Temperature sensitive contact lenses for triggered ophthalmic drug delivery

Biomaterials

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 2289-2300

  Jung, Hyun Jung ^a   Chauhan, Anuj ^a  

^a University of Florida   (United States)

Author keywords

Contact lenses; Drug delivery; Glaucoma; Nanoparticles; Timolol

Indexed keywords

CONTACT LENS MATERIAL; CROSSLINKED; DIFFUSION CELLS; DRUG RELEASE; DRUG RELEASE STUDY; DRUG TRANSPORT; ESTER BONDS; ESTER HYDROLYSIS; ETHYLENE GLYCOL DIMETHACRYLATE; EYE DROPS; FIRST-ORDER REACTION MODEL; GLAUCOMA; HYDROPHOBIC PARTICLES; LOW WATER-CONTENT; MATRIX; METHYL METHACRYLATES; OPHTHALMIC DRUG DELIVERY; PARTICLE FORMATION PROCESS; PHOSPHATE-BUFFERED SALINES; RESIDENCE TIME; STERIC EFFECT; TARGETED DRUG DELIVERY; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENT; TEMPERATURE SENSITIVE; THERAPEUTIC DOSE; TIMOLOL;

BIOCHEMISTRY; CONTACT LENSES; DROPS; DRUG DELIVERY; ESTERIFICATION; ESTERS; ETHYLENE; ETHYLENE GLYCOL; GELS; HYDROLYSIS; NANOPARTICLES; RATE CONSTANTS;

DRUG DOSAGE;

AGENTS ACTING ON THE EYE; ESTER; ETHYLENE GLYCOL DIMETHACRYLATE; METHACRYLIC ACID METHYL ESTER; MONOMER; NANOPARTICLE; PHOSPHATE BUFFERED SALINE; TIMOLOL;

ARTICLE; CONTACT LENS; DISPERSION; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; DRUG RELEASE; DRUG TRANSPORT; GEL; HYDROLYSIS; OPHTHALMIC DRUG DELIVERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE; TEMPERATURE SENSITIVITY;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CONTACT LENSES; CROSS-LINKING REAGENTS; DELAYED-ACTION PREPARATIONS; DRUG CARRIERS; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; EYE DISEASES; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; NANOPARTICLES; OPHTHALMIC SOLUTIONS; PARTICLE SIZE; TEMPERATURE; TIMOLOL;

EID: 84855729411     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.076     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Rathore K.S., Nema R.K. Review on ocular inserts. Int J PharmTech Res 2009, 1(2):164-169.
2. Ding S. Recent developments in ophthalmic drug delivery. Pharm Sci Technol 1998, 1(8):328-335.
3. Ma W.D., Xu H., Wang C., Nie S.F., Pan W.S. Pluronic F127-g-poly(acrylic acid) copolymers as in situ gelling vehicle for ophthalmic drug delivery system. Int J Pharm 2008, 350:247-256.
4. Srividya B., Cardoza R.M., Amin O.D. Sustained ophthalmic delivery of ofloxacin from a pH triggered in situ gelling system. JControl Rel 2001, 73:205-211.
5. Xiong W., Gao X., Zhao Y., Xu H., Yang X. The dual temperature/pH-sensitive multiphase behavior of poly (N-isopropylacrylamide-co-acrylic acid) microgels for potential application in situ gelling system. Colloids Surf B 2011, 84:103-110.
6. Ibrahim H., Bindschaedler C., Doelker E., Buri P., Gurny R. Concept and development of ophthalmic pseudo-latexes triggered by pH. Int J Pharm 1991, 77:211-219.
7. Gokulgandhi M.R., Parikh J.R., Megha B., Dharmesh M.M. ApH-triggered in situ gel forming ophthalmic drug delivery system for tropicamide. Drug Deliv Technol 2007, 5:44-49.
8. Garcia A., Marquez M., Cai T., Rosario R., Hu Z., Gust D., et al. Photo-, thermally, and pH-responsive microgels. Langmuir 2007, 23:224-229.
9. Katarina E., Johan C., Roger P. Rheological evaluation of poloxamer as an insitu gel for ophthalmic use. Eur J Pharm Sci 1998, 6:105-112.
10. El-Kamel A.H. Invitro and invivo evaluation of pluronic F127- based ocular delivery system for timolol maleate. Int J Pharm 2002, 241(1):47-55.
11. Gan L., Gan Y., Zhu C., Zhang X., Zhu J. Novel microemulsion in situ electrolyte-triggered gelling system for ophthalmic delivery of lipophilic cyclosporine A: invitro and invivo results. Int J Pharm 2009, 365:143-149.
12. Balasubramaniam J., Kant S., Pandit J.K. Invitro and invivo evaluation of the gelrite gellan gum-based ocular delivery system for indomethacin. Acta Pharm 2003, 53(4):251-261.
13. Bourlais C.L., Acar L., Zia H., Sado P.A., Needham T., Leverge R. Ophthalmic drug delivery systems-recent advances. Prog Retin Eye Res 1998, 17(1):33-58.
14. Vasantha V., Sehgal P.K., Panduranga R.K. Collagen ophthalmic inserts for pilocarpine drug delivery systems. Int J Pharm 1988, 47:95-102.
15. McNamara N.A., Polse K.A., Brand R.J., Graham A.D., Chan J.S., McKenney C.D. Tear mixing under a soft contact lens: effects of lens diameter. Am J Ophthalmol 1999, 6:659-665.
16. Creech J.L., Chauhan A., Radke C.J. Dispersive mixing in the posterior tear film under a soft contact lens. Ind Eng Chem Res 2001, 14:3015-3026.
17. Kapoor Y., Thomas J.C., Tan G., John V.T., Chauhan A. Surfactant-laden soft contact lenses for extended delivery of ophthalmic drugs. Biomaterials 2009, 30:867-878.
18. Li C.C., Chauhan A. Modeling ophthalmic drug delivery by soaked contact lenses. Ind Eng Chem Res 2006, 10:3718-3734.
19. Hiratani H., Fujiwara A., Tamiya Y., Mizutani Y., Alvarez-Lorenzo C. Ocular release of timolol from molecularly imprinted soft contact lenses. Biomaterials 2005, 26:1293-1298.
20. Hiratani H., Mizutani Y., Alvarez-Lorenzo C. Controlling drug release from imprinted hydrogels by modifying the characteristics of the imprinted cavities. Macromol Biosci 2005, 5:728-733.
21. Alvarez-Lorenzo C., Hiratani H., Concheiro A. Contact lenses for drug delivery: achieving sustained release with novel systems. Am J Drug Deliv 2006, 4:131-151.
22. Duncan R. The dawning era of polymer therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Disc 2003, 2:347-360.
23. Duncan R., Izzo L. Dendrimer biocompatibility and toxicity. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2005, 57:2215-2237.
24. Muller R.H., Radtke M., Wissing S.A. Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) in cosmetic and dermatological preparations. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2002, 54(1):131-155.
25. Gulsen D., Chauhan A. Ophthalmic drug delivery through contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004, 45:2342-2347.
26. Gulsen D., Li C.C., Chauhan A. Dispersion of DMPC liposomes in contact lenses for ophthalmic drug delivery. Curr Eye Res 2005, 30(12):1071-1080.
27. Gulsen D., Chauhan A. Dispersion of microemulsion drops in HEMA hydrogel: a potential ophthalmic drug delivery vehicle. Int J Pharm 2005, 292:95-117.
28. Kapoor Y., Chauhan A. Ophthalmic delivery of cyclosporine A from Brij-97 microemulsion and surfactant-laden p-HEMA hydrogels. Int J Pharm 2008, 361:222-229.
29. Kapoor Y., Chauhan A. Drug and surfactant transport in cyclosporine A and Brij 98 laden p-HEMA hydrogels. JColloid Interface Sci 2008, 322:624-633.
30. Alvarez-Lorenzo C., Hiratani H., Gomez-Amoza J.L., Martinez-Pacheco R., Souto C., Concheiro A. Soft contact lenses capable of sustained delivery of timolol. JPharm Sci 2002, 91:2182-2192.
31. Hiratani H., Alvarez-Lorenzo C. Timolol uptake and release by imprinted soft contact lenses made of N, N-diethylacrylamide and methacrylic acid. JControl Rel 2002, 83:223-230.
32. Venkatech A., Sizemore S.P., Byrne M.E. Biomimetic hydrogels for enhanced loading and extended release of ocular therapeutics. Biomaterials 2007, 28:717-724.
33. Hiratani H., Alvarex-Lorenzo C. The nature of backbone monomers determines the performance of imprinted soft contact lenses as timolol drug delivery systems. Biomaterials 2004, 25:1105-1113.
34. Ciolino J.B., Hoare T.R., Iwata N.G., Behlau I., Dohlman C.H., Langer R., et al. Adrug-eluting contact lens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009, 50(7):3346-3352.
35. Frelichowska J., Bolzinger M.A., Pelletier J., Valour J.P., Chevalier Y. Topical delivery of lipophilic drugs from o/w pickering emulsions. Int J Pharm 2009, 371:56-63.
36. Nakashima T., Shimizu M., Kukizaki M. Particle control of emulsion by membrane emulsification and its applications. Adv Drug Deliver Rev 2000, 45:47-56.
37. Sjöström B., Bergenstǎhl B. Preparation of submicron drug particles in lecithin-stabilized o/w emulsions: I. Model studies of the precipitation of cholesteryl acetate. Int J Pharm 1992, 84:107-116.
38. Buyukozturk F., Benneyan J.C., Carrier R.L. Impact of emulsion-based drug delivery systems on intestinal permeability and drug release kinetics. JControl Release 2010, 142:22-30.
39. Hansen T., Holm P., Rohde M., Schultz K. Invivo evaluation of tablets and capsules containing spray-dried o/w-emulsions for oral delivery of poorly soluble drugs. Int J Pharm 2005, 293:203-211.
40. Kim C.K., Ryuu S.A., Park K.M., Lim S.J., Hwang S.J. Preparation and physicochemical characterization of phase inverted water/oil microemulsion containg cycloporin A. Int J Pharm 1997, 147:131-134.
41. Gasco M.R., Gallarate M., Trorra M., Bauchiero L., Gremmo E., Chiappero O. Micro-emulsions as topical delivery vehicles: ocular administration of timolol. JPharm Bio Anal 1989, 7:433-439.
42. Chan J., El Maghraby G.M.M., Craig J.P., Alany R.G. Phase transition water-in-oil microemulsions as ocular drug delivery systems: invitro and invivo evaluation. Int J Pharm 2007, 328:65-71.
43. Simovic S., Prestidge C.A. Nanoparticle layers controlling drug release from emulsions. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2007, 67(1):39-47.
44. Merkovich E.A., Carruette M.L., Babak V.G., Vikhoreva G.A., Gal'braikh L.S., Kim V.E. Kinetics of the initial stage of gelation in chitosan solutions containing glutaric aldehyde: viscometric study. Colloid J 2001, 63:350-354.
45. Andersson M., Maunu S.L. Structural studies of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) microgels: effect of SDS surfactant concentration in the microgel synthesis. JPolym Sci Part B Polym Phys 2006, 44:3305-3314.
46. Wu X., Pelton R.H., Hamielec A.E., Woods D.R., McPhee W. The kinetics of poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) microgel latex formation. Colloid Polym Sci 1994, 272:467-477.
47. Bundgarrd H., Buur A., Chang S.C., Lee V.H.L. Prodrugs of timolol for improved ocular delivery: synthesis, hydrolysis kinetics and lipophilicity of various timolol esters. Int J Pharm 1986, 33:15-26.
48. Bundgarrd H., Buur A., Chang S.C., Lee V.H.L. Timolol prodrugs: synthesis, stability and lipophilicity of various alkyl, cycloalkyl and sromatic esters of timolol. Int J Pharm 1988, 46:77-88.