Biomolecular self-defense and futility of high-specifcity therapeutic targeting

Gene Regulation and Systems Biology

Volumn 2011, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 89-104

  Rosenfeld, Simon ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptivity; Biological networks; Biological robustness; Cancer therapeutics; Chemoresistance; Dynamic stability; Swarm intelligence

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CARCINOGENESIS; DRUG RESISTANCE; DRUG TARGETING; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENE STRUCTURE; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULARLY TARGETED THERAPY; NONHUMAN; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUORUM SENSING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STEADY STATE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; TUMOR ESCAPE;

EID: 83755188110     PISSN: 11776250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4137/GRSB.S8542     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Stelling J, Sauer U, Szallasi Z, Doyle FJ III, Doyle J. Robustness of cellular functions. Cell. 2004;118:675.
2. Kitano H. Biological robustness. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5:826.
3. Kitano H. Cancer robustness: tumour tactics. Nature. 2003;426:125.
4. Kitano H. A robustness-based approach to systems-oriented drug design. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007;6:202.
5. Csermely P, Agoston V, Pongor S. The effciency of multi-target drugs: the network approach might help drug design. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2005; 26:178.
6. Thomas R, D'Ari R. Biological Feedback. CRC Press; 1990.
7. Huang Y, Tienda-Luna IM, Wang Y. A survey of statistical models for reverse engineering gene regulatory networks, IEEE signal. Process Mag. 2009;26:76.
8. Ideker TE. Network genomics, systems biology, Springer, Berlin. Heidelberg. 2007:89-115.
9. Newman MEJ. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review. 2003;45:167.
10. Strogatz S. Nonlinear dynamics and chaos: with applications to physics, biology, chemistry and engineering. Springer-Verlag. 1994.
11. Rosenfeld S. Why do high-dimensional networks seem to be stable?-A refection on stochasticity of dynamically unstable nonlinear systems, In: Gauges R, Kummer U, Pahle J, Willy P, eds. Fifth workshop on computation of biochemical pathways and genetic networks, university of Heidelberg. Heidelberg. 2008:101-12.
12. Rosenfeld S. Mathematical descriptions of biochemical networks: Stability, stochasticity, evolution. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2011.
13. Albert R, Jeong H, Barabasi AL. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature. 2000;406:378.
14. Latora V, Marchiori M. How the science of complex networks can help developing strategies against terrorism. 2004:69-75.
15. Guckenheimer J, Holmes P. Nonlinear oscillations, dynamical systems, and bifurcations of vector felds. Springer. 2002.
16. Rosenfeld S. Characteristics of transcriptional activity in nonlinear dynamics of genetic regulatory networks. Gene Regul Syst Bio. 2009;3:159.
17. Gantmacher FR. Applications of the theory of matrices, interscience, NY. 1959.
18. May RM. Will a large complex system be stable? Nature. 1972;238:413.
19. Rosenfeld S. Origins of stochasticity and burstiness in high-dimensional biochemical networks, EURASIP. J Bioinform Syst Biol. 2009:362309.
20. Beisner BE, Haydon DT, Cuddington K. Alternative stable states in ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment. 2003;1:376.
21. Laurent M, Kellershohn N. Multistability: a major means of differentiation and evolution in biological systems. Trends Biochem Sci. 1999;24: 418.
22. Goldbeter A. Computational approaches to cellular rhythms. Nature. 2002; 420:238.
23. Jain S, Krishna S. Graph theory and the evolution of autocatalitic networks. In: Bornholdt S, Shuster HG, eds. Handbook of graphs and networks: from the genome to the internet. Wiley-VCH. 2003;356-95.
24. Ikeda M, Siljak DD. Lotka-volterra equations: decomposition, stability and structure. J Math Biology. 1980;9:65.
25. Hernanades-Bermejo B, Fairen V. Lotka-volterra representation of general nonlinear systems. Math Biosci. 1997;140:1.
26. Samuelsson B, Troein C. Superpolynomial growth in the number of attrac-tors in Kauffman networks. Phys Rev Lett. 2003;90:098701.
27. Levin RD. Molecular Reaction Dynamics, Cambridge University Press; 2005.
28. Stelling J, Gilles ED, Doyle FJ III. Robustness properties of circadian clock architectures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:13210.
29. Arnold L. Qualitative Theory of stochastic non-linear systems. In: Arnold L, Lefever R, eds, stochastic nonlinear systems, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo. 1981:86-99.
30. Gardiner CW. Handbook of stochastic methods: for physics, chemistry and the natural sciences. Springer-Verlag. 1983.
31. Krakauer DC, Plotkin JB. Redundancy, antiredundancy, and the robustness of genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:1405.
32. Li J, Yuan Z, Zhang Z. The cellular robustness by genetic redundancy in budding yeast. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1001187.
33. Pasek S, Risler JL, Brezellec P. The role of domain redundancy in genetic robustness against null mutations. J Mol Biol. 2006;362:184.
34. Wagner A. Distributed robustness versus redundancy as causes of muta-tional robustness. Bioessays. 2005;27:176.
35. Wagner A, Wright J. Alternative routes and mutational robustness in complex regulatory networks. Biosystems. 2007;88:163.
36. Brookfeld J. Can genes be truly redundant? Curr Biol. 1992;2:553.
37. Brookfeld JF. Genetic redundancy. Adv Genet. 1997;36:137.
38. Papp B, Pal C, Hurst LD. Evolution of cis-regulatory elements in duplicated genes of yeast. Trends Genet. 2003;19:417.
39. Voit EO. Canonical nonlinear modeling. S-system approach to understanding complexity. Van Norstand Reinhold N Y. 1991.
40. Garnier S, Gautrails J, Theraulas G. The biological principles of swarm intelligence. Swarm Intelligence. 2007;1:3.
41. Seeley TD. When is self-organization used in biological systems? Biol Bull. 2002;202:314.
42. Garnier S, et al. The embodiment of cockroach aggregation behavior in a group of micro-robots. Artif Life. 2008;14:387.
43. Garnier S, et al. Aggregation behavior as a source of collective decision in a group of cockroach-like-robots, advances in artifcial life. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2005:169-78.
44. Rubenstein M, Sai Y, Chuong C, Shen W. Regenerative patterning in Swarm robots: mutual benefts of research in robotics and stem sell biology. The International Journal of Developmental Biology. 2009;53:869.
45. Labella T, Dorigo M, Deneubourg JL. Division of labor in a group of robots inspired by ants' foraging behavior. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems. 2006;1:4.
46. Bonabeau E, Dorigo M, Theraulaz G. Swarm intelligence: from natural to artifcial systems, Oxford University Press, New York Oxford; 1999.
47. Chandrasekaran S, Hougen D. Swarm intelligence for cooperation of bio-nano robots using quorum sensing, BMN ′06, San Francisco, CA, USA. 2006:15-8.
48. Maltzahn G, et al. Nanoparticles that communicate in vivo to amplify tumor targeting. Nature Naterials. 2011;10:545.
49. Kiranyaz S, Ince T, Yildirim A, Gabbouj M. Evolutionary artifcial neural networks by multi-dimensional particle swarm optimization. Neural Netw. 2009;22:1448.
50. Shmygelska A, Hoos HH. An ant colony optimisation algorithm for the 2D and 3D hydrophobic polar protein folding problem, BMC. Bioinformatics. 2005;6:30.
51. Karaboga D, Basturk B. A powerful and effcient algorithm for numerical function optimization: artifcial bee olony (ABC) algorithm. J Glob Optim. 2007;39:459.
52. Ben-Jacob E, Becker I, Shapira Y, Levine H. Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence. Trends Microbiol. 2004;12:366.
53. Bassler BL. How bacteria talk to each other: regulation of gene expression by quorum sensing. Curr Opin Microbiol. 1999;2:582.
54. Queller DC, Strassmann JE. Beyond society: the evolution of organismality. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009;364:3143.
55. Morimoto BH, Koshland DE. Short-term and long-term memory in single cells. FASEB J. 1991;5:2061.
56. Kashiwagi A, Urabe I, Kaneko K, Yomo T. Adaptive response of a gene network to environmental changes by ftness-induced attractor selection. PLoS ONE. 2006;1:e49.
57. Barabasi AL, Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science. 1999;286:509.
58. Albert R. Scale-free networks in cell biology. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:4947.
59. Strogatz SH. Exploring complex networks. Nature. 2001;410:268.
60. Grebogi C, Ott E, Yorke JA. Unstable periodic orbits and the dimensions of multifractal chaotic attractors. Phys Rev A. 1988;37:1711.
61. Ott E, Grebogi C, Yorke JA. Controlling chaos. Phys Rev Lett. 1990;64: 1196.
62. Ditto WL, Rauseo SN, Spano ML. Experimental control of chaos. Phys Rev Lett. 1990;65:3211.
63. Andrievskii B, Fradkov A. Control of chaos: methods and applications. part 1. methods. Automation and Remote Control. 2003;64:673.
64. Andrievskii B, Fradkov A. Control of chaos: methods and applications. part 2. applications. Automation and Remote Control. 2004;65:505.
65. Feudel U, Grebogi C. Multistability and the control of complexity. Chaos. 1997;7:597.
66. Goswami BK, et al. Control of stochastic multistable systems: experimental demonstration. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2009;80:016211.
67. Shibata D. Clonal diversity in tumor progression. Nat Genet. 2006;38:402.
68. Sonnenschein C, Soto AM. Theories of carcinogenesis: an emerging perspective. Semin Cancer Biol. 2008.
69. Laconi E. The evolving concept of tumor microenvironments. Bioessays. 2007;29:738.
70. Bissell MJ, Hines WC. Why don't we get more cancer? A proposed role of the microenvironment in restraining cancer progression. Nat Med. 2011;17:320.
71. Grunewald TG, Herbst SM, Heinze J, Burdach S. Understanding tumor heterogeneity as functional compartments-superorganisms revisited. J Transl Med. 2011;9:79.
72. Dunne BJ, Jahn RG. Consciousness, information, and living systems. Cell Mol Biol. (Noisy. -le-grand) 2005;51:703.
73. Gates E. Methods of Research and Importance of Cellular Psychology. The American Therapist. 1895;4:157.
74. Kitano H. Cancer as a robust system: implications for anticancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:227.
75. Lev Baror R, et al. Generation of oscillations by the p53-Mdm2 feedback loop: a theoretical and experimental study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:11250.
76. Fodale V, Pierobon M, Liotta L, Petricoin E. Mechanism of cell adaptation: when and how do cancer cells develop chemoresistance? Cancer J. 2011; 17:89.
77. Radisky D, Hagios C, Bissell MJ. Tumors are unique organs defined by abnormal signaling and context. Semin Cancer Biol. 2001;11:87.
78. Egeblad M, Nakasone ES, Werb Z. Tumors as organs: complex tissues that interface with the entire organism. Dev Cell. 2010;18:884.
79. Merlo LM, et al. A comprehensive survey of clonal diversity measures in Barrett's esophagus as biomarkers of progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2010;3:1388.
80. Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Morales-Vasquez F, Hortobagyi GN. Overview of resistance to systemic therapy in patients with breast cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2007;608:1.
81. Mellor HR, Callaghan R. Resistance to chemotherapy in cancer: a complex and integrated cellular response. Pharmacology. 2008;81:275.
82. Vogelstein B, Lane D, Levine AJ. Surfng the p53 network. Nature. 2000; 408:307.
83. Longley DB, Johnston PG. Molecular mechanisms of drug resistance. J Pathol. 2005;205:275.
84. Mukherjee S. The Emperor of all maladies: a biography of cancer. Scribner. 2011.
85. Chuang HY, Lee E, Liu YT, Lee D, Ideker T. Network-based classifcation of breast cancer metastasis. Mol Syst Biol. 2007;3:140.
86. Pawson T, Linding R. Network medicine. FEBS Lett. 2008;582:1266.
87. Barabasi AL. Network medicine-from obesity to the "diseasome". N Engl J Med. 2007;357:404.
88. Agoston V, Csermely P, Pongor S. Multiple weak hits confuse complex systems: a transcriptional regulatory network as an example. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2005;71:051909.
89. Hopkins AL. Network pharmacology: the next paradigm in drug discovery. Nat Chem Biol. 2008;4:682.
90. Agur Z, et al. Disruption of a Quorum Sensing mechanism triggers tumorigenesis: a simple discrete model corroborated by experiments in mammary cancer stem cells. Biol Direct. 2010;5:20.
91. Hickson J, et al. Societal interactions in ovarian cancer metastasis: a quorum-sensing hypothesis. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2009;26:67.
92. Goldberg P. Prepare for tsunami of genomic information, sledge urges in ASCO presidential address. The Cancer Letter. 2011;37:1.