Cofactor-binding sites in proteins of deviating sequence: Comparative analysis and clustering in torsion angle, cavity, and fold space

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 626-648

  Stegemann, Björn ^a   Klebe, Gerhard ^a  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Analysis of binding cavity space; Analysis of local folding patterns; Analysis of torsion angle space; Clustering of proteins; Cofactor binding sites; Drug cross reactivity; Protein ligand complexes; Statistical analysis of crystal structure data

Indexed keywords

ACETYL COENZYME A; ADENOSINE DIPHOSPHATE; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; FLAVINE ADENINE NUCLEOTIDE; MEMBRANE COFACTOR PROTEIN; REDUCED NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE PHOSPHATE; COENZYME; COENZYME A; LIGAND; NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; PHYSICOCHEMICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN MOTIF; TORSION; BINDING SITE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COENZYME; METABOLISM; PROTEIN DATABASE;

ADENOSINE DIPHOSPHATE; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; BINDING SITES; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COENZYME A; COENZYMES; DATABASES, PROTEIN; FLAVIN-ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NAD; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS;

EID: 84855711573     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.23226     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Kortagere S, Krasowski MD, Ekins S. The importance of discerning shape in molecular pharmacology. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2009; 30: 138-147.
2. Kahraman A, Morris RJ, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM. Shape variation in protein binding pockets and their ligands. J Mol Biol 2007; 368: 283-301.
3. Amyes TL, Richard JP. Rational design of transition-state analogues as potent enzyme inhibitors with therapeutic applications. ACS Chem Biol 2007; 20: 711-714.
4. Mestres J, Gregori-Puigjane E, Valverdebc S, Sole RV. The topology of drug-target interaction networks: implicit dependence on drug properties and target families. Mol BioSyst 2009; 5: 1051-1057.
5. α-(3-methyl-1, 2, 3, 4-tetrahydro-8-quinolinesulphonyl)-l-arginyl]-2-piperidine carboxylic acid (MQPA) to human α-thrombin. X-ray crystallographic determination of the NAPAP-trypsin complex and modeling of NAPAP-thrombin and MQPA-thrombin. Eur J Biochem 1990; 193: 175-182.
6. Banner DW, Hadváry P. Crystallographic analysis at 3.0-A resolution of the binding to human thrombin of four active site-directed inhibitors. J Biol Chem 1991; 266: 20085-20093.
7. Weber A, Casini A, Heine A, Kuhn D, Supuran CT, Scozzafava A, Klebe G. Unexpected nanomolar inhibition of carbonic anhydrase by COX-2-selective celecoxib: new pharmacological opportunities due to related binding site recognition. J Med Chem 2004; 47: 550-557.
8. Kawamori T, Rao CV, Seibert K, Reddy BS. Chemopreventive activity of celecoxib, a specific cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, against colon carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 1998; 58: 409-412.
9. Oshima M, Murai N, Kargman S, Arguello M, Luk P, Kwong E, Taketo MM, Evans JF. Chemoprevention of intestinal polyposis in the Apcdelta716 mouse by rofecoxib, a specific cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor. Cancer Res 2001; 61: 1733-1740.
10. Waskewich C, Blumenthal RD, Li H, Stein R, Goldenberg DM, Burton J. Celecoxib exhibits the greatest potency amongst cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors for growth inhibition of COX-2-negative hematopoietic and epithelial cell lines. Cancer Res 2002; 62: 2029-2033.
11. Moreira L, Castells A. Cyclooxygenase as a target for colorectal cancer chemoprevention. Curr Drug Targets 2010; 11(12).
12. Cowan-Jacob SW, Fendrich G, Floersheimer F, Furet P, Liebetanz J, Rummel G, Rheinberger P, Centeleghe M, Fabbro D, Manley PW. Structural biology contributions to the discovery of drugs to treat chronic myelogenous leukaemia. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2007; 63: 80-93.
13. Winger JA, Hantschel O, Superti-Furga G, Kuriyan J. The structure of the leukemia drug imatinib bound to human quinone reductase 2 (NQO2). BMC Struct Biol 2009; 9: 7-7.
14. Istvan ES, Deisenhofer J. Structural mechanism for statin inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase. Science 2001; 292: 1160-1164.
15. Kallen J, Welzenbach K, Ramage P, Geyl D, Kriwacki R, Legge G, Cottens S, Weitz-Schmidt G, Hommel U. Structural basis for LFA-1 inhibition upon lovastatin binding to the CD11a I-domain. J Mol Biol 1999; 292: 1-9.
16. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28: 235-242.
17. Taylor R. Life science applications of the Cambridge Structural Database. Acta Cryst D 2002; 58: 879-888.
18. Schmitt S, Kuhn D, Klebe G. A new method to detect related function among proteins independent of sequence and fold homology. JMol Biol 2002; 323: 387-406.
19. Holm L, Sander C. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J Mol Biol 1993; 233: 123-138.
20. Webb EC. Enzyme nomenclature 1992: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology on the nomenclature and classification of enzymes. San Diego: Academic Press; 1992.
21. Gohlke H, Hendlich M, Klebe G. Knowledge-based scoring functionto predict protein-ligand interactions. J Mol Biol 2000; 295: 337-356.
22. Boström J. Reproducing the conformations of protein-bound ligands: a critical evaluation of several popular conformational searching tools. J Comput-Aided Mol Des 2001; 15: 1137-1152.
23. Nicklaus MC, Wang S, Driscol JS, Milne GWA. Conformational changes of small molecules binding to proteins. Bioorg Med Chem 1995; 3: 411-428.
24. Perola E, Charifson PS. Conformational analysis of drug-like molecules bound to proteins: an extensive study of ligand recognition upon binding. J Med Chem 2004; 47: 2499-2510.
25. Klebe G, Mietzner T. A fast and efficient method to generate biologically relevant conformations. J Comput-Aided Mol Des 1994; 8: 583-606.
26. Hao M-H, Haq O, Muegge I. Torsion angle preference and energetics of small molecule ligands bound to proteins. J Chem Inf Model 2007; 47: 2242-2252.
27. Bramfeld KA, Kuhn B, Reuter DC, Stahl M. Small molecule conformational preferences derived from crystal structure data. A medicinal chemistry focused analysis. J Chem Inf Model 2008; 48: 1-24.
28. Butler KT, Luque FJ, Barril X. Towards accurate energy predictions of the bioactive conformation of drugs. J Comput Chem 2008; 30: 601-610.
29. Moodie SL, Thornton JM. A study into the effect of protein binding on nucleotide conformation. Nucleic Acids Res 1993; 26: 1369-1380.
30. Klebe G. Structure correlation and ligand/receptor interactions. In: Bürgi HB, Dunitz JD, editors. Structure correlation. Weinheim: VCH; 1994. pp 543-603.
31. Carugo O, Argos P. NADP-dependent enzymes. Conserved stereochemistry of cofactor binding. Proteins 1997; 28: 10-28.
32. Dym O, Eisenberg D. Sequence-structure analysis of FAD-containing proteins. Protein Sci 2001; 10: 1712-1728.
33. Stockwell G, Thornton JM. Conformational diversity of ligands bound to proteins. J Mol Biol 2006; 356: 928-944.
34. Orengo CA, Michie AD, Jones S, Jones DT, Swindells MB, Thornton JM. CATH-a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure 1997; 5: 1093-1108.
35. Mitchell JBO. The relationship between the sequence identities of alpha helical proteins in the PDB and the molecular similarities of their ligands. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2001; 41: 1617-1622.
36. 2 from contingency tables, and the calculation of P. J R Stat Soc 1922; 85: 87-94.
37. Koch O, Klebe G. Turns revisited: a uniform and comprehensive classification of normal, open and reverse turn families minimizing unassigned random chain portions. Proteins 2009; 74: 353-367.
38. Ultsch A. Maps for the visualization of high-dimensional data spaces. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Self-Organizing Maps, Kyushu, Japan, 2003. pp 225-230.
39. Kupas K, Ultsch A, Klebe G. Classification of substructures in protein binding cavities using wavelets. Proteins 2008; 71: 1288-1306.
40. Sundaralingam M. Structure and conformation of nucleosides and nucleotides and their analogs as determined by Xray diffraction. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1975; 255: 3-42.
41. Saenger W. Structure and function of nucleosides and nucleotides. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 1973; 12: 591-601.
42. +, cozymase, codehydrase I). J Am Chem Soc 1981; 103: 907-914.
43. Laskowski RA, Luscombe NM, Swindells MB, Thornton JM. Protein clefts in molecular recognition and function. Protein Sci 1996; 5: 2438-2452.
44. Campbell SJ, Gold ND, Jackson RM, Westhead DR. Ligand binding: functional site location, similarity and docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2003; 13: 389-395.
45. Gold ND, Jackson RM. Fold independent structural comparisons of protein-ligand binding sites for exploring functional relationships. J Mol Biol 2006; 355: 1112-1124.
46. Rosen M, Lin SL, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Molecular shape comparisons in searches for active sites and functional similarity. Protein Eng Des Select 1998; 11: 263-277.
47. Whisstock JC, Lesk AM. Prediction of protein function from protein sequence and structure. Quart Rev Biophys 2003; 36: 307-340.
48. Nicholls A, McGaughey GB, Sheridan RP, Good AC, Warren G, Mathieu M, Muchmore SW, Brown SP, Grant JA, Nevins N, Jain AN, Kelley B. Molecular shape and medicinal chemistry: a perspective. J Med Chem 2010; 53: 3862-3886.
49. Baroni M, Cruciani G, Sciabola S, Perruccio F, Mason JS. A common reference framework for analyzing/comparing protein and ligands. Fingerprints for ligands and proteins (FLAP): theory and application. J Chem Inf Model 2007; 47: 279-294.
50. Henrich S, Salo-Ahena OMH, Huanga B, Rippmann F, Cruciani G, Wade RC. Computational approaches to identifying and characterizing protein binding sites for ligand design. J Mol Recognit 2010; 23: 209-219.
51. Kinoshita K, Furui J, Nakamura H. Identification of protein biochemical functions by similarity search using the molecular surface database eF-site. Protein Sci 2003; 12: 1589-1595.
52. Najmanovich R, Kurbatova N, Thornton JM. Detection of 3D atomic similarities and their use in the discrimination of small molecule protein-binding sites. Bioinformatics 2008; 24: i105-i111.
53. Laskowski RA. SURFNET: a program for visualizing molecular surfaces, cavities, and intermolecular interactions. J Mol Graph 1995; 13: 323-330.
54. Park K, Kim D. Binding similarity network of ligand. Proteins 2008; 71: 960-971.
55. Jambon M, Imberty A, Deléage G, Geourjon C. A new bioinformatic approach to detect common 3D sites in protein structures. Proteins 2003; 52: 137-145.
56. Powers R, Copeland JC, Germer K, Mercier KA, Ramanathan V, Revesz P. Comparison of protein active site structures for functional annotation of protein and drug design. Proteins 2006; 65: 124-135.
57. Pickering SJ, Bulpitt AJ, Efford N, Gold ND, Westhead DR. AI-based algorithms for protein surface comparisons. Comput Chem 2001; 26: 79-84.
58. Schalon C, Surgand JS, Kellenberger E, Rognan D. A simple and fuzzy method to align and compare druggable ligand binding sites. Proteins 2008; 71: 1755-1778.
59. Shulman-Peleg A, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. Recognition of functional sites in protein structures. J Mol Biol 2004; 339: 607-633.
60. Hendlich M, Rippmann F, Barnickel G. LIGSITE: automatic and efficient detection of potential small molecule-binding sites in proteins. J Mol Graph Model 1997; 389: 359-363.
61. Porter CT, Bartlett GJ, Thornton JM. The catalytic site atlas: a resource of catalytic sites and residues identified in enzymes using structural data. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32: D129-D133.
62. Binkowski TA, Adamian L, Liang J. Inferring functional relationships of proteins from local sequence and spatial surface patterns. J Mol Biol 2003; 332: 505-526.
63. Binkowski TA, Naghibzadeg S, Liang J. CASTp: computed atlas of surface topography of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31: 3352-3355.
64. Kleywegt GJ. Recognition of spatial motifs in protein structures. J Mol Biol 1999; 285: 1887-1897.
65. Barker JA, Thornton JM. An algorithm for constraint-based structural template matching: application to 3D templates with statistical analysis. Bioinformatics 2003; 19: 1644-1649.
66. Besl PJ, McKay ND. A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans PAMI 1992; 14: 239-256.
67. Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. Efficient detection of three-dimensional motifs in biological macromolecules by computer vision techniques. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991; 88: 10495-10499.
68. Stark A, Russell RB. Annotation in three dimensions. PINTS: patterns in non-homologous tertiary structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31: 3341-3344.
69. Russell RB. Detection of protein three dimensional side-chain patterns: new examples of convergent evolution. J Mol Biol 1998; 279: 1211-1227.
70. Milik M, Szalma S, Olszewski KA. Common structural cliques: a tool for protein structure and function analysis. Protein Eng 2003; 16: 543-552.
71. Wallac AC, Borkakoti N, Thornton JM. TESS: a geometric hashing algorithm for deriving 3D coordinate templates for searching structural databases, application to enzyme active sites. Protein Sci 1997; 6: 2308-2323.
72. Brakoulias A, Jackson RM. Towards a structural classification of phosphate binding sites in protein-nucleotide complexes: an automated all-against-all structural comparison using geometric matching. Proteins 2004; 56: 250-260.
73. Spriggs RV, Artymiuk PJ, Willett P. Searching for patterns of amino acids in 3D protein structures. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2003; 3: 412-421.
74. Artymiuk P, Poirrette AR, Grindley HM, Rice DW, Willett P. A graph-theoretic approach to the identification of three-dimensional patterns of amino acid side-chains in protein structures. J Mol Biol 1994; 243: 327-344.
75. Ausiello G, Via A, Helmer-Citterich M. Query3d: a new method for high-throughput analysis of functional residues in protein structures" BMC Bioinformatics 2005; 6( Suppl 4): S5.
76. Wangikar PP, Tendulkar AV, Ramya S, Mali DN, Sarawagi S. Functional sites in protein families uncovered via a objective and automated graph theoretical approach. J Mol Biol 2003; 326: 955-978.
77. May ACW, Johnson MS. Protein structure comparisons using a combination of a genetic algorithm, dynamic programming and least-squares minimization. Protein Eng 1994; 4: 475-485.
78. Piorrette AR, Artymiuk PJ, Rice DW, Willett P. Comparison of protein surfaces using a genetic algorithm. J Comput-Aided Mol Des 1997; 11: 557-569.
79. Lehtonen J, Denessiouk K, May ACW, Johnson MS. Finding local structural similarities among families of unrelated protein structures: a generic non-linear alignment algorithm. Proteins 1999; 34: 341-355.
80. DeLano WL. The PyMOL molecular graphics system. San Carlos, CA: DeLano Scientific; 2002.
81. Gilbert D, Westhead D, Nagano N, Thornton JM. Motif-based searching in TOPS protein topology databases. Bioinformatics 1999; 15: 317-326.
82. Westhead DR, Hatton DC, Thornton JM. An atlas of protein topology cartoons available on the World-Wide Web. Trends Biochem Sci 1998; 23: 35-36.
83. Branden C, Tooze J. Introduction to protein structure, 2nd ed. New York: Garland; 1999.
84. Hendlich M, Bergner A, Günther J, Klebe G. Relibase: design and development of a database for comprehensive analysis of protein-ligand interactions. J Mol Biol 2003; 326: 607-620.
85. Hobohm U, Sander C. Enlarged representative set of protein structures. Protein Sci 1994; 3: 522-524.
86. Bruno IJ, Cole JC, Edgington PR, Kessler M, Macrae CF, McCabe P, Pearson J, Taylor R. New software for searching the Cambridge Structural Database and visualising crystal structures. Acta Cryst B 2002; 58: 389-397.
87. Ultsch A. Pareto density estimation: a density estimation for knowledge discovery. In: Baier D, Wernecke KD, editors. Innovations in classification, data science, and information systems-Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the German Classification Society (GfKL) 2003. Berlin: Springer; 2003. pp 91-100.
88. Ultsch A. Eine Begründung der Pareto 80/20 Regel und Grenzwerte für die ABC Analyse, Technical Report No. 30, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Marburg, Germany, 2001.
89. Bron C, Kerbosch J. Algorithm 457. Finding all cliques of an undirected graph. Commun ACM 1973; 16: 575-577.
90. Kuhn D, Weskamp N, Schmidt S, Hüllermeier E, Klebe G. From the similarity analysis of protein cavities to the functional classification of protein families using Cavbase. J Mol Biol 2006; 359: 1023-1044.
91. Ward JH. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc 1963; 58: 236-244.
92. MATLAB technical documentation. Retrieved 2010-06-07.