Phylogeny estimation of the radiation of Western North American chipmunks (Tamias) in the face of introgression using reproductive protein genes

Systematic Biology

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 44-62

  Reid, Noah ^a,b   Demboski, John R ^c   Sullivan, Jack ^b  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

^c DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE AND SCIENCE   (United States)

Author keywords

Coalescent simulation; gene tree; hybridization; introgression; lineage sorting; multilocus; reproductive proteins; Sciuridae; species tree; Tamias

Indexed keywords

ACROSIN; CYTOCHROME B; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; PROTEIN;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; CELL NUCLEUS; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; HAPLOTYPE; HYBRIDIZATION; INTRON; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NORTH AMERICA; PHYLOGENY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SCIURIDAE; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ACROSIN; ANIMALS; CELL NUCLEUS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYTOCHROMES B; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; GENETIC SPECIATION; HAPLOTYPES; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; INTRONS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; NORTH AMERICA; PHYLOGENY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROTEINS; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SCIURIDAE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

SCIURIDAE; TAMIAS; TAMIAS MINIMUS; TAMIAS PANAMINTINUS; TAMIAS SPECIOSUS;

EID: 84555186848     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syr094     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. Akaike H. 1974. A new look at statistical model identifcation. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 19:716-723.
2. Alfaro M.E., Santini F., Brock C.D., Alamillo H., Dornburg A., Carnevale G., Rabosky D., Harmon L.J. 2009. Nine exceptional radiations plus high turnover explain species diversity in jawed vertebrates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106:13410-13414.
3. Banbury J.L., Spicer G.S. 2007. Molecular systematics of chipmunks (Neotamias) inferred by mitochondrial control region sequences. J. Mammal. Evol. 14:149-162. (Pubitemid 47497961)
4. Bazin E., Glémin S., Galtier N. 2006. Population size does not infuence mitochondrial genetic diversity in animals. Science 312:570-572.
5. Bergstrom B.J. 1992. Parapatry and encounter competition between chipmunk (Tamias) species and the hypothesized role of parasitism. Am. Midl. Nat. 128:168-179.
6. Blossom P.M. 1937. Description of a race of chipmunk from south central Idaho. Occas. Papers Mus. Zool. 366:1-3.
7. Bossu C.M., Near T.J. 2009. Gene trees reveal repeated instances of introgression in orangethroat darters (Percidae: Etheostoma). Syst. Biol. 58:114-129.
8. Brown J.H. 1971. Mechanisms of competitive exclusion between two species of chipmunks. Ecology. 52:305-311.
9. Buckley T.R., Cordeiro M., Marshall D.C., Simon C. 2006. Differentiating between hypotheses of lineage sorting and introgression in New Zealand alpine cicadas (Maoricicada Dugdale). Syst. Biol. 55:411-425.
10. Brown J.M., Hedtke S.M., Lemmon A.R., Lemmon E.M. 2010. When trees grow too long: investigating the causes of highly inaccurate Bayesian branch-length estimates. Syst. Biol. 59:145-161.
11. Carling M.D., Brumfeld R.T. 2009. Speciation in Passerina buntings: introgression patterns of sex-linked loci identify a candidate region for reproductive isolation. Mol. Ecol. 18:834-847.
12. Chan K., Levin S. 2005. Leaky prezygotic isolation and porous genomes: rapid introgression of maternally inherited DNA. Evolution. 59:720-729. (Pubitemid 40589284)
13. Cheviron Z.A., Brumfeld R.T. 2009. Migration-selection balance and local adaptation of mitochondrial haplotypes in rufous-collared sparrows (Zonotrichia capensis) along an elevational gradient. Evolution. 63:1593-1605.
14. Degnan J.H., Rosenberg N.A. 2006. Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees. PLoS Genet. 2:762-768. (Pubitemid 43794324)
15. Demboski J.R., Sullivan J. 2003.Extensive mtDNA variation within the yellow-pine chipmunk, Tamias amoenus (Rodentia: Sciuridae), and phylogeographic inferences for northwest North America. Mol. Phylogent. Evol. 26:389-408. (Pubitemid 36386497)
16. Dobzhansky T. 1951. Genetics and the origin of species. 3rd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.
17. Dowling T.E., Secor C.L. 1997. The role of hybridization in the evolutionary diversifcation of animals. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28:593-619. (Pubitemid 28012305)
18. Eckert A.J., Carstens B.C. 2008. Does gene fow destroy phylogenetic signal? The performance of three methods for estimating species phylogenies in the presence of gene fow. Mol. Phylogent. Evol. 49:834-842.
19. Edwards S.V. 2008. Is a new and general theory of molecular system-atics emerging? Evolution. 63:1-19.
20. Edwards S.V., Liu L., Pearl D.K. 2007. High resolution species trees without concatenation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104:5936-5941. (Pubitemid 47175637)
21. Fisher R.A. 1958. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. New York: Dover.
22. Funk D.J., Omland K.E. 2003. Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: frequency, causes, consequences, with insight from animal mito-chondrial DNA. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34:397-423.
23. Gannon W., Sikes R.S. 2007. Animal Care and Use Committee of the American Society of Mammalogists. Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research. J. Mammal. 88:809-823. (Pubitemid 47001236)
24. Gatesy J., Baker R.H. 2005. Hidden likelihood support in genomic data: can forty-fve wrongs make a right. 54:483-492.
25. Gatesy J., Swanson W.J. 2007. Adaptive evolution and phylogenetic utility of ACR (Acrosin), a rapidly evolving mammalian fertilization gene. J. Mammal. 88:32-42. (Pubitemid 46363944)
26. Goldman N., Anderson J.P., Rodrigo A.G. 2000. Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 49:652-670. (Pubitemid 33213083)
27. Good J.M., Demboski J.R., Nagorsen D.W., Sullivan J. 2003. Phylogeog-raphy and introgressive hybridization: Chipmunks (genus: Tamias) in the northern Rocky Mountains. Evolution. 57:1900-1916. (Pubitemid 37096405)
28. Good J.M., Hird S., Reid N., Demboski J.R., Steppan S.J., Martin-Nims T.R., Sullivan J. 2008. Ancient hybridization and mitochon-drial capture between two species of chipmunks. Mol. Ecol. 17: 1313-1327. (Pubitemid 351294600)
29. Good J.M., Nachman M.W. 2005. Rates of protein evolution are positively correlated with timing of expression during mouse spermato-genesis. Mol. Bio. Evol. 22:1044-1052 (Pubitemid 40471417)
30. Good J.M., Sullivan J. 2001. Phylogeography of the red-tailed chipmunk (Tamias rufcaudus), a northern Rocky Mountain endemic. Mol. Ecol. 10:2683-2695. (Pubitemid 33136572)
31. Haldane J.B.S. 1922. Sex ratio and unisexual sterility in animal hybrids. J. Genet. 12:101-109.
32. Harrison R.G. 1990. Hybrid zones: windows on evolutionary process. Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol. 7:69-128.
33. Heled J., Drummond A.J. 2010. Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27:570-580.
34. Hey J. 2004. HKA-a computer program for tests of natural selection. [Internet] Available from: http://lifesci.rutgers.edu/∼heylab/ ProgramsandData/Programs/HKA/HKA Documentation.htm.
35. Hey J., Nielsen R. 2004. Multilocus methods for estimating population sizes, migration rates and divergence time, with applications to the divergence of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Genetics. 167:747-760. (Pubitemid 38931862)
36. Hird S., Reid N., Demboski J., Sullivan J. 2010. Introgression at differentially aged hybrid zones in red-tailed chipmunks. Genetica. 138:869-883.
37. Hird S., Sullivan J. 2009. Assessing gene fow across a hybrid zone in red-tailed chipmunks (Tamias rufcaudus). Mol. Ecol. 18: 3097-3109.
38. Holder M.T., Anderson J.A., Holloway A.K. 2001. Diffculties in detecting hybridization. Syst. Biol. 50:978-982.
39. Howell A.H. 1925. Preliminary descriptions of fve new chipmunks from North America. J. Mammal. 6:51-54.
40. Hudson R.R., Kreitman M., Aguadé M. 1987. A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data. Genetics. 116:153-159.
41. Huelsenbeck J., Ronquist F. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic tress. Bioinformatics. 17:754-755. (Pubitemid 32851390)
42. Knowles L.L., Carstens B.C. 2007. Delimiting species without mono-phyletic gene trees. Syst. Biol. 56:887-895. (Pubitemid 350129639)
43. Kubatko L.S., Carstens B.C., Knowles L.L. 2009. STEM: species-tree estimation using maximum-likelihood for gene trees under coalescence. Bioinformatics. 25:971-973.
44. Kubatko L.S., Degnan J.H. 2007. Inconsistency of phylogenetic estimates from concatenated data under coalescence. Syst. Biol. 56: 17-24.
45. Kuhner M.K. 2006. LAMARC 2.0: Maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimation of population parameters. Bioinformatics Appl. Note. 22:768-770.
46. Levenson H., Hoffmann R.S., Nadler C.F., Deutsch L., Freeman S.D. 1985. Systematics of the holarctic chipmunks (Tamias). J. Mammal. 66:219-242.
47. Librado P., Rozas J. 2009. DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics. 25: 1451-1452.
48. Linnen C.R., Farrell B.D. 2008. Phylogenetic analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial genes reveals evolutionary relationships and mito-chondrial introgression in the sertifer species group of the genus Neodiprion (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae). Mol. Phylogent. Evol. 48:240-257.
49. Liu L., Pearl D.K. 2007. Species trees from gene trees: Reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions from a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions. Syst. Biol. 56:504-514.
50. Llopart A., Lachaise D., Coyne J.A. 2005. Multilocus analysis of in-trogression between two sympatric sister species of Drosophila: Drosophila yakuba and D. santomea. Genetics. 171:197-210. (Pubitemid 41437551)
51. Machado C.A., Kliman R.M., Markert J.A., Hey J. 2002. Inferring the history of speciation from multilocus DNA sequence data: the case of Drosophila pseudoobscura and close relatives. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:472-488. (Pubitemid 34289423)
52. Maddison W.P. 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 46: 523-536.
53. Maddison W.P., Knowles L. 2006. Inferring phylogeny despite incomplete lineage sorting. Syst. Biol. 55:21-30.
54. Maddison D.R., Maddison W.P. 2003. MacClade. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer& Associates.
55. Maddison D.R., Maddison W.P. 2009. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis, version 2.71 [Internet]. Available from: http://mesquiteproject.org/mesquite/mesquite.html.
56. Maroja L.S., Andres J.A., Harrison R.G. 2009. Genealogical discordance and patterns of introgression and selection across a cricket hybrid zone. Evolution. 63:2999-3015.
57. Maureira-Butler I.J., Pfeil B.E., Muangprom A., Osborn T.C., Doyle J.J. 2008. The reticulate history of medicago (Fabaceae). Syst. Biol., 57:466-482. (Pubitemid 351882211)
58. Mayr E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
59. Milne I., Lindner D., Bayer M., Husmeier D., McGuire G., Marshall D.F., Wright F. 2009. TOPALi v2: a rich graphical interface for evolutionary analyses of multiple alignments on HPC clusters and multi-core desktops. Bioinformatics. 25:126-127.
60. Minin V., Abdo Z., Joyce P., Sullivan J. 2003. Performance-based selection of likelihood models for phylogeny estimation. Syst. Biol. 52:674-683. (Pubitemid 37365048)
61. Mossel E., Roch S. 2008. Incomplete lineage sorting: consistent phy-logeny estimation from multiple loci. IEEE Comput. Biol. Bioin-form. 7:166-171.
62. Nadler C.F., Hoffmann R.S., Honacki J.H., Pozin D. 1977. Chromosomal evolution in chipmunks, with a special emphasis on A and B karyotypes of the subgenus Neotamias. Am. Midl. Nat. 98: 343-353.
63. Nordborg M. 2001. Coalescent theory. In: Balding, D.J., Bishop M., Cannings C., editors. Handbook of statistical genetics. Chichester (UK): Wiley. p. 179-212.
64. O'Meara B.C. 2010. New heuristic methods for joint species delimitation and species tree inference. Syst. Biol. 59:59-73.
65. Pamilo P., Nei M. 1988. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:568-583.
66. Patterson B.D., Thaeler C.S. Jr. 1982. The mammalian baculum: hypotheses on the nature of bacular variability. J. Mammal. 63: 1-15.
67. Payseur B.A., Krenz J.G., Nachman M.W. 2004. Differential patterns of introgression across the X chromosome in a hybrid zone between two species of house mice. Evolution. 58:2064-2078. (Pubitemid 39348506)
68. Petit R.J., Excoffer L. 2009. Gene fow and species delimitation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24:386-393.
69. Piaggio A.J., Spicer G.S. 2001. Molecular phylogeny of the chipmunks inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome b and cytochrome oxidase II gene sequences. Mol. Phylogent. Evol. 20:335-350. (Pubitemid 32835882)
70. Rambaut A., Drummond A.J. 2007. Tracer v1.4 [Internet]. Available from: http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer.
71. Rambaut A., Grassly N.C. 1997. Seq-Gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13:235-238. (Pubitemid 27249927)
72. Reid N., Hird S., Schulte-Hostedde A., Sullivan J. 2010. Examination of nuclear loci across a zone of mitochondrial introgression between Tamias rufcaudus and Tamias amoenus. J. Mammal. 91:1389-1400.
73. Rieseberg L.H., Whitton J., Gardner K. 1999. Hybrid zones and the genetic architecture of a barrier to gene fow between two sunfower species. Genetics. 152:713-727. (Pubitemid 29272722)
74. Rokas A., Williams B.L., King N., Carroll S.B. 2003. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature. 425:798-804. (Pubitemid 37355944)
75. Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J. 2003. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phy-logenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 19: 1572-1574. (Pubitemid 37038874)
76. Ruiz-Pesini E., Mishmar D., Brandon M., Procaccio V., Wallace D.C. 2004. Effects of purifying and adaptive selection on regional variation in human mtDNA. Science. 303:223-226. (Pubitemid 38057570)
77. Schluter D. 2000. The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press.
78. Schwenk K., Brede N., Streit B. 2008. Introduction. Extent, processes and evolutionary impact of interspecifc hybridization in animals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. B. 363:2805-2811.
79. Spinks P.Q., Shaffer H.B. 2009. Conficting mitochondrial and nuclear phylogenies for the widly disjunct Emys (Testudines:Emydidae) species complex and what they tell us about biogeography and hybridization. Syst. Biol. 58(1):1-20.
80. Stein A.C., Uy J.A.C. 2006. Unidirectional spread of a secondary sexual trait across an avian hybrid zone. Evolution. 60:1476-1485. (Pubitemid 44795590)
81. Stephens M., Donnelly P. 2003. A comparison of Bayesian methods for haplotype reconstruction from population genotype data. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 73:1162-1169. (Pubitemid 37414228)
82. Stephens M., Smith N., Donnelly P. 2001. A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 68:978-989. (Pubitemid 32289743)
83. Sukumaran J., Holder M.T. 2010. DendroPy: a python library for phy-logenetic computing. Bioinformatics. 26:1569-1571.
84. Sullivan J., Arellano E.A., Rogers D.S. 2000. Comparative phylogeog-raphy of Mesoamerican highland rodents: concerted versus independent responses to past climatic fuctuations. Am. Nat. 155: 755-768. (Pubitemid 30390832)
85. Sutton D.A. 1992. Tamias amoenus. Mamm. Species. 390:1-8.
86. Sutton D.A. 1995. Problems of taxonomy and distribution in four-species of chipmunks. J. Mammal. 76:843-850. (Pubitemid 26452688)
87. Sutton D.A., Patterson B.D. 2000. Geographic variation of the western chipmunks Tamiassenex and T. siskiyou, with two new subspecies from California. J. Mammal. 81:299-316. (Pubitemid 32964920)
88. Swanson W.J., Nielsen R., Yang Q. 2003. Pervasive adaptive evolution in mammalian fertilization proteins. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20: 18-20. (Pubitemid 36077894)
89. Swofford D.L. 2000. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Sunderland (MA): Sinauer and Associates.
90. Than C., Nakhleh L. 2009. Species tree inference by minimizing deep coalescences. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5:e1000501.
91. Turner L.M., Hoekstra H.E. 2006. Adaptive evolution of fertilization proteins within a genus: variation in Zp2 and Zp3 in deer mice (Peromyscus). Mol. Biol. Evol. 23:1656-1669. (Pubitemid 44309759)
92. Vacquier V.D. 1998. Evolution of gamete recognition proteins. Science. 281:1995-1998. (Pubitemid 28475481)
93. Ward P.S., Brady S.G., Fisher B.L., Schultz T.R. 2010. Phylogeny and biogeography of Dolichoderine ants: effects of data partitioning and relict taxa on historical inference. Syst. Biol. 59: 342-362.
94. Wasserman P.M., Jovine L., Litscher E.S. 2001. A profle of fertilization in mammals. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:E59-E64.
95. White J.A. 1953. The baculum in the chipmunks of western North America. Univ. Kansas Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist. 5:611-631.
96. Wilgenbusch J.C., Warren D.L., Swofford D.L. 2004. AWTY: a system for graphical exploration of MCMC convergence in Bayesian phy-logenetic inference [Internet]. Available from: http://ceb.csit.fsu. edu/awty.
97. Thorington R.W. Jr., Hoffmann R.S. 2005. Family Sciuridae. In: Wilson D.E., Reeder D.M., editors. Mammal species of the world: a taxo-nomic and geographic reference. 3rd edn. Baltimore (MD): John Hopkins University Press. p. 754-818.
98. Wirtz P. 1999. Mother species-father species: unidirectional hybridization in animals with female choice. Anim. Behav. 58:1-12. (Pubitemid 29337782)
99. Wu C.I. 2001. The genic view of the process of speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 14:851-865.
100. Yang Z., Rannala B. 2010. Bayesian species delimitation using multilo-cus data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107:9264-9269.
101. Zwickl D.J. 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion [dissertation]. Austin (TX): University of Texas.