The complexity of majority and minority influence processes

Minority Influence and Innovation: Antecedents, Processes and Consequences

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 21-52

  Quiamzade, Alain ^a,b   Mugny, Gabriel ^b   Falomir Pichastor, Juan Manuel ^b   Butera, Fabrizio ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FRIBOURG   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650697293     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203865552     Document Type: Chapter

References (159)

1. Allen, V. L., & Levine, J. M. (1968). Social support, dissent and conformity. Sociometry , 31, 138-149.
2. Alvaro, Ε. M., & Crano, W. D. (1997). Indirect minority influence: Evidence for leniency in source evaluation and counterargumentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 72, 949-964.
3. Aronson, E., & Golden, B. W. (1962). The effect of relevant and irrelevant aspects of communicator credibility on opinion change. Journal of Personality , 30, 135-146.
4. Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies on independence and conformity: A minority of one against an unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs , 70 (No. 416).
5. Baker, S. M., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Majority and minority influence: Source-position imbalance as a determinant of message scrutiny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 67, 5-19.
6. Baron, R. S., & Bellman, S. B. (2007). No guts, no glory: Courage, harassment and minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology , 37, 101-124.
7. Binet, A. (1900). Attention et adaptation [Attention and adaptation], L'Annee Psychologique , 6, 248-404.
8. Bohner, G., Erb, Η. P., Reinhard, Μ. Α., & Frank, E. (1996). Distinctiveness across topics in minority and majority influence: An attributional analysis and preliminary data. British Journal of Social Psychology , 35, 27-46.
9. Bohner, G., Frank, E., & Erb, Η. P. (1998). Heuristic processing of distinctiveness information in minority and majority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology , 28, 855-860.
10. Bond, Μ. H., & Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of the Asch line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin , 119, 111-137.
11. Brandstatter, V., Ellemers, N., Gaviria, E., Giosue, F., Huguet, P., Kroon, Μ., et al. (1991). Indirect majority and minority influence: An exploratory study. European Journal of Social Psychology , 21, 199-211.
12. Brown, J. D. (1986). Evaluations of self and others: Self-enhancement biases in social judgment. Social Cognition , 4, 353-376.
13. Brown, R. (1965). Social psychology . New York, London: The Free Press, Collier-Macmillan.
14. Butera, F., & Buchs, C. (2005). Reasoning together: From focusing to decentring. In V. Girotto & P. N. Johnson-Laird (Eds.), The shape of reason (pp. 193-203). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
15. Butera, F., Caverni, J. P., & Rossi, S. (2005). Interaction with a high-versus low-competence influence source in inductive reasoning. The Journal of Social Psychology , 145, 173-190.
16. Butera, F., Huguet, P., Mugny, G., & Pérez, J. A. (1994). Socio-epistemic conflict and constructivism. Swiss Journal of Psychology , 53, 229-239.
17. Butera, F., Legrenzi, P., & Mugny, G. (1993). De limitation á la validation: études sur le raisonnement [From imitation to validation: Studies on reasoning]. In J. A. Pérez & G. Mugny (Eds.), La théorie de l'elaboration du conflit (pp. 99-120). Neuchátel, Switzerland: Delachaux et Niestlé.
18. Butera, F., & Mugny, G. (1992). Influence minoritaire et falsification. A propos de "quelques réflexions psycho-sociologiques sur une controverse" de B. Matalon [Minority influence and falsification. A rejoinder to B. Matalon on "some psycho-sociological conjectures on a controversy"]. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale , 5, 115-132.
19. Butera, F., & Mugny, G. (1995). Conflict between incompetences and influence of a low-expertise source in hypothesis testing. European Journal of Social Psychology , 25, 457-462.
20. Butera, F., & Mugny, G. (2001). Conflict and social influences in hypothesis testing. In C. K. W. De Dreu & N. K. De Vries (Eds.), Group consensus and minority influence implications for innovation . Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
21. Butera, F., Mugny, G., Legrenzi, P., & Pérez, J. A. (1996). Majority and minority influence, task representation, and inductive reasoning. British Journal of Social Psychology , 35, 123-136.
22. Butera, F., Mugny, G., & Tomei, A. (2000). Incertitude et enjeux identitaires dans l'influence sociale [Uncertainty and identity in social influence]. In J. L. Beauvois, R. V. Joule, & J. M. Monteil (Eds.), Perspectives cognitives et conduites sociale (Vol. 7, pp. 205-229). Rennes, France: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
23. Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 339). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
24. Chaiken, S., & Stangor, C. (1987). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology , 38, 575-630.
25. Clark, R. D., III, & Maass, A. (1988). Social categorization in minority influence: The case of homosexuality. European Journal of Social Psychology , 18, 347-364.
26. Collins, R. L. (1996). For better or worse: The impact of upward social comparison on self-evaluation. Psychological Bulletin , 1, 51-69.
27. Crano, W. D. (2000). Social influence: Effects of leniency on majority-and minority-induced focal and indirect attitude change. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale , 13, 89-121.
28. Crano, W. D., & Alvaro, E. M. (1998). Indirect minority influence: The leniency contract revisited. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations , 1, 99-115.
29. Crano, W. D., & Chen, X. (1998). The leniency contract and persistence of majority and minority influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 74, 1437-1450.
30. De Dreu, C. K. W., & De Vries, Ν. K. (Eds.). (2001). Group consensus and minority influence: Implications for innovation . Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
31. De Vries, Ν. K., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2001). Group consensus and minority influence: Introduction and overview. In C. K. W. De Dreu & Ν. K. De Vries (Eds.), Group consensus and minority influence: Implications for innovation (pp. 114). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
32. De Vries, Ν. K., De Dreu, C. K. W., Gordijn, E., & Schuurman, M. (1996). Majority and minority influence: A dual role interpretation. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 145-172). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
33. Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict. Constructive and destructive processes . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
34. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influence upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology , 51, 629-636.
35. Doise, W. (1978). Images, representations, idéologies, et expérimentations psychosociologique [Images, representations, ideologies and psycho-sociological experiments]. Social Science Information , 17, 41-69.
36. Doms, M., & Van Avermaet, E. (1980). Majority influence, minority influence and conversion behaviour: A replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 16, 283-292.
37. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes . Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
38. Erb, H. P., Bohner, G., Rank, S., & Einwiller, S. (2002). Processing minority and majority communications: The role of conflict with prior attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(9), 1172-1182.
39. Erb, H. P., Bohner, G., Schmälzle, K., & Rank, S. (1998). Beyond conflict and discrepancy: Cognitive bias in minority and majority influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 24, 620-633.
40. Falomir, J. M., Mugny, G., & Pérez, J. A. (1996). Le paradoxe du déni [The paradox of denial]. In J. C. Deschamps & J. L. Beauvois (Eds.), La psychologie sociale (Vol. 2, pp 91-97). Grenoble, France: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
41. Falomir, J. M., Mugny, G., & Pérez, J. A. (2000). Social influence and identity conflict. In D. Terry & M. Hogg (Eds.), Attitudes, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership (pp. 245-264). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
42. Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review , 57, 271-282.
43. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations , 7, 117-140.
44. Goethals, G. R., & Darley, J. M. (1977). Social comparison theory: An attributional approach. In J. M. Suls & R. L. Miller (Eds.), Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 259-278). New York: Hemisphere.
45. Gorenflo, D. W., & Crano, W. D. (1989). Judgmental subjectivity/objectivity and locus of choice in social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 57, 605-614.
46. Gorman, M. E., & Carlson, B. (1989). Can experiments be used to study science? Social Epistemology , 3, 89-106.
47. Gorman, M. E., & Gorman, M. E. (1984). A comparison of disconfirmatory, confirmatory and control strategies on Wason's 2-4-6 task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology , 36A(4), 629-648.
48. Kerr, N. L. (2002). When is a minority a minority? Active versus passive minority advocacy and social influence. European Journal of Social Psychology , 32(4), 471-483.
49. Kruglanski, A., & Mackie, D. M. (1990). Majority and minority influence: A judgmental process analysis . In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 229-261). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
50. Legrenzi, P. (1983). Il ragionamento [Reasoning]. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia , 10, 251-267.
51. Legrenzi, P., Butera, F., Mugny, G., & Pérez, J. A. (1991). Majority and minority influence in inductive reasoning: A preliminary study. European Journal of Social Psychology , 21, 359-363.
52. Levine, J. M., & Russo, E. M. (1987). Majority and minority influence. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Group processes (pp. 13-54). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
53. Maass, A., & Clark, R. D., III (1983). Internalization versus compliance: Differential processes underlying minority influence and conformity. European Journal of Social Psychology , 13, 45-55.
54. Maass, A., & Clark, R. D., III (1984). The hidden impact of minorities: Fourteen years of minority influence research. Psychological Bulletin , 95, 428-450.
55. Maass, A., Clark, R. D., III, & Haberkorn, G. (1982). The effect of differential ascribed category membership and norms on minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology , 12, 89-104.
56. Maass, A., & Volpato, C. (1994). Theoretical perspectives on minority influence: Conversion versus divergence? In S. Moscovici, A. Mucchi-Faina, & A. Maass (Eds.), Minority influence (pp. 135-147). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
57. Maass, A., & Volpato, C. (1996). Social influence and the verifiability of the issue under discussion: Attitudinal versus objective items. British Journal of Social Psychology , 35, 15-26.
58. Mackie, D. M. (1987). Systematic and nonsystematic processing of majority and minority persuasive communications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 53, 41-52.
59. Maggi, J., Butera, F., & Mugny, G. (1996). The conflict of incompetences: Direct and indirect influences on the representation of the centimeter. International Review of Social Psychology , 9, 91-105.
60. Martin, R. (1995). Majority and minority influence using the afterimage paradigm: A replication with an unambiguous blue slide. European Journal of Social Psychology , 25, 373-381.
61. Martin, R. (1998). Majority and minority influence using the afterimage paradigm: A series of attempted replications. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 34, 1-26.
62. Martin, R., Gardikiotis, A., & Hewstone, M. (2002). Levels of consensus and majority and minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology , 32, 645-665.
63. Martin, B., & Hewstone, M. (2001a). Determinants and consequences of cognitive processes in majority and minority influence. In J. P. Forgas & K. D. Williams (Eds.), Social influence: Direct and indirect processes (pp. 315-330). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
64. Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (2001b). Afterthought on afterimages: A review of the afterimage paradigm in majority and minority influence research. In C. K. W. De Dreu & N. K. De Vries (Eds.), Group consensus and minority influence: Implications for innovation (pp. 15-39). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
65. Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (2003). Majority versus minority influence: When, not whether, source status instigates heuristic or systematic processing. European Journal of Social Psychology , 33, 313-330.
66. Martin, R., Hewstone, M., & Martin, P. Y. (2003). Resistance to persuasive messages as a function of majority and minority source status. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 39, 585-593.
67. Mayseless, O., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1987). What makes you so sure? Effects of epistemic motivations on judgmental confidence. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes , 39, 162-183.
68. McGuire, W. J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. II, pp. 233-346). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
69. Mettee, D. R., & Smith, G. (1977). Social comparison and interpersonal attraction: The case for dissimilarity. In J. M. Suls & R. L. Miller (Eds.), Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 69-101). New York: Hemisphere.
70. Moliner, P. (1988). Validation expérimentale de l'hypothese du noyau central des representations sociales. Bulletin de Psychologie , 42, 759-762.
71. Morse, S., & Gergen, K. J. (1970). Social comparison, self-consistency, and the concept of self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 16, 148-156.
72. Moscovici, S. (1976). Social influence and social change . London: Academic Press.
73. Moscovici, S. (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 209-239). New York: Academic Press.
74. Moscovici, S. (1985a). Social influence and conformity. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. II, pp. 347-412). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
75. Moscovici, S. (1985b). Préface de l'ouvrage de G. Paicheler [Preface to G. Paicheler's book]. Psychologie des influences sociales . Neuchatel, Switzerland: Delachaux et Niestlé.
76. Moscovici, S., & Faucheux, C. (1972). Social influence, conformity bias and the study of active minorities. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 150-202). New York: Academic Press.
77. Moscovici, S., & Lage, E. (1976). Studies in social influence III: Majority versus minority influence in a group. European Journal of Social Psychology , 6, 149-174.
78. Moscovici, S., & Lage, E. (1978). Studies in social influence IV: Minority influence in a context of original judgments. European Journal of Social Psychology , 8, 349-365.
79. Moscovici, S., Lage, E., & Naffrechoux, M. (1969). Influence of a consistent minority on the responses of a majority in a color perception task. Sociometry , 32, 365-380.
80. Moscovici, S., Mucchi-Faina, A., & Maass, A. (Eds.). (1994). Minority influence . Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
81. Moscovici, S., Mugny, G., & Pérez, J. A. (1984-1985). Les effets pervers du déni (par la majorité) des opinions d'une minorité [Paradoxical effects of denial of minority opinions (by the majority)]. Bulletin de Psychologie , 38, 365-380.
82. Moscovici, S., Mugny, G., & Van Avermaet, E. (Eds.). (1985). Perspectives on minority influence . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.
83. Moscovici, S., & Personnaz, B. (1980). Studies in social influence V. Minority influence and conversion behaviour in a perceptual task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 16, 270-282.
84. Moscovici, S., & Personnaz, B. (1991). Studies in social influence VI: Is Lenin orange or red? Imagery and social influence. European Journal of Social Psychology , 21, 101-118.
85. Moskowitz, G. B. (1996). The mediational effects of attributions and information processing in minority social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology , 35, 47-66.
86. Moskowitz, G. B., & Chaiken, S. (2001). Mediators of minority social influence: Cognitive processing mechanisms revealed through a persuasion paradigm. In C. K. W. De Dreu & N. K. De Vries (Eds.), Group consensus and minority influence: Implications for innovation (pp. 60-90). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
87. Mucchi-Faina, A. (2000). Minority influence and ambivalence. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale , 13(3), 65-87.
88. Mucchi-Faina, A., & Cicoletti, G. (2006). Divergence vs. ambivalence: Effects of personal relevance on minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology , 36, 91-104.
89. Mucchi-Faina, A., Maass, A., & Volpato, C. (1991). Social influence: The role of originality. European Journal of Social Psychology , 21(3), 183-197.
90. Mugny, G. (1982). The power of minorities . London: Academic Press.
91. Mugny, G. (1984). Compliance, conversion and the Asch paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology , 14, 353-368.
92. Mugny, G., & Butera, F. (1995). Influence majoritaire et minoritaire: vers une intégration [Majority and minority influence: Toward an integration]. Psychologie Frangaise , 40, 339-346.
93. Mugny, G., Butera, F., & Falomir, J. M. (2001). Social influence and threat in social comparison between self and source's competence: Relational factors affecting the transmission of knowledge. In F. Butera & G. Mugny (Eds.), Social influence in social reality: Promoting individual and social change (pp. 225-247). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.
94. Mugny, G., Butera, F., Quiamzade, A., Dragulescu, A., & Tomei, A. (2003). Comparaisons sociales des compétences et influence sociale [Social comparison of competences and social influence]. L'Annee Psychologique , 103, 469-496.
95. Mugny, G., Butera, F., Sanchez-Mazas, M., & Pérez, J. A. (1995). Judgements in conflict: The conflict elaboration theory of social influence. In B. Boothe, R. Hirsig, A. Helminger, B. Meier, & R. Volkart (Eds.), Perception-Evaluation-Interpretation. Swiss monographs in psychology (Vol. 3, pp.160-168). Bern, Switzerland: Huber.
96. Mugny, G., Chatard, A., & Quiamzade, A. (2006). The social transmission of knowledge at the university: Teaching style and epistemic dependence. European Journal of Psychology of Education , 21, 413-427.
97. Mugny, G., & Papastamou, S. (1980). When rigidity does not fail: Individualization and psychologization as resistance to the diffusion of minority innovations. European Journal of Social Psychology , 10, 43-61.
98. Mugny, G., Quiamzade, A., Falomir, J. M., & Tafani, E. (2006). Diagnosticité de la tache dans l'évaluation des compétences et dépendance informationnelle [Task diagnosticity in competence evaluation and informational dependence]. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale , 19, 5-26.
99. Mugny, G., Quiamzade, A., Pigiere, D., Dragulescu, A., & Buchs, C. (2002). Self-competence, interaction style and expert social influence: Toward a correspondence hypothesis. Swiss Journal of Psychology , 61, 153-166.
100. Mugny, G., Quiamzade, A., & Tafani, E. (2001). Dynamique représentationnelle et influence sociale [Representational dynamics and social influence]. In P. Moliner (Ed.), La dynamique des representations sociales (pp. 123-161). Grenoble, France: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
101. Mugny, G., Quiamzade, A., & Trandafir, A. (2006). Dépendance informationnelle et styles de comportement dans l'influence sociale [Informational dependence and behavioural styles in social influence]. Psihologie Sociala , 17, 43-56.
102. Mugny, G., Tafani, E., Butera, F., & Pigiere, D. (1998). Contrainte et dépendance informationnelles: influence sociale sur la représentation du groupe d'amis idéal [Informational dependence and informational constraint: Social influence of the representation of an ideal group of friends]. Connexions , 72, 55-72.
103. Mugny, G., Tafani, E., Falomir, J. M., & Layat, C. (2000). Source credibility, social comparison and social influence. International Review of Social Psychology , 13, 151-175.
104. Nemeth, C. J. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review , 93, 1-10.
105. Nemeth, C. J., & Chiles, C. (1988). Modelling courage: The role of dissent in fostering independence. European Journal of Social Psychology , 18, 275-280.
106. Nemeth, C. J., & Kwan, J. (1985). Originality of word associations as a function of majority vs. minority influence. Social Psychology Quarterly , 48, 277-282.
107. Nemeth, C. J., & Kwan, J. (1987). Minority influence, divergent thinking and detection of correct solutions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 17, 786-797.
108. Nemeth, C. J., Mayseless, O., Sherman, J., & Brown, Y. (1990). Exposure to dissent and recall of information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 58, 429-437.
109. Nemeth, C. J., Mosier, K., & Chiles, C. (1992). When convergent thought improves performance: Majority versus minority influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 18, 139-144.
110. Nemeth, C. J., & Rogers, J. (1996). Dissent and the search for information. British Journal of Social Psychology , 35, 67-76.
111. Nemeth, C. J., & Wachtler, J. (1983). Creative problem solving as a result of majority vs. minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology , 13 , 45-55.
112. Papastamou, S. (1983). Strategies of minority and majority influences. In W. Doise & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Current issues in European social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 33-83). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
113. Papastamou, S. (1986). Psychologization and processes of minority and majority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology , 16, 165-180.
114. Papastamou, S., & Mugny, G. (1990). Synchronic consistency and psychologization in minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology , 20(2), 85-98.
115. Papastamou, S., Mugny, G., & Kaiser, S. (1980). Echec á l'influence minoritaire: la psychologisation [The failure of minority influence: Psychologization]. Recherches de Psychologie Sociale , 2, 41-56.
116. Papastamou, S., Mugny, G., & Pérez, J. A. (1991-1992). La valeur stratégique de la psychologisation dans l'influence sociale [Strategic value of psychologization in social influence]. Bulletin de Psychologie , 45, 164-172.
117. Pérez, J. A., Dasi, F., & Lucas, A. (1997). Length overestimation bias as a product of normative pressure arising from anthropocentric vs. geocentric representations of length. Swiss Journal of Psychology , 56, 243-255.
118. Pérez, J. A., Moscovici, S., & Mugny, G. (1991). Effets de résistance á une source experte ou minoritaire, et changement d'attitude [Resistance to an expert versus minority source and attitude change]. Revue Suisse de Psychologie , 50, 260-267.
119. Pérez, J. A., & Mugny, G. (1990). Minority influence: Manifest discrimination and latent influence. In D. Abrams & M. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 152-168). Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
120. Pérez, J. A., & Mugny, G. (1993). La théorie de l'elaboration du conflit [The conflict elaboration theory] . Neuchatel, Switzerland: Delachaux et Niestlé.
121. Pérez, J. A., & Mugny, G. (1996). The conflict elaboration theory of social influence. In E. Witte & J. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behaviour: Small group processes and interpersonal relations (Vol. 2, pp. 191-210). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
122. Pérez, J. A., & Mugny, G. (1998). Categorization and social influence. In S. Worchel, J. F. Morales, D. Paez, & J. Deschamps (Eds.), Social identity: International perspectives (pp. 142-153). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
123. Pérez, J. A., Mugny, G., Butera, F., Kaiser, C., & Roux, P. (1994). Integrating minority and majority influence: Conversion, consensus and uniformity. In S. Moscovici, A. Mucchi-Faina, & A. Maass (Eds.), Minority influence (pp. 185208). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
124. Pérez, J. A., Mugny, G., & Moscovici, S. (1986). Les effets paradoxaux du déni dans l'influence sociale [Paradoxical effects of denial in social influence]. Cahiers de Psychologie Sociale , 32, 1-14.
125. Peterson, R., & Nemeth, C. J. (1996). Focus versus flexibility: Majority and minority influence can both improve performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 22, 14-23.
126. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion . New York: Springer Verlag.
127. Popper, K. R. (1955). The logic of scientific discovery . New York: Harper & Row.
128. Quiamzade, A. (2002). Influence sociale et elaboration du conflit dans les taches d'aptitudes: le conflit d'incompétences [Social influence and conflict elaboration in aptitude tasks: The conflict of incompetencies]. Doctoral thesis. University of Geneva & University of Grenoble.
129. Quiamzade, A. (2003). Mesure de la réorganisation du noyau central d'une représentation sociale: mise en cause de Moliner (1988) [Measuring the reorganization of the central core of a social representation (Moliner, 1988): A potential flaw]. International Review of Social Psychology , 16, 25-46.
130. Quiamzade, A. (2007). Imitation and performance in confrontations between competent peers: The role of the representation of the task. European Journal of Psychology of Education , 22, 243-258.
131. Quiamzade, A., Falomir, J. M., Mugny, G., & Butera, F. (1999). Gestion identitaire vs épistémique des compétences [Identity versus epistemic competence management]. In H. Hansen, B. Sigrist, H. Goorhuis, & H. Landolt (Eds.), Formation et travail. La fin d'une distinction? (pp. 267-276). Aarau, Germany: Sauerlander.
132. Quiamzade, A., & Mugny, G. (2001). Social influence dynamics in aptitude tasks. Social Psychology of Education , 4, 311-334.
133. Quiamzade, A., & Mugny, G. (2004). Les niveaux d'analyse: le cas de l'influence des sources compétentes [Levels of analysis: The case of competent sources]. Nouvelle Revue de Psychologie Sociale , 3(1-2), 65-72.
134. Quiamzade, A., & Mugny, G. (2009). Social influence and threat in confrontations between competent peers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 97, 652-666.
135. Quiamzade, A., Mugny, G., & Buchs, C. (2005). Correspondance entre rapport social et auto-compétence dans la transmission de savoir par une autorité épistémique: une extension [Correspondence between social relationships and self-competence in knowledge transmission by an epistemic source. An extension]. L'Annee Psychologique , 105, 423-449.
136. Quiamzade, A., Mugny, G., & Darnon, C. (2009). The coordination of problem solving strategies: When low competence sources exert more influence on task processing than high competence ones. British Journal of Social Psychology , 48, 159-182.
137. Quiamzade, A., Mugny, G., Dragulescu, A., & Buchs, C. (2003). Interaction styles and expert social influence. European Journal of Psychology of Education , 18(4), 389-404.
138. Quiamzade, A., Mugny, G., Falomir, J. M., Invernizzi, F., Buchs, C., & Dragulescu, A. (2004). Correspondance entre style d'influence et significations des positions initiales de la cible: le cas des sources experts [Correspondence between influence style and target's initial positions: The case of expert sources]. In J. L. Beauvois, R. V. Joule, & J. M. Monteil (Eds.), Perspectives cognitives et conduites sociales (Vol. 9, pp. 341-363). Rennes, France: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
139. Quiamzade, A., Pérez, J. A., Mugny, G., & Alonso, R. (2003). Le patron de la conversion minoritaire, vers une articulation des théories de la dissociation et de l'auto-catégorisation: les multiples catégorisations simultanées [Minority conversion integrates dissociation theory and self-categorization theory: The multiple simultaneous categorizations]. International Review of Social Psychology , 16, 87-123.
140. Quiamzade, A., Tomei, A., & Butera, F. (2000). Informational dependence and informational constraint: Social comparison and social influences in anagram resolution. International Review of Social Psychology , 13, 123-150.
141. Sanchez-Mazas, M., Mugny, G., & Falomir, J. M. (1997). Minority influence and intergroup relations: Social comparison and validation processes in the context of xenophobia in Switzerland. Swiss Journal of Psychology , 56(3), 182-192.
142. Selimbegovic, L., Quiamzade, A., Chatard, A., Mugny, G., & Fluri, D. (2007). Competence Conflict, Counterfactual thinking and Performance. Swiss Journal of Psychology , 66, 153-161.
143. Sorrentino, R. M., King, G., & Leo, G. (1980). The influence of the minority on perception: A note on a possible alternative explanation. Journal ofExperimental Social Psychology , 16, 293-301.
144. Tafani, E., Falomir, J. M., & Mugny, G. (2000). Influence sociale et representations sociales: études expérimentales sur le groupe d'amis idéal [Social influence and social representation: Experimental studies on the ideal group of friends]. In J. L. Beauvois, R. V. Joule, & J. M. Monteil (Eds.), Perspectives cognitives et conduites sociales (Vol. 7, pp. 95-124). Rennes, France: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
145. Tafani, E., Mugny, G., & Bellon, S. (1999). Irréversibilité du changement et enjeux identitaires dans l'influence sociale sur une représentation sociale [Irreversibility of change and identity stakes in social influence over a social representation]. Psychologie et Société , 1, 73-104.
146. Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations . London: Academic Press.
147. Taylor, S., & Lobel, M. (1989). Social comparison activity under threat: Downward evaluation and upward contacts. Psychological Review , 96, 569-575.
148. Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behaviour. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 181-227). New York: Academic Press.
149. Trost, M. R., & Kenrick, D. T. (1994). Ego involvement in the minority influence paradigm: The double-edged sword of minority advocacy. In S. Moscovici, A. Mucchi-Faina, & A. Maass (Eds.), Minority influence (pp. 149-161). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
150. Trost, M., Maass, A., & Kenrick, D. T. (1992). Minority influence: Personal relevance biases cognitive processes and reverses private acceptance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 28(3), 234-254.
151. Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence . Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
152. Volpato, C., Maass, A., Mucchi-Faina, A., & Vitti, E. (1990). Minority influence and social categorization. European Journal of Social Psychology , 20(2), 119-132.
153. Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 12, 129-140.
154. Wheeler, L., Martin, R., & Suls, J. (1997). The proxy model of social comparison for self-assessment of ability. Personality and Social Psychology Review , 1, 54-61.
155. Wilder, D. A. (1977). Perception of groups size of opposition, and social influence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 13, 253-268.
156. Wills, T. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin , 90, 245-271.
157. Wills, T. A. (1991). Similarity and self-esteem in downward comparison. In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 5178). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
158. Wolf, S. (1979). Behavioral style and group cohesiveness as sources of minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology , 9, 381-395.
159. Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J. A., Busceme, M. S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytical review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin , 115, 323-345.