Recommendations for mass spectrometry data quality metrics for open access data (corollary to the Amsterdam principles)

Proteomics - Clinical Applications

Volumn 5, Issue 11-12, 2011, Pages 580-589

  Kinsinger, Christopher R ^a   Apffel, James ^b   Baker, Mark ^c   Bian, Xiaopeng ^a   Borchers, Christoph H ^d   Bradshaw, Ralph ^e   Brusniak, Mi Youn ^f   Chan, Daniel W ^g   Deutsch, Eric W ^f   Domon, Bruno ^h   Gorman, Jeff ⁱ   Grimm, Rudolf ^b   Hancock, William ^j   Hermjakob, Henning ^k   Horn, David ^l   Hunter, Christie ^m   Kolar, Patrik ⁿ   Kraus, Hans Joachim ^o   Langen, Hanno ^p   Linding, Rune ^q   Moritz, Robert L ^f   Omenn, Gilbert S ^r   Orlando, Ron ^s   Pandey, Akhilesh ^t   Ping, Peipei ^u   Rahbar, Amir ^a   Rivers, Robert ^m   Seymour, Sean L ^a   Simpson, Richard J ^v   Slotta, Douglas ^w   Smith, Richard D ^x   Stein, Stephen E ^y   Tabb, David L ^z   Tagle, Danilo ^aa   Yates III, John R ^ab   Rodriguez, Henry ^a   more..

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES   (United States)

^c MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (United States)

^g JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^h LUXEMBOURG INSTITUTE OF HEALTH   (Luxembourg)

ⁱ QIMR BERGHOFER MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^j NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^k EUROPEAN BIOINFORMATICS INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^l Thermo Fisher Scientific   (United States)

^m MDS SCIEX   (Canada)

ⁿ EUROPEAN COMMISSION   (Belgium)

^o Wiley VCH   (Germany)

^p F HOFFMANN LA ROCHE LTD   (Switzerland)

^q TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^r UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^s UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^t JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^u UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^v LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^w NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^x PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^y NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^z VANDERBILT INGRAM CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^aa NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE   (United States)

^ab SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Amsterdam principles; Bioinformatics; Data quality; Metrics; Open access; Selected reaction monitoring; Standards

Indexed keywords

PEPTIDE;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CLINICAL DATA REPOSITORY; EDUCATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEOMICS; QUALITY CONTROL; REFERENCE DATABASE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELECTED REACTION MONITORING; TRAINING;

BENCHMARKING; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PEPTIDES; PROTEOMICS; QUALITY CONTROL; REFERENCE STANDARDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84855171902     PISSN: 18628346     EISSN: 18628354     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prca.201100097     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Policies on Release of Human Genomic Sequence Data. US Department of Energy Human Genome Project, Washington.
2. Sharing Data from Large-sclae Biological Research Projects: A System of Tripartite Responsibility. Wellcome Trust, London 2003.
3. Brazma, A., Hingamp, P., Quackenbush, J., Sherlock, G. et al., Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data. Nat. Genet. 2001, 29, 365-371.
4. Carr, S., Aebersold, R., Baldwin, M., Burlingame, A. et al., The need for guidelines in publication of peptide and protein identification data: working group on publication guidelines for peptide and protein identification data. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2004, 3, 531-533.
5. Bradshaw, R. A., Revised draft guidelines for proteomic data publication. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4, 1223-1225.
6. Bradshaw, R. A., Burlingame, A. L., Carr, S., Aebersold, R., Reporting protein identification data: the next generation of guidelines. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2006, 5, 787-788.
7. Wilkins, M. R., Appel, R. D., Van Eyk, J. E., Chung, M. C. M. et al., Guidelines for the next 10 years of proteomics. Proteomics 2006, 6, 4-8.
8. Celis, J. E., Carr, S. A., Bradshaw, R. A., New guidelines for clinical proteomics manuscripts. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2008, 7, 2071-2072.
9. Taylor, C. F., Paton, N. W., Lilley, K. S., Binz, P. A. et al., The minimum information about a proteomics experiment (MIAPE). Nat. Biotechnol. 2007, 25, 887-893.
10. Martens, L., Chambers, M., Sturm, M., Kessner, D. et al., mzML - a community standard for mass spectrometry data. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2011, 10, R110 000133.
11. Rodriguez, H., Snyder, M., Uhlén, M., Andrews, P. et al., Recommendations from the 2008 International Summit on Proteomics Data Release and Sharing Policy: The Amsterdam Principles. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 3689-3692.
12. Hill, J. A., Smith, B. E., Papoulias, P. G., Andrews, P. C., ProteomeCommons.org collaborative annotation and project management resource integrated with the Tranche repository. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 2809-2811.
13. Hermjakob, H., Apweiler, R., The Proteomics Identifications Database (PRIDE) and the ProteomExchange Consortium: making proteomics data accessible. Expert Rev. Proteomics 2006, 3, 1-3.
14. Legrain, P., Aebersold, R., Archakov, A., Bairoch, A. et al., The human proteome project: current state and future direction. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2011, 10, M111.009993.
15. Boja, E., Hiltke, T., Rivers, R., Kinsinger, C. et al., Evolution of clinical proteomics and its role in medicine. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 66-84.
16. Kall, L., Canterbury, J. D., Weston, J., Noble, W. S., MacCoss, M. J., Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets. Nat. Methods 2007, 4, 923-925.
17. Farrah, T., Deutsch, E. W., Omenn, G. S., Campbell, D. S. et al., A high-confidence human plasma proteome reference set with estimated concentrations in PeptideAtlas. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2011.
18. Tabb, D. L., McDonald, W. H., Yates, J. R., 3rd DTASelect and Contrast: tools for assembling and comparing protein identifications from shotgun proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 2002, 1, 21-26.
19. Keller, A., Nesvizhskii, A. I., Kolker, E., Aebersold, R., Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 5383-5392.
20. Nesvizhskii, A. I., Roos, F. F., Grossmann, J., Vogelzang, M. et al., Dynamic spectrum quality assessment and iterative computational analysis of shotgun proteomic data: toward more efficient identification of post-translational modifications, sequence polymorphisms, and novel peptides. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2006, 5, 652-670.
21. Kall, L., Storey, J. D., MacCoss, M. J., Noble, W. S., Assigning significance to peptides identified by tandem mass spectrometry using decoy databases. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 29-34.
22. Rudnick, P. A., Clauser, K. R., Kilpatrick, L. E., Tchekhovskoi, D. V. et al., Performance metrics for liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry systems in proteomics analyses. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2010, 9, 225-241.
23. Tabb, D. L., Vega-Montoto, L., Rudnick, P. A., Variyath, A. M. et al. Repeatability and reproducibility in proteomic identifications by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 761-776.
24. Whiteaker, J. R., Zhang, H., Zhao, L., Wang, P. et al., Integrated pipeline for mass spectrometry-based discovery and confirmation of biomarkers demonstrated in a mouse model of breast cancer. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6, 3962-3975.
25. Ross, P. L., Huang, Y. N., Marchese, J. N., Williamson, B. et al., Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2004, 3, 1154-1169.
26. Liu, H., Sadygov, R. G., Yates, J. R., A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 4193-4201.
27. Reiter, L., Rinner, O., Picotti, P., Huttenhain, R. et al., mProphet: automated data processing and statistical validation for large-scale SRM experiments. Nat. Methods 2011, 8, 430-435.
28. Abbatiello, S. E., Mani, D. R., Keshishian, H., Carr, S. A., Automated detection of inaccurate and imprecise transitions in peptide quantification by multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry. Clin. Chem. 2009, 56, 291-305.
29. Orchard, S., Albar, J. P., Deutsch, E. W., Eisenacher, M. et al., implementing data standards: a report on the HUPOPSI workshop September 2009, Toronto, Canada. Proteomics 2010, 10, 1895-1898.
30. Deutsch, E., mzML: A single, unifying data format for mass spectrometer output. Proteomics 2008, 8, 2776-2777.
31. Falkner, J. A., Andrews, P. C., Tranche: secure decentralized data storage for the proteomics community. J. Biomol. Tech. 2007, 18, 3.
32. Falkner, J. A., Hill, J. A., Andrews, P. C., Proteomics FASTA archive and reference resource. Proteomics 2008, 8, 1756-1757.
33. Vizcaino, J. A., Cote, R., Reisinger, F., Barsnes, H. et al., The Proteomics Identifications database: 2010 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, D736-742.
34. Craig, R., Cortens, J. P., Beavis, R. C., Open source system for analyzing, validating, and storing protein identification data. J. Proteome Res. 2004, 3, 1234-1242.
35. Deutsch, E. W., Lam, H., Aebersold, R., PeptideAtlas: A resource for target selection for emerging targeted proteomics workflows. EMBO Rep. 2008, 9, 429-434.
36. Beavis, R., The GPM Data Set of the Week, 2011. The GPMDB contains tens of thousands of data sets contributed by researchers around the world. Every week, a data set is selected because of its technical excellence, biological interest or simply because of its general interest to the proteomics community, 2011.
37. Paulovich, A. G., Billheimer, D., Ham, A. J., Vega-Montoto, L. et al., Interlaboratory study characterizing a yeast performance standard for benchmarking LC-MS platform performance. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2010, 9, 242-254.
38. Turck, C. W., Falick, A. M., Kowalak, J. A., Lane, W. S. et al., The association of biomolecular resource facilities proteomics research group 2006 study: relative protein quantitation. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2007, 6, 1291-1298.
39. Addona, T. A., Abbatiello, S. E., Schilling, B., Skates, S. J. et al., Multi-site assessment of the precision and reproducibility of multiple reaction monitoring-based measurements of proteins in plasma. Nat. Biotechnol. 2009, 27, 633-641.
40. Picotti, P., Rinner, O., Stallmach, R., Dautel, F. et al., High-throughput generation of selected reaction-monitoring assays for proteins and proteomes. Nat. Methods 2010, 7, 43-46.
41. Klimek, J., Eddes, J. S., Hohmann, L., Jackson, J. et al., The standard protein mix database: a diverse data set to assist in the production of improved peptide and protein identification software tools. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 7, 96-103.
42. Falkner, J., Kachman, M., Veine, D., Walker, A. et al., Validated MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectra for protein standards. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2007, 18, 850-855.
43. Askenazi, M., Falkner, J., Kowalak, J. A., Lane, W. S. et al., ABRF iPRG 2009 E. coli Subtractive Analysis. In: Tabb, D. L., (ed.), Proteome Commons, Nashville, TN 2009.
44. Askenazi, M., Clauser, K. R., Martens, L., McDonald, W. H. et al., Study Materials for Phosphopeptide Identification. In: Clauser, K., (ed.), Proteome Commons, Ann Arbor, MI 2010.
45. Omenn, G. S., The human proteome organization plasma proteome project pilot phase: reference specimens, technology platform comparisons, and standardized data submissions and analyses. Proteomics 2004, 4, 1235-1240.
46. Park, S. K., Yates, J. R., 3rd, Census for proteome quantification. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics Chapter 2010, 13, Unit 13 12 11-11.
47. Lu, B., Ruse, C. I., Yates, J. R., 3rd, Colander: A probability-based support vector machine algorithm for automatic screening for CID spectra of phosphopeptides prior to database search. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 3628-3634.
48. Lu, B., Ruse, C., Xu, T., Park, S. K., Yates, J., 3rd, Automatic validation of phosphopeptide identifications from tandem mass spectra. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 1301-1310.
49. Ma, Z. Q., Dasari, S., Chambers, M. C., Litton, M. D. et al., IDPicker 2.0: Improved protein assembly with high discrimination peptide identification filtering. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 3872-3881.
50. Keller, A., Nesvizhskii, A., Kolker, E., Aebersold, R., Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 5383.
51. Klammer, A. A., Park, C. Y., Noble, W. S., Statistical Calibration of the SEQUEST XCorr Function. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 2106-2113.
52. Nesvizhskii, A., Keller, A., Kolker, E., Aebersold, R., A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 4646.