Format as a false judge of credibility: Messages from librarians and faculty and student responses

Communications in Information Literacy

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 21-37

  Mark, Amy E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 82755186999     PISSN: 19335954     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.15760/comminfolit.2011.5.1.100     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Albitz, R. (2007, January). The what and who of information literacy and critical thinking in higher education. Portal: Libraries & the Academy, 7(1), 97-109.
2. Abrams, S. & Luther, J. (2004). Born with the chip. Library Journal 129(8), 34-38.
3. American Council on Higher Education (ACE). (2008). About ACE. Retrieved October 16, 2008, from http://www.acenet.edu/AM/Template.cfm?Section=About_ACE
4. American Library Association. (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Retrieved, December 29, 2008, from http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency.cfm
5. Brabazon, T. (2007). The University of Google: Education in the (post) information age. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
6. Bruckman, A. (2005). Student research and the Internet. Communications of the ACM, 48(12), 35-37.
7. Clemmitt, M. (2008). Internet accuracy. CQ Researcher, 18, 625-648.
8. Cooley, E & Goedeken, E. A. (1999). The significance of information provision and content: Libraries as information providers instead of format collectors. In J. Cole & J. W. Williams (Eds.), Serials management in the electronic era: Papers in honor of Peter Gellatly (pp. 47-55). New York: Haworth Press.
9. Crawley, V. (1996, December 30). Learning in the age of Internet information overload. Community College Week, 4.
10. Davis, P. M. (2003). Effect of the Web on undergraduate citation behavior: Guiding student scholarship in a networked age. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(1), 41-51.
11. Davis, P. M., & Cohen, S. A. (2001). The effect of the Web on undergraduate citation behavior 1996-1999. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 52(4), 309-314.
12. Diller, K. R., & Phelps, S. F. (2008). Learning outcomes, portfolios, and rubrics, oh my! Authentic assessment of an information literacy program. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 8(1), 75-89.
13. Doherty, J., & Ketchner, K. (2005). Empowering the intentional learner: A critical theory for information literacy instruction. Library Philosophy & Practice, 8(1), 1-10.
14. Elmborg, J. (2006). Critical information literacy: Implications for instructional practice. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(2), 192-199.
15. Fields, A. M. (2005). Self-efficacy and the first-year university student's authority of knowledge: An exploratory study. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(6), 539-545.
16. Foster, A. (2007, March 9). Information navigation 101. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(27), A38-A40.
17. Freire, P. (2000) Pedagogy of the oppressed. (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). New York: Continuum.
18. Graham, L., & Metaxas, P. T. (2003). Of course it's true; I saw it on the Internet: Critical thinking in the Internet Era. Communications of the ACM, 46(5), 71-75.
19. Gratch, B. (1985). Toward a methodology for evaluating research paper bibliographies. Research Strategies, 3(4), 170-177.
20. Harris, F. J. (2005). I found it on the Internet: Coming of age online. Chicago: American Library Association.
21. Head, A. J. (2007). Beyond Google: How do students conduct academic research? First Monday, 12(8-6). Retrieved December 28, 2008, from, http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1998/1873
22. Head, A. J., & Eisenberg, M. B. (2009). Finding Context: What today's college students say about conducting research in the digital age. Project Information Literacy Report. Retrieved November 10, 2009 from, http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_ProgressReport_2_2009.pdf
23. Head, A. J., & Eisenberg, M. B. (2010). How handouts for research assignments guide today's college students. Project Information Literacy Report. Retrieved August 2, 2010 from, http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_Handout_Study_finalvJuly_2010.pdf
24. Hearn, M. R. (2005). Embedding a librarian in the classroom: An intensive information literacy model. Reference Services Review, 33(2), 219-227.
25. Hogan, J., & West, A. (2007). Improving the way we do business: Managing the information overload. Perspectives: Policy & Practice in Higher Education, 11(1), 3-6.
26. Hovde, K. (2000). Check the citation: Library instruction and student paper bibliographies. Research Strategies, 17(1), 3-9.
27. Joswick, K. E. (1994). Library materials use by college freshmen: A citation analysis of composition papers. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 1(1), 43-66.
28. Kirkwood, A. (2006). Getting networked learning in context: Are online students' technical and information literacy skills adequate and appropriate? Learning, Media, & Technology, 31(2), 117-131.
29. Lazonder, A. W., Biemans, H. J. A., & Wopereis, I. G. J. H. (2000). Differences between novice and experienced users in searching for information on the World Wide Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(6), 576-581.
30. Leckie, G. J. (1996). Desperately seeking citations: Uncovering faculty assumptions about the undergraduate research process. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 22(3), 201-208.
31. Meola, M. (2004). Chucking the checklist: A contextual approach to teaching undergraduates Web-Site evaluation. Portal: Libraries & the Academy, 4(3), 331-344.
32. Middleton A. (2005). An attempt to quantify the quality of student bibliographies. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 6 (1), 7-18.
33. Mohler, B. (2005). Citation analysis as an assessment tool. Science & Technology Libraries, 25(4), 57-64.
34. Moore, P. (2002). An analysis of information literacy education worldwide. A white paper prepared for UNESCO, the U.S. National Commission on Libraries and Information Science, and the National Forum on Information Literacy, for use at the Information Literacy Meeting of Experts, Prague, and The Czech Republic. Retrieved December 18, 2008, from http://portal.unesco.org/ci/en/files/19633/11228857221Information_Literacy_Education_(Moore).pdf/Information%2BLiteracy%2BEducation%2B(Moore).pdf
35. O'Hanlon, N. (2002). Net knowledge: Performance of new college students on an Internet skills proficiency test. Internet & Higher Education, 5(1), 55.
36. Online Computer Library Center (OCLC). (2005). Perceptions of libraries and information resources: A report to the OCLC Membership. Dublin, OH: OCLC.
37. Pew Internet & American Life Project. (2007) "Online activities and pursuits" section. Retrieved September 4, 2008, from http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/231/report_display.asp
38. Pithers, R. T. & Soden, R. (2000). Critical thinking in education: A review. Educational Research 42(3), 237-249.
39. Rowley, J., & Urquhart, C. (2007). Understanding student information behavior in relation to electronic information services: Lessons from longitudinal monitoring and evaluation, Part 1. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 58(8), 1162-1174.
40. Savolainen, R. (2007). Filtering and withdrawing: Strategies for coping with information overload in everyday contexts. Journal of Information Science, 33(5), 611-621.
41. Schantz, S. (1999). The limits of Internet research. Community College Week, 12(8), 4.
42. Seamans, N. H. (2002). Student perception of information literacy: Insights for librarians. Reference Services Review, 30 (2), 112-123.
43. Singh, J. (2008). Paulo Freire: Possibilities for dialogic communication in a marketdriving information age. Information, Communication & Society, 11(5), 699-726.
44. Snavely, L. (2008). Global educational goals, technology, and information literacy in higher education. New Directions for Teaching & Learning, 2008(114), 35-46.
45. Spira, J. (2007). From knowledge to distraction. (Cover story). KM World, 16(3), 1-32.
46. Swanson, T. (2004). Applying a critical pedagogical perspective to information literacy standards. Community & Junior College Libraries, 12(4), 65-78.
47. Sylvia, M., & Lesher, M. (1995). What journals do psychology graduate students need? A citation analysis of thesis references. College & Research Libraries, 56(4), 313-18.
48. Ursin, L., Lindsay, E. B., & Johnson, C. M. (2004). Assessing library instruction in the freshman seminar: A citation analysis study. Reference Services Review, 32(3), 284-292.
49. Valentine, B. (1993). Undergraduate research behavior: Using focus groups to generate theory. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 19(5), 300-304.
50. Waldman, M. (2003). Freshmen's use of library electronic resources and selfefficacy. Information Research, 8(2). Retrieved December 28, 2008, from http://informationr.net/ir/8-2/paper150.html
51. Walker, B. (2006). Google no more: A model for successful research. Teaching Professor, 20(2), 1-4.
52. Wang, Y. & Artero, M. (2005). Caught in the Web: University students use of Web resources. Educational Media International, 42(1), 71-82.
53. Ward, D. (2006). Revisioning information literacy for lifelong meaning. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(4), 396-402.
54. Weiler, A. (2005). Information-seeking behavior in generation Y students: Motivation, critical thinking, and learning theory. Journal of Academic Librarianship 31(1), 46-53.
55. Whitmire, E. (2002). Disciplinary differences and undergraduates' information-seeking behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 53(8), 631-638.
56. Wiegand, W. (1986). The politics of an emerging profession: The American Library Association, 1879-1917. New York: Greenwood Press.
57. Young, J. (2005, April 22). Knowing when to log Off. Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(33), A34-A35.
58. Yu, F., Sullivan, J., & Woodall, L. (2006). What can students' bibliographies tell us? Evidence based information skills teaching for engineering students. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 1(2), 12-22.