Effects of motivational and volitional email messages (MVEM) with personal messages on undergraduate students' motivation, study habits and achievement

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 36-51

  Kim, Chanmin ^a   Keller, John M ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTROL THEORY; ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT EXCHANGE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MESSAGE PASSING; PROBLEM SOLVING; STUDENTS;

EMAIL MESSAGES; INTEGRATED MODEL;

ELECTRONIC MAIL;

EID: 38149011340     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00701.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Alexander, M. W., Zhao, J. J. Underwood, R. A. (2002). An analysis of e-mail technologies used by business educators at the secondary and postsecondary levels. The Delta Pi Epilon Journal, 44, 2, 110 124.
2. Benedict, M. E. Hoag, J. (2004). Seating location in large lectures: are seating preferences or location related to course performance? Research in Economic Education, 35, 3, 215 231.
3. Boxie, P. (2004). Making a cyber literacy connection from the storage room to the college room. Read Horizons, 45, 2, 127 138.
4. Buckley, G. L., Bain, N. R., Luginbuhl, A. M. Dyer, M. L. (2004). Adding an "active learning" component to a large lecture course. Journal of Geography, 103, 231 237.
5. Burgstahler, S. Cronheim, D. (2001). Supporting peer-peer and mentor-protege relationships on the internet. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34, 1, 59 74.
6. Cascio, T. Gasker, J. (2001). Everyone has a shining side: computer-mediated mentoring in social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 2, 283 293.
7. Chang, M.-M. (2001). Effects of embedded relevance enhancement within a computer based interactive multimedia program for English as a foreign language learners. West Lafayette, IN : Purdue University.
8. Cifuentes, L. Shih, Y.-c. D. (2001). Teaching and learning online: a collaboration between U.S. and Taiwanese students. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 4, 456 464.
9. Davenport, N. A. M. (2006). Connecting preservice teachers with students: using email to build skills for teaching writing. Journal of Reading Education, 31, 2, 13 19.
10. Dunlap, D. R., Neale, D. C. Carroll, J. M. (2000). Teacher collaboration in a networked community. Educational Technology & Society, 3, 3, 442 454.
11. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions. Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 7, 493 503.
12. Huang, W., Huang, W., Diefes-Dux, H. Imbrie, P. K. (2006). A preliminary validation of attention, relevance, confidence and satisfaction model-based instructional material motivational survey in a computer-based tutorial setting. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37, 2, 243 259.
13. Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed Instructional theories and models: an overview of their current status (pp. 383 434). New York : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
14. Keller, J. M. (1987a). Development and use of the ARCS model of motivational design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10, 3, 2 10.
15. Keller, J. M. (1987b). Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Performance & Instruction, 26, 8, 1 7.
16. Keller, J. M. (1987c). The systematic process of motivational design. Performance & Instruction, 26, 9, 1 8.
17. Keller, J. M. (1999). Using the ARCS motivational process in computer-based instruction and distance education. In M. D. Svinicki (Series Ed. M. Theall (Volume Ed. New Directions for Teaching and Learning: Motivation from Within: Approaches for Encouraging Faculty and Students to Excell (Number 78, pp. 39 47). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
18. Keller, J. M. (2004a). A predictive model of motivation, volition, and multimedia learning. In Proceedings of the International Symposium & Conference, Educational Media in Schools (pp. 9 19). Osaka, Japan : Kansai University.
19. Keller, J. M. (2004b). A predictive model of motivation, volition, and multimedia learning. Paper presented at the International Symposium & Conference, Educational Media in Schools, Osaka, Japan.
20. Keller, J. M. Subhiyah, R. (1993). Course interest survey. Tallahassee, FL : Instructional Systems Program, Florida State University.
21. Kuhl, J. (1987). Action control: the maintenance of motivational states. In F. Halisch J. Kuhl (Eds Motivation, intention and volition (pp. 279 291). Berlin, Germany : Springer.
22. Naime-Diefenbach, B. N. (1991). Validation of attention and confidence as independent components of the ARCS motivational model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida.
23. Nicosia, G. (2005). Developing an online writing intensive course: will it work for public speaking? International Journal of Instructional Media, 32, 2, 163 170.
24. Pintrich, P. R. Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education. theory, research, and applications (Vol. 2). Upper Saddle River, NJ : Merrill Prentice Hall.
25. Poole, D. M. (2000). An email activity: preservice teachers' perceptions of authenticity. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8, 1, 13 28.
26. Small, R. V. Gluck, M. (1994). The relationship of motivational conditions to effective instructional attributes: a magnitude scaling approach. Educational Technology, 34, 8, 33 40.
27. Springgay, S. (2005). Thinking through bodies: bodied encounters and the process of meaning making in an e-mail generated art project. Studies in Art Education, 47, 1, 34 50.
28. Suzuki, K. Keller, J. M. (1996). Creation and cultural validation of an ARCS motivational design matrix. Paper presented at The Annual Meeting of the Japanese Association for Educational Technology, Kanazawa, Japan.
29. van der Meij, H. Boersma, K. (2002). Email use in elementary school: an analysis of exchange patterns and content. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 2, 189 200.
30. Visser, J. Keller, J. M. (1990). The clinical use of motivaitonal messages: an inquiry into the validity of the ARCS model of motivational design. Instructional Science, 19, 467 500.
31. Woods, R. H. (2002). How much communications is enough in online courses?: exploring the relationship between frequency of instructor-initiated personal email and learners' perceptions of and participation in online learning. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29, 4, 377 394.