Blogging: Promoting learner autonomy and intercultural competence through study abroad

Language Learning and Technology

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 87-109

  Lee, Lina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer assisted language learning; Learner autonomy; Task based Instruction

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053478370     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10943501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Abrams, Z. (2005). Asynchronous CMC, collaboration and the development of critical thinking in a graduate seminar in applied linguistics. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(2), 23-47.
2. Allen, L. Q. (2000). Culture and the ethnographic interview in foreign language teacher development. Foreign Language Annals, 33(1), 51-57.
3. Armstrong, K., & Retterer, O. (2008). Blogging as L2 writing: A case study. AACE Journal, 16(3), 233-251.
4. Arnold, N., & Ducate, L. (2006). Future foreign language teachers' social and cognitive collaboration in an online environment. Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), 42-66. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol10num1/arnoldducate/default.html
5. Baggetun, R., & Wasson, B. (2006). Self-regulated learning and open writing. European Journal of Education, 41(3-4), 453-472.
6. Bateman, B. (2002). Promoting openness toward culture learning: Ethnographic interviews for students of Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 86(3), 318-331.
7. Belz, J. (2002). Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 60-81.
8. Bennett, M. (1993). Towards ethnorelativism: A development model of intercultural sensitivity. In M. Paige (Ed.) Education for the intercultural experience (pp. 21-71). Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
9. Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. London: Longman.
10. Benson, P. (2003). Learner autonomy in the classroom. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Practical English language teaching (pp. 289-308). New York: McGraw Hill.
11. Benson, P. (2004). Autonomy and information technology in the educational discourse of the information age. In C. Davison (Ed.), Information technology and innovation in language education (pp. 173-192). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
12. Benson, P. (2006). (Ed.). Learner autonomy 8: Insider perspectives on autonomy in language teaching and learning. Dublin: Authentik.
13. Benson, P., & Voller, P. (1997). Autonomy and independence in language learning. London: Longman.
14. Blin, F. (2004). CALL and the development of learner autonomy: Towards an activity-theoretical perspective. ReCALL, 16(2), 377-395.
15. Bloch, J. (2007). Abdullah's blogging: A generation 1.5 student enters the blogosphere. Language Learning & Technology, 11(2), 128-141. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol11num2/bloch/default.html
16. Brammerts, H. (2001). Autonomes Sprachenlernen im Tandem: Entwicklung eines Konzepts. In H. Brammerts & K. Kleppin (Eds.), Selbstgesteuertes Sprachenlernen im Tandem: Ein Handbuch (pp. 9-16). Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.
17. Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevendon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
18. Campbell, A. P. (2003). Weblogs for use with ESL classes. TESL Journal, IX(2). Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Campbell-Weblogs.html
19. Carney, N. (2007). Language study through blog exchanges. Paper presented at the Wireless Ready Symposium: Podcasting Education and Mobile Assisted Language Learning, NUCB Graduate School, Nagoya, Japan. Retrieved from http://wirelessready.nucba.ac.jp/Carney.pdf
20. Carney, N. (2009). Blogging in foreign language education. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Handbook of research on Web 2.0 and second language learning (pp. 292-312). IGI Global.
21. Chapelle, C. (2001). Computer Applications in Second Language Acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Churchill, D. (2009). Educational applications of Web 2.0: Using blogs to support teaching and learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 179-183.
23. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
24. Dam, L. (1995). Learner autonomy 3: From theory to classroom practice. Dublin: Authentik.
25. Dang, H. V. (2006). Learner-centeredness and EFL instruction in Vietnam: A case study. International Education Journal, 7(4), 598-610.
26. Dang, T. T. (2010). Learner autonomy in EFL studies in Vietnam: A discussion from sociocultural perspective. English Language Teaching, 3(2), 3-9.
27. Darhower, M. (2002). Interactional features of synchronous computer-mediated communication in the intermediate L2 class: A sociocultural case study. CALICO Journal, 19(2), 249-277.
28. Dickinson, L. (1995) Autonomy and motivation: a literature review. System, 23(2), 165-174.
29. Donato, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language Classroom. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 27-50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Ducate, L., & Lomicka, L. (2008). Adventures in the blogosphere: From blog readers to blog writers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(1), 9-28.
32. Duffy, T. M., & Cunningham, D. J. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Educational communications and technology (pp. 170-199). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
33. Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2008). Blogging: Fostering intercultural competence development in foreign language and study abroad contexts. Foreign Language Annals, 41(3), 454-478.
34. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23.
35. Hauck, M., & Youngs, B. (2008). Telecollaboration in multimodal environments: The impact of task design and learner interaction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(2), 87-124.
36. Henri, F., & Rigault, C. R. (1996). Collaborative distance learning and computer conferencing. In T. Liao (Ed.), Advanced educational technology: Research issues and future potential (pp. 45-76). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
37. Hewitt, B. L. (2000). Characteristics of interactive oral and computer-mediated peer group talk and its influence on revision. Computers and Composition, 17, 265-288.
38. Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
39. Hurd, S., & Murphy, L. (2005). (Eds.). Success with languages. London: Routledge.
40. Jackson, J. (2008). Language, identity, and study aboard: Sociocultural perspectives. London: Equinox.
41. Jeong, A. (2004). The combined effects of response time and message content on growth patterns of discussion threads in computer-supported collaborative argumentation. Journal of Distance Education, 19(1), 36-53.
42. Jin, L., & Erben, T. (2007). Intercultural learning via instant messenger interaction. CALICO Journal, 24(2), 291-311.
43. Jonassen, D. H. (2003). Using cognitive tools to represent problems. Journal of Research in Technology in Education, 35(3), 362-381.
44. Kenning, M. (2010). Collaborative scaffolding in online task-based voice interactions between advanced learners. ReCALL, 22(2), 135-151.
45. Lamb, M. (2004). Integrative motivation in a globalizing world. System, 32, 3-19.
46. Lamb, T., & Reinders, H. (2008). (Eds.). Learner and teacher autonomy: Concepts, realities and responses. AILA Applied Linguistics Series, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
47. Lamy, M. N., & Goodfellow, R. (1999). Supporting language students' interactions in web-based conferencing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12(4), 457-477.
48. Lamy, M. N., & Hassan, X. (2003) What influences reflective interaction in distance peer learning? Evidence from four long-term learners of French. Open Learning, 18(2), 39-59.
49. Leahy, C. (2008). Learner activities in a collaborative CALL task. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(3), 253-268.
50. Lee, L. (2002). Enhancing learners' communication skills through synchronous electronic interaction and task-based instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 35(1), 16-23.
51. Lee, L. (2004). Learners' perspectives on networked collaborative interaction with native speakers of Spanish in the US. Language Learning & Technology, 8(1), 83-100. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num1/lee/default.html
52. Lee, L. (2005). Using web-based instruction to promote active learning: Learners' perspectives. CALICO Journal, 23(1), 139-156.
53. Lee, L. (2007). Fostering second Language oral communication through constructivist interaction in desktop videoconferencing. Foreign Language Annals, 40(4), 635-649.
54. Lee, L. (2008). Focus-on-form through collaborative scaffolding in expert-to-novice online interaction. Language Learning & Technology, 12(3), 53-72. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol12num3/lee.pdf
55. Lee, L. (2009a). Scaffolding collaborative exchanges between expert and novice language teachers in threaded discussions. Foreign Language Annals, 42(2), 212-228.
56. Lee, L. (2009b). Promoting intercultural exchanges with blogs and podcasting: A study of Spanish-American telecollaboration. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(5), 425-443.
57. Lee, L. (2010). Fostering reflective writing and interactive exchange through blogging in an advanced language course. ReCALL, 22(2), 212-22.
58. Levy, M., & Stockwell, G. (2006). CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer assisted language learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
59. Liaw, M.-L., & Bunn-Le Master, S. (2010). Understanding telecollaboration through an analysis of intercultural discourse. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(1), 21-40.
60. Little, D. (1994). Learner autonomy: A theoretical construct and its practical applications. Die Neuren Sprachen, 93(5), 430-442.
61. Little, D. (1996). Freedom to learn and compulsion to interact: promoting learner autonomy through the use of information systems and information technologies. In R. Pemberton, S. L. Edward, W. W. F. Or, & Pierson, H. D. (Eds.), Taking control: Autonomy in language learning (pp. 203-219). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
62. Little, D. (2001) Learner autonomy and the challenge of tandem language learning via the Internet. In A. Chambers & G. Davies (Eds.), ICT and language learning: A European perspective (pp. 29-38). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
63. Little, D. (2003). Learner autonomy and second/foreign language learning. Subject Centre for Languages, Linguistics and Area Studies, Guide to Good Practice. Retrieved from http://www.llas.ac.uk/resources/gpg/1409
64. Little, D. (2007). Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 14-29.
65. Long, M. (2000). Second language acquisition theories. In M. Byram (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language teaching (pp. 527-534). London: Routledge.
66. Meskill, C., & Ranglova, K. (2000). Sociocollaborative language learning in Bulgaria. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 20-40). New York: Cambridge University Press.
67. Murphy, L. (2006). Supporting learner autonomy in a distance learning context. In D. Gardner (Ed.), Learner autonomy 10: Integration and support (pp. 72-92). Dublin: Authentik.
68. Murray L., & Hourigan, T. (2006). Using micropublishing to facilitate writing in the foreign language. In L. Ducate & N. Arnold (Eds.), Calling on CALL: From theory to research to new directions in foreign language teaching (pp. 149-179). Texas: CALICO Monograph Series.
69. O'Dowd, R. (2006). Combining networked communication tools for students' ethnographic research. In J. Belz & S. Thorne (Eds.), Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education (pp. 147-176). Boston: Thomsen & Heinle.
70. O'Dowd, R., & Ritter, M. (2006). Understanding and working with 'failed communication' in telecollaborative exchanges. CALICO Journal, 61(2), 623-642.
71. O'Rourke, B., & Schwienhorst, K. (2003). Talking text: Reflections on reflection in computer-mediated communication. In D. Little, et al. (Eds.), Learner autonomy in foreign language classrooms: Teacher, learner, curriculum and assessment (pp. 47-62). Dublin: Authentik.
72. Oxford, R. L. (2003). Toward a more systematic model of L2 learner autonomy. In D. Palfreyman & R. C. Smith (Eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures: Language education perspectives (pp. 75-91). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
73. Pavlenko, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Second language learning as participation and the (re)construction of selves. J. L. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 155-178). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
74. Pawan, F., Paulus, T. M., Yalcin, S., & Chang, C. F. (2003). Online learning: Patterns of engagement and interaction among in-service teachers. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 119-140. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/pawan/default.html
75. Peterson, M. (1997). Language teaching and networking. System, 25 (1), 29-37.
76. Pinkman, K. (2005). Using blogs in the foreign language classroom: Encouraging learner independence. The JALT CALL Journal, 1(1), 12-24.
77. Reinders, H. (2006). Supporting self-directed learning through an electronic learning environment. In T. Lamb & H. Reinders (Eds.), Supporting independent learning: Issues and interventions (pp. 219-238). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
78. Richardson, W. (2005). Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful web tools for classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
79. Rubin, J. (2001). Language learner self-management. Journal of Asia-Pacific Communication, 11(1), 25-37.
80. Schwienhorst, K. (2008). Learner autonomy and CALL environments. New York: Routledge.
81. Spradley, J. (1980). Participant observation. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace.
82. Sun, Y.-C. (2009). Voice blog: An exploratory study of language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 13(2), 88-103. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol13num2/sun.pdf
83. Sykes, J., Oskoz, A., & Thorne, S. L. (2008). Web 2.0, inmersive environments, and the future of language education. CALICO Journal, 25(3), 528-546.
84. Thorne, S. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 38-67. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/pdf/thorne.pdf
85. Ushioda, E. (2006). Motivation, autonomy and sociocultural theory. In P. Benson (Ed.), Learner autonomy 8: Insider perspectives on autonomy in language teaching and learning (pp. 5-24). Dublin: Authentik.
86. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
87. Ward, J. (2004). Blog assisted language learning (BALL): Push button publishing for the pupils. TEFL Web Journal, 3(1). Retrieved from http://www.citeulike.org/group/378/article/327972
88. Ware, P. (2005). "Missed communication" in online communication: Tensions in fostering successful online interactions. Language Learning & Technology, 9(2), 64-89. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num2/ware/default.html
89. Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
90. Wenden, A. (2002). Learner development in language learning. Applied Linguistics 23(1), 32-55.
91. White, C. (2003). Language learning in distance education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
92. Yang, S.-H. (2009). Using blogs to enhance critical reflection and community of practice. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 11-21.