Comparison of the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 52, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 5887-5891

  Feizi, Sepehr ^a   Hashemloo, Ali ^a   Rastegarpour, Ali ^a  

^a SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORNEA HYSTERESIS; CORNEA RESISTANCE FACTOR; CORNEA THICKNESS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DEEP LAMELLAR ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY; EYE EXAMINATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETER; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; OCULAR RESPONSE ANALYZER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TONOMETER; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORNEA TRANSPLANTATION; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ASTIGMATISM; CORNEAL TRANSPLANTATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80053300766     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-6771     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Feizi S, Javadi MA, Jamali H, Mirbabaee F. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus: big-bubble technique. Cornea. 2010;29:177-182.
2. Javadi MA, Feizi S, Yazdani S, Mirbabaee F. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: a clinical trial. Cornea. 2010;29:365-371.
3. Foulks GN. Glaucoma associated with penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1987;94:871-874.
4. Goldberg DB, Schanzlin DJ, Brown SI. Incidence of increased intraocular pressure after keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1981;92:372-377.
5. Aldave AJ, Rudd JC, Cohen EJ, et al. The role of glaucoma therapy in the need for repeat penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 2000;9: 772-776.
6. Kirkness CM, Ficker LA. Risk factors for the development of postkeratoplasty glaucoma. Cornea. 1992;11:427-432.
7. Rootman DS, Insler MS, Thompson HW, et al. Accuracy and precision of the Tono-Pen in measuring intraocular pressure after keratoplasty and epikeratophakia and in scarred corneas. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106:1697-1700.
8. Geyer O, Mayron Y, Loewenstein A, et al. Tono-Pen tonometry in normal and in post-keratoplasty eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 1992;76: 538-540.
9. Rao VJ, Gnanaraj L, Mitchell KW, et al. Clinical comparison of ocular blood flow tonometer, Tonopen, and Goldmann applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in postkeratoplasty eyes. Cornea. 2001;20:834-838.
10. Lisle C, Ehlers N. A clinical comparison of the Xpert non-contact tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer after penetrating keratoplasty. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2000;78:211-215.
11. Ceruti P, Morbio R, Marraffa M, et al. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:215-221.
12. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:156-162.
13. Ortiz D, Piñero D, Shabayek MH, Arnalich-Montiel F, Alió JL. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1371-1375.
14. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measurement error. BMJ. 1996;313:744.
15. Mok KH, Wong CS, Lee VW. Tono-Pen tonometer and corneal thickness. Eye. 1999;13:35-37.
16. Kwon TH, Ghaboussi J, Pecknold DA, Hashash YM. Role of corneal biomechanical properties in applanation tonometry measurements. J Refract Surg. 2009;2:1-8.
17. Francis BA, Hsieh A, Lai MY, et al.; Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Group. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:20-26.
18. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Vico E, et al. J. Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and Goldmann tonometry. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:2156-2162.
19. Papastergiou GI, Kozobolis V, Siganos DS. Effect of recipient corneal pathology on Pascal tonometer and Goldmann tonometer readings in eyes after penetrating keratoplasty. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2010;20:29-34.
20. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Robert YC, Thiel MA. Ocular pulse amplitude in healthy subjects as measured by dynamic contour tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124:1104-1108.
21. Moreno-Montañés J, Maldonado MJ, García N, Mendiluce L, García-Gómez PJ, Seguí-Gómez M. Reproducibility and clinical relevance of the ocular response analyzer in nonoperated eyes: corneal biomechanical and tonometric implications. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:968-974.
22. Xu G, Chiu Lam DS, Leung CK. Influence of ocular pulse amplitude on ocular response analyzer measurements. J Glaucoma. 2010 Sep
23. Kotecha A, White E, Schlottmann PG, Garway-Heath DF. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:730-737.
24. Sullivan-Mee M, Gerhardt G, Halverson KD, Qualls C. Repeatability and reproducibility for intraocular pressure measurement by dynamic contour, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma. 2009;18:666-673.
25. Eisenberg DL, Sherman BG, McKeown CA, Schuman JS. Tonometry in adults and children. A manometric evaluation of pneumatonometry, applanation, and TonoPen in vitro and in vivo. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1173-1181.
26. Ehongo A, De Maertelaer V, Pourjavan S. Effect of topical corneal anesthesia on ocular response analyzer parameters: pilot study. Int Ophthalmol. 2009;29:325-328.
27. Holladay JT, Allison ME, Prager TC. Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with regular corneal astigmatism. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983;96:90-93.
28. Viestenz A, Langenbucher A, Seitz B, et al. Evaluation of dynamic contour tonometry in penetrating keratoplasties. Ophthalmologe. 2006;103:773-776.
29. Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:146-155.
30. Kirwan C, O'Keefe M. Measurement of intraocular pressure in LASIK and LASEK patients using the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Refract Surg. 2008;24:366-370.
31. Denis P, Nordmann JP, Bertin V, et al. Evaluation of the Tono-Pen and X-Pert noncontact tonometers in cataract surgery. Ophthalmologica. 1993;207:155-161.
32. Armstrong TA. Evaluation of the Tono-Pen and the Pulsair tonometers. Am J Ophthalmol. 1990;109:716-720.