Orthographic and phonological parafoveal processing of consonants, vowels, and tones when reading Thai

Applied Psycholinguistics

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 739-759

  Winskel, Heather ^a  

^a SOUTHERN CROSS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 82555171666     PISSN: 01427164     EISSN: 14691817     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S014271641100004X     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Acha, J., & Perea, M. (2008). The effect of neighborhood frequency in reading: Evidence with transposed-letter neighbors. Cognition, 108, 290-300.
2. Ashby, J., Treiman, R., Kessler, B., & Rayner, K. (2006). Vowel processing during silent reading: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 416-424. (Pubitemid 43551112)
3. Balota, D. A., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 364-390.
4. Berent, I., & Perfetti, C. A. (1995). A rose is a REEZ: The two-cycles model of phonological assembly in reading English. Psychological Review, 102, 146-184.
5. Besner, D., Coltheart, M., & Davelaar, E. (1984). Basic processes in reading: Computation of abstract letteridentities. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 38, 126-134.
6. Binder, K. S., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1999). Extraction of information to the left of the fixated word in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1162-1172.
7. Brown, P., & Besner, D. (1987). The assembly of phonology in oral reading: A new model. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention andperformance: Thepsychology of reading (Vol. 12, pp. 471-489). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Carr, T. H., & Pollatsek, A. (1985). Recognizing printed words: A look at current models. In D. Besner, T. J. Waller, & G. E. Mac Kinnon (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory andpractice (Chap. 5, pp. 1-82). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
9. Carreiras, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Molinaro, N. (2009). Consonants and vowels contribute differently to visual word recognition: ERPs of relative position priming. Cerebral Cortex, 19,2659-2670.
10. Carreiras, M., & Price, C. J. (2008). Brain activation for consonants and vowels. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 1727-1735. (Pubitemid 351882049)
11. Carreiras, M., Vergara, M., & Perea, M. (2007). ERP correlates oftransposed-letter similarity effects: Are consonants processed differently from vowels? Neuroscience Letters, 419, 219-224. (Pubitemid 46755494)
12. Carreiras, M., Vergara, M., & Perea, M. (2009). ERP correlates of transposed-letter priming effects: The role of vowels vs. consonants. Psychophysiology, 46, 34-42.
13. Castles, A., Davis, C., & Forster, K. I. (2003). Word recognition development in children: Insights from masked-priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. Lupker (Eds.), Maskedpriming: State of the art (pp. 345-360). Hove: Psychology Press.
14. Chace, K. H., Rayner, K., & Well, A. D. (2005). Eye movements and phonological parafoveal preview: Effects of reading skill. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 209-217. (Pubitemid 43706241)
15. Colombo, L. (2000). The assembly of phonology in Italian and English: Consonants and vowels. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 377-398). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
16. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256. (Pubitemid 33604132)
17. Davis, C. J. (1999). The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales.
18. Davis, C. J. (2006). Orthographic input coding: A review of behavioural data and current models. In S. Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexicalprocessing (pp. 180-206). Hove: Psychology Press.
19. Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2005). Morphological parafoveal preview benefit effects in reading: Evidence from Hebrew. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 341-371. (Pubitemid 40309973)
20. Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 39, 211-251.
21. Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71-99. (Pubitemid 128770176)
22. Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 104-115.
23. Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2007). A model of the go/no-go task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 389-413.
24. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565. (Pubitemid 126432209)
25. Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 417-429.
26. Inhoff, A.W.,& Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal wordprocessing during eye fixations inreading. Effects of word frequency. Perception and Psychophysics, 40, 431-439. (Pubitemid 17214531)
27. Johnson, R. L. (2007). The flexibility of letter coding: Nonadjacent letter transposition effects in the parafovea. In R. van Gompel, M. Fisher, W. Murray, & R. L. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mindand brain (pp. 425-440). Oxford: Elsevier.
28. Johnson, R. L., Perea, M., & Rayner, K. (2007). Transposed- lettereffects inreading: Evidencefromeye movements and parafoveal preview. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 209-229.
29. Kambe, G. (2004). Parafoveal processing of prefixed words during eye fixations in reading: Evidence against morphological influences on parafoveal preprocessing. Perception and Psychophysics, 66, 279-292. (Pubitemid 38740006)
30. Kessler, B., & Treiman, R. (2001). Relationships between sounds and letters in English monosyllables. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 592-617. (Pubitemid 33654793)
31. Kinoshita, S. (1998). The role of phonology in reading Japanese: Or why I don't hear myself when reading Japanese. Reading and Writing, 10, 439-455.
32. Lee, H. W., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2001). The relative contribution of consonants and vowels to word identification during silent reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 189-205. (Pubitemid 33379930)
33. Lee, H. W., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2002). The processing of vowels and consonants in reading: Evidence from the fast-priming paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 766-772.
34. Lee, Y., Binder, K. S., Kim, J., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1999). Activation ofphonological codes during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 948-964.
35. Liu, L., Peng, D., Ding, G., Jin, Z., Zhang, L., Li, K., & Chen, C. (2006). Dissociation in the neural basis underlying Chinese tone and vowel production. Neuro Image, 29, 515-523. (Pubitemid 43063308)
36. Liu, W., Inhoff, A. W., Ye, Y., & Wu, C. (2002). Use of parafoveally visible characters during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1213-1227.
37. Luksaneeyanawin, S. (2004). The Thai one million worddatabase. Bangkok, Thailand: Chulaglongkorn University, Center for Research in Speech and Language Processing.
38. Mc Clelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
39. Mc Conkie, G. W., &Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perceptionand Psychophysics, 17, 578-586.
40. Miellet, S., & Sparrow, L. (2004). Phonological codes are assembled before word fixation: Evidence from boundary paradigm in sentence reading. Brain and Language, 90, 299-310. (Pubitemid 38681144)
41. Norris, D., & Kinoshita, S. (2008). Perception as evidence accumulation and Bayesian inference. Insights from masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 434-455.
42. Perea, M., & Acha, J. (2009). Does letter position coding depend on consonant/vowel status? Evidence with the masked priming technique. Acta Psychologica, 130, 127-137.
43. Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2006). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a prelexical phono-logical level? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 59, 1600-1613. (Pubitemid 44180436)
44. Perea, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2008). Transposed-letterpriming effects forclose versus distant transpositions. Experimental Psychology, 55, 397-406.
45. Perea, M., &Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231-232.
46. Perea, M., & Peretz, E. (2009). Beyond alphabetic orthographies: The role of form and phonology in transposition effects in Katakana. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 67-88.
47. Perfetti, C. A., & Mc Cutchen, D. (1982). Speech processes in reading. In N. Lass (Ed.), Speech and language: Advances in basic research and practice (Vol. 7, pp. 237-269). New York: Academic Press.
48. Pollatsek, A., Lesch, M. F., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1992). Phonological codes are used in inte-grating information across saccades in word identification and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perceptionand Performance, 18, 148-162.
49. Pollatsek, A., Tan,L. H., &Rayner, K. (2000). The role of phonological code sinintegrating information across saccadic eye movements in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 607-633.
50. Rayner, K.(1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7,65-81.
51. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422. (Pubitemid 128461792)
52. Rayner, K., Well, A. D., Pollatsek, A., & Bertera, J. H. (1982). The availability ofuseful information to the right of fixation in reading. Perception and Psychophysics, 31, 537-550.
53. Rayner, K., White, S., Johnson, R. L., & Liversedge, S. (2006). Reading words withjumbled letters: There's a cost. Psychological Science, 17, 192-193.
54. Slattery, T. J., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2006). The time course ofphonological and orthographic processing of acronyms in reading: Evidence from eye movements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 412-417. (Pubitemid 44825061)
55. Tsai, J.-L., Lee, C.-Y., Tzeng, O. J. L., Hung, D. L., & Yen, N.-S. (2004). Use ofphonological codes for Chinese characters: Evidence from processing ofparafoveal preview when reading sentences. Brain and Language, 91, 235-244. (Pubitemid 39361635)
56. Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2009). Letter-transposition effects are not universal: The impact of transposing letters in Hebrew. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 285-302.
57. White, S. J., Rayner, K., & Liversedge, S. P. (2005). Eye movements and the modulation of parafoveal processing by foveal processing difficulty: A re-examination. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 891-896. (Pubitemid 43341545)
58. Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 221-243. (Pubitemid 33604173)
59. Whitney, C. (inpress). Comparison of the SERIOL and SOLARtheories of letter-position encoding. Brain and Language.
60. Williams, C. C., Perea, M., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2006). Previewing the neighborhood: The role of orthographic neighbors as parafoveal previews in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perceptionand Performance, 32, 1072-1082. (Pubitemid 44157621)
61. Winskel, H., Radach, R., & Luksaneeyanawin, S. (2009). Eye movements when reading spaced and un-spaced Thai and English: A comparison of Thai-English bilinguals and English monolinguals. Journal of Memoryand Language, 61, 339-351.
62. Xu, Y., Pollatsek, A., & Potter, M. C. (1999). The activation ofphonology during silent Chinese word reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 838-857.