The coproduction of organizational presence: A study of Mdecins Sans Frontires in action

Human Relations

Volumn 61, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1339-1370

  Cooren, Franois ^a,b   Brummans, Boris H J M ^a,c   Charrieras, Damien ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b Départment de Communication ^*

^c Universit de Montral ^*

^d UNIVERSITÉ SORBONNE NOUVELLE PARIS 3   (France)

Author keywords

Actor network theory; Incarnation; Organizational communication; Organizational ethnography; Organizing; Presence

Indexed keywords

EID: 52349122752     PISSN: 00187267     EISSN: 1741282X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0018726708095707     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Alvesson, M. & Krreman, D. Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 2000, 53, 1125-49.
2. Bass, B.M. & Avolio, B.J. Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1994.
3. Boden, D. The business of talk: Organizations in action. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994.
4. Brummans, B.H.J.M. The Montral School and the question of agency. In F. Cooren, J.R. Taylor & E.J. Van Every (Eds), Communication as organizing: Practical approaches to research into the dynamic of text and conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence-Erlbaum, 2006, pp. 197-211.
5. Brummans, B.H.J.M. Death by document: Tracing the agency of a text. Qualitative Inquiry, 2007, 13, 711-27.
6. Brummans, B.H.J.M., Cooren, F. & Chaput, M. Discourse, communication, and organisational ontology. In F. Bargiela (Ed.), The handbook of business discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, in press.
7. Bruni, A. Shadowing software and clinical records: On the ethnography of nonhumans and heterogeneous contexts. Organization, 2005, 12, 357-78.
8. Bruni, A., Gherardi, S. & Poggio, B. Gender and entrepreneurship: An ethnographic approach. London: Routledge, 2004.
9. Burrell, G. Modernism, post modernism and organizational analysis 2: The contribution of Michel Foucault. Organization Studies, 1988, 9 (2). 221-35.
10. Burrell, G. & Morgan, G. Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London: Heinemann, 1979.
11. Butler, J. Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. New York: Routledge, 1993.
12. Butler, J. Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York: Routledge, 1997.
13. Callon, M. Some elements of a sociology of translation: The domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St-Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action, and belief. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986, pp. 196-233.
14. Callon, M. & Latour, B. Unscrewing the big Leviathan: How actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them do so. In A.V. Cicourel & K. Knorr-Cetina (Eds), Advances in social theory and methodology: Towards an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981, pp. 277-303.
15. Castor, T. & Cooren, F. Organizations as hybrid forms of life: The implications of the selection of agency in problem formulation. Management Communication Quarterly, 2006, 16, 570-600.
16. Cheney, G. & Christensen, L.T. Organizational identity: Linkages between internal and external organizational communication. In F.M. Jablin & L.L. Putnam (Eds), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods. London: Sage, 2001, pp. 231-69.
17. Chia, R. The concept of decision: A deconstructive analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 1994, 31 (6). 781-806.
18. Chia, R. Organizational analysis as decosntructive practice. Berlin / New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1996.
19. Christensen, L.T. & Askegaard, S. Corporate identity and corporate image revisited: A semiotic perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 2001, 35, 292-315.
20. Conrad, C. & Haynes, J. Development of key constructs. In F.M. Jablin & L.L. Putnam (Eds), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2001, pp. 47-77.
21. Cooper, R. Modernism, post-modernism and organizational analysis 3: The contribution of Jacques Derrida. Organization Studies, 1989, 10 (4). 479-502.
22. Cooper, R. & Burrell, G. Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis: An introduction. Organization Studies, 1988, 9 (1). 91-112.
23. Cooren, F. The organizing property of communication. Philadelphia, PA / Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2000.
24. Cooren, F. Textual agency: How texts do things in organizational settings. Organization, 2004, 11, 373-93.
25. Cooren, F. The organizational world as a plenum of agencies. In F. Cooren, J.R. Taylor & E.J. van Every (Eds), Communication as organizing: Practical approaches to research into the dynamic of text and conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence-Erlbaum, 2006, pp. 81-100.
26. Cooren, F. Between semiotics and pragmatics: Opening language studies to textual agency. Journal of Pragmatics, 2008, 40, 1-16.
27. Cooren, F. & Fairhurst, G.T. Dislocation and stabilization: How to scale up from interactions to organization. In L.L. Putnam & A.M. Nicotera (Eds), The communicative constitution of organization: Centering organizational communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, in press.
28. Cooren, F. & Taylor, J.R. Organization as an effect of mediation: Redefining the link between organization and communication. Communication Theory, 1997, 7, 219-60.
29. Cooren, F., Fox, S., Robichaud, D. & Talih, N. Arguments for a plurified view of the social world: Spacing and timing as hybrid achievements. Time & Society, 2005, 14, 263-80.
30. Cooren, F., Matte, F., Taylor, J.R. & Vasquez, C. A humanitarian organization in action: Organizational discourse as an immutable mobile. Discourse and Communication, 2007, 1, 153-90.
31. Couldry, N. Passing ethnographies: Rethinking the sites of agency and reflexivity in a mediated world. In P.D. Murphy & M.M. Kraidy (Eds), Global media studies: Ethnographic perspectives. New York: Routledge, 2003, pp. 40-56.
32. Czarniawska-Joerges, B. Exploring complex organizations. A cultural perspective. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, 1992.
33. Deetz, S. Alternative perspectives in organizational communication studies. In F.M. Jablin & L.L. Putnam (Eds), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2001, pp. 3-46.
34. Derrida, J. Declarations of independence. New Political Science, 1986, 15, 7-15.
35. Derrida, J. Limited Inc Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1988.
36. Diamond, M., Allcorn, S. & Stein, H. The surface of organizational boundaries: A view from psychoanalytic object relations theory. Human Relations, 2004, 57, 31-53.
37. Fairhurst, G.T. & Putnam, L.L. Organizations as discursive constructions. Communication Theory, 2004, 14, 5-26.
38. Fleming, P. & Spicer, A. 'You can check out anytime, but you can never leave': Spatial boundaries in a high commitment organization. Human Relations, 2004, 57, 75-94.
39. Ford, J. & Harding, N. We went looking for an organization but could find only the metaphysics of its presence. Sociology, 2004, 38, 815-30.
40. Foucault, M. Discipline and punish. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977.
41. Garfinkel, H. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1967.
42. Garfinkel, H. Ethnomethodology's program: Working out Durkheim's aphorism. Lantham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002.
43. Goffman, E. The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1959.
44. Greimas, A.J. On meaning: Selected writings in semiotic theory. London: Frances Pinter, 1987.
45. Grunig, J.E. (Ed.). Excellence in public relations and communication management. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1992.
46. Gumbrecht, H.U. Production of presence: What meaning cannot convey. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2004.
47. Gumbrecht, H.U. & Pfeiffer, K.L. (Eds). The materialities of communication. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1994.
48. Heracleous, L. Boundaries in the study of organization. Human Relations, 2004, 57, 95-103.
49. Hernes, T. Studying composite boundaries: A framework of analysis. Human Relations, 2004, 57, 9-29.
50. Hobbes, T. Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. (Original work published 1651.)
51. Jefferson, G. On stepwise transition from talk about a trouble to inappropriately next-positioned matters. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds), Structures of social action: Studies of conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984, pp. 191-222.
52. Keenoy, T., Marshak, R., Oswick, C. & Grant, D. The discourses of organizing. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 2000, 36, 511-12.
53. Keenoy, T., Oswick, C. & Grant, D. Organizational discourses: Texts and context. Organization, 1997, 4, 147-57.
54. Knights, D. Organization theory in the age of deconstruction: Dualism, gender and postmodernism revisited. Organization Studies, 1997, 18, 1-19.
55. Knights, D. & Morgan, G. Corporate strategy, organizations, and subjectivity: A critique. Organization Studies, 1991, 12, 251-73.
56. Kostera, M. Organisational ethnography: Methods and inspirations. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur, 2007.
57. Kurke, L.B. & Aldrich, H.E. Mintzberg was right: A replication and extension of the nature of managerial work. Management Science, 1983, 29, 975-85.
58. Latour, B. The powers of association. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action, and belief. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986, pp. 264-80.
59. Latour, B. We have never been modern, trans. C. Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.
60. Latour, B. On interobjectivity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1996, 3, 228-45.
61. Latour, B. Gabriel Tarde and the end of the social. In P. Joyce (Ed.), The social in question. New bearings in history and the social sciences. London: Routledge, 2002, pp. 117-32.
62. Latour, B. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
63. Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986.
64. Law, J. (Ed.). A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination. London: Routledge, 1991.
65. Law, J. & Hassard, J. (Eds). Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
66. Law, J. & Singleton, V. Object lessons. Organization, 2005, 12, 331-55.
67. Livingston, E. Making sense of ethnomethodology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1987.
68. Manning, P.K. Metaphors of the field: Varieties of organizational discourse. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1979, 24, 660-71.
69. Marcus, G.E. The uses of complicity in the changing mise-en-scne of anthropological fieldwork. Representations, 1997, 59, 85-108.
70. McDonald, S. Studying actions in context: A qualitative shadowing method for organizational research. Qualitative Research, 2005, 5, 455-73.
71. Mintzberg, H. The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row, 1973.
72. Moore, F. Symbols of organization: Informal ways of negotiating the global and the local in MNCs. Global Networks, 2004, 4, 181-98.
73. Moriarty, S.E. PR and IMC: The benefits of integration. Public Relations Quarterly, 1994, 39, 38-44.
74. Mumby, D.K. & Clair, R.P. Organizational discourse. In T.A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction. London: SAGE, 1997, pp. 181-205.
75. Mumby, D.K. & Stohl, C. Power and discourse in organization studies: Absence and the dialectic of control. Discourse & Society, 1991, 2, 313-32.
76. Mumford, A. What managers really do. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 1989, 7, 38-40.
77. Phillips, N. & Hardy, C. Managing multiple identities: Discourse legitimacy and resources in the UK refugee system. Organization, 1997, 4, 159-85.
78. Pollach, I. Corporate self-presentation on the WWW: Strategies for enhancing usability, credibility, and utility. Corporate Communications, 2005, 10, 285-301.
79. Putnam, L.L. & Fairhurst, G.T. Discourse analysis in organizations: Issues and concerns. In F.M. Jablin & L.L. Putnam (Eds), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2001, pp. 78-136.
80. Putnam, L.L. & Pacanowsky, M.E. (Eds). Communication and organizations: An interpretive perspective. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE, 1983, pp. 31-54.
81. Roberts, J. The manufacture of corporate social responsibility: Constructing corporate sensibility. Organization, 2003, 10, 249-65.
82. Robichaud, D. Steps toward a relational view of agency. In F. Cooren, J.R. Taylor & E.J. Van Every (Eds), Communication as organizing: Empirical and theoretical explorations in the dynamic of text and conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2006, pp. 101-14.
83. Robichaud, D., Giroux, H. & Taylor, J.R. The metaconversation: The recursive property of language as the key to organizing. Academy of Management Review, 2004, 29 (4). 617-34.
84. Rowland, R.C. & Jerome, A.M. On organizational apologia: A reconceptualization. Communication Theory, 2004, 14, 191-211.
85. Schutz, A. Collected papers: The problem of social reality, Vol. 1. The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973.
86. Schwartzman, H.B. Ethnography in organizations. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, 1993.
87. Shumate, M. & Fulk, J. Boundaries and role conflict when work and family are collocated: A communication network and symbolic interaction approach. Human Relations, 2004, 57, 55-74.
88. Spradley, J.P. The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1979.
89. Tarde, G. Les lois sociales [Social laws]. Paris: Les empêcheurs de penser en rond, 1895 / 1999.
90. Taylor, J.R. Shifting from a heteronomous to an autonomous worldview of organizational communication: Communication theory on the cusp. Communication Theory, 1995, 5, 1-35.
91. Taylor, J.R. & Van Every, E.J. The emergent organization: Communication as its site and surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2000.
92. Tompkins, P.K. & Wanca-Thibault, M. Organizational communication: Prelude and prospects. In F.M. Jablin & L.L. Putnam (Eds), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2001, pp. xvii - xxxi.
93. Trujillo, N. 'Performing' Mintzberg's roles: The nature of managerial communication. In L.L. Putnam & M.E. Pacanowsky (Eds), Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE, 1983, pp. 73-98.
94. Waldman, D.A. & Yammarino, F.J. CEO charismatic leadership: Levels-of-management and levels-of-analysis effects. Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24, 266-85.
95. Weick, K.E. The social psychology of organizing, 2 nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979.
96. Weick, K.E. Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1995.
97. Wittgenstein, L. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell, 1953.
98. Wolcott, H.R. Man in the principal's office: An ethnography. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973.