Pragmatism in the field of communication theory;Pragmatismus in der Kommunikationstheorie

Communication Theory

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 125-145

  Craig, Robert T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; META-ANALYSIS; MODELING; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 34247505973     PISSN: 10503293     EISSN: 14682885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00292.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine Books.
2. Carey, J. W. (1989). Communication as culture: Essays on media and society. Winchester, MA: Unwin Hyman.
3. Craig, R. T. (1989). Communication as a practical discipline. In B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B. J. O'Keefe, & E. Wartella (Eds.), Rethinking communication; volume 1: Paradigm issues (pp. 97-122). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4. Craig, R. T. (1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9, 119-161.
5. Craig, R. T. (2001a). Minding my metamodel, mending Myers. Communication Theory, 11, 133-142.
6. Craig, R. T. (2001b). Dewey and Gadamer on practical reflection: Toward a methodology for the practical disciplines. In D. K. Perry (Ed.), American pragmatism and communication research (pp. 131-148). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Craig, R. T. (2005). How we talk about how we talk: Communication theory in the public interest [2004 ICA Presidential Address]. Journal of Communication, 55, 659-667.
8. Craig, R. T. (2006). Communication as a practice. In G. J. Shepherd, J. St. John, & T. Striphas (Eds.), Communication as ⋯: Perspectives on theory (pp. 38-47). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Cronen, V. E. (1995). Coordinated management of meaning: The consequentiality of communication and the recapturing of experience. In S. J. Sigman (Ed.), The consequentiality of communication (pp. 17-65). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Cronen, V. E., & Chetro-Szivos, J. (2001). Pragmatism as a way of inquiring with special reference to a theory of communication and the general form of pragmatic social theory. In D. K. Perry (Ed.), American pragmatism and communication research (pp. 27-65). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Deetz, S. A. (1994). Future of the discipline: The challenges, the research, and the social contribution. In S. A. Deetz (Ed.), Communication yearbook 17 (pp. 565-600). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. Chicago: Swallow Press.
13. Dewey, J. (1929). Experience and nature (2nd ed.). LaSalle, IL: Open Court. (Original work published 1925).
14. Griffin, E. (2006). A first look at communication theory (6th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
15. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action; volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
16. Hauser, G. A., & Cushman, D. P. (1973). McKeon's philosophy of communication: The architectonic and interdisciplinary arts. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 6, 211-234.
17. James, W. (1996). Essays in radical empiricism. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. (Original work published 1912).
18. Langsdorf, L., & Smith, A. R. (Eds.). (1995). Recovering pragmatism's voice: The classical tradition, Rorty, and the philosophy of communication. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
19. Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2005). Theories of human communication (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
20. McKeon, R. (1957). Communication, truth, and society. Ethics, 67, 89-99.
21. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist (C. W. Morris, Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
23. Miller, K. I. (2005). Communication theories: Perspectives, processes, and contexts (2nd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
24. Myers, D. (2001). A pox on all compromises: Reply to Craig (1999). Communication Theory, 11, 231-240.
25. Pearce, W. B. (1989). Communication and the human condition. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
26. Pearce, W. B., & Cronen, V. E. (1980). Communication, action, and meaning: The creation of social realities. New York: Praeger.
27. Pearce, W. B., & Littlejohn, S. W. (1997). Moral conflict: When social worlds collide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Penman, R. (1992). Good theory and good practice: An argument in progress. Communication Theory, 2, 234-250.
29. Penman, R. (2000). Reconstructing communicating: Looking to a future. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30. Perry, D. K. (Ed.). (2001). American pragmatism and communication research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Peters, J. D. (1999). Speaking into the air: A history of the idea of communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. Peters, J. D. (2005). Courting the abyss: Free speech and the liberal tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33. Russill, C. (2004). Toward a pragmatist theory of communication. Doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. (UMI No. 3140078. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest Information and Learning Company.)
34. Russill, C. (2005). The road not taken: William James's radical empiricism and communication theory. Communication Review, 8, 277-305.
35. Russill, C. (2006). For a pragmatist perspective on publics: Advancing Carey's cultural studies through John Dewey ⋯ and Michel Foucault?! In J. Packer, & C. Robertson (Eds.), Thinking with James Carey: Essays on communications, transportation, history, (pp. 57-78). New York: Peter Lang.
36. Shepherd, G. J. (1998). The trouble with goals. Communication Studies, 49, 294-299.
37. Shepherd, G. J. (2001). Community as the interpersonal accomplishment of communication. In G. J. Shepherd, & E. W. Rothenbuhler (Eds.), Communication and community (pp. 25-36). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Simonson, P. (2001). Varieties of pragmatism and communication: Visions and revisions from Peirce to Peters. In D. K. Perry (Ed.), American pragmatism and communication research (pp. 1-26). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. St. John, J., & Shepherd, G. J. (2004). Transcending tolerance: Pragmatism, social capital, and community in communication. In P. J. Kalbfleisch (Ed.), Communication yearbook, 28 (pp. 167-187). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.