Assessment of probiotic properties of lactobacillus plantarum ZLP001 isolated from gastrointestinal tract of weaning Pigs

African Journal of Biotechnology

Volumn 10, Issue 54, 2011, Pages 11303-11308

  Wang, Jing ^a   Ji, Haifeng ^a   Zhang, Dongyan ^a   Liu, Hui ^a   Wang, Sixin ^a   Shan, Dacong ^a   Wang, Yamin ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PLANT AND ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION   (China)

Author keywords

In vitro assessment; In vivo trial; Lactobacillus plantarum; Probiotic properties

Indexed keywords

PROBIOTIC AGENT;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BACTERIUM CULTURE; BACTERIUM ISOLATION; CELL VIABILITY; COLONY FORMING UNIT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; LACTOBACILLUS PLANTARUM; MICROFLORA; NONHUMAN; SALMONELLA ENTERICA; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; STOMACH JUICE; SURVIVAL RATE; SWINE; WEANING;

ESCHERICHIA COLI; LACTOBACILLUS PLANTARUM; SALMONELLA ENTERICA; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; SUIDAE;

EID: 80053088158     PISSN: 16845315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5897/ajb11.255     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. AOAC (1992). Official Methods of Analysis, Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 15th Edition. Washington, DC, USA.
2. Asai T, Otagiri Y, Osumi T, Namimatsu T, Hirai H, Sato S (2002). Isolation of Salmonella from diarrheic feces of pigs. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 64: 159-160.
3. Backstrom L (1973). Environment and health in piglet production. A field study of incidences and correlations. Acta Vet. Scand. Suppl. 41: 1-240.
4. Cebeci A, Gürakan C (2003). Properties of potential probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum strains. Food Microbiol. 20: 511-518.
5. Chang YH, Kim JK, Kim HJ, Kim WY, Kim YB, Park YH (2001). Selection of a potential probiotics Lactobacillus strain and subsequent in vivo studies. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 80: 193-199.
6. Choi YJ, Huang MK, Houde R, Lee JW, Zhao X (2004). Effects of Lactobacilli and an acidophilic fungus on the production performance and immune responses in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 8: 788-795.
7. De Smet I, Van Hoorde L, Vande Woestyne M, Christiaens H, Verstraete W (1995). Significance of bile-salt hydrolytic activities of lactobacilli. J. Appl. Microbiol. 79: 292-301.
8. Fernández MF, Boris S, Barbés C (2003). Probiotic properties of human lactobacilli strains to be used in the gastrointestinal tract. J. Appl. Microbiol. 94: 449-455.
9. Hacin B, Rogelj I, Matijasic BB (2008). Lactobacillus isolates from weaned piglets' mucosa with inhibitory activity against common porcine pathogens. Folia Microbiol. 53: 569-576.
10. Hampson DJ (1994). Postweaning Escherichia coli diarrhea in pigs. Gyles C L (ed.): Escherichia coli in Domestic Animals and Humans. London: CABI, 171-791.
11. Huang Y, Adams MC (2004). In vitro assessment of the upper gastrointestinal tolerance of potential probiotic dairy propionibacteria.Int. J. Food Microbiol. 91: 253-260.
12. Fairbrother JM, Nadeau E, Gyles CL (2005). Escherichia coli in postweaning diarrhea in pigs: an update on bacterial types, pathogenesis, and prevention strategies. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 6: 17-39.
13. FAO/WHO, Evaluation of health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food. Including power milk with live lactic acid bacteria, Report from FAO/WHO Expert Consultation, 1-4 October 2001, Cordoba, Argentina, 2001.
14. Francisco T, Juan R, Erenia F, Maria LR (1995). Response of piglets to oral administration of lactic acid bacteria. J. Food. Protect. 58: 1369-1374.
15. Hong HA, Duc le H, Cutting SM (2005). The use of bacterial spore formers as probiotics. FEMS Microbial Rev. 29: 813-835.
16. Jacobsen CN, Rosenfeldt Nielsen V, Hayford AE, Møller PL, Michaelsen KF, Pærregaard A, Sandström B, Tvede M, Jakobsen M (1999). Screening of probiotic activities of forty-seven strains of Lactobacillus spp. by in vitro techniques and evaluation of the colonization ability of five selected strains in humans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65: 4949-4956.
17. Koninkx JFJG, Malago JJ (2008). The protective potency of probiotic bacteria and their microbial products against enteric infections. Folia Microbiol. 53: 189-194.
18. Leser TD, Amenuvor JZ, Jensen TK, Lindecrona RH, Boye M, Møller K (2002). Culture-independent analysis of gutbacteria: the pig gastrointestinal tract microbiota revisited. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68: 673-690.
19. Lin WH, Hwang CF, Chen LW, Tsen HY (2006). Viable counts, characteristic evaluation for commercial lactic acid bacteria products. Food Microbiol. 23: 74-81.
20. Lin WH, Yu B, Jang SH, Tsen HY (2007). Different probiotic properties for Lactobacillus fermentum strains isolated from swine and poultry. Anaerobe, 13: 107-113.
21. NRC (1998). National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 10th Edition. National Academic Press. Washington, DC, USA.
22. Ouoba LII, Diawara B, Jespersen L, Jakobsen M (2007). Antimicrobial activity of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus pumilus during the fermentation of African locust bean (Parkia biglobosa) for Soumbala production. J. Appl. Microbiol. 102: 963-970.
23. Ouwehand A, Salminen AC, Isolauri E (2002). Probiotics: an overview of beneficial effects. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 82: 279-289.
24. Rogelj I, Matijašić BB (2006). Lactobacillus gasseri LF221 and K7-from isolation to application. Biologia, 61: 761-769.
25. SAS (1997). SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 9. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA.
26. Turner JL, Dritz SS, Minton JE (2001). Review: alternatives to conventional antimicrobials in swine diets. Prof. Anim. Sci. 17: 217-226.
27. Wang X, Qiao SY, Liu M, Ma YX (2006). Effects of graded levels of true ileal digestible threonine on performance, serum parameters and immune function of 10-25 kg pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 129: 264-278.
28. Zar JH (1984). Biostatistical Analysis. 2nd Edition. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.