Effect of roasting on the allergenicity of major peanut allergens Ara h 1 and Ara h 2/6: The necessity of degranulation assays

Clinical and Experimental Allergy

Volumn 41, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1631-1642

  Vissers, Y M ^a   Iwan, M ^b   Adel Patient, K ^c   Stahl Skov, P ^d,e   Rigby, N M ^f   Johnson, P E ^f   Mandrup Muller P ^d   Przybylski Nicaise, L ^c   Schaap, M ^a   Ruinemans Koerts, J ^g   Jansen, A P H ^h   Mills, E N C ^f   Savelkoul, H F J ^a   Wichers, H J ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARMIA AND MAZURY IN OLSZTYN   (Poland)

^c Bâtiment 136 CEA de Saclay   (France)

^d Reference Laboratory   (Denmark)

^e ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^f NORWICH RESEARCH PARK   (United Kingdom)

^g RIJNSTATE HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^h RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Allergenicity; Ara h 1; Ara h 2 6; Glycation; Histamine release; IgE binding; Peanut allergy; RBL; Roasting; Thermal processing

Indexed keywords

FOOD ALLERGEN; GLUCOSE; IMMUNOGLOBULIN E; PROTEIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; DEGRANULATION; HEATING; HUMAN; HYDROLYSIS; IC 50; PARTICLE SIZE; PEANUT ALLERGY; POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WESTERN BLOTTING;

2S ALBUMINS, PLANT; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANIMALS; ANTIGENS, PLANT; BASOPHIL DEGRANULATION TEST; BASOPHILS; FEMALE; GLYCOPROTEINS; HISTAMINE RELEASE; HOT TEMPERATURE; HUMANS; IMMUNOGLOBULIN E; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PEANUT HYPERSENSITIVITY; PLANT PROTEINS; PROTEIN DENATURATION; RATS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80054027559     PISSN: 09547894     EISSN: 13652222     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03830.x     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Ben-Shoshan M, Harrington DW, Soller Let al. A population-based study on peanut, tree nut, fish, shellfish, and sesame allergy prevalence in Canada. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 125:1327-35.
2. Sicherer SH, Munoz-Furlong A, Godbold JH, Sampson HA. US prevalence of self-reported peanut, tree nut, and sesame allergy: 11-year follow-up. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 125:1322-6.
3. Nicolaou N, Poorafshar M, Murray Cet al. Allergy or tolerance in children sensitized to peanut: prevalence and differentiation using component-resolved diagnostics. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 125:191-7.
4. Codreanu F, Collignon O, Roitel Oet al. A novel immunoassay using recombinant allergens simplifies peanut allergy diagnosis. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2010; 154:216-26.
5. Flinterman AE, van Hoffen E, den Hartog Jager CFet al. Children with peanut allergy recognize predominantly Ara h2 and Ara h6, which remains stable over time. Clin Exp Allergy 2007; 37:1221-8.
6. Schmidt H, Krause S, Gelhaus C, Petersen A, Janssen O, Becker WM. Detection and structural characterization of natural Ara h 7, the third peanut allergen of the 2S albumin family. J Proteome Res 2010; 9:3701-9.
7. Suhr M, Wicklein D, Lepp U, Becker WM. Isolation and characterization of natural Ara h 6: evidence for a further peanut allergen with putative clinical relevance based on resistance to pepsin digestion and heat. Mol Nutr Food Res 2004; 48:390-9.
8. Koppelman SJ, de Jong GA, Laaper-Ertmann Met al. Purification and immunoglobulin E-binding properties of peanut allergen Ara h 6: evidence for cross-reactivity with Ara h 2. Clin Exp Allergy 2005; 35:490-7.
9. Burks AW, Williams LW, Helm RM, Connaughton C, Cockrell G, O'Brien T. Identification of a major peanut allergen, Ara h I, in patients with atopic dermatitis and positive peanut challenges. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1991; 88:172-9.
10. Shin DS, Compadre CM, Maleki SJet al. Biochemical and structural analysis of the IgE binding sites on Ara h1, an abundant and highly allergenic peanut protein. J Biol Chem 1998; 273:13753-9.
11. van Boxtel EL, van Beers MM, Koppelman SJ, van den Broek LA, Gruppen H. Allergen Ara h 1 occurs in peanuts as a large oligomer rather than as a trimer. J Agric Food Chem 2006; 54:7180-6.
12. Breiteneder H, Radauer C.A classification of plant food allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004; 113:821-30.
13. Maleki SJ, Kopper RA, Shin DSet al. Structure of the major peanut allergen Ara h 1 may protect IgE-binding epitopes from degradation. J Immunol 2000; 164:5844-9.
14. Mills EN, Jenkins JA, Alcocer MJ, Shewry PR. Structural, biological, and evolutionary relationships of plant food allergens sensitizing via the gastrointestinal tract. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2004; 44:379-407.
15. Mills EN, Sancho AI, Rigby NM, Jenkins JA, Mackie AR. Impact of food processing on the structural and allergenic properties of food allergens. Mol Nutr Food Res 2009; 53:963-9.
16. Chung SY, Champagne ET. Association of end-product adducts with increased IgE binding of roasted peanuts. J Agric Food Chem 2001; 49:3911-6.
17. Maleki SJ, Chung SY, Champagne ET, Raufman JP. The effects of roasting on the allergenic properties of peanut proteins. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000; 106:763-8.
18. Renn PT, Sathe SK. Effects of pH, temperature, and reactant molar ratio on l-leucine and d-glucose Maillard browning reaction in an aqueous system. J Agric Food Chem 1997; 45:3782-7.
19. Gruber P, Becker WM, Hofmann T. Influence of the Maillard reaction on the allergenicity of rAra h 2, a recombinant major allergen from peanut (Arachis hypogaea), its major epitopes, and peanut agglutinin. J Agric Food Chem 2005; 53:2289-96.
20. Gruber P, Vieths S, Wangorsch A, Nerkamp J, Hofmann T. Maillard reaction and enzymatic browning affect the allergenicity of Pru av 1, the major allergen from cherry (Prunus avium). J Agric Food Chem 2004; 52:4002-7.
21. Mondoulet L, Paty E, Drumare MFet al. Influence of thermal processing on the allergenicity of peanut proteins. J Agric Food Chem 2005; 53:4547-53.
22. Nakamura S, Suzuki Y, Ishikakawa Eet al. Reduction of in vitro allergenicity of buckwheat Fag e 1 through the Maillard-type glycosylation with polysaccharides. Food Chem 2008; 103:538-45.
23. Sancho AI, Rigby NM, Zuidmeer Let al. The effect of thermal processing on the IgE reactivity of the non-specific lipid transfer protein from apple, Mal d 3. Allergy 2005; 60:1262-8.
24. Brockow K, Ring J. Food anaphylaxis. Anal Bioanal Chem 2009; 395:17-23.
25. Sampson HA. Anaphylaxis and emergency treatment. Pediatrics 2003; 111:1601-8.
26. Marsh J, Rigby N, Wellner Ket al. Purification and characterisation of a panel of peanut allergens suitable for use in allergy diagnosis. Mol Nutr Food Res 2008; 52(Suppl. 2):S272-85.
27. Johnson PE, Van der Plancken I, Balasa Aet al. High pressure, thermal and pulsed electric-field-induced structural changes in selected food allergens. Mol Nutr Food Res 2010; 54:1701-10.
28. Slade L, Levine H. Optimization of roasting process and product quality of peanuts. J Therm Anal Calorim 2006; 83:163-6.
29. Lu J, Wang XJ, Liu YX, Ching CB. Thermal and FTIR investigation of freeze-dried protein-excipient mixtures. J Therm Anal Calorim 2007; 89:913-9.
30. Saklar S, Katnas S, Ungan S. Determination of optimum hazelnut roasting conditions. Int J Food Sci Technol 2001; 36:271-81.
31. Laemmli UK, Favre M. Maturation of the head of bacteriophage T4.I. DNA packaging events. J Mol Biol 1973; 80:575-99.
32. Nielsen PM, Petersen D, Dambmann C. Improved method for determining food protein degree of hydrolysis. J Food Sci 2001; 66:642-6.
33. Bernard H, Paty E, Mondoulet Let al. Serological characteristics of peanut allergy in children. Allergy 2003; 58:1285-92.
34. Bernard H, Drumare MF, Guillon B, Paty E, Scheinmann P, Wal JM. Immunochemical characterisation of structure and allergenicity of peanut 2S albumins using different formats of immunoassays. Anal Bioanal Chem 2009; 395:139-46.
35. Caruelle D, Grassi J, Courty Jet al. Development and testing of radio and enzyme immunoassays for acidic fibroblast growth factor (aFGF). Anal Biochem 1988; 173:328-39.
36. Grassi J, Didierlaurent A, Stadler BM. Quantitative determination of total and specific human IgE with the use of monoclonal antibodies. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1986; 77:808-22.
37. Pradelles P, Grassi J, Maclouf J. Enzyme immunoassays of eicosanoids using acetylcholine esterase as label: an alternative to radioimmunoassay. Anal Chem 1985; 57:1170-3.
38. Jensen LB, Pedersen MH, Skov PSet al. Peanut cross-reacting allergens in seeds and sprouts of a range of legumes. Clin Exp Allergy 2008; 38:1969-77.
39. Vogel L, Luttkopf D, Hatahet L, Haustein D, Vieths S. Development of a functional in vitro assay as a novel tool for the standardization of allergen extracts in the human system. Allergy 2005; 60:1021-8.
40. Hoffmann A, Vieths S, Haustein D. Biologic allergen assay for in vivo test allergens with an in vitro model of the murine type I reaction. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997; 99:227-32.
41. Pomes A, Butts CL, Chapman MD. Quantification of Ara h 1 in peanuts: why roasting makes a difference. Clin Exp Allergy 2006; 36:824-30.
42. Beyer K, Morrow E, Li XMet al. Effects of cooking methods on peanut allergenicity. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2001; 107:1077-81.
43. Cong YJ, Lou F, Xue WT, Li LF, Wang J, Zhang H. The effect of cooking methods on the allergenicity of peanut. Food Agric Immunol 2007; 18:53-65.
44. Koppelman SJ, Bruijnzeel-Koomen CA, Hessing M, de Jongh HH. Heat-induced conformational changes of Ara h 1, a major peanut allergen, do not affect its allergenic properties. J Biol Chem 1999; 274:4770-7.
45. Schmitt DA, Nesbit JB, Hurlburt BK, Cheng H, Maleki SJ. Processing can alter the properties of peanut extract preparations. J Agric Food Chem 2010; 58:1138-43.
46. Gekko K, Timasheff SN. Mechanism of protein stabilization by glycerol: preferential hydration in glycerol-water mixtures. Biochemistry (Moscow) 1981; 20:4667-76.
47. Breiteneder H, Mills EN. Molecular properties of food allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005; 115:14-23.
48. Rouvinen J, Janis J, Laukkanen MLet al. Transient dimers of allergens. PLoS One 2010; 5:e9037.
49. Lehmann K, Schweimer K, Reese Get al. Structure and stability of 2S albumin-type peanut allergens: implications for the severity of peanut allergic reactions. Biochem J 2006; 395:463-72.