What goes on must come off: Phosphatases gate-crash the DNA damage response

Trends in Biochemical Sciences

Volumn 36, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 569-577

  Lee, Dong Hyun ^a   Chowdhury, Dipanjan ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRCA1 PROTEIN; DNA; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; PHOSPHATASE; PP1 PHOSPHATASE; PP1ALPHA PHOSPHATASE; PP1BETA PHOSPHATASE; PP1GAMMA PHOSPHATASE; PP2 PHOSPHATASE; PP2AC PHOSPHATASE; PP4C PHOSPHATASE; PROTEIN P53; PROTEIN SERINE THREONINE KINASE; SERINE; THREONINE; TYROSINE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WIP1 PHOSPHATASE;

CELL DIVISION; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEPHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN PURIFICATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TARGETING; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ANIMALS; DNA DAMAGE; HUMANS; PHOSPHOPROTEIN PHOSPHATASES; PHOSPHORYLATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 80755138409     PISSN: 09680004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2011.08.007     Document Type: Review

References (100)

1. Matsuoka S., et al. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science 2007, 316:1160-1166.
2. Mu J.J., et al. A proteomic analysis of ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM)/ATM-Rad3-related (ATR) substrates identifies the ubiquitin-proteasome system as a regulator for DNA damage checkpoints. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:17330-17334.
3. Reinhardt H.C., Yaffe M.B. Kinases that control the cell cycle in response to DNA damage: Chk1, Chk2, and MK2. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2009, 21:245-255.
4. Smith J., et al. The ATM-Chk2 and ATR-Chk1 pathways in DNA damage signaling and cancer. Adv. Cancer Res. 2010, 108:73-112.
5. van Vugt M.A., et al. Polo-like kinase-1 controls recovery from a G2 DNA damage-induced arrest in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell 2004, 15:799-811.
6. Takaki T., et al. Polo-like kinase 1 reaches beyond mitosis-cytokinesis, DNA damage response, and development. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2008, 20:650-660.
7. Bennetzen M.V., et al. Site-specific phosphorylation dynamics of the nuclear proteome during the DNA damage response. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2010, 9:1314-1323.
8. Bensimon A., et al. ATM-dependent and -independent dynamics of the nuclear phosphoproteome after DNA damage. Sci. Signal. 2010, 3:rs3.
9. Bollen M., et al. The extended PP1 toolkit: designed to create specificity. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2010, 35:450-458.
10. Kuntziger T., et al. Protein phosphatase 1 regulators in DNA damage signaling. Cell Cycle 2011, 10:1356-1362.
11. Moorhead G.B., et al. Emerging roles of nuclear protein phosphatases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8:234-244.
12. Peng A., et al. Repo-man controls a protein phosphatase 1-dependent threshold for DNA damage checkpoint activation. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:387-396.
13. Winter S.L., et al. The interaction of PP1 with BRCA1 and analysis of their expression in breast tumors. BMC Cancer 2007, 7:85.
14. Yu Y.M., et al. A PP1-binding motif present in BRCA1 plays a role in its DNA repair function. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2008, 4:352-361.
15. Bazzi M., et al. Dephosphorylation of gamma H2A by Glc7/protein phosphatase 1 promotes recovery from inhibition of DNA replication. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2010, 30:131-145.
16. den Elzen N.R., O'Connell M.J. Recovery from DNA damage checkpoint arrest by PP1-mediated inhibition of Chk1. EMBO J. 2004, 23:908-918.
17. Shimada M., et al. Protein phosphatase 1gamma is responsible for dephosphorylation of histone H3 at Thr 11 after DNA damage. EMBO Rep. 2010, 11:883-889.
18. Li X., et al. SUMOylation of the transcriptional co-repressor KAP1 is regulated by the serine and threonine phosphatase PP1. Sci. Signal. 2010, 3:ra32.
19. Honkanen R.E., Golden T. Regulators of serine/threonine protein phosphatases at the dawn of a clinical era?. Curr. Med. Chem. 2002, 9:2055-2075.
20. Van Hoof C., Goris J. Phosphatases in apoptosis: to be or not to be, PP2A is in the heart of the question. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2003, 1640:97-104.
21. Janssens V., et al. PP2A holoenzyme assembly: in cauda venenum (the sting is in the tail). Trends Biochem. Sci. 2008, 33:113-121.
22. Westermarck J., Hahn W.C. Multiple pathways regulated by the tumor suppressor PP2A in transformation. Trends Mol. Med. 2008, 14:152-160.
23. Goodarzi A.A., et al. Autophosphorylation of ataxia-telangiectasia mutated is regulated by protein phosphatase 2A. EMBO J. 2004, 23:4451-4461.
24. Li G., et al. Phosphatase type 2A-dependent and -independent pathways for ATR phosphorylation of Chk1. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:7287-7298.
25. Petersen P., et al. Protein phosphatase 2A antagonizes ATM and ATR in a Cdk2- and Cdc7-independent DNA damage checkpoint. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006, 26:1997-2011.
26. Douglas P., et al. Protein phosphatases regulate DNA-dependent protein kinase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276:18992-18998.
27. Freeman A.K., et al. Negative regulation of CHK2 activity by protein phosphatase 2A is modulated by DNA damage. Cell Cycle 2010, 9:736-747.
28. Leung-Pineda V., et al. Phosphorylation of Chk1 by ATR is antagonized by a Chk1-regulated protein phosphatase 2A circuit. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006, 26:7529-7538.
29. Liang X., et al. Protein phosphatase 2A interacts with Chk2 and regulates phosphorylation at Thr-68 after cisplatin treatment of human ovarian cancer cells. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2006, 17:703-708.
30. Yan Y., et al. Protein phosphatase 2A has an essential role in the activation of gamma-irradiation-induced G2/M checkpoint response. Oncogene 2010, 29:4317-4329.
31. Dozier C., et al. Regulation of Chk2 phosphorylation by interaction with protein phosphatase 2A via its B' regulatory subunit. Biol. Cell 2004, 96:509-517.
32. Chowdhury D., et al. gamma-H2AX dephosphorylation by protein phosphatase 2A facilitates DNA double-strand break repair. Mol. Cell 2005, 20:801-809.
33. Nakada S., et al. PP4 is a gamma H2AX phosphatase required for recovery from the DNA damage checkpoint. EMBO Rep. 2008, 9:1019-1026.
34. Wang Q., et al. A nonhomologous end-joining pathway is required for protein phosphatase 2A promotion of DNA double-strand break repair. Neoplasia 2009, 11:1012-1021.
35. MacLaine N.J., Hupp T.R. How phosphorylation controls p53. Cell Cycle 2011, 10:916-921.
36. Dohoney K.M., et al. Phosphorylation of p53 at serine 37 is important for transcriptional activity and regulation in response to DNA damage. Oncogene 2004, 23:49-57.
37. Shouse G.P., et al. Serine 15 phosphorylation of p53 directs its interaction with B56gamma and the tumor suppressor activity of B56gamma-specific protein phosphatase 2A. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2008, 28:448-456.
38. Li H.H., et al. A specific PP2A regulatory subunit, B56gamma, mediates DNA damage-induced dephosphorylation of p53 at Thr55. EMBO J. 2007, 26:402-411.
39. Shouse G.P., et al. ATM-mediated phosphorylation activates the tumor-suppressive function of B56gamma-PP2A. Oncogene 2011, 10.1038/onc.2011.95.
40. Chen G.I., et al. PP4R4/KIAA1622 forms a novel stable cytosolic complex with phosphoprotein phosphatase 4. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:29273-29284.
41. Cohen P.T., et al. Protein phosphatase 4-from obscurity to vital functions. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579:3278-3286.
42. Mourtada-Maarabouni M., Williams G.T. Protein phosphatase 4 regulates apoptosis, proliferation and mutation rate of human cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2008, 1783:1490-1502.
43. Mourtada-Maarabouni M., Williams G.T. Protein phosphatase 4 regulates apoptosis in leukemic and primary human T-cells. Leuk. Res. 2009, 33:1539-1551.
44. Zhang X., et al. Histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3) activity is regulated by interaction with protein serine/threonine phosphatase 4. Genes Dev. 2005, 19:827-839.
45. Ciccia A., Elledge S.J. The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Mol. Cell 2010, 40:179-204.
46. Chowdhury D., et al. A PP4-phosphatase complex dephosphorylates gamma-H2AX generated during DNA replication. Mol. Cell 2008, 31:33-46.
47. Lee D.H., et al. A PP4 phosphatase complex dephosphorylates RPA2 to facilitate DNA repair via homologous recombination. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2010, 17:365-372.
48. Keogh M.C., et al. A phosphatase complex that dephosphorylates gammaH2AX regulates DNA damage checkpoint recovery. Nature 2006, 439:497-501.
49. Guillemain G., et al. Mechanisms of checkpoint kinase Rad53 inactivation after a double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 27:3378-3389.
50. O'Neill B.M., et al. Pph3-Psy2 is a phosphatase complex required for Rad53 dephosphorylation and replication fork restart during recovery from DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:9290-9295.
51. Szyjka S.J., et al. Rad53 regulates replication fork restart after DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 2008, 22:1906-1920.
52. Travesa A., et al. Distinct phosphatases mediate the deactivation of the DNA damage checkpoint kinase Rad53. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:17123-17130.
53. Kim J.A., et al. Protein phosphatases pph3, ptc2, and ptc3 play redundant roles in DNA double-strand break repair by homologous recombination. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2011, 31:507-516.
54. Falk J.E., et al. A Mec1- and PP4-dependent checkpoint couples centromere pairing to meiotic recombination. Dev. Cell 2010, 19:599-611.
55. Zhang W., Durocher D. De novo telomere formation is suppressed by the Mec1-dependent inhibition of Cdc13 accumulation at DNA breaks. Genes Dev. 2010, 24:502-515.
56. Kim S.H., et al. SMK-1/PPH-4.1-mediated silencing of the CHK-1 response to DNA damage in early C. elegans embryos. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 179:41-52.
57. Mi J., et al. Activation of DNA-PK by ionizing radiation is mediated by protein phosphatase 6. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e4395.
58. Bastians H., Ponstingl H. The novel human protein serine/threonine phosphatase 6 is a functional homologue of budding yeast Sit4p and fission yeast ppe1, which are involved in cell cycle regulation. J. Cell Sci. 1996, 109:2865-2874.
59. Stefansson B., Brautigan D.L. Protein phosphatase 6 subunit with conserved Sit4-associated protein domain targets IkappaBepsilon. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281:22624-22634.
60. Perry J., Kleckner N. The ATRs, ATMs, and TORs are giant HEAT repeat proteins. Cell 2003, 112:151-155.
61. Douglas P., et al. Protein phosphatase 6 interacts with the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit and dephosphorylates gamma-H2AX. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2010, 30:1368-1381.
62. Chen M.X., Cohen P.T. Activation of protein phosphatase 5 by limited proteolysis or the binding of polyunsaturated fatty acids to the TPR domain. FEBS Lett. 1997, 400:136-140.
63. Ali A., et al. Requirement of protein phosphatase 5 in DNA-damage-induced ATM activation. Genes Dev. 2004, 18:249-254.
64. Wechsler T., et al. DNA-PKcs function regulated specifically by protein phosphatase 5. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101:1247-1252.
65. Yong W., et al. Mice lacking protein phosphatase 5 are defective in ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM)-mediated cell cycle arrest. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:14690-14694.
66. Kang Y., et al. Protein phosphatase 5 is necessary for ATR-mediated DNA repair. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 404:476-481.
67. Zhang J., et al. Protein phosphatase 5 is required for ATR-mediated checkpoint activation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005, 25:9910-9919.
68. Dong F., et al. Activation of PARP-1 in response to bleomycin depends on the Ku antigen and protein phosphatase 5. Oncogene 2010, 29:2093-2103.
69. Kang Y., et al. Protein phosphatase 5 regulates the function of 53BP1 after neocarzinostatin-induced DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284:9845-9853.
70. van Vugt M.A., et al. A mitotic phosphorylation feedback network connects Cdk1, Plk1, 53BP1, and Chk2 to inactivate the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8:e1000287.
71. Linding R., et al. Systematic discovery of in vivo phosphorylation networks. Cell 2007, 129:1415-1426.
72. Schweighofer A., et al. Plant PP2C phosphatases: emerging functions in stress signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9:236-243.
73. Macurek L., et al. Wip1 phosphatase is associated with chromatin and dephosphorylates gammaH2AX to promote checkpoint inhibition. Oncogene 2010, 29:2281-2291.
74. An H., et al. LZAP inhibits p38 MAPK (p38) phosphorylation and activity by facilitating p38 association with the wild-type p53 induced phosphatase 1 (WIP1). PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e16427.
75. Fujimoto H., et al. Regulation of the antioncogenic Chk2 kinase by the oncogenic Wip1 phosphatase. Cell Death Differ. 2006, 13:1170-1180.
76. Lu X., et al. The Wip1 Phosphatase acts as a gatekeeper in the p53-Mdm2 autoregulatory loop. Cancer Cell 2007, 12:342-354.
77. Lu X., et al. PPM1D dephosphorylates Chk1 and p53 and abrogates cell cycle checkpoints. Genes Dev. 2005, 19:1162-1174.
78. Shreeram S., et al. Wip1 phosphatase modulates ATM-dependent signaling pathways. Mol. Cell 2006, 23:757-764.
79. Cha H., et al. Wip1 directly dephosphorylates gamma-H2AX and attenuates the DNA damage response. Cancer Res. 2010, 70:4112-4122.
80. Moon S.H., et al. Wild-type p53-induced phosphatase 1 dephosphorylates histone variant gamma-H2AX and suppresses DNA double strand break repair. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285:12935-12947.
81. Bulavin D.V., et al. Inactivation of the Wip1 phosphatase inhibits mammary tumorigenesis through p38 MAPK-mediated activation of the p16(Ink4a)-p19(Arf) pathway. Nat. Genet. 2004, 36:343-350.
82. Lu X., et al. The type 2C phosphatase Wip1: an oncogenic regulator of tumor suppressor and DNA damage response pathways. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2008, 27:123-135.
83. Meiselbach H., et al. Structural analysis of the protein phosphatase 1 docking motif: molecular description of binding specificities identifies interacting proteins. Chem. Biol. 2006, 13:49-59.
84. Hendrickx A., et al. Docking motif-guided mapping of the interactome of protein phosphatase-1. Chem. Biol. 2009, 16:365-371.
85. Virshup D.M., Shenolikar S. From promiscuity to precision: protein phosphatases get a makeover. Mol. Cell 2009, 33:537-545.
86. Guergnon J., et al. Mapping of protein phosphatase-6 association with its SAPS domain regulatory subunit using a model of helical repeats. BMC Biochem. 2009, 10:24.
87. Sandhu S.K., et al. The emerging role of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in cancer treatment. Curr. Drug Targets 2011.
88. Gingras A.C., et al. A novel, evolutionarily conserved protein phosphatase complex involved in cisplatin sensitivity. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2005, 4:1725-1740.
89. Henderson H., et al. New candidate targets of protein phosphatase-1c-gamma-2 in mouse testis revealed by a differential phosphoproteome analysis. Int. J. Androl. 2011, 34:339-351.
90. Hilger M., et al. Systems-wide analysis of a phosphatase knock-down by quantitative proteomics and phosphoproteomics. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2009, 8:1908-1920.
91. Zieske L.R. A perspective on the use of iTRAQ reagent technology for protein complex and profiling studies. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57:1501-1508.
92. Bodenmiller B., et al. Reproducible isolation of distinct, overlapping segments of the phosphoproteome. Nat. Methods 2007, 4:231-237.
93. Ndassa Y.M., et al. Improved immobilized metal affinity chromatography for large-scale phosphoproteomics applications. J. Proteome Res. 2006, 5:2789-2799.
94. Ham B.M., et al. Novel Ser/Thr protein phosphatase 5 (PP5) regulated targets during DNA damage identified by proteomics analysis. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9:945-953.
95. San Filippo J., et al. Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2008, 77:229-257.
96. Liu Y., et al. Modulation of replication protein A function by its hyperphosphorylation-induced conformational change involving DNA binding domain B. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280:32775-32783.
97. Zou Y., et al. Functions of human replication protein A (RPA): from DNA replication to DNA damage and stress responses. J. Cell. Physiol 2006, 208:267-273.
98. Wu X., et al. Preferential localization of hyperphosphorylated replication protein A to double-strand break repair and checkpoint complexes upon DNA damage. Biochem. J. 2005, 391:473-480.
99. Dephoure N., et al. A quantitative atlas of mitotic phosphorylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:10762-10767.
100. Toh G.W., et al. Mec1/Tel1-dependent phosphorylation of Slx4 stimulates Rad1-Rad10-dependent cleavage of non-homologous DNA tails. DNA Repair (Amst) 2010, 9:718-726.