Minority Influence

Social and Personality Psychology Compass

Volumn 5, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 679-693

  Gardikiotis, Antonis ^a  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052601240     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17519004     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00377.x     Document Type: Article

References (111)

1. Aebischer, V., Hewstone, M., & Henderson, M. (1984). Minority influence and musical preference: Innovation by conversion not coercion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 23-33.
2. Allen, V. L. (1965). Situational factors in conformity. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 133-175). New York: Academic Press.
3. Alvaro, E. M., & Crano, W. D. (1997). Indirect minority influence: Evidence for leniency in source evaluation and counterargumentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 949-964.
4. Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzhow (Ed.), Groups, Leadership, and Men (pp. 177-190). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press.
5. Atuel, H., Seyranian, V., & Crano, W. D. (2007). Media representations of majority and minority groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 561-572.
6. Baker, S. M., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Majority and minority influence: Source-position imbalance as a determinant of message scrutiny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 5-19.
7. Bohner, G., Frank, S., & Erb, H. P. (1998). Heuristic processing of distinctiveness information in minority and majority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 855-860.
8. Butera, F., Mugny, G., Legrenzi, P., & Pérez, J. A. (1996). Majority and minority influence, task representation and inductive reasoning. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 123-136.
9. Campbell, J. D., Tesser, A., & Fairey, P. J. (1986). Conformity and attention to the stimulus: Some temporal and contextual dynamics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 315-324.
10. Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process Theories in Social Psychology (pp. 73-96). New York: Guilford Press.
11. Crano, W. D. (2001). Social influence, social identity, and ingroup leniency. In C. K. W. De Dreu & N. K. De Vries (Eds.), Group Consensus and Minority Influence: Implications for Innovation (pp. 122-143). Oxford: Blackwell.
12. Crano, W. D. (2010). Majority and minority influence in attitude formation and attitude change: Context/categorization - leniency contract theory. In R. Martin & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Minority Influence and Innovation: Antecedents, Processes and Consequences (pp. 53-78). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
13. Crano, W. D., & Alvaro, E. M. (1998). The context/comparison model of social influence: Mechanisms, structure, and linkages that underlie indirect attitude change. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 175-202). Chichester: John Wiley.
14. Crano, W. D., & Chen, X. (1998). The leniency contract and persistence of majority and minority influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1437-1450.
15. Crano, W. D., & Hannula-Bral, K. A. (1994). Context/categorization model of social influence: Minority and majority influence in the formation of a novel response norm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 247-276.
16. Crano, W. D., & Seyranian, V. (2007). Majority and minority influence. Social Psychology and Personality Compass, 1, 572-589.
17. David, B., & Turner, J. C. (1996). Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion: Is being a member of the outgroup an advantage? British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 179-199.
18. David, B., & Turner, J. C. (1999). Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion: The ingroup minority in intragroup and intergroup contexts. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 115-134.
19. David, B., & Turner, J. C. (2001). Majority and minority influence: A single process self-categorization analysis. In C. K. W. De Dreu & N. K. De Vries (Eds.), Group Consensus and Minority Influence: Implications for Innovation (pp. 91-121). Oxford: Blackwell.
20. De Dreu, C. K. W., & De Vries, N. K. (1993). Numerical support, information processing and attitude change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 647-663.
21. De Dreu, C. K. W., & De Vries, N. K. (Eds.) (2001). Group Consensus and Minority Influence: Implications for Innovation. Oxford: Blackwell.
22. De Vries, N. K., De Dreu, C. K.W., Gordijn, E., & Schuurman, M. (1996).Majority and minority influence: A dual interpretation. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 145-172). Chichester: John Wiley.
23. Doise, W. (1986). Levels of Explanation in Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Doms, M. (1984). The minority influence effect: An alternative approach. In S. Moscovici & W. Doise (Eds.), Current Issues in European Social Psychology (pp. 1-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Doms, M., & Van Avermaet, E. (1980). Majority influence, minority influence and conversion behaviour: A replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 283-292.
26. Erb, H. P., & Bohner, G. (2001). Mere consensus effects in minority and majority influence. In C. K. W. De Dreu & N. K. De Vries (Eds.), Group Consensus and Minority Influence: Implications for Innovation (pp. 40-59). Oxford: Blackwell.
27. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
28. Gardikiotis, A. (2005). Majority and minority source and processing of the influential message. Psychology: The Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society, 12, 455-469.
29. Gardikiotis, A. (under review). Third Person Perception and Social Influence: Perceiving Majority and Minority Influence.
30. Gardikiotis, A., Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (2004). The representation of majorities and minorities in the British Press: A content analytic approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 637-646.
31. Gardikiotis, A., Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (2005). Group consensus in social influence: Type of consensus information as a moderator of majority and minority influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1163-1174.
32. Guillon, M., & Personnaz, B. (1983). Analyse de la dynamique des representations des conflicts minoritaire et majoritaire. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 3, 65-87.
33. Hewstone, M., & Martin, R. (2010). Minority influence: From groups to attitudes and back again. In R. Martin & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Minority Influence and Innovation: Antecedents, Processes and Consequences (pp. 365-395). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
34. Kerr, N. (2002). When is a minority a minority? Active vs. passive minority advocacy and social influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 471-484.
35. Latané, B., & Wolf, S. (1981). The social impact of majorities and minorities. Psychological Review, 88, 438-453.
36. Levine, J. M., & Ranelli, C. J. (1978). Majority reaction to shifting and stable attitudinal deviates. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 55-70.
37. Levine, J. M., & Russo, E. M. (1987).Majority and minority influence. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Group Processes: Review of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 13-54). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38. Maass, A., & Clark, R. D. III (1983). Internalization versus compliance: Differential processes underlying minority influence and conformity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 197-215.
39. Maass, A., & Clark, R. D. III (1984). Hidden impact of minorities: Fifteen years of minority influence research. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 428-450.
40. Maass, A., Clark, R., & Haberkorn, G. (1982). The effects of differential ascribed category membership and norms on minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 89-104.
41. Maass, A., & Volpato, C. (1996). Social influence and the verifiability of the issue under discussion: Attitudinal versus objective items. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 15-26.
42. Mackie, D. M. (1987). Systematic and nonsystematic processing of majority and minority persuasive communications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 41-52.
43. Martin, R. (1988). Ingroup and outgroup minorities: Differential impact upon public and private responses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 39-52.
44. Martin, R., Gardikiotis, A., & Hewstone, M. (2002). Levels of consensus and majority and minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 645-665.
45. Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (2001). Afterthought on afterimages: A review of the afterimage paradigm in majority and minority influence research. In C. K. W. De Dreu & N. K. De Vries (Eds.), Group Consensus and Minority Influence: Implications for Innovation (pp. 15-39). Oxford: Blackwell.
46. Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (2003a). Social influence processes of control and change: Conformity, obedience to authority, and innovation. In M. A. Hogg & J. Cooper (Eds.), Sage Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 347-366). London: Sage.
47. Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (2003b). Majority versus minority influence: When, not whether, source status instigates heuristic or systematic processing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 313-330.
48. Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (2008). Majority versus minority influence, message processing and attitude change: The source-context-elaboration model. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 40, pp. 237-326). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
49. Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (Eds.) (2010). Minority Influence and Innovation: Antecedents, Processes and Consequences. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
50. Martin, R., Hewstone, M., & Martin, P. Y. (2003). Resistance to persuasive messages as a function of majority and minority source status. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 585-593.
51. Martin, R., Hewstone, M., & Martin, P. Y. (2007). Systematic and heuristic processing of majority- and minority-endorsed messages: The effects of varying outcome relevance and levels of orientation on attitude and message processing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 43-56.
52. Martin, R., Hewstone, M., & Martin, P. Y. (2008). Majority versus minority influence: The role of message processing in determining resistance to counter-persuasion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 16-34.
53. Martin, R., Hewstone, M., & Martin, P. Y. (2010). Consequences of attitudes changed by majority and minority influence. In R. Martin & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Minority Influence and Innovation: Antecedents, Processes and Consequences (pp. 175-200). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
54. Martin, R., Hewstone, M., Martin, P. Y., & Gardikiotis, A. (2008).Persuasion from majority and minority groups. In W. Crano & R. Prislin (Eds.), Attitudes and Attitude Change (pp. 361-384). New York: Psychology Press.
55. Martin, R., Martin, P. Y., Smith, J., & Hewstone, M. (2007). Majority and minority influence and prediction of behavioural intentions and behaviour. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 763-771.
56. Moscovici, S. (1976). Social Influence and Social Change. London: Academic Press.
57. Moscovici, S. (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 209-239). New York: Academic Press.
58. Moscovici, S. (1985). Social influence and conformity. In G. Lindsey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (Vol. 2, 3rd edn, pp. 347-412). New York: Random House.
59. Moscovici, S. (1994). Three concepts: Minority, conflict, and behavioral style. In S. Moscovici, A. Mucci-Faina & A. Maass (Eds.), Minority Influence (pp. 233-252). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall Publishers.
60. Moscovici, S., & Faucheux, C. (1972). Social influence, conformity bias and the study of active minorities. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 149-202). New York: Academic Press.
61. Moscovici, S., & Lage, E. (1976). Studies in social influence III: Majorities versus minority influence in a group. European Journal of Social Psychology, 6, 149-174.
62. Moscovici, S., Lage, E., & Naffrechoux, M. (1969). Influence of a consistent minority on the responses of a majority in a color perception task. Sociometry, 32, 365-380.
63. Moscovici, S., Mucci-Faina, A., & Maass, A. (1994). Minority Influence. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall Publishers.
64. Moscovici, S., & Personnaz, B. (1980). Studies in social influence: V. Minority influence and conversion behavior in a perceptual task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 270-282.
65. Moskowitz, G. B., & Chaiken, S. (2001). Mediators of minority social influence: Cognitive processing mechanisms revealed through a persuasion paradigm. In C. K. W. De Dreu & N. K. De Vries (Eds.), Group Consensus and Minority Influence: Implications for Innovation (pp. 60-90). Oxford: Blackwell.
66. Mucchi-Faina, A., & Cicoletti, G. (2006). Divergence vs. ambivalence: Effects of personal relevance on minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 91-104.
67. Mucchi-Faina, A., Maass, A., & Volpato, C. (1991). Social influence: The role of originality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 183-197.
68. Mugny, G. (1975). Negotiations, image of the other and the process of minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 209-228.
69. Mugny, G. (1976). Quelle influence majoritaire? Quelle influence minoritaire?. Revue Suisse de Psychologie, 4, 255-268.
70. Mugny, G., Butera, F., Sanchez-Mazas, M., & Pérez, J. A. (1995). Judgements in conflict: The conflict elaboration theory of social influence. In B. Boothe, R. Hirsig, A. Helminger, B. Meier & R. Volkart (Eds.), Perception-Evaluation-Interpretation (pp. 160-168). Göttingen: Hogrefe and Huber.
71. Mugny, G., Kaiser, C., & Papastamou, S. (1983). Influence minoritaire, identification et relations entre groupes: Etude exéprimentale autour d'une votation. Cahiers de Psychologie Sociale, 19, 1-30.
72. Mugny, G., & Papastamou, S. (1980). When rigidity does not fail: Individualization and psychologization as resistances to the diffusion of minority innovations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 43-61.
73. Mugny, G., & Papastamou, S. (1984). Les styles de comportement et leur représentation sociale. In S. Moscovici (Ed.), Psychologie Sociale (pp. 391-414). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
74. Nemeth, C. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93, 23-32.
75. Nemeth, C. (1995). Dissent as driving cognition, attitudes and judgements. Social Cognition, 13, 273-291.
76. Nemeth, C. J., & Kwan, J. (1985). Originality of word associations as a function of majority and minority influence. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 277-282.
77. Nemeth, C. J., & Kwan, J. (1987). Minority influence, divergent thinking and detection of correct solutions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 788-799.
78. Nemeth, C. J., Mayseless, O., Sherman, J., & Brown, Y. (1990). Exposure to dissent and recall of information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 429-437.
79. Nemeth, C. J., & Wachtler, J. (1974). Creating the perceptions of consistency and confidence: A necessary condition for minority influence. Sociometry, 37, 529-540.
80. Nemeth, C. J., & Wachtler, J. (1983). Creative problem solving as a result of majority vs minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 45-55.
81. Nemeth, C. J., Wachtler, J., & Endicott, J. (1977). Increasing the size of the minority: Some gains and some losses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 15-27.
82. Nemeth, C., Mosier, K., & Chiles, C. (1992). When convergent thought improves performance: Majority vs. minority influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 139-144.
83. Nemeth, C., Swedlund, M., & Kanki, B. (1974). Patterning of the minority's response and their influence on the majority. European Journal of Social Psychology, 4, 53-64.
84. Paicheler, G. (1976). Norms and attitude change I: Polarization and styles of behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 6, 405-427.
85. Papastamou, S. (1983). Strategies of minority and majority influence. In W. Doise & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Current Issues in European Social Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 33-83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
86. Papastamou, S. (1986). Psychologization and processes of minority and majority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 165-180.
87. Papastamou, S., & Mugny, G. (1990). Synchronic consistency and psychologization in minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 85-98.
88. Papastamou, S., & Prodromitis, G. (forthcoming). Implicit theories of social influence as input and outcome of a social psychological process. In J. P. Valentim (Ed.), Societal Approaches in Social Psychology. Berne: Peter Lang.
89. Pérez, J. A., & Mugny, G. (1987). Paradoxical effects of categorization in minority influence: When being an outgroup is an advantage. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 157-169.
90. Pérez, J. A., & Mugny, G. (1990). Minority influence, manifest discrimination and latent influence. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances (pp. 152-168). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
91. Pérez, J. A., & Mugny, G. (1996). The conflict elaboration theory of social influence. In E. H. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding Group Behavior: Small Group Processes and Interpersonal Relations (Vol. 2, pp. 191-210). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
92. Pérez, J. A., & Mugny, G. (1998). Categorization and social influence. In S. Worchel & J. M. Francisco (Eds.), Social Identity: International Perspectives (pp. 142-153). London: Sage.
93. Pérez, J. A., Mugny, G., & Moscovici, S. (1986). Les effets paradoxaux du déni dans l'influence sociale. Cahiers de Psychologie Sociale, 32, 7-14.
94. Perloff, R. M. (2009). Mass media, social perception, and the third-person effect. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research (3rd edn, pp. 252-269). Oxon, UK: Routledge.
95. Peterson, R., & Nemeth, C. J. (1996). Focus versus flexibility: Majority and minority influence can both improve performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 14-23.
96. Petty, R. E., & Wegner, D. T. (1999). The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process Theories in Social Psychology (pp. 37-72). New York: Guilford Press.
97. Quiamzade, A., Mugny, G., Falomir-Picastor, J. M., & Pascal, A. (under review). Minority Influence and Identity Threat: Articulating Dissociation and Self-categorization Theories.
98. Quiamzade, A., Mugny, G., Falomir-Pichastor, J. M., & Butera, F. (2010). The complexity of majority and minority influence processes. In R. Martin & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Minority Influence and Innovation: Antecedents, Processes and Consequences (pp. 21-52). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
99. Quiamzade, A., Pérez, J. A., Mugny, G., & Alonso, R. A. (2003). Towards an integration of theories of dissociation and self-categorization: Simultaneous multiple categorizations in a minority influence situation. International Review of Social Psychology, 16, 87-123.
100. Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The "false consensus effect": An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279-301.
101. Smith, C. M., & Tindale, R. S. (2010). Direct and indirect minority influence in groups. In R. Martin & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Minority Influence and Innovation: Antecedents, Processes and Consequences (pp. 263-284). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
102. Smith, C. M., Tindale, R. S., & Bernard, L. D. (1996). Minority and majority influence in freely interacting groups: Qualitative versus quantitative differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 137-149.
103. Sorrentino, R. M., King, G., & Leo, G. (1980). The influence of the minority on perception: A note on a possible alternative explanation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 293-301.
104. Tanford, S., & Penrod, S. (1984). Social influence model: A formal integration of research on majority and minority influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 189-225.
105. Tesser, A., Campbell, J., & Mickler, S. (1983). The role of social pressure, attention to the stimulus, and self-doubt in conformity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 217-233.
106. Tormala, A. L., Petty, R. E., & DeSensi, V. L. (2010).Multiple roles for minority sources in persuasion and resistance. In R. Martin & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Minority Influence and Innovation: Antecedents, Processes and Consequences (pp. 105-132). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
107. Turner, J. C. (1991). Social Influence. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
108. Van-Dyne, L., & Saavedra, R. (1996). A naturalistic minority influence experiment: Effects of divergent thinking, conflict and originality in work-groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 151-167.
109. Volpato, C., Maass, A., Mucchi-Faina, A., & Vitti, E. (1990). Minority influence and social categorization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 119-132.
110. Wolf, S. (1979). Behavioural style and group cohesiveness as sources of minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 381-395.
111. Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J. A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 323-345.