Interactivity in the classroom and its impact on learning

Computers and Education

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 759-766

  Beauchamp, Gary ^a   Kennewell, Steve ^b  

^a CARDIFF METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Swansea Metropolitan University   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cooperative collaborative learning; Improving classroom teaching; Interactive learning environments; Pedagogical issues; Teaching learning strategies

Indexed keywords

COOPERATIVE/COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; IMPROVING CLASSROOM TEACHING; INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT; PEDAGOGICAL ISSUES; TEACHING/LEARNING STRATEGY;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; SCHOOL BUILDINGS; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING;

TEACHING;

EID: 75149121842     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.033     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Alexander R. Dialogic teaching (2004), Dialogos, York
2. Bauersfeld H. Interaction, construction and knowledge: Alternative perspectives for mathematics education. In: Grouws D., Cooney T., and Jones D. (Eds). Effective mathematics teaching (1988), NCTM/Lawrence Erlbaum, Reston, VA
3. Beauchamp G. Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools - Towards an effective transition framework. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 13 3 (2004) 327-348
4. Beauchamp G., and Kennewell S. The influence of ICT on the interactivity of teaching. Education and Information Technologies 13 4 (2008) 305-315
5. Birnbaum I. The assessment of IT capability. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 6 (1990) 88-97
6. Blatchford P., Baines E., Rubie-Davies C., Bassett P., and Chowne A. The effect of a new approach to group-work on student-student and teacher-student interaction. Journal of Educational Psychology 98 (2006) 750-765
7. Burgoon J., Bonito J., Bengtsson B., Cederberg C., Lundeberg M., and Allspach L. Interactivity in human-computer interaction: A study of credibility, understanding, and influence. Computers in Human Behaviour 16 (2000) 553-574
8. Chou C. Interactivity and interactive functions in web-based learning systems: A technical framework for designers. British Journal of Educational Technology 34 3 (2003) 265-279
9. Damarin, S. (1982). Fitting the tool with the task: A problem with the instructional use of computers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
10. DfEE, (1998a). Initial teacher training national curriculum for the use of information and communications technology in subject teaching. Circular 4/98 Annex B. London: Department for Education and Employment.
11. DfEE, (1998b). The national literacy strategy. London: DfEE.
12. DfEE, (1999). The national numeracy strategy. London: DfEE.
13. Galton M., Hargreaves L., Comber C., Wall D., and Pell A. Inside the primary classroom: 20 years on (1999), Routledge, London
14. Galton M., Hargreaves L., and Pell A. Group work and whole-class teaching with 11-14 year olds compared. Cambridge Journal of Education 39 1 (2009) 119-140
15. Hennessy S., Deaney R., Ruthven K., and Winterbottom M. Pedagogical strategies for using the interactive whiteboard to foster learner participation in school science. Learning Media and Technology 32 3 (2007) 283-301
16. Kennewell S., Parkinson J., and Tanner H. Developing the ICT capable school (2000), RoutledgeFalmer, London
17. Kennewell S., and Beauchamp G. The features of interactive whiteboards and their influence on learning. Learning Media and Technology 32 3 (2007) 227-241
18. Kennewell, S., Tanner, H., Beauchamp, G., Parkinson, J., Jones, S., Norman, N., et al. (2007). The use of ICT to improve learning and attainment through interactive teaching: Full research report ESRC end of award report, RES-139-25-0167-A. Swindon: ESRC..
19. Kennewell S., Tanner H., Jones S., and Beauchamp G. Analysing the use of interactive technology to implement interactive teaching. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 24 1 (2008) 61-73
20. Kennewell, S., Tanner, H., Beauchamp, G., Parkinson, J., Jones, S., Loughran, C., et al. (2009). Final report to Becta concerning the use of video-stimulated reflective dialogue for professional development in ICT.
21. Laurillard D. Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies (2002), RoutledgeFalmer, London
22. Luckin R. The learner centric ecology of resources: A framework for using technology to scaffold learning. Computers & Education 50 2 (2008) 449-462
23. Mercer N., and Littleton K. Dialogue and the development of children's thinking (2007), Routledge, London
24. Moss, G., Jewitt, C., Levaãiç, R., Armstrong, V., Cardini A. & Castle, F. (2007) The interactive whiteboards, pedagogy and pupil performance evaluation: An evaluation of the schools whiteboard expansion (SWE) project: London Challenge DfES research report 816, London: DfES.
25. Moyles J., Hargreaves L., and Merry R. Interactive teaching. In: Moyles J., Hargreaves L., Merry R., Paterson F., and Esartes-Sarries V. (Eds). Interactive teaching in the primary school: Digging deeper into meanings (2003), Open University Press, Maidenhead 171-192
26. Oliver, R. (1996) Interactions in multimedia learning materials: The things that matter. In C. McBeathf & R. Atkinson (Eds.). The learning superhighway: New world? new worries? Proceedings of the third international interactive multimedia symposium, 303-308. Perth, Western Australia, 21-25 January. Accessed 9.2.09..
27. Plowman, L. (2005). Getting the story straight the role of narrative in teaching and learning with interactive media. In P. Gardenfors, & P. Johansson (Eds.). Cognition education and communication technology, (pp. 55-76).
28. Proske A., Narciss S., and Körndler H. Interactivity and learners' achievement in web-based learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 18 4 (2007) 511-531
29. Ravenscroft A., Wegerif R., and Hartley R. Reclaiming thinking: Dialectic, dialogic and learning in the digital age. In: Underwood J., and Dockrell J. (Eds). Learning through Digital Technologies (2007), British Psychological Society, London
30. Rojas-Drummond S., and Mercer N. Scaffolding the development of effect and learning. International Journal of Educational Research 39 1-2 (2004) 99-111
31. Salmon G. E-moderating. 2nd ed. (2004), RoutledgeFalmer, London
32. Scott P.H., Mortimer E.F., and Aguiar O.G. The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education 90 (2006) 605-631
33. Sims R. Interactivity: A forgotten art?. Computers in Human Behavior 13 2 (1997) 157-180
34. Smith H., Higgins S., Wall K., and Miller J. Interactive whiteboards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 21 (2005) 91-101
35. Smith F., Hardman F., and Higgins S. The impact of interactive whiteboards on teacher-pupil interaction in the national literacy and numeracy strategies. British Educational Research Journal 32 3 (2006) 443-457
36. Somekh B. Methodological issues in identifying and describing the way knowledge is constructed with and without information and communications technology. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education 10 (2001) 157-178
37. Somekh, B. and 13 others (2007). Evaluation of the primary schools whiteboard expansion project: Report to the Department for Education and Skills. Manchester: MMU.
38. Tanner, H., Jones, S., Kennewell, S., and Beauchamp, G. (2005). Interactive whiteboards and pedagogies of whole class teaching. In Proceedings of MERGA 28, mathematics education research group of Australasia conference, Melbourne, July 2005. .
39. Wegerif R. The role of educational software as a support for teaching and learning conversations. Computers and Education 34 1,2 (2004) 179-191
40. Wegerif R. Dialogic or dialectic? The significance of ontological assumptions in research on educational dialogue. British Educational Research Journal 34 3 (2008) 347-361