The road not taken: William James’s radical empiricism and communication theory

Communication Review

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 277-305

  Russill, Chris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247469681     PISSN: 10714421     EISSN: 15477487     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10714420500240474     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. Apel, K. O., 1980. Towards a transformation of philosophy, London: Routledge. (G. Adey & D. Frisby. Trans.)
2. Apel, K. O., 1995. Charles Peirce: From pragmatism to pragmaticism, Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
3. Bernstein, R. J., 1983. Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics and praxis, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
4. Blumer, H., 1969. Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5. Bohm, D., and Peat, F. D., 2000. Science, order, and creativity, New York: Routledge.
6. Cappella, J. N., 1989. “ Remaking communication theory ”. In Rethinking communication: Vol. 1. Paradigm issues, Edited by: Dervin, B., Grossberg, L., O’Keefe, B. J., and Wartella, E., 139–143. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7. Carey, J., 1982. The mass media and critical theory: An American view. Communication Yearbook, 6: 18–33. [CSA]
8. Carey, J., 1983. The origins of radical discourse on cultural studies in the United States. Journal of Communication, 33: 311–313. [CSA]
9. Carey, J., 1989a. “ A cultural approach to communication ”. In Communication as culture: Essays in media and society, 13–36. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
10. Carey, J., 1989b. Communications and the Progressives. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 6: 264–282. [CSA]
11. Carey, J., 1995. Abolishing the old spirit world. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 12: 82–89. [CSA]
12. Carey, J., 1997. “ The Chicago School and the history of mass communication research ”. In James Carey: A critical reader, Edited by: Munson, E. S., and Warren, C. A., 14–33. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
13. Chang, B., 1996. Deconstructing communication, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
14. Craig, R. T., 1989. “ Communication as a practical discipline ”. In Rethinking communication: Vol. 1. Paradigm issues, Edited by: Dervin, B., Grossberg, L., O’Keefe, B. J., and Wartella, E., 97–122. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15. Craig, R. T., 1993. Why are there so many communication theories?. Journal of Communication, 43 (3): 26–33. [CSA]
16. Craig, R. T., 1999. Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9: 119–161. [CSA]
17. Craig, R. T., 2001. “ Dewey and Gadamer on practical reflection: Toward a methodology for the practical disciplines ”. In American pragmatism and communication research, Edited by: Perry, D. K., 131–148. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Cronen, V., 2001. Practical theory, practical art, and the pragmatic-systematic account of inquiry. Communication Theory, 11: 14–35. [CSA][CROSSREF]
19. Cronen, V., and Chetro-Szivos, J., 2001. “ Pragmatism as a way of inquiring with special reference to a theory of communication and the general form of pragmatic social theory ”. In American pragmatism and communication research, Edited by: Perry, D. K., 27–66. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Demers, D., 2000. Communication theory in the 21st century: Differentiation and convergence. Mass Communication and Society, 3: 1–2. [CSA][CROSSREF]
21. Dennett, D. C., 1995. Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life, New York: Simon & Schuster.
22. Dervin, B., 1993. Book review. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 10: 439–440. [CSA]
23. Dewey, J., 1969. “ Philosophy and democracy ”. In John Dewey: The middle works, Edited by: Boydston, J. A., Vol. 11, 41–53. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published 1919)
24. Dewey, J., 1981. “ Experience and nature ”. In John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953, Edited by: Boydston, J. A., Vol. 1, 1–326. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published 1925)
25. Dewey, J., 1984. “ The quest for certainty ”. In John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953, Edited by: Boydston, J. A., Vol. 4, 1–250. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published 1929)
26. Dewey, J., 1986. “ Logic: The theory of inquiry ”. In John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953, Edited by: Boydston, J. A., Vol. 12, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published 1938)
27. Dewey, J., 1988. “ The vanishing subject in the psychology of James ”. In John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953, Edited by: Boydston, J. A., Vol. 14, 155–167. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published 1940)
28. Dewey, J., 1988. “ The development of American pragmatism ”. In John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953, Edited by: Boydston, J. A., 3–21. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published 1925)
29. Dewey, J., 1997. The public and its problems, Athens: Swallow Press. (Original work published 1927)
30. Feyerabend, P., 1975. Against method, New York: Verso.
31. Foucault, M., 1970. The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences, New York: Vintage Books.
32. Gadamer, H.-G., 1992. Truth and method, New York: Crossroad. (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall. Trans.). (Original work published 1960)
33. Gandy, O., 1995. Colloquy. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 12: 60–61. [CSA]
34. Gleick, J., 1987. Chaos: Making a new science, New York: Penguin Books.
35. Greene, R., 2003. John Dewey’s eloquent citizen: Communication, judgment, and postmodern capitalism. Argumentation and Advocacy, 39: 189–200. [CSA]
36. Habermas, J., 1971. Knowledge and human interests, Boston: Beacon Press. (J. J. Shapiro. Trans.) (Original work published 1968)
37. Habermas, J., 1973. A postscript to Knowledge and human interests. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 3: 157–189. [CSA]
38. Habermas, J., 1984. The theory of communicative action, Vol. 1, Boston: Beacon Press. (T. McCarthy, Trans.)
39. Habermas, J., 1985. “ Questions and counterquestions ”. In Habermas and modernity, Edited by: Bernstein, R. J., 192–216. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Habermas, J., 1987. The theory of communicative action, Vol. 2, Boston: Beacon Press. (T. McCarthy. Trans.). (Original work published 1981)
41. Habermas, J., 2001. On the pragmatics of social interaction, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (B. Fultner, Trans.). (Original work published 1971)
42. Hacking, I., 1990. The taming of chance, New York: Cambridge University Press.
43. Hall, S., 1980. Cultural studies: Two paradigms. Media, Culture and Society, 2: 57–72. [CSA]
44. Harris, R., 1987. Re-reading Saussure, LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
45. Hayles, N. K., 1990. Chaos bound: Orderly disorderly in contemporary literature and science, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
46. Jacobson, T. L., 1991. Theories as communications. Communication Theory, 1: 145–150. [CSA]
47. Jacobson, T. L., 2001. “ Habermas, Dewey, and pragmatism ”. In American pragmatism and communication research, Edited by: Perry, D. K., 225–240. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48. James, W., 1975. Pragmatism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1907)
49. James, W., 1975. The meaning of truth, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1909)
50. James, W., 1981. “ The principles of psychology ”. In The works of William James, Edited by: Burkhardt, F. H., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1890)
51. James, W., 1988a. “ The many and the one ”. In The works of William James, Edited by: Burkhardt, F. H., 3–61. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52. James, W., 1988b. “ The Miller-Bode objections ”. In The works of William James, Edited by: Burkhardt, F. H., 65–129. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53. James, W., 1996. Essays in radical empiricism, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. (Original work published 1912)
54. James, W., 1996. A pluralistic universe, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. (Original work published 1909)
55. James, W., 1997. The varieties of religious experience, New York: Simon & Schuster. (Original work published 1903)
56. Jensen, J., 1995. Questioning the social power of art: Toward a pragmatist aesthetics. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 12: 365–379. [CSA]
57. Jensen, J., 2001. “ Art, the public, and Deweyan cultural criticism ”. In American pragmatism and communication research, Edited by: Perry, D. K., 111–130. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
58. Jensen, K. B., 1995. The social semiotics of mass communication, London: Sage.
59. Joas, H., 1985. G. H. Mead: A contemporary re-examination of his thought, Cambridge: Polity Press. (R. Meyer, Trans.). (Original work published 1980)
60. Kaufman-Osborn, T. V., 1991. Politics/sense/experience: A pragmatic inquiry into the promise of democracy, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
61. Krippendorff, K., 1989. “ On the ethics of constructing communication ”. In Rethinking communication: Vol. 1. Paradigm issues, Edited by: Dervin, B., Grossberg, L., O’Keefe, B. J., and Wartella, E., 66–96. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
62. Krippendorff, K., 1993. Conversation or intellectual imperialism in comparing communication (theories). Communication Theory, 3: 252–266. [CSA]
63. Kuhn, T., 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64. Leonhirth, W. J., 2001. “ William James and the uncertain universe ”. In American pragmatism and communication research, Edited by: Perry, D. K., 89–110. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
65. Locke, J., 1975. An essay concerning human understanding, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Original work published 1690)
66. McDermott, J. J., 1978. “ Foreword ”. In Chaos and context: A study in William James, Edited by: Seigfried, C. H., ix–xiii. Athens: Ohio University Press.
67. Mead, G. H., 1926. The nature of aesthetic experience. International Journal of Ethics, 36: 382–392. [CSA][CROSSREF]
68. Mosco, V., 1996. The political economy of communication, London: Sage.
69. Pauly, J., 1997. “ Introduction /On the origins of media studies (and media scholars) ”. In James Carey: A critical reader, Edited by: Munson, E. S., and Warren, C. A., 3–13. Minneapoli: University of Minnesota Press.
70. Pavitt, C., 1994. Review. Communication Theory, 4: 324–329. [CSA]
71. Pavitt, C., 1999. The third way: Scientific realism and communication theory. Communication Theory, 9: 162–188. [CSA]
72. Pearce, W. B., 1989. “ On the potential for eloquence in communication among theories ”. In Rethinking communication: Vol. 1. Paradigm issues, Edited by: Dervin, B., Grossberg, L., O’Keefe, B. J., and Wartella, E., 200–203. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
73. Pearce, W. B., 1991. On comparing theories: Treating theories as commensurate or incommensurate. Communication Theory, 1: 159–164. [CSA]
74. Pearce, W. B., and Cronen, V. E., 1980. Communication, action, and meaning: The creation of social realities, New York: Praeger.
75. Penman, R., 1992. Good theory and good practice: An argument in progress. Communication Theory, 2: 234–250. [CSA]
76. Perry, D. K., 2001a. “ Preface ”. In American pragmatism and communication research, Edited by: Perry, D. K., vii–x. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
77. Perry, D. K., 2001b. “ Shattering the mirror: Linking media-effects research and American pragmatism ”. In American pragmatism and communication research, Edited by: Perry, D. K., 185–208. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
78. Peters, J. D., 1986. Institutional sources of intellectual poverty in communication research. Communication Research, 13: 527–559. [CSA]
79. Peters, J. D., 1988. The need for theoretical foundations: Reply to Gonzalez. Communication Research, 15: 309–317. [CSA]
80. Peters, J. D., 1989. John Locke, the individual, and the origin of communication. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 75: 387–399. [CSA]
81. Peters, J. D., 1996. Tangled legacies. Journal of Communication, 46 (3): 85–87. [CSA]
82. Peters, J. D., 1999. Speaking into the Air: A history of the idea of communication, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
83. Putnam, H., 1995. Pragmatism, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
84. Robinson, G. J., 1989. “ Communication paradigm dialogues: Their place in the history of science debate ”. In Rethinking communication: Vol. 1. Paradigm issues, Edited by: Dervin, B., Grossberg, L., O’Keefe, B. J., and Wartella, E., 204–208. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
85. Rorty, R., 1998. “ Dewey between Hegel and Darwin ”. In Truth and progress: Philosophical papers: Vol. 3 (290–306), New York: Cambridge University Press.
86. Rosengren, K. E., 1989. “ Paradigms lost and regained ”. In Rethinking communication: Vol. 1. Paradigm issues, Edited by: Dervin, B., Grossberg, L., O’Keefe, B. J., and Wartella, E., 21–39. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
87. Ruf, F. J., 1991. The creation of chaos: William James and the stylistic making of a disorderly world, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
88. Russill, C., 2003. Book review: On the pragmatics of social interaction, by Jurgen Habermas. The Canadian Journal of Communication, 28 (1): 128–130. [CSA]
89. Schudson, M., 1997. Why conversation is not the soul of democracy. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 14: 297–309. [CSA]
90. Seigfried, C. H., ed. 1978. Chaos and context: A study in William James, Athens: Ohio University Press.
91. Seigfried, C. H., ed. 1990. William James’s radical reconstruction of philosophy, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
92. Shalin, D. N., 1992. Critical theory and the pragmatist challenge. American Journal of Sociology, 98: 237–279. [CSA][CROSSREF]
93. Shepherd, G. J., 1993. Building a discipline of communication. Journal of Communication, 49: 156–164. [CSA][CROSSREF]
94. Shepherd, G. J., 1999. Advances in communication theory: A critical review. Journal of Communication, 49: 156–164. [CSA][CROSSREF]
95. Shepherd, G. J., 2001a. “ Pragmatism and tragedy, communication and hope: A summary story ”. In American pragmatism and communication research, Edited by: Perry, D. K., 241–254. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
96. Shepherd, G. J., 2001b. “ Community as the interpersonal accomplishment of communication ”. In Communication and community, Edited by: Shepherd, G. J., and Rothenbuhler, E. W., 25–36. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
97. Slater, M., 2003. Augustine’s cup: boundary conditions and relocating science in a post-postmodern world. Paper presented the Philosophy of Communication Division at the International Communication Association annual conference. May2003, San Diego, CA.
98. Stuhr, J., 1997. Genealogical pragmatism: Philosophy, experience, and community, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
99. Taylor, T., 1992. Mutual misunderstanding: Scepticism and the theorizing of language and interpretation, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
100. Westbrook, R. B., 1991. John Dewey and American democracy, New York: Cornell University Press.
101. Wittgenstein, L., 1963. Tractatus logico-philosophicus, London: Routledge. (D. F. Pears & B. F. McGuinness, Trans.)