Communication Theory at the Center: Ventriloquism and the Communicative Constitution of Reality

Journal of Communication

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-20

  Cooren, François ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; COMMUNICATION BEHAVIOR; NUMERICAL MODEL;

EID: 84856557156     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: 14602466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01622.x     Document Type: Article

References (124)

1. Anderson, J. A. (1996). Communication theory: Epistemological foundations. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
2. Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In L. Althusser (Ed.), Lenin and philosophy and other essays (pp. 127-186). London, England: Monthly Review Press.
3. Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53(1125-1149). DOI: 10.1177/ 0018726700539002..
4. Ashby, R. W. (1956). An introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall.
5. Ashcraft, K. L., Kuhn, T., & Cooren, F. (2009). Constitutional amendments: "Materializing" organizational communication. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 1-64. DOI: 10. 1080/19416520903047186..
6. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. San Francisco, CA: Chandler.
7. Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. San Francisco, CA: Chandler.
8. Bencherki, N., & Cooren, F. (2011). Having to be: The possessive constitution of organization. Human Relations, 64(12), 1579-1607.
9. Benoit Barné, C., & Cooren, F. (2009). The accomplishment of authority through presentification: How authority is distributed among and negotiated by organizational members. Management Communication Quarterly, 23(1), 5-31.
10. Berger, C. R. (1991). Chautauqua: Why are there so few communication theories. Communication theories and other curios. Communication Monographs, 58(1), 101-113.
11. Brummans, B. H. J. M. (2006). The Montreal School and the question of agency. In F. Cooren, J. R. Taylor, & E. J. Van Every (Eds.), Communication as organizing: Empirical and theoretical explorations in the dynamic of text and conversation (pp. 197-211). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Brummans, B. H. J. M. (2007). Death by document: Tracing the agency of a text. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(5), 711-727. DOI: 10.1177/1077800407301185..
13. Brummans, B. H. J. M., Cooren, F., & Chaput, M. (2009). Discourse, communication, and organisational ontology. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini (Ed.), The handbook of business discourse (pp. 53-65). Edinburgh, England: Edinburgh University Press.
14. Burke, K. (1945). A grammar of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15. Campos, M. N. (2009). Critical constructivism. In S. Littlejohn & K. Foss (Eds.), Encyclopedia of communication theory (pp. 179-183). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Carey, J. W. (1989). Communication as culture: Essays on media and society. Winchester, MA: Unwin Hyman.
17. Castor, T., & Cooren, F. (2006). Organizations as hybrid forms of life: The implications of the selection of agency in problem formulation. Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 570-600.
18. Chaput, M., Brummans, B. H. J. M., & Cooren, F. (2011). The role of organizational identification in the communicative constitution of an organization: A study of consubstantialization in a young political party. Management Communication Quarterly, 25(2), 252-282. DOI: 10.1177/0893318910386719..
19. Charland, M. (1987). Constitutive rhetoric: the case of the Peuple Québécois. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 73, 133-150.
20. Cooren, F. (2004). Textual agency: How texts do things in organizational settings. Organization, 11(3), 373-393. DOI: 10.1177/1350508404041998..
21. Cooren, F. (2006). The organizational world as a plenum of agencies. In F. Cooren, J. R. Taylor & E. J. Van Every (Eds.), Communication as organizing: Empirical and theoretical explorations in the dynamic of text and conversation (pp. 81-100). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Cooren, F. (2008a). Between semiotics and pragmatics: Opening language studies to textual agency. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 1-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.018..
23. Cooren, F. (2008b). The selection of agency as a rhetorical device: Opening up the scene of dialogue through ventriloquism. In E. Weigand (Ed.), Dialogue and rhetoric (pp. 23-37). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
24. Cooren, F. (2009a). The haunting question of textual agency: Derrida and Garfinkel on iterability and eventfulness. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42(1), 42-67.
25. Cooren, F. (2009b). When voices really clash: A tribute to Jacob Mey. In B. Fraser & K. Turner (Eds.), Language in life, and a life in language: Jacob Mey-A Festschrift (pp. 57-62). Bingley, England: Emerald.
26. Cooren, F. (2010a). Action and agency in dialogue: Passion, incarnation, and ventriloquism. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
27. Cooren, F. (2010b). Le cahier des charges d'un (méta-) modèle constitutif de la communication: une proposition. Revue internationale Communication sociale et publique (3-4), 103-122.
28. Cooren, F., & Bencherki, N. (2010). How things do things with words: Ventriloquism, passion and technology. Encyclopaideia, XIV(28), 35-62.
29. Cooren, F., Brummans, B. H. J. M., & Charrieras, D. (2008). The coproduction of organizational presence: A study of Médecins Sans Frontières in action. Human Relations, 61(10), 1339-1370.
30. Cooren, F., & Fairhurst, G. T. (2009). Dislocation and stabilization: How to scale up from interactions to organization. In L. L. Putnam & A. M. Nicotera (Eds.), The communicative constitution of organization: Centering organizational communication (pp. 117-152). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Cooren, F., Fox, S., Robichaud, D., & Talih, N. (2005). Arguments for a plurified view of the social world: Spacing and timing as hybrid achievements. Time & Society, 14(2/3), 263-280. DOI: 10.1177/0961463X05055138..
32. Cooren, F., Kuhn, T., Cornelissen, J. P., & Clark, T. (2011). Communication, organizing and organization: An overview and introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 32(9), 1149-1170.
33. Cooren, F., & Matte, F. (2010). For a constitutive pragmatics: Obama, Médecins Sans Frontières and the measuring stick. Pragmatcs and Society, 1(1), 9-31.
34. Cooren, F., Matte, F., Vasquez, C., & Taylor, J. R. (2007). A humanitarian organization in action: Organizational discourse as an immutable mobile. Discourse and Communication, 1(2), 153-190. DOI: 10.1177/1750481307075996..
35. Cooren, F., Thompson, F., Canestraro, D., & Bodor, T. (2006). From agency to structure: Analysis of an episode in a facilitation process. Human Relations, 59(4), 533-565. DOI: 10.1177/0018726706065373..
36. Cornelissen, J. P., & Kafouros, M. (2008). The emergent organization: Primary and complex metaphors in theorizing about organizations. Organization Studies, 29(7), 957-978. DOI: 10.1177/0170840608090533..
37. Craig, R. (1989). Communication as a practical discipline. In B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B. O'Keefe & E. Wartella (Eds.), Rethinking communication: Paradigm issues (Vol. 1, pp. 97-122). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38. Craig, R. T. (1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9(2), 119-161. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00355.x..
39. Craig, R. T. (2007). Pragmatism in the field of communication theory. Communication Theory, 17(2), 125-145. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00292.x..
40. Deetz, S. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
41. Deetz, S. A. (1994). Future of the discipline: The challenges, the research, and the social contribution. Communication yearbook (Vol. 17, pp. 565-600). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42. Deetz, S., Heath, R., & MacDonald, J. (2007). On talking to not make decisions: A critical analysis of organizational talk. In F. Cooren (Ed.), Interacting and organizing: Analyses of a management meeting (pp. 225-244). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Derrida, J. (1986). Declarations of independence. New Political Science, 15, 7-15.
44. Derrida, J. (1988). Limited Inc. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
45. Derrida, J. (1992). Force of law. In D. Cornell, M. Rosenfeld & D. C. Carlson (Eds.), Deconstruction and the possibility of justice. New York and London: Routledge.
46. Derrida, J. (1994). Specters of Marx: The state of the debt, the work of mourning, and the New International. New York, NY: Routledge.
47. Derrida, J. (1995). Voice II. In E. Weber (Ed.), Points...Interviews 1974-1994 (pp. 156-170). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
48. Fairhurst, G. T., & Cooren, F. (2009). Leadership as the hybrid production of presence(s) Leadership, 5(4), 469-490. DOI: 10.1177/1742715009343033..
49. Fitch, K. L. (2003). Cultural Persuadables. Communication Theory, 13(1), 100-123.
50. Fitch, K. L., & Foley, M. (2007). The persuasive nature of emotion and the cultural nature of feelings in organizations. In F. Cooren (Ed.), Interacting and organizing: Analyses of a management meeting (pp. 113-126). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51. Foucault, M. (1977). The archaeology of knowledge. London, England: Tavistock.
52. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
53. Garfinkel, H. (1992). Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis. In G. Watson & R. M. Seller (Eds.), Text in context: Contributions to ethnomethodology (pp. 175-206). London, England: Sage.
54. Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology's program: Working out Durkheim's aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
55. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
56. Goldblatt, D. (2006). Art and ventriloquism: Critical voices in art, theory and culture. London, England: Routledge.
57. Greimas, A. J. (1983). Structural semantics. An attempt at a method (R. S. Daniele McDowell, and Alan Velie, Trans.). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
58. Greimas, A. J. (1987). On meaning: Selected writings in semiotic theory (P. J. P. F. H. Collins, Trans.). London, England: Frances Pinter.
59. Gross, L. (2011). ICA Call for Papers: Communication @ the center. Retrieved from
60. Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
61. Katambwe, J., & Taylor, J. R. (2006). Modes of organizational integration. In F. Cooren, J. R. Taylor & E. J. Van Every (Eds.), Communication as organizing: Empirical and theoretical explorations in the dynamic of text and conversation (pp. 55-77). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
62. Krippendorff, K. (1994). A recursive theory of communication. In D. Crowley & D. Mitchell (Eds.), Communication theory today (pp. 78-104). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
63. Kuhn, T. (2008). A communicative theory of the firm: Developing an alternative perspective on intra-organizational power and stakeholder relationships. Organization Studies, 29(8-9), 1227-1254. DOI: 10.1177/0170840608094778..
64. Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern (C. Porter, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
65. Latour, B. (1996). On interobjectivity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(4), 228-245. DOI: 10.1207/s15327884mca0304_2..
66. Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
67. Latour, B. (2002). Gabriel Tarde and the end of the social. In P. Joyce (Ed.), The social in question: New bearings in history and the social sciences (pp. 117-133). London, England: Routledge.
68. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. London, England: Oxford University Press.
69. Latour, B. (2010). Foreword-Who is making the dummy speak? In F. Cooren (Ed.), Action and agency in dialogue: Passion, incarnation and ventriloquism (pp. xiii-xvi). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
70. Latour, B. (2011). Reflections on Étienne Souriau's Les différents modes d'existence. In B. Levi, N. Srnicek & G. Harman (Eds.), The speculative turn: Continental materialism and realism (pp. 304-333). Melbourne, Australia: Re.press.
71. Latour, B., & Lépinay, V. A. (2010). The science of passionate interests: An introduction to Gabriel Tarde's economic anthropology. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.
72. Luhmann, N. (1992). What is communication? Communication Theory, 2(3), 251-259. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1992.tb00042.x..
73. Lynch, M. (1993). Scientific practice and ordinary action: Ethnomethodology and social studies of science. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
74. Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of understanding. Boston et Londres: Shambhala.
75. McGee, M. C. (1975). In search of the 'People': A rhetorical alternative. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 61, 235-249.
76. McGlone, M. S., & Giles, H. (in press). Language and interpersonal communication. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
77. McGlone, M. S., & Pfiester, R. A. (2009). Does time fly when you're having fun, or do you? Affect, agency, and embodiment in temporal communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 28, 3-31.
78. McPhee, R. D. (1985). Formal structure and organizational communication. In R. D. McPhee & P. K. Tompkins (Eds.), Organizational communication: Traditional themes and new directions (pp. 149-177). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
79. McPhee, R. D. (1989). Organizational communication: A structurational exemplar. In B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B. J. O'Keefe & E. Wartella (Eds.), Rethinking communication (Vol. 2, pp. 199-212). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
80. McPhee, R. D. (2004). Text, agency, and organization in the light of structuration theory. Organization, 11(3), 355-371. DOI: 10.1177/1350508404041997..
81. McPhee, R. D., Corman, S. R., & Iverson, J. (2007). "We ought to have...gumption...:" A CRA analysis of an excerpt from the videotape "After Mr. Sam". In F. Cooren (Ed.), Interacting and organizing: Analyses of a management meeting (pp. 133-161). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
82. McPhee, R. D., & Iverson, J. (2009). The communicative constitution of organizations: A framework for explanation. In L. L. Putnam & A. M. Nicotera (Eds.), Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication (pp. 21-47). New York, NY: Routledge.
83. McPhee, R. D., & Poole, M. S. (2001). Organizational structures and configurations. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 503-543). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
84. McPhee, R. D., & Zaug, P. (2000). The communicative constitution of organizations: A framework for explanation. The Electronic Journal of Communication/La revue électronique de communication, 10(1/2), 1-16.
85. Meunier, D., & Vasquez, C. (2008). On shadowing the hybrid character of actions: A communicational approach. Communication Methods and Measures, 2(3), 167-192. DOI: 10.1080/19312450802310482..
86. Mumby, D. K. (1987). The political function of narrative in organizations. Communication Monographs, 54, 113-127.
87. Mumby, D. K. (1993). Narrative and social control: Critical perspectives. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
88. Mumby, D. K. (1997). Modernism, postmodernism, and communication studies: A rereading of an ongoing debate. Communication Theory, 7(1), 1-28. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1997.tb00140.x..
89. Mumby, D. K. (2001). Power and politics. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The New Handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research and methods (pp. 585-623). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
90. Nicotera, A. M. (in press). Ontologizing organizational entities: Modeling communicative constitution. In D. Robichaud & F. Cooren (Eds.), Organization and organizing: Materiality, agency, and discourse. New York, NY: Routledge.
91. Peirce, C. S. (1955). Philosophical writings of Peirce. New York, NY: Dover.
92. Pomerantz, A., & Fehr, B. J. (1997). Conversation analysis: An approach to the study of social action as sense making Practices. In T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 64-91). London, England: Sage.
93. Putnam, L. L. (1983). The interpretive perspective: An alternative to functionalism. In L. L. Putnam & M. E. Pacanowsky (Eds.), Communication and organizations. An interpretive approach (pp. 31-54). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
94. Putnam, L. L. (2007). Contradictions in the meta-talk about feelings in "After Mr. Sam". In F. Cooren (Ed.), Interacting and organizing: Analyses of a management meeting (pp. 95-111). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
95. Putnam, L. L., & Cooren, F. (2004). Alternative perspective on the role of text and agency in constituting organizations. Organization, 11(3), 323-333. DOI: 10.1177/ 1350508404041995..
96. Putnam, L. L., & Nicotera, A. M. (Eds.). (2009). The Communicative Constitution of Organization: Centering Organizational Communication. New York: Routledge.
97. Robichaud, D. (2001). Interaction as a text: A semiotic look at an organizing process. American Journal of Semiotics, 17(1), 141-161.
98. Robichaud, D. (2002). Greimas' semiotics and the analysis of organizational action. In P. B. Anderson, R. J. Clarke, K. Liu & R. K. Stamper (Eds.), Coordination and communication using signs: Studies in organizational semiotics (pp. 129-149). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
99. Robichaud, D. (2003). Narrative institutions we organize by: The case of a municipal administration. In B. Czarniawska & P. Gagliardi (Eds.), Narratives we organize by: Narrative approaches in organizational studies (pp. 37-53). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
100. Robichaud, D. (2006). Steps toward a relational view of agency. In F. Cooren, J. R. Taylor & E. J. Van Every (Eds.), Communication as organizing: Empirical and theoretical explorations in the dynamic of text and conversation (pp. 101-114). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
101. Robichaud, D., Giroux, H., & Taylor, J. R. (2004). The meta-conversation: The recursive property of language as the key to organizing. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 617-634. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2004.14497614..
102. Russill, C. (2005). The road not taken: William James's radical empiricism and communication theory. The Communication Review, 8, 277-305. DOI: 10.1080/ 10714420500240474..
103. Russill, C. (2008). Through a public darkly: Reconstructing pragmatist perspectives in Communication Theory. Communication Theory, 18, 478-504. DOI: 10.1111/j. 1468-2885.2008.00331.x..
104. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
105. Sanders, R. E. (1987). Cognitive foundations of calculated speech: Controlling understandings in conversation and persuasion. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
106. Sanders, R. E. (2007). The effect of interactional competence on group problem-solving. In F. Cooren (ed.), Interacting and organizing: Analyses of a management meeting (pp. 163-183). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
107. Saussure, F. D. (1959). Course in general linguistics (W. Baskin, Trans. Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye ed.). New York, NY: Philosophical Library.
108. Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97(5), 1295-1345. DOI: 10.1086/229903..
109. Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse & Society, 8(2), 165-187. DOI: 10.1177/0957926597008002002..
110. Schoeneborn, D. (2011). Organization as communication: A Luhmannian perspective. Management Communication Quarterly, 25(4), 663-689.
111. Seidl, D., & Becker, K. H. (2006). Niklas Luhmann and organization studies. Copenhagen, Denmark: Copenhagen Business School Press.
112. Tarde, G. (2009). The laws of imitation. Charleston, SC: Bibliobazaar.
113. Tarde, G. (2010). Social laws: An outline of sociology. Charleston, SC: Nabu Press.
114. Taylor, J. R. (1988). Une organisation n'est qu'un tissu de communication. [An organization is a tissue of communication] Montréal: Cahiers de recherches en communication.
115. Taylor, J. R. (1993). Rethinking the theory of organizational communication: How to read an organization. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
116. Taylor, J. R., & Cooren, F. (1997). What makes communication 'organizational'? How the many voices of a collectivity become the one voice of an organization. Journal of Pragmatics, 27, 409-438. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00044-6..
117. Taylor, J. R., Cooren, F., Giroux, N., & Robichaud, D. (1996). The communicational basis of organization: Between the conversation and the text. Communication Theory, 6(1), 1-39. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00118.x..
118. Taylor, J. R., & Van Every, E. J. (1993). The Vulnerable Fortress. Bureaucratic Organization and Management in the Information Age. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
119. Taylor, J. R., & Van Every, E. J. (2000). The Emergent Organization. Communication as Site and Surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
120. Taylor, J. R., & Van Every, E. J. (2011). The situated organization. New York, NY: Routledge.
121. Tracy, K. (2007). Feeling-limned talk: Conduct ideals in the Steinberg succession meeting. In F. Cooren (Ed.), Interacting and organizing: Analyses of a management meeting (pp. 77-94). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
122. Van Vuuren, M., & Cooren, F. (2010). 'My attitude made me do it': Considering the agency of attitudes. Human Studies, 33, 85-101. DOI: 10.1007/s10746-010-9137-x..
123. Vasquez, C. (in press). Spacing organization (or how to be here and there at the same time). In D. Robichaud & F. Cooren (Eds.), Organization and organizing: Materiality, agency, and discourse. New York, NY: Routledge.
124. Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathology, and paradoxes. New York, NY: Norton.