The effects of change control and management review on software flexibility and project performance

Information and Management

Volumn 45, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 438-443

  Wang, Eric T G ^a   Ju, Pei Hung ^a   Jiang, James J ^b   Klein, Gary ^c  

^a NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Change control; Management review; Project management; Software flexibility; Software process improvement

Indexed keywords

CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; MAINTAINABILITY; MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT SCIENCE; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

CHANGE CONTROL; COMPLEX APPLICATIONS; CONTROL ACTIVITIES; MANAGEMENT CONTROLS; MANAGEMENT REVIEW; PROJECT EFFICIENCY; PROJECT MANAGERS; PROJECT PERFORMANCE; PROJECT SUCCESS; ROLE OF SOFTWARE; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; SOFTWARE FLEXIBILITY; SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT; SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES;

CONCURRENCY CONTROL;

EID: 52149116017     PISSN: 03787206     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2008.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ashrafi N. The impact of software process improvement on quality: in theory and practice. Information & Management 40 7 (2003) 677-690
2. Austin R.D. The effects of time pressure on quality in software development: an agency model. Information Systems Research 12 2 (2001) 195-207
3. Banker R.D., Datar S.M., and Kemerer C.F. A model to evaluate variables impacting the productivity of software maintenance projects. Management Science 37 1 (1991) 1-18
4. Banker R.D., and Slaughter S.A. The moderating effects of structure on volatility and complexity in software enhancement. Information Systems Research 11 3 (2000) 219-240
5. Bosch J., and Lundberg L. Software architecture - engineering quality attributes. Journal of Systems & Software 66 3 (2003) 183-186
6. Chin W.W. Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly 22 1 (1998) pp. VII-XVI
7. Dekleva S., and Drehmer D. Measuring software engineering evolution: a rasch calibration. Information Systems Research 8 1 (1997) 95-104
8. DeLone W.H., and McLean E.R. Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research 3 1 (1992) 60-95
9. DeLone W.H., and McLean E.R. The Delone and Mclean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems 19 4 (2003) 9-30
10. Eisenhardt K.M. Control: organizational and economic approaches. Management Science 31 2 (1985) 134-149
11. Ethiraj S.K., Kale P., Krishnan M.S., and Singh J.V. Where do capabilities come from and how do they matter? A study in the software services industry. Strategic Management Journal 26 1 (2005) 25-45
12. Fingar P. Component-based frameworks for e-commerce. Communications of the ACM 43 10 (2000) 61-66
13. Guinan P.J., Cooprider J.G., and Sawyer S. The effective use of automated application development tools. IBM Systems Journal 36 1 (1997) 124-139
14. Henderson J.C., and Lee S. Managing I/S design teams: a control theories perspective. Management Science 38 6 (1992) 757-777
15. Jiang J.J., Klein G., Chen H.G., and Lin L. Reducing user-related risks during and prior to system development. International Journal of Project Management 20 7 (2002) 507-515
16. Jiang J.J., Klein G., Hwang H.-G., Huang J., and Hung S.-Y. An exploration of the relationship between software development process maturity and project performance. Information & Management 41 3 (2004) 279-288
17. Kemerer C.F. Software complexity and software maintenance: a survey of empirical research. Annals of Software Engineering 1 (1995) 1-22
18. Krishnan M.S., Kriebel C.H., Kekre S., and Mukhopadhyay T. An empirical analysis of productivity and quality in software products. Management Science 46 6 (2000) 745-759
19. Nelson K.M., and Ghods M. Measuring technology flexibility. European Journal of Information Systems 7 4 (1998) 232-240
20. Nidumolu S.R. A comparison of the structural contingency and risk-based perspectives on coordination in software-development projects. Journal of Management Information Systems 13 2 (1996) 77-113
21. CMM-CMU/SEI-93-TR-24, Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, 1993.
22. Pressman R.S. Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach (2001), McGraw-Hill, NY
23. Ray G., Barney J.B., and Muhanna W.A. Capabilities, business processes, and competitive advantage: choosing the dependent variable in empirical tests of the resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal 25 1 (2004) 23-37
24. Saarinen T. An expanded instrument for evaluating information system success. Information & Management 31 2 (1996) 103-118
25. Song M., and Montoya-Weiss M.M. The effects of perceived technological uncertainty on Japanese new product development. Academy of Management Journal 44 1 (2001) 61-80
26. Wallace L., Keil M., and Rai A. How software project risk affects project performance: an investigation of the dimensions of risk and an exploratory model. Decision Sciences 35 2 (2004) 289-321
27. Wallace L., Keil M., and Rai A. Understanding software project risk: a cluster analysis. Information & Management 42 1 (2004) 115-125
28. Wernerfelt B. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5 2 (1984) 171-180
29. Zmud R.W. Management of large software development efforts. MIS Quarterly 4 2 (1980) 45-55