Student team projects in information systems development: Measuring collective creative efficacy

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 881-895

  Cheng, Hsiu Hua ^a   Yang, Heng Li ^b  

^a CHAOYANG UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHENGCHI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 81355123059     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14495554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.918     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Akgun, A. E., Keskin, H., Byren, J. & Imamoglu, S. Z. (2007). Antecedents and consequences of team potency in software development projects. Information and Management, 44, 646-656. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.08.001
2. Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39-58. http://cmr.berkeley.edu/search/articleDetail.aspx?article=3889
3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social-cognitive theory. NJ: Prentice-Hall Press.
4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise control. New York: Freeman.
5. Barki, H., Rivard, S. & Talbot, J. (2001). An integrative contingency model of software project risk management. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(4), 37-69. http://www.jmisweb.org/issues/Spring_2001/index.html
6. Byrd, T. A., Crossick, K. L. & Zmud, R. W. (1992). A synthesis of research on requirements analysis and knowledge acquisition techniques. MIS Quarterly, 16(9), 117-138. http://www.jstor.org/stable/249704
7. Carmeli, A. & Schaubroeck, J. (2007). The influence of leaders' and other referents' normative expectations on individual involvement in creative work. The Leadership Quarterly, 35, 35-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.11.001
8. Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: a typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.234
9. Chen, G., Gully, S. M. & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 62-83. http://orm.sagepub.com/content/4/1/62.short.
10. Chen, G., Webber, S. S., Bliese, P. D., Mathieu, J. E., Payne, S. C., Born, D. H. & Zaccaro, S. J. (2002). Simultaneous examination of the antecedents and consequences of efficacy beliefs at multiple levels of analysis. Human Performance, 15(4), 381-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327043HUP1504_05
11. Chen, L. H. (2008). Job satisfaction among information system (IS) personal. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 105-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.012
12. Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), vii-xvi. http://misq.org/misq/downloads/download/editorial/314/?SID=kq7gcccm2jqj1 olv049jlv7cd2
13. Coleman, G. & O'Connor, R. (2007). Using grounded theory to understand software process improvement: A study of Irish software product companies. Information and Software Technology, 49, 654-667. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2007.02.011
14. Dyba, T. (2005). An empirical investigation of the key factors for success in software process improvement. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31, 410-424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2005.53
15. Fichman, R. G. & Kemerer, C. F. (1999). The illusory diffusion of innovation: An examination of assimilation gaps. Information Systems Research, 10(3), 255-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.10.3.255
16. Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3151312
17. Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York: Basicbook.
18. Gibson, C. B. & Earley, P. C. (2007). Collective cognition in action: Accumulation, interaction, examination, and accommodation in the development and operation of group efficacy beliefs in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 438-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.24351397
19. Green, G. C., Hevner, A. R. & Collins, R. W. (2005). The impacts of quality and productivity perceptions on the use of software process improvement innovations. Information and Software Technology, 47, 543-553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2004.10.004
20. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
21. Helmreich, R. L. & Spence, J. T. (1978). Achievement motivation and scientific attainment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 222-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014616727800400209
22. Henderson, J. C. & Lee, S. (1992). Managing I/S design teams: A control theories perspective. Management Science, 38(6), 757-776. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2632340
23. Herrera, O. & Fuller, D. A. (2011). Collaborative model for remote experimentation laboratories used by non-hierarchical distributed groups of engineering students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(3), 428-445. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet27/herrera.html
24. Hooper, J. W. & Hsia, P. (1982). Scenario-based prototyping for requirements identification. ACM Sigsoft Software Engineering, 7(5), 88-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1006258.1006275
25. Hsu, M. H., Chen, I. Y. L., Chiu, C. M. & Ju, T. L. (2007), Exploring the antecedents of team performance in collaborative learning of computer software. Computers & Education, 48(4), 700-718. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.018
26. Iskender, M. & Akin, A. (2010). Social self-efficacy, academic locus of control, and internet addiction. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1101-1106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.014
27. James, L. R., Demaree, R. G. & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85
28. Jiang, J. J., Klein, G., Hwang, H. G., Huang, J. & Huang, J. (2004). An exploration of the relationship between software development process maturity and project performance. Information & Management, 41(3), 279-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00052-1
29. Jiang, J. J., Klein, G., Van Slyke, C. & Cheney, G. (2003). A note on interpersonal and communication skills for IS professionals: Evidence of positive influence. Decision Sciences, 34(4), 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5414.2003.02546.x
30. Kiliç-Çakmak, E. (2010). Learning strategies and motivational factors predicting information literacy self-efficacy of e-learners. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(2), 192-208. http://ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet26/kilik-cakmak.html
31. Kim, C. M. & Keller, J. M. (2008). Effects of motivational and volitional email messages (MVEM) with personal messages on undergraduate students' motivation, study habits and achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 36-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00701.x
32. Kurtzberg, T. R. & Amabile, T. M. (2001). From Guilford to creative synergy: opening the black box of team level creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 285-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_06
33. Lisack, S. (2000). The personal software process in the classroom: Student reactions (An experience report). Software Engineering Education & Training. Proceedings 13th Conference, 169-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CSEE.2000.827035
34. Lodewyk, K. R. & Winne, P. H. (2005). Relations among the structure of learning tasks, achievement, and changes in self-efficacy in secondary students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(1), 3-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.3
35. Murray, H. A. (1938). Exploration in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
36. Niazi, M., Wilson, D. & Zowghi, D. (2005). A framework for assisting the design of effective software process improvement implementation strategies. The Journal of Systems & Software, 78, 204-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2004.09.001
37. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
38. Oldham, G. R. & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607-634. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256657
39. Park, S. Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students' behavioral intention to use e-learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 150-162. http://www.ifets.info/journals/12_3/14.pdf
40. Paulk, M. C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M. & Bush, M. (1993). Key practices of the capability maturity model, Version 1.1. Technical Report, CMU/SEI-93-TR-025. Pittsburgh. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/reports/93tr025.pdf
41. Paulus, P. B. (2000). Groups, teams and creativity: the creative potential of idea generating groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 237-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00013
42. Rainer, A. & Hall, T. (2002). Key success factors for implementing software process improvement: A maturity-based analysis. The Journal of Systems & Software, 62, 71-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0164-1212(01)00122-4
43. Rozman, T., Horvat, R. V. & Rozman, I. (2008). Modeling the standard compliant software processes in the university environment. Business Process Management Journal, 14(1), 53-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14637150810849409
44. Shalley, C. E. & Oldham, G. R. (1997). Competition and creative performance: Effects of competitor presence and visibility. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 337-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1004_5
45. Solingen, R. (2004). Measuring the ROI of software process improvement. IEEE Software, 21(3), 32-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MS.2004.1293070
46. Telem, M. (1988). Information requirements specification I: brainstorming collective decisionmaking approach. Information Processing and Management, 24(5), 549-557. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(88)90024-6
47. Tierney, P. T. & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137-1148. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3069429
48. Tierney, P. T., Farmer, S. M. & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52, 591-620. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00173.x
49. Treffinger, D. J. (1980). Creative learning: what is it, and why is it important? LTI Bulletin, May, 6-7.
50. Umphress, D. A., Hendrix, T. D. & Cross, J. H. (2002). Software process in the classroom: The Capstone Project experience. IEEE Software, 19(5), 78-85. http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MS.2002.1032858
51. Wang, E. T. G., Ju, P. H., Jiang, J. J. & Klein, G. (2008). The effects of change control and management review on software flexibility and project performance. Information & Management, 45(7), 438-443. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.05.003
52. Wang, S. L. & Wu, P. Y. (2008). The role of feedback and self-efficacy on web-based learning: The social cognitive perspective. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1589-1598. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.03.004
53. Xia, W. & Lee G. (2005). Complexity of information systems development projects: Conceptualization and measurement development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(1), 45-83. http://misrc.umn.edu/workingpapers/fullpapers/2003/0341_110103.pdf
54. Xu, P. & Ramesh, B. (2008). Impact of knowledge support on the performance of software process tailoring. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(3), 277-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222250308
55. Zander, A. & Forward, J. (1968). Position in group, achievement motivation, and group aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 282-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0025595