Effect of Corneal Thickness on Dynamic Contour, Rebound, and Goldmann Tonometry

Ophthalmology

Volumn 113, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 2156-2162

  Martinez de la Casa, Jose M ^a   Garcia Feijoo, Julian ^a   Vico, Eva ^a   Fernandez Vidal, Ana ^a   Benitez del Castillo, Jose M ^a   Wasfi, Mohamed ^a   Garcia Sanchez, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CORNEA SENSIBILITY; CORNEA THICKNESS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REBOUND; TONOMETER; TONOMETRY;

BODY WEIGHTS AND MEASURES; CORNEA; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 33751505840     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.016     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Leske M.C. The epidemiology of open-angle glaucoma: a review. Am J Epidemiol 118 (1983) 166-191
2. Whitacre M.M., and Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 38 (1993) 1-30
3. Whitacre M.M., Stein R.A., and Hassanein K. The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 115 (1993) 592-596
4. Kontiola AI. A new electromechanical method for measuring intraocular pressure. Doc Ophthalmol 1996-97;93:265-76.
5. Kontiola A.I. A new induction-based impact method for measuring intraocular pressure. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 78 (2000) 142-145
6. Kontiola A.I., Goldblum D., Mittag T., and Danias J. The induction/impact tonometer: a new instrument to measure intraocular pressure in the rat. Exp Eye Res 73 (2001) 781-785
7. Danias J., Kontiola A.I., Filippopoulos T., and Mittag T. Method for the noninvasive measurement of intraocular pressure in mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44 (2003) 1138-1141
8. Martinez-de-la-Casa J.M., Garcia-Feijoo J., Castillo A., and Garcia-Sanchez J. Reproducibility and clinical evaluation of rebound tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46 (2005) 4578-4580
9. Kontiola A., and Puska P. Measuring intraocular pressure with the Pulsair 3000 and Rebound tonometers in elderly patients without an anesthetic. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 242 (2004) 3-7
10. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1 (1986) 307-310
11. Argus W.A. Ocular hypertension and central corneal thickness. Ophthalmology 102 (1995) 1810-1812
12. Chatterjee A., Shah S., Bessant D.A., et al. Reduction in intraocular pressure after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy: correlation with pretreatment myopia. Ophthalmology 104 (1997) 355-359
13. Herndon L.W., Choudhri S.A., Cox T., et al. Central corneal thickness in normal, glaucomatous, and ocular hypertensive eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 115 (1997) 1137-1141
14. Kass M.A., Heuer D.K., Higginbotham E.J., et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 120 (2002) 701-713
15. Gordon M.O., Beiser J.A., Brandt J.D., et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 120 (2002) 714-720
16. Morad Y., Sharon E., Hefetz L., and Nemet P. Corneal thickness and curvature in normal-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 125 (1998) 164-168
17. Doughty M.J., and Zaman M.L. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 44 (2000) 367-408
18. Orssengo G.J., and Pye D.C. Determination of the true intraocular pressure and modulus of elasticity of the human cornea in vivo. Bull Math Biol 61 (1999) 551-572
19. Gunvant P., O'Leary D.J., Baskaran M., et al. Evaluation of tonometric correction factors. J Glaucoma 14 (2005) 337-343
20. Fernandes P., Diaz-Rey J.A., Queiros A., et al. Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 25 (2005) 436-440
21. van der Jagt L.H., and Jansonius N.M. Three portable tonometers, the TGDc-01, the ICare and the Tonopen XL, compared with each other and with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 25 (2005) 429-435
22. Kaufmann C., Bachmann L.M., and Thiel M.A. Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44 (2003) 3790-3794
23. Kaufmann C., Bachmann L.M., and Thiel M.A. Comparison of cynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45 (2004) 3118-3121
24. Pache M., Wilmsmeyer S., Lautebach S., and Funk J. Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243 (2005) 763-767
25. Schneider E., and Grehn F. Intraocular pressure measurement-comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma 15 (2006) 2-6
26. Kotecha A., White E.T., Shewry J.M., and Garway-Heath D.F. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol 89 (2005) 1572-1575
27. Ku J.Y., Danesh-Meyer H.V., Craig J.P., et al. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Eye 20 (2006) 191-198
28. Kniestedt C., Nee M., and Stamper R.L. Dynamic contour tonometry: a comparative study on human cadaver eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 122 (2004) 1287-1293
29. Siganos D.S., Papastergiou G.I., and Moedas C. Assessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg 30 (2004) 746-751