Arguments for a Plurified View of the Social World: Spacing and timing as hybrid achievements

Time & Society

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 265-282

  Cooren, François ^a   Fox, Stephanie ^a   Robichaud, Daniel ^a   Talih, Nayla ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

hybridicity; interaction; ontology; organization; timing

Indexed keywords

EID: 27644540063     PISSN: 0961463X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0961463X05055138     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. B.J., Allen, Social Constructionism, Engaging Organizational Communication Theory and Research: Multiple Perspectives, in, S. May, and, D. K. Mumby, (eds.), Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, (2005), 35-53
2. P.L., Berger, The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, and, Luckmann T., New York: Irvington Publishers, (1966)
3. Boje, D. C., Oswick, C. and Ford, J. D. (2004) ‘Language and Discourse: The Doing of Discourse’, Academy of Management Review 29(4): 571-577.
4. M., Callon, Unscrewing the Big Leviathan: How Actors Macro-Structure Reality and How Sociologists Help Them to Do So, Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Towards an Integration of Micro- and Macro-Sociologies, and, Latour B., in, A. V. Cicourel, and, K. Knorr-Cetina, (eds), Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, (1981), 277-303
5. Cooren, F. (2000) The Organizing Property of Communication. Amsterdam/New York: John Benjamins.
6. Cooren, F. and Fairhurst, G. T. (2004) ‘Speech Timing and Spacing: The Phenomenon of Organizational Closure’, Organization 11(6): 793-824.
7. Derrida, J. (1988) Limited Inc. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
8. J., Derrida, Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International, New York: Routledge, (1994)
9. Durkheim, É. (1895/1964) The Rules of the Sociological Method. New York: Free Press.
10. Emirbayer, M. and Mische, A. (1998) ‘What is Agency?’, American Journal of Sociology 103(4): 962-1023.
11. Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
12. N., Fairclough, Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language, London: Longman, (1995)
13. H., Garfinkel, Ethnomethodology's Program: Working out Durkheim's Aphorism, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, (2002)
14. Grant, D., Keenoy, T. and Oswick, C. (eds) (1998) Discourse and Organization. London: SAGE Publications.
15. Grant, D., Keenoy, T. and Oswick, C. (2001) ‘Organisational Discourse’, International Studies of Management and Organisation 31(3): 5-24.
16. A.J., Greimas, Semiotics and Language: An Analytical Dictionary, and, Courtés J., Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, (1982)
17. Hacking, I. (2000) The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Hardy, C., Grant, D., Keenoy, T., Oswick, C. and Phillips, N. (2004) ‘Organizational Discourse’, Special issue of Organization Studies 25(1): 1-148.
19. Keenoy, T., Marshak, R., Oswick, C. and Grant, D. (2000) ‘The Discourses of Organizing’, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 36(2): 511-512.
20. Keenoy, T., Oswick, C. and Grant, D. (1997) ‘Organizational Discourses: Texts and Context’, Organization 4(2): 147-157.
21. Keenoy, T., Oswick, C. and Grant, D. (2000) ‘Discourse, Epistemology and Organization: A Discursive Footnote’, Organization 7(3): 542-545.
22. Jones, G., McLean, C. and Quattrone, P. (2004) ‘Spacing and Timing’, Organization 11(6): 723-741.
23. B., Latour, Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, (1987)
24. Latour, B. (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25. Latour, B. (1994) ‘On Technical Mediation - Philosophy, Sociology, Genealogy’, Common Knowledge 3(2): 29-64.
26. Latour, B. (1996a) Aramis or the Love of Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27. Latour, B. (1996b) ‘On Interobjectivity’, Mind, Culture, and Activity 3(4): 228-245.
28. Latour, B. (1997) ‘Trains of Thought: Piaget, Formalism and the Fifth Dimension’, Common Knowledge 6(3): 170-191.
29. B., Latour, Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, (1999)
30. B., Latour, Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, (2004)
31. Mackenzie, A. (2001) ‘The Technicity of Time: From 1.00 Oscillations/sec to9,192,631,770 Hz’, Time & Society 10(2/3): 235-257.
32. Mead, G. H. (1932/1980) The Philosophy of the Present. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33. D.K., Mumby, Organizational Discourse, Discourse as Social Interaction, and, Clair R. P., in, T. A. Van Dijk, (ed.), London: SAGE Publications, (1997), 181-205
34. C., Oswick, Closing Words (and Opening Discussions?): An Afterword on After Mr Sam, Interacting and Organizing: Analyses of a Management Meeting, (Forthcoming), in, F. Cooren, (ed.), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
35. Oswick, C., Keenoy, T. and Grant, D. (1997) ‘Managerial Discourses: Words Speak Louder Than Actions?’, Journal of Applied Management Studies 6(1): 5-12.
36. Oswick, C., Keenoy, T. and Grant, D. (2000) ‘Discourse, Organizations and Organizing: Concepts, Objects and Subjects’, Human Relations 52(9): 1115-1124.
37. Oswick, C., Keenoy, T., Grant, D. and Marshak, B. (2000) ‘Discourse, Organization, and Epistemology’, Organization 7(3): 511-512.
38. A., Pickering, The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency & Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, (1995)
39. L.L., Putnam, Alternative Perspective on The Role of Text and Agency in Constituting Organizations, Organization, and, Cooren F.), (2004), 11, 3, 323-333
40. A.W., Rawls, Editor's Introduction, Ethnomethodology's Program: Working Out Durkheim's Aphorism, in, A. W. Rawls, (ed.), Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, (2002), 1-64
41. M., Reed, Organizational Analysis as Discourse Analysis: A Critique, Discourse and Organization, in, D. Grant, T. Keenoy, and, C. Oswick, (eds), London: SAGE Publications, (1999), 193-213
42. Reed, M. (2000) ‘The Limits of Discourse Analysis in Organisation Analysis’, Organization 7(3): 524-530.
43. Ryle, G. (1949) The Concept of Mind. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
44. Simon, H. A. (1945/1997) Administrative Behavior: A Study ofDecision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations. New York: The Free Press.
45. Weick, K. E. (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing. New York: Random House.
46. Weick, K. E. (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
47. Zucchermaglio, C. and Talamo, A. (2000) ‘The Social Construction of Work Times: Negotiated Time andExpected Time’, Time & Society 9(2/3): 205-222.