Video-stimulated reflection as a professional development tool in interactive whiteboard research

ReCALL

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 252-270

  Cutrim Schmid, Euline ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Interactive whiteboard; language teaching; teacher education; video stimulated reflection

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855601449     PISSN: 09583440     EISSN: 14740109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0958344011000176     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Aldrich, F., Rogers, Y. and Scaife, M. (1998) Getting to grips with ''interactivity'': Helping teachers assess the educational value of CD-ROMs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 29(4): 321-332. (Pubitemid 128526927)
2. Andrews, S. andMcNeil, A. (2005) Knowledge about language and the 'good language teacher'. In: Bartels, N. (ed.), Applied linguistics and language teacher education. New York: Springer, 159-178.
3. Beauchamp, G. and Kennewell, S. (2010) Interactivity in the classroom and its impact on learning. Computers and Education, 54(3): 759-766.
4. Borg, S. (2006) Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. London: Continuum.
5. Cutrim Schmid, E. (2008) Potential pedagogical benefits and drawbacks of multimedia use in the English language classroom equipped with interactive whiteboard technology. Computers and Education, 51(4): 1553-1568.
6. Cutrim Schmid, E. (2010) Developing competencies for using the interactive whiteboard to implement communicative language teaching in the English as a Foreign Language classroom. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2): 159-172.
7. Cutrim Schmid, E. and Stetter, C. (2008) Houses of the future: Mit dem whiteboard das will-future üben. Der Fremdsprachliche Unterricht Englisch (Heft Web 2.0), 96: 42-44.
8. Cutrim Schmid, E. and Schimmack, E. (2010) First steps towards a model of interactive whiteboard training for language teachers. In: Thomas, M. and Cutrim Schmid, E. (eds.), Interactive whiteboards: Theory, research and practice. USA: IGI Global, 197-214.
9. Cutrim Schmid, E. and Van Hazebrouck, S. (2010) The interactive whiteboard as a digital hub. Praxis Fremdsprachenunterricht, 2010(4): 12-15.
10. Dooly, M. (2009) New Competencies in a New Era? Examining the Impact of a Teacher Training Project. Recall, 21(3): 352-369.
11. Dudeney, G. (2006) Interactive, quite bored. IATEFL CALL Review, Summer, 2006: 8-10.
12. Edwards, D. and Mercer, N. (1987) Common Knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Routledge.
13. Egbert, J., Huff, L., Levi, M., Preuss, C. and Sellen, J. (2009) Pedagogy, process, and classroom context: Integrating teacher voice and experience into research on technology-enhanced language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93(Focus Issue): 754-768.
14. Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
15. Gray, C. (2010) Meeting teachers' real needs: New tools in the secondary modern. foreign languages classroom. In: Thomas, M. and Cutrim Schmid, E. (eds.), Interactive Whiteboards: Theory, Research and Practice. USA: IGI Global, 69-85.
16. Gray, G., Hagger-Vaughan, L., Pilkington, R. and Tomkins, S. (2007) Integrating ICT into classroom practice in modern foreign language teaching in England: Making room for teachers' voices. European Journal of Teacher Education, 30(4): 407-429.
17. Guichon, N. (2009) Training Future Language Teachers to Develop Online Tutors' Competence through Reflective Analysis. Recall, 21(2): 166-185.
18. Hampel, R. (2009) Training teachers for the multimedia age: Developing teacher expertise to enhance online learner interaction and collaboration. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 3(1): 35-50.
19. Hong, K. H. (2010) CALL teacher education as an impetus for L2 teachers in integrating technology. ReCALL, 22(1): 53-69.
20. Hubbard, P. and Levy, M. (2006) Teacher education in CALL. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
21. Johnson, K. E. (1992) The relationship between teachers' beliefs and practices during literacy instruction for nonnative speakers of English. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24(1): 83-108.
22. Levy, M., Wang, Y. and Chenb, N. (2009) Developing the skills and techniques for online language teaching: A focus on the process. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 3(1): 17-34.
23. Mathews-Aydinlia, J. and Elaziz, F. (2010) Turkish students' and teachers' attitudes toward the use of interactive whiteboards in EFL classrooms. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(3): 235-252.
24. Mcniff, J. and Whitehead, J. A. (2006) All you need to know about action research. London: Sage Publications.
25. Meskill, C. (2009) CMC in language teacher education: Learning with and through instructional conversations. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 3(1): 51-63.
26. Meskill, C., Anthony, N., Hilliker, S., Tseng, C. and You, J. (2006) Expert-novice teacher mentoring in language learning technology. In: Hubbard, P. and Levy, M. (eds.), Research in CALL Teacher Education. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 283-298.
27. Orr, M. (2008) Learner perceptions of interactive whiteboards in EFL classrooms. CALL-EJ Online, 9(2), http://www.tell.is.ritsumei.ac.jp/ callejonline/journal/9-2/orr.html
28. Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C. and Dwyer, D. C. (1997) Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
29. Stockwell, G. (2009) Teacher education in CALL: Teaching teachers to educate themselves. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 3(1): 99-112.
30. Stickler, U., Batstone, C., Duensing, A. and Heins, B. (2005) Distance and virtual distance: Preliminary results of a study of interaction patterns in synchronous audio graphic CMC and face-to-face tutorials in beginners' language tutorials. In: Proceedings of the 2004 international symposium on applied linguistics and language teaching. Beijing, Shanghai: University of Northern Iowa, 740-750.
31. Wallace, M. (1998) Action research for language teachers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32. Warschauer, M. (2000) On-line learning in second language classrooms: An ethnographic study. In: Warschauer, M. and Kern, R. (eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 41-58.