A new bioinformatic approach to detect common 3D sites in protein structures

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 137-145

  Jambon, Martin ^a   Imberty, Anne ^b   Deléage, Gilbert ^a   Geourjon, Christophe ^a  

^a INSTITUT DE BIOLOGIE ET CHIMIE DES PROTÉINES   (France)

^b CENTRE DE RECHERCHES SUR LES MACROMOLÉCULES VÉGÉTALES CERMAV CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

3D structure of proteins; Bioinformatics; Detection of similar 3D functional sites; User defined chemical groups

Indexed keywords

CARBOHYDRATE; LECTIN; SERINE PROTEINASE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; BIOINFORMATICS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA BASE; DYNAMICS; EVOLUTION; LEGUME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STEREOCHEMISTRY; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

ALGORITHMS; CATALYTIC DOMAIN; CHYMOTRYPSIN; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FABACEAE; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PLANT LECTINS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SUBTILISIN;

EID: 0037661398     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.10339     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25: 3389-3402.
2. Pearson WR. Rapid and sensitive sequence comparison with FASTP and FASTA. Methods Enzymol 1990;183:63-98.
3. Bairoch A. PROSITE: a dictionary of sites and patterns in proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 1991;Suppl 19:2241-2245.
4. Gribskov M, McLachlan AD, Eisenberg D. Profile analysis: detection of distantly related proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987;84: 4355-4358.
5. Blanchet C. Logiciel MPSA et ressources bioinformatiques client-serveur Web dédiés à l'analyse de séquences de protéine. Lyon, France: Université Claude Bernard, Lyon 1; 1999.
6. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994;22:4673-4680.
7. Holm L, Sander C. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J Mol Biol 1993;233:123-138.
8. Holm L, Sander C. Touring protein fold space with Dali/FSSP. Nucleic Acids Res 1998;26:316-319.
9. Via A, Ferre F, Brannetti B, Helmer-Citterich M. Protein surface similarities: a survey of methods to describe and compare protein surfaces. Cell Mol Life Sci 2000;57:1970-1977.
10. Fischer D, Bachar O, Nussinov R, Wolfson H. An efficient automated computer vision based technique for detection of three dimensional structural motifs in proteins. J Biomol Struct Dyn 1992;9:769-789.
11. Lin SL, Nussinov R, Fischer D, Wolfson HJ. Molecular surface representations by sparse critical points. Proteins 1994;18:94-101.
12. Sandak B, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. An automated computer vision and robotics-based technique for 3-D flexible biomolecular docking and matching. Comput Appl Biosci 1995;11:87-99.
13. Preissner R, Goede A, Frommel C. Dictionary of interfaces in proteins (DIP). Data bank of complementary molecular surface patches. J Mol Biol 1998;280:535-550.
14. Preissner R, Goede A, Frommel C, Homonyms and synonyms in the dictionary of interfaces in proteins (DIP). Bioinformatics 1999;15:832-836.
15. Katchalski-Katzir E, Shariv I, Eisenstein M, Friesem AA, Aflalo C, Vakser IA. Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:2195-2199.
16. Karlin S, Zhu ZY. Characterizations of diverse residue clusters in protein three-dimensional structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:8344-8349.
17. Wei L, Altman RB. Recognizing protein binding sites using statistical descriptions of their 3D environments. Pac Symp Biocomput 1998:497-508.
18. Taroni C, Jones S, Thornton JM. Analysis and prediction of carbohydrate binding sites. Protein Eng 2000;13:89-98.
19. Russell RB. Detection of protein three-dimensional side-chain patterns: new examples of convergent evolution. J Mol Biol 1998;279:1211-1227.
20. Wallace AC, Borkakoti N, Thornton JM. TESS: a geometric hashing algorithm for deriving 3D coordinate templates for searching structural databases. Application to enzyme active sites. Protein Sci 1997;6:2308-2323.
21. Wallace AC, Thornton JM. PROCAT, a database of 3D enzyme active site templates http://www.biochem.ucl.ac.uk/bsm/PROCAT/PROCAT.html.
22. Leroy X, Doligez D, Garrigue J, Rémy D, Vouillon J. The Objective Caml system. Software and documentation on the web, http://caml.inria.fr/ocaml/.1996.
23. Weis P, Leroy X. Le langage Caml: Dunod; 1999.
24. Chailloux E, Manoury P, Pagano B. Développement d'applications avec Objective Caml: O'Reilly; 2000.
25. Voet D, Voet J. Biochemistry. New York: Wiley and Sons; 1997. p 389-400.
26. Loris R, Hamelryck T, Bouckaert J, Wyns L. Legume lectin structure. Biochim Biophys Acta 1998:9-36.
27. Lis H, Sharon N. Lectins: carbohydrate-specific proteins that mediate cellular recognition. Chem Rev 1998;98:637-674.
28. Mirkov TE, Wahlstrom JM, Hagiwara K, Finardi-Filho F, Kjemtrup S, Chrispeels MJ. Evolutionary relationships among proteins in the phytohemagglutinin-arcelin-α-inhibitor family of the common bean and its relatives. Plant Mol Biol 1994;26:1103-1113.
29. Holm L, Sander C. Dali/FSSP classification of three-dimensional protein folds. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25:231-234.
30. Bouckaert J, Dewallef Y, Poortmans F, Wyns L, Loris R. The structural features of concanavalin A governing non-proline peptide isomerization. J Biol Chem 2000;275:19778-19787.
31. Young NM, Oomen RP. Analysis of sequence variation among legume lectins. A ring of hypervariable residues forms the perimeter of the carbohydrate binding site. J Mol Biol 1992;228:924-934.