Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Deep Lamellar and Penetrating Keratoplasties

American Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 145, Issue 2, 2008, Pages

  Ceruti, Piero ^a   Morbio, Roberta ^a   Marraffa, Michele ^a   Marchini, Giorgio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORNEA CURVATURE; CORNEA THICKNESS; CORNEA TRANSPLANTATION; DEEP LAMELLAR KERATOPLASTY; DYNAMIC CONTOUR TONOMETRY; FEMALE; GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETRY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TONOMETER;

EID: 38349084770     PISSN: 00029394     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Zadok D., Tran D.B., Twa M., et al. Pneumotonometry versus Goldmann tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 25 (1999) 1344-1348
2. Mardelli P.G., Piebenga L.W., Whitacre M.M., et al. The effect of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy on intraocular pressure measurements using the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Ophthalmology 104 (1997) 945-948
3. Park H.J., Uhm K.B., and Hong C. Reduction in intraocular pressure after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 27 (2001) 303-309
4. Rashad K.M., and Bahnassy A.A. Changes in intraocular pressure after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg 17 (2001) 420-427
5. Duch S., Serra A., Castanera J., et al. Tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis treatment. J Glaucoma 10 (2001) 261-265
6. Fournier A.V., Podtetenev M., Lemire J., et al. Intraocular pressure change measured by Goldmann tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 24 (1998) 905-910
7. Abbasoǧlu ÖE., Bowman R.W., Cavanagh H.D., et al. Reliability of intraocular pressure measurements after myopic excimer photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmology 105 (1998) 2193-2196
8. Garzozi H.J., Chung H.S., Yang Y., et al. Intraocular pressure and photorefractive keratectomy; a comparison of three different tonometers. Cornea 20 (2001) 33-36
9. Pepose J.S., Feigenbaum S.K., Qazi M.A., Sanderson J.P., and Roberts C.J. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 143 (2007) 39-47
10. Kniestedt C., Michelle N., and Stamper R.L. Dynamic contour tonometry: a comparative study on human cadaver eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 122 (2004) 1287-1293
11. Burvenich H., Burvenich E., and Vincent C. Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) versus non-contact tonometry (NCT): a comparison study. Bull Soc Belge Ophthalmol 298 (2005) 63-69
12. Schneider E., and Grehn F. Intraocular pressure measurement-comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma 15 (2006) 2-6
13. Ku J.K., Danesh-Meyer H.V., Craig J.P., et al. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Eye 20 (2006) 191-198
14. Pache M., Wilmsmeyer S., Lautebach S., et al. Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243 (2005) 763-767
15. Hoffmann E.M., Grus F.H., and Pfeiffer N. Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude using dynamic contour tonometry and contact lens tonometry. BMC Ophthalmol 4 (2004) 4
16. Kniestedt C., Lin S., Choe J., et al. Correlation between intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, stage of glaucoma, and demographic patient data: prospective analysis of biophysical parameters in tertiary glaucoma practice population. J Glaucoma 15 (2006) 91-97
17. Kotecha A., White E.T., Shewry J.M., et al. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol 89 (2005) 1572-1575
18. Kniestedt C., Lin S., Choe J., et al. Clinical comparison of contour and applanation tonometry and their relationship to pachymetry. Arch Ophthalmol 123 (2005) 1532-1537
19. Doyle A., and Lachkar Y. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry over a wide range of central corneal thickness. J Glaucoma 14 (2005) 288-292
20. Salvetat M.L., Zeppieri M., Tosoni C., and Brusini P. Comparison between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 85 (2007) 272-279
21. Kniestedt C., Kanngiesser H., and Stamper R.L. Assessment of Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring IOP after LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 458-459
22. Duba I., and Wirthlin A.C. Dynamic contour tonometry for post-LASIK intraocular pressure measurements. Klin Monastbl Augenheilkd 221 (2004) 347-350
23. Siganos D.S., Papastergiou G.I., and Moedas C. Assessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg 30 (2004) 746-751
24. Kaufmann C., Bachmann L.M., and Thiel M.A. Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44 (2003) 3790-3794
25. Viestenz A., Laugenbucher A., Seitz B., and Viestenz A. Evaluation of dynamic contour tonometry in penetrating keratoplasties. Ophthalmologe 103 (2006) 773-776
26. Ismail A.R., Lamont M., Perera S., et al. Comparison of IOP measurement using GAT and DCT in patients with penetrating keratoplasties. Br J Ophthalmol 91 (2007) 980-981
27. Ozbek Z., Cohen E.J., Hammersmith K.M., and Rapuano C.J. Dynamic contour tonometry: a new way to assess intraocular pressure in ectatic corneas. Cornea 25 (2006) 890-894
28. Marchini G., Mastropasqua L., Pedrotti E., Nubile M., Ciancaglini M., and Sbabo A. Deep lamellar keratoplasty by intracorneal dissection: a prospective clinical and confocal microscopic study. Ophthalmology 113 (2006) 1289-1300
29. Shah S., Chatterjee A., Mathai M., et al. Relationship between corneal thickness and measured intraocular pressure in a general ophthalmology clinic. Ophthalmology 106 (1999) 2154-2160
30. Morad Y., Sharon E., Hefetz L., and Nemet P. Corneal thickness and curvature in normal-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 125 (1998) 164-168
31. Copt R.P., Thomas R., and Mermoud A. Corneal thickness in ocular hypertension, primary open-angle glaucoma, and normal tension glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 117 (1999) 14-16
32. Brandt J.D., Beiser J.A., Kass M.A., et al. Central corneal thickness in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS). Ophthalmology 108 (2001) 1779-1788
33. Francis B.A., Hsieh A., Lai M.Y., et al. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Ophthalmology 114 (2007) 20-26