Binding similarity network of ligand

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 71, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 960-971

  Park, Keunwan ^a   Kim, Dongsup ^a  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Binding site comparison; Evolution; Ligand structure; Network analysis; Protein function; Scale free network

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; LIGAND BINDING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; DATABASES, PROTEIN; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS;

EID: 41149103365     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21780     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Benkovic SJ, Hammes-Schiffer S. A perspective on enzyme catalysis. Science 2003;301:1196-1202.
2. Harris JL, Craik CS. Engineering enzyme specificity. Curr Opin Chem Biol 1998;2:127-132.
3. Bridgham JT, Carroll SM, Thornton JW. Evolution of hormone-receptor complexity by molecular exploitation. Science 2006;312:97-101.
4. Binkowski TA, Adamian L, Liang J. Inferring functional relationships of proteins from local sequence and spatial surface patterns. J Mol Biol 2003;332:505-526.
5. Ferre F, Ausiello G, Zanzoni A, Helmer-Citterich M. Functional annotation by identification of local surface similarities: a novel tool for structural genomics. BMC Bioinformatics 2005;6:194.
6. Kinoshita K, Nakamura H. Identification of protein biochemical functions by similarity search using the molecular surface database eF-site. Protein Sci 2003;12:1589-1595.
7. Schmitt S, Kuhn D, Klebe G. A new method to detect related function among proteins independent of sequence and fold homology. J Mol Biol 2002;323:387-406.
8. Shulman-Peleg A, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. Recognition of functional sites in protein structures. J Mol Biol 2004;339:607-633.
9. Park K, Kim D. A method to detect important residues using protein binding site comparison. Proc Genome Inform 2006;17:216-225.
10. Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat Rev Genet 2004;5:101-113.
11. Ito T, Tashiro K, Muta S, Ozawa R, Chiba T, Nishizawa M, Yamamoto K, Kuhara S, Sakaki Y. Toward a protein-protein interaction map of the budding yeast: a comprehensive system to examine two-hybrid interactions in all possible combinations between the yeast proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:1143-1147.
12. Jeong H, Mason SP, Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 2001;411:41-42.
13. Park J, Lappe M, Teichmann SA. Mapping protein family interactions: intramolecular and intermolecular protein family interaction repertoires in the PDB and yeast. J Mol Biol 2001;307:929-938.
14. Schwikowski B, Uetz P, Fields S. A network of protein-protein interactions in yeast. Nat Biotechnol 2000;18:1257-1261.
15. Uetz P, Giot L, Cagney G, Mansfield TA, Judson RS, Knight JR, Lockshon D, Narayan V, Srinivasan M, Pochart P, Qureshi-Emili A, Li Y, Godwin B, Conover D, Kalbfleisch T, Vijayadamodar G, Yang M, Johnston M, Fields S, Rothberg JM. A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2000;403:623-627.
16. von Mering C, Krause R, Snel B, Cornell M, Oliver SG, Fields S, Bork P. Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature 2002;417:399-403.
17. Vazquez A, Flammini A, Maritan A, Vespignani A. Global protein function prediction from protein-protein interaction networks. Nat Biotechnol 2003;21:697-700.
18. Schreiber SL. Small molecules: the missing link in the central dogma. Nat Chem Biol 2005;1:64-66.
19. Campbell SJ, Gold ND, Jackson RM, Westhead DR. Ligand binding: functional site location, similarity and docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2003;13:389-395.
20. Zhang Z, Grigorov MG. Similarity networks of protein binding sites. Proteins 2006;62:470-478.
21. Keiser MJ, Roth BL, Armbruster BN, Ernsberger P, Irwin JJ, Shoichet BK. Relating protein pharmacology by ligand chemistry. Nat Biotechnol 2007;25:197-206.
22. Alves R, Chaleil RA, Sternberg MJ. Evolution of enzymes in metabolism: a network perspective. J Mol Biol 2002;320:751-770.
23. Keskin O, Nussinov R. Favorable scaffolds: proteins with different sequence, structure and function may associate in similar ways. Protein Eng Des Sel 2005;18:11-24.
24. Berman HM, Battistuz T, Bhat TN, Bluhm WF, Bourne PE, Burkhardt K, Feng Z, Gilliland GL, Iype L, Jain S, Fagan P, Marvin J, Padilla D, Ravichandran V, Schneider B, Thanki N, Weissig H, Westbrook JD, Zardecki C. The protein data bank. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2002;58(Part 6 No. 1):899-907.
25. Hu L, Benson ML, Smith RD, Lerner MG, Carlson HA. Binding MOAD (Mother of all databases). Proteins 2005;60:333-340.
26. Hu Z, Bowen D, Southerland WM, Del Sol A, Pan Y, Nussinov R, Ma B. Ligand binding and circular permutation modify residue interaction network in DHFR. PLoS Comput Biol 2007;3:e117.
27. Bron C, Kerbosch J. Finding all cliques of an undirected graph [H]. Commun ACM 1973;16:575-577.
28. Martin AC. PDBSprotEC: a Web-accessible database linking PDB chains to EC numbers via SwissProt. Bioinformatics 2004;20:986-988.
29. Goto S, Okuno Y, Hattori M, Nishioka T, Kanehisa M. LIGAND: database of chemical compounds and reactions in biological pathways. Nucl Acids Res 2002;30:402-404.
30. Haider N. Checkmol/Matchmol Homepage. http://merian.pch.univie.ac.at/ ~nhaider/cheminf/cmmm.html.
31. Bender A, Glen RC. Molecular similarity: a key technique in molecular informatics. Org Biomol Chem 2004;2:3204-3218.
32. Delaney JS. Assessing the ability of chemical similarity measures to discriminate between active and inactive compounds. Mol Divers 1996;1:217-222.
33. Patterson DE, Cramer RD, Ferguson AM, Clark RD, Weinberger LE. Neighborhood behavior: a useful concept for validation of "molecular diversity" descriptors. J Med Chem 1996;39:3049-3059.
34. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature 1998;393:440-442.
35. Schmidt S, Sunyaev S, Bork P, Dandekar T. Metabolites: a helping hand for pathway evolution? Trends Biochem Sci 2003;28:336-341.
36. Sheridan RP, Kearsley SK. Why do we need so many chemical similarity search methods? Drug Discov Today 2002;7:903-911.
37. Transue TR, Krahn JM, Gabel SA, DeRose EF, London RE. X-ray and NMR characterization of covalent complexes of trypsin, borate, and alcohols. Biochemistry 2004;43:2829-2839.
38. Frantz S. Drug discovery: playing dirty. Nature 2005;437:942-943.
39. Hopkins AL, Mason JS, Overington JP. Can we rationally design promiscuous drugs? Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006;16:127-136.
40. Csermely P, Agoston V, Pongor S. The efficiency of multi-target drugs: the network approach might help drug design. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2005;26:178-182.