Benchmarks for flexible and rigid transcription factor-DNA docking

BMC Structural Biology

Volumn 11, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Kim, Ryangguk ^a   Corona, Rosario I ^a   Hong, Bo ^b   Guo, Jun Tao ^a  

^a University of North Carolina at Charlotte   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; COMPLEX FORMATION; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NONHUMAN; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; METABOLISM; PROTEIN BINDING;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DNA; PROTEIN BINDING; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 80055047271     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726807     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6807-11-45     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. DNA binding sites: representation and discovery. Stormo GD, Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2000 16 1 16 23 (Pubitemid 30204197)
2. Protein-DNA recognition patterns and predictions. Sarai A, Kono H, Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2005 34 379 398 (Pubitemid 40847730)
3. Mechanisms of transcription factor selectivity. Pan Y, Tsai CJ, Ma B, Nussinov R, Trends Genet 2010 26 2 75 83
4. Structure and evolution of gene regulatory networks in microbial genomes. Janga SC, Collado-Vides J, Res Microbiol 2007 158 10 787 794 (Pubitemid 350235176)
5. Evolution of transcriptional regulatory networks in microbial genomes. Gelfand MS, Current opinion in structural biology 2006 16 3 420 429 (Pubitemid 43831639)
6. Early Career Research Award Lecture. Structure, evolution and dynamics of transcriptional regulatory networks. Babu MM, Biochem Soc Trans 2010 38 5 1155 1178
7. Structure and evolution of transcriptional regulatory networks. Babu MM, Luscombe NM, Aravind L, Gerstein M, Teichmann SA, Current opinion in structural biology 2004 14 3 283 291 (Pubitemid 38749055)
8. Computational prediction of transcription-factor binding site locations. Bulyk ML, Genome biology 2003 5 1 201
9. Computational approaches to study transcriptional regulation. Babu MM, Biochem Soc Trans 2008 36 Pt 4 758 765
10. Toward an atomistic model for predicting transcription-factor binding sites. Endres RG, Schulthess TC, Wingreen NS, Proteins 2004 57 2 262 268 (Pubitemid 39223731)
11. Ab initio prediction of transcription factor targets using structural knowledge. Kaplan T, Friedman N, Margalit H, PLoS computational biology 2005 1 1 1
12. Structure-based prediction of C2H2 zinc-finger binding specificity: sensitivity to docking geometry. Siggers TW, Honig B, Nucleic Acids Res 2007 35 4 1085 1097 (Pubitemid 46522964)
13. Structure-based prediction of transcription factor binding sites using a protein-DNA docking approach. Liu Z, Guo JT, Li T, Xu Y, Proteins 2008 72 4 1114 1124
14. Prediction of TF target sites based on atomistic models of protein-DNA complexes. Angarica VE, Perez AG, Vasconcelos AT, Collado-Vides J, Contreras-Moreira B, BMC Bioinformatics 2008 9 436
15. An all-atom knowledge-based energy function for protein-DNA threading, docking decoy discrimination, and prediction of transcription-factor binding profiles. Xu B, Yang Y, Liang H, Zhou Y, Proteins 2009 76 3 718 730
16. From nonspecific DNA-protein encounter complexes to the prediction of DNA-protein interactions. Gao M, Skolnick J, PLoS Comput Biol 2009 5 3 1000341
17. DBD-Hunter: a knowledge-based method for the prediction of DNA-protein interactions. Gao M, Skolnick J, Nucleic Acids Res 2008 36 12 3978 3992 (Pubitemid 351984814)
18. The Protein Data Bank. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE, Nucleic Acids Res 2000 28 1 235 242 (Pubitemid 30047768)
19. High-resolution protein-protein docking. Gray JJ, Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006 16 2 183 193
20. A combination of rescoring and refinement significantly improves protein docking performance. Pierce B, Weng Z, Proteins 2008 72 1 270 279 (Pubitemid 351809165)
21. Present and future challenges and limitations in protein-protein docking. Pons C, Grosdidier S, Solernou A, Perez-Cano L, Fernandez-Recio J, Proteins 2010 78 1 95 108
22. Docking and chemoinformatic screens for new ligands and targets. Kolb P, Ferreira RS, Irwin JJ, Shoichet BK, Curr Opin Biotechnol 2009 20 4 429 436
23. Information-driven protein-DNA docking using HADDOCK: it is a matter of flexibility. van Dijk M, van Dijk AD, Hsu V, Boelens R, Bonvin AM, Nucleic Acids Res 2006 34 11 3317 3325
24. Pushing the limits of what is achievable in protein-DNA docking: benchmarking HADDOCK's performance. van Dijk M, Bonvin AM, Nucleic Acids Res 2010 38 17 5634 5647
25. MONTY: a Monte Carlo approach to protein-DNA recognition. Knegtel RM, Antoon J, Rullmann C, Boelens R, Kaptein R, J Mol Biol 1994 235 1 318 324 (Pubitemid 24049516)
26. Assessing the performance of fold recognition methods by means of a comprehensive benchmark. Fischer D, Elofsson A, Rice D, Eisenberg D, Pac Symp Biocomput 1996 300 318
27. Multi-class protein fold recognition using support vector machines and neural networks. Ding CH, Dubchak I, Bioinformatics 2001 17 4 349 358 (Pubitemid 32421929)
28. Comparative evaluation of eight docking tools for docking and virtual screening accuracy. Kellenberger E, Rodrigo J, Muller P, Rognan D, Proteins 2004 57 2 225 242 (Pubitemid 39223729)
29. A protein-protein docking benchmark. Chen R, Mintseris J, Janin J, Weng Z, Proteins 2003 52 1 88 91 (Pubitemid 36648855)
30. Protein-protein docking benchmark version 4.0. Hwang H, Vreven T, Janin J, Weng Z, Proteins 2010 78 15 3111 3114
31. Issues in bioinformatics benchmarking: the case study of multiple sequence alignment. Aniba MR, Poch O, Thompson JD, Nucleic Acids Res 2010 38 21 7353 7363
32. A protein-DNA docking benchmark. van Dijk M, Bonvin AM, Nucleic Acids Res 2008 36 14 88
33. Scaling laws in the functional content of genomes. van Nimwegen E, Trends in genetics: TIG 2003 19 9 479 484 (Pubitemid 37101085)
34. An overview of the structures of protein-DNA complexes. Luscombe NM, Austin SE, Berman HM, Thornton JM, Genome Biol 2000 1 1 EVIEWS001
35. Protein-DNA interactions: amino acid conservation and the effects of mutations on binding specificity. Luscombe NM, Thornton JM, J Mol Biol 2002 320 5 991 1009 (Pubitemid 34808820)
36. Assessment of the optimization of affinity and specificity at protein-DNA interfaces. Ashworth J, Baker D, Nucleic Acids Res 2009 37 10 73
37. PDA: an automatic and comprehensive analysis program for protein-DNA complex structures. Kim R, Guo JT, BMC Genomics 2009 10 Suppl 1 13
38. The Protein-DNA Interface database. Norambuena T, Melo F, BMC Bioinformatics 2010 11 262
39. Protein-DNA interactions: A structural analysis. Jones S, van Heyningen P, Berman HM, Thornton JM, J Mol Biol 1999 287 5 877 896 (Pubitemid 29188875)
40. Comparison of DNA binding across protein superfamilies. Contreras-Moreira B, Sancho J, Angarica VE, Proteins 2010 78 1 52 62
41. Classification of protein-DNA complexes based on structural descriptors. Prabakaran P, Siebers JG, Ahmad S, Gromiha MM, Singarayan MG, Sarai A, Structure 2006 14 9 1355 1367 (Pubitemid 44331615)
42. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B, Nature 2009 461 7268 1248 1253
43. 3D-footprint: a database for the structural analysis of protein-DNA complexes. Contreras-Moreira B, Nucleic Acids Research 2010 38 Database 91 97
44. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C, J Mol Biol 1995 247 4 536 540
45. Modelling repressor proteins docking to DNA. Aloy P, Moont G, Gabb HA, Querol E, Aviles FX, Sternberg MJ, Proteins 1998 33 4 535 549 (Pubitemid 28565736)
46. The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) 2009. Nucleic Acids Res 2009 37 Database 169 174
47. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Nat Genet 2000 25 1 25 29 (Pubitemid 30257031)
48. TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Zhang Y, Skolnick J, Nucleic Acids Res 2005 33 7 2302 2309 (Pubitemid 41439897)
49. Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Zhang Y, Skolnick J, Proteins 2004 57 4 702 710 (Pubitemid 39626992)
50. EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A, Trends Genet 2000 16 6 276 277
51. Parameter optimized surfaces (POPS): analysis of key interactions and conformational changes in the ribosome. Fraternali F, Cavallo L, Nucleic Acids Res 2002 30 13 2950 2960 (Pubitemid 34790204)
52. PISCES: a protein sequence culling server. Wang G, Dunbrack RL Jr, Bioinformatics 2003 19 12 1589 1591 (Pubitemid 37038881)
53. Basic local alignment search tool. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ, J Mol Biol 1990 215 3 403 410
54. Quantitative evaluation of protein-DNA interactions using an optimized knowledge-based potential. Liu Z, Mao F, Guo JT, Yan B, Wang P, Qu Y, Xu Y, Nucleic Acids Res 2005 33 2 546 558 (Pubitemid 40360984)
55. A knowledge-based energy function for protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-DNA complexes. Zhang C, Liu S, Zhu Q, Zhou Y, J Med Chem 2005 48 7 2325 2335 (Pubitemid 40516427)
56. Energetics of protein-DNA interactions. Donald JE, Chen WW, Shakhnovich EI, Nucleic Acids Res 2007 35 4 1039 1047
57. Nuclear-receptor interactions on DNA-response elements. Khorasanizadeh S, Rastinejad F, Trends Biochem Sci 2001 26 6 384 390 (Pubitemid 32530657)
58. DNA deformability as a recognition feature in the reverb response element. Sierk ML, Zhao Q, Rastinejad F, Biochemistry 2001 40 43 12833 12843 (Pubitemid 33026630)
59. Diversity and complexity in DNA recognition by transcription factors. Badis G, Berger MF, Philippakis AA, Talukder S, Gehrke AR, Jaeger SA, Chan ET, Metzler G, Vedenko A, Chen X, et al. Science 2009 324 5935 1720 1723
60. Yeast HAP1 activator binds to two upstream activation sites of different sequence. Pfeifer K, Prezant T, Guarente L, Cell 1987 49 1 19 27
61. Transcription factor binding variation in the evolution of gene regulation. Dowell RD, Trends Genet 2010 26 11 468 475
62. Classification of protein complexes based on docking difficulty. Vajda S, Proteins 2005 60 2 176 180 (Pubitemid 40934883)
63. Conformational transitions upon ligand binding: holo-structure prediction from apo conformations. Seeliger D, de Groot BL, PLoS Comput Biol 2010 6 1 1000634.
64. Crystal structure of trp repressor/operator complex at atomic resolution. Otwinowski Z, Schevitz RW, Zhang RG, Lawson CL, Joachimiak A, Marmorstein RQ, Luisi BF, Sigler PB, Nature 1988 335 6188 321 329
65. The activity of the Escherichia coli transcription factor FNR is regulated by a change in oligomeric state. Lazazzera BA, Bates DM, Kiley PJ, Genes Dev 1993 7 10 1993 2005 (Pubitemid 23312951)
66. The DNA binding pattern of the retinoid × receptor is regulated by ligand-dependent modulation of its oligomeric state. Kersten S, Gronemeyer H, Noy N, J Biol Chem 1997 272 19 12771 12777 (Pubitemid 27203377)
67. The oligomeric state of CtBP determines its role as a transcriptional co-activator and co-repressor of Wingless targets. Bhambhani C, Chang JL, Akey DL, Cadigan KM, Embo J 2011 30 10 2031 2043