cogn 4:113-142
20. Jeannerod M (1986) The formation of finger grip during prehension A cortically mediated visuomotor pattern. Behav Brain Res 19:99-116
21. Loftus A, Servos P, Goodale MA, Mendarozqueta N, Mon-Williams M (2004) When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance. Exp Brain Res 158:317-327
22. Marotta JJ, Goodale MA (1998) The role of learned pictorial cues in the programming and control of grasping. Exp Brain Res 121:465-470
23. Marotta JJ, Kruyer A, Goodale MA (1998) The role of head movements in the control of manual prehension. Exp Brain Res 120:134-138
24. Mazyn LI, Lenoir M, Montagne G, Savelsbergh GJ (2004) The contribution of stereo vision to one-handed catching. Exp Brain Res 157:383-390
25. Milner AD, Paulignan Y, Dijkerman HC, Michel F, Jeannerod M (1999) A paradoxical improvement of misreaching in optic ataxia: new evidence for two separate neural systems for visual localization. Proc R Soc Biol Sci 266:2225-2229
26. Mon-Williams M, McIntosh RD, Milner AD (2001a) Vertical gaze angle as a distance cue for programming reaching: insights from visual form agnosia II (of III). Exp Brain Res 139:137-142
27. Mon-Williams M, Tresilian JR, McIntosh RD, Milner AD (2001b) Monocular and binocular distance cues: insights from visual form agnosia I (of III). Exp Brain Res 139:127-136
28. Morgan MJ (1989) Vision of solid objects. Nature 339:101-103
29. Prablanc C, Martin O (1992) Automatic control during hand reaching at undetected two-dimensional target displacements. J Neurophysiol 67:455-469
30. Pélisson D, Prablanc C, Goodale MA, Jeannerod M (1986) Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb II Evidence of fast unconscious processes correcting the trajectory of the hand to the final position of a double-step stimulus. Exp Brain Res 62:303-311
31. Rossetti Y (1998) Implicit short-lived motor representations of space in brain damaged and healthy subjects. Conscious Cogn 7:520-558
32. Sarlegna F, Blouin J, Vercher JL, Bresciani JP, Bourdin C, Gauthier GM (2004) Online control of the direction of rapid reaching movements. Exp Brain Res 157:468-471
33. Saunders JA, Knill DC (2003) Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control fast reaching movements. Exp Brain Res 152:341-352
34. Sedgwick HA (1986) Space perception. In: Boff KR, Kaufman L, Thomas JP (eds) Handbook of perception and human performance, vol 1. Sensory processes and perception. Wiley, New York, pp 21.1-21.57
35. Servos P, Goodale MA (1994) Binocular vision and the on-line control of human prehension. Exp Brain Res 98:119-127
36. Servos P, Goodale MA, Jakobson LS (1992) The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis. Vis Res 32:1513-1521
37. Wann JP, Mon-Williams M, McIntosh RD, Smyth M, Milner AD (2001) The role of size and binocular information in guiding reaching: insights from virtual reality and visual form agnosia III (of III). Exp Brain Res 139:143-150
38. Watt SJ, Bradshaw MF (2000) Binocular cues are important in controlling the grasp but not the reach in natural prehension movements. Neuropsychologia 38:1473-1481
39. Watt SJ, Bradshaw MF (2002) Binocular information in the control of prehensile movements in multiple-object scenes. Spat Vis 15:141-155
40. Watt SJ, Bradshaw MF (2003) The visual control of reaching and grasping: binocular disparity and motion parallax. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 29:404-415