Quality standards in eLearning: A matrix of analysis

International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 68-85

  Frydenberg, Jia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Delivery and support of online learning; Development; ELearning; Online learning; Quality standards; Web based learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 1442293639     PISSN: 14923831     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v3i2.109     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. American Association for Higher Education. (2000). Implementing the Seven Principles: Technology as a Lever. Washington, DC: AAHE
2. American Federation of Teachers. (2000). Distance Education: Guidelines for Good Practice. Washington, DC: AFT (AFL-CIO)
3. American Federation of Teachers. (2001). Is Online Education off Course? New AFT Report Proposes Standards for Online Colleges. Press Release. Washington, DC: AFT (AFL-CIO).
4. Astin, Alexander W. (1993). What matters in college? The four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Bates, Tony. (2000). Managing Technological Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult education Series.
6. Berge, Zane. (2001). Sustaining Distance Training: Integrating Learning Technologies into the Fabric of the Enterprise. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Bindé, Jérome. (1998). "Communication and Intelligence: Distance Education and Culture." Futures. Vol. 30., No. 8. pp. 843-851.
8. Bloom, Benjamin. (1964). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. New York: Longman.
9. Eaton, Judith. (2000). Core Academic Values, Quality, and Regional Accreditation: The Challenge of Distance Learning. Washington, DC: Council for Higher Education Accreditation.
10. Gibson, Chere Campbell. (1998). Distance Learners in Higher Education. Madison, WI: Atwood
11. Gilbert, Sara Dulaney. (2001). How to be a Successful Online Student. New York: McGraw-Hill
12. Innovations in Distance Education. (1998). An Emerging Set of Guiding Principles and Practices for the Design and Development of Distance Education. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University.
13. Institute for Higher Education Policy. (2000). Quality on the Line: Benchmarks for Success in Internet-Based Distance Education. Washington, DC: IHEP.
14. Institute for Higher Education Policy. (1999). What's the Difference? A Review of Contemporary Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Learning in Higher Education. Washington, DC: IHEP.
15. Keegan, Desmond. (2000). Distance Training: Taking Stock at a Time of Change. London: Routledge / Falmer.
16. National Education Association. (2001). "Focus on Distance Education." Update. Vol. 7, No. 2.
17. Schank, R. (2002). Designing World Class E-Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18. Smith, Sharralyn. (1999). An Overview of Internet-Based Education: Challenges Facing Online Education Providers. Berkeley, CA: E-Curriculum Corporation.
19. Southern Regional Education Board (2000-2001). Essential Principles of Quality: Guidelines for Web-based Courses for Middle Grades and High School Students. Atlanta, GA: SREB Educational Technology Cooperative.
20. Toffler, Alvin (1970). Future Shock. New York, Random House
21. University of Illinois. (1999). Teaching at an Internet Distance: The Pedagogy of Online Teaching and Learning. Chicago, IL: UI Faculty Seminar.
22. Wahlstrom, C., Williams, B., and Shea, P. (2003). The Successful Distance Learning Student. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth (advance copy)
23. Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education. (2001). Best Practices for Electronically Offered Degree and Certificate Programs. Boulder, CO: WICHE.