Evaluation of dynamic contour tonometry in penetrating keratoplasties;Evaluierung der dynamischen konturtonometrie nach penetrierender keratoplastik

Ophthalmologe

Volumn 103, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 773-776

  Viestenz, An ^a,b   Langenbucher, A ^c   Seitz, B ^d   Viestenz, Ar ^a,b  

^a OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ERLANGEN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^d SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cornea; Dynamic contour tonometer; Goldmann applanation tonometry; Intraocular pressure; Keratoplasty

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MEASUREMENT; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SUTURING METHOD; TECHNIQUE; TONOMETRY;

EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; KERATOPLASTY, PENETRATING; MALE; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 33748790161     PISSN: 0941293X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00347-006-1395-7     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Becker B, Hahn K (1964) Topical corticosteroids and heredity in primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 57: 543-551
2. Doyle A, Lachkar Y (2005) Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry over a wide range of central corneal thickness. J Glaucoma 14: 288-292
3. Duba I, Wirthlin AC (2004) Dynamic Contour Tonometry for post-LASIK intraocular pressure measurements. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 221: 347-350
4. Ehlers N, Hansen FK, Aasved H (1975) Biometric correlations of corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 53: 652-659
5. Goldmann H, Schmidt T (1957) Uber Applanationstonometrie. Ophthalmologica 134: 221-242
6. Goldmann H, Schmidt T (1961) Weiterer Beitrag zur Applanationstonometrie. Ophthalmologica 141: 441-456
7. Kanngiesser H, Kniestedt C (2005) Tonometrie im Wandel. Ophthalmologe 102: 849-855
8. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA (2003) Intraocular pressure measurements using Dynamic Contour Tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44: 3790-3794
9. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA (2004) Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry with Goldmann Applanation Tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45: 3118-3121
10. Kniestedt C, Nee M, Stamper RL (2005) Accuracy of dynamic contour tonometry compared with applanation tonometry in human cadaver eyes of different hydration states. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243: 359-366
11. Madilessi F, Marx W, Reinhard T et al. (2000) Impressions- und Applanationstonometrie bei pathologischen Hornhauten. Vergleich mit der intraokularen Nadeldruckmessung. Ophthalmologe 97:478-481
12. Pache M, Wilmsmeyer S, Lautebach S, Funk J (2004) Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243: 763-767
13. Stodtmeister R (1998) Applanation tonometry and correction according to corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol 76: 319-324
14. Stodtmeister R (2001) Glaukom: Applanationstonometrie und Hornhautdicke. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 218: 179-183
15. Viestenz A, Martus P, Schrehardt U et al. (2004) Einfluss von Prostaglandin F2α-Analoga und Karboanhydraseinhibitoren auf die zentrale Hornhautdicke. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 221: 753-756
16. Viestenz A, Langenbucher A, Mardin CY, Viestenz A (2006) Reproduzierbarkeit der Dynamischen Kontur-Tonometrie: Vergleich mit demTonopen XL und Goldmann-Applikationstonometer. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd (im Druck)
17. Whitacre MM, Stein R (1993) Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 38: 1-30