Precut sphincterotomy, repeated cannulation and post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with bile duct stone disease

Digestive and Liver Disease

Volumn 43, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 792-796

  Testoni, Pier Alberto ^a   Giussani, Antonella ^a   Vailati, Cristian ^a   Testoni, Sabrina ^a   Di Leo, Milena ^a   Mariani, Alberto ^a  

^a VITA SALUTE SAN RAFFAELE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

"Needle knife" precut sphincterotomy; Post ERCP pancreatitis; Repeated attempts at cannulating the papilla of Vater

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT STONE; CANNULATION; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PANCREATITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SPHINCTEROTOMY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CATHETERIZATION; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CHOLELITHIASIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATITIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPHINCTER OF ODDI; SPHINCTEROTOMY, ENDOSCOPIC;

EID: 80052502858     PISSN: 15908658     EISSN: 18783562     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2011.05.010     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Gottlieb K., Sherman S. ERCP and endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 1998, 8:87-114.
2. Freeman M.L. Adverse outcomes of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2002, 56(Suppl.):S273-S282.
3. Sherman S., Ruffolo T.A., Hawes R.H., et al. Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy: a prospective study with emphasis on the increased risk associated with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and non-dilated bile ducts. Gastroenterology 1991, 101:1068-1075.
4. Freeman M.L., Nelson D.B., Sherman S., et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996, 335:909-918.
5. Loperfido S., Angelini G., Benedetti G., et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998, 48:1-10.
6. Dickinson R.J., Davies S. Post-ERCP pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia: the role of operative and patient. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1998, 10:423-428.
7. Mehta S.N., Pavone E., Barkun J.S., et al. Predictors of post-ERCP complications in patients with choledocholithiasis. Endoscopy 1998, 30:457-463.
8. Masci E., Toti G., Mariani A., et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001, 96:417-423.
9. Freeman M.L., DiSario J.A., Nelson D.B., et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001, 54:425-434.
10. Vandervoort J., Soetikno R.M., Tham T.C.K., et al. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2002, 56:652-656.
11. Masci E., Mariani A., Curioni S., et al. Risk factors for pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2003, 35:830-834.
12. Cheng C.L., Sherman S., Watkins J.L., et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2006, 101:139-147.
13. Williams E.J., Taylor S., Fairclough P., et al. Risk factors for complication following ERCP: results of a large scale, prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 2007, 39:793-801.
14. Cotton P.B., Garrow D.A., Gallagher J., et al. Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc 2009, 70:80-88.
15. Wang P., Li Z.S., Liu F., et al. Risk factors for ERCP-related complications: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2009, 104:31-40.
16. Sherman S., Hawes R.H., Rathgaber S.W., et al. Post-ERCP pancreatitis: randomized, prospective study comparing a low- and high-osmolality contrast agent. Gastrointest Endosc 1994, 40:422-427.
17. Testoni P.A., Mariani A., Giussani A., et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis in high- and low-volume centers and among expert and non-expert operators: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2010, 105:1753-1761.
18. Friedland S., Soetkino R.M., Vandervoort J., et al. Bedside scoring system to predict the risk of developing pancreatitis following ERCP. Endoscopy 2002, 34:483-488.
19. Tang S.J., Haber G.B., Kortan P., et al. Precut papillotomy versus persistence in difficult biliary cannulation: a prospective randomized trial. Endoscopy 2005, 37:58-65.
20. de Weerth A., Seitz U., Zhong Y., et al. Primary precutting versus conventional over-the-wire sphincterotomy for bile duct access: a prospective randomized study. Endoscopy 2006, 38:1235-1240.
21. Cennamo V., Fuccio L., Repici A., et al. Timing of precut procedure does not influence success rate and complications of ERCP procedure: a prospective randomized comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc 2009, 69:473-479.
22. Cennamo V., Fuccio L., Zagari R.M., et al. Can early precut implementation reduce endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complication risk? Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endoscopy 2010, 42:381-388.
23. Aronson N., Flamm C.R., Bohn R.L., et al. Evidence-based assessment: patient, procedure, or operator factors associated with ERCP complications. Gastrointest Endosc 2002, 56(Suppl.):S294-S302.
24. Cotton P.B., Lehman G.A., Vennes J., et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991, 37:383-393.
25. Bradley E.L. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Arch Surg 1993, 128:586-590.
26. Bruins Slot W., Schoeman M.N., Disario J.A., et al. Needle knife sphincterotomy as a precut procedure: a retrospective evaluation of efficacy and complications. Endoscopy 1996, 28:334-339.
27. Vandervoort J., Carr-Locke D.L. Needle-knife access papillotomy: an unfairly maligned technique?. Endoscopy 1996, 28:365-366.
28. Binmoeller K.F., Seifert H., Gerke H., et al. Papillary roof incision using the Erlangen-type precut papillotome to achieve selective bile duct cannulation. Gastrointest Endosc 1996, 44:689-695.
29. Dhir V., Mallah M.K. Is precut papillotomy guilty as accused?. Gastrointest Endosc 1999, 50:143-144.
30. Katsinelos P., Mimidis K., Paroutoglou G., et al. Needle-knife papillotomy: a safe and effective technique in experienced hands. Hepatogastroenterology 2004, 51:349-352.
31. Lee J.K., Park J.K., Yoon W.J., et al. Risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis after needle knife precut sphincterotomy following repeated cannulation attempts. J Clin Gastroenterol 2007, 41:427-431.
32. Haltunen J., Keraenen I., Udd M., et al. Pancreatic sphincterotomy versus needle knife precut in difficult biliary cannulation. Surg Endosc 2009, 23:745-749.
33. Parlak E., Cicek B., Disibeyaz S., et al. Early decision for precut sphincterotomy: is it a risky preference?. Dig Dis Sci 2007, 52:845-851.
34. Bailey A.A., Bourke M.J., Kaffes A.L., et al. Needle-knife sphincterotomy: factors predicting its use and the relationship with post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2010, 71:266-271.
35. Ang T.L., Kwek A.B., Lim K.B., et al. An analysis of the efficacy and safety of a strategy of early precut for biliary access during difficult endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in a general hospital. J Dig Dis 2010, 11:306-312.
36. Gong B., Hao L., Bie L., et al. Does precut technique improve selective bile duct cannulation or increase post-ERCP pancreatitis rate? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 2010, 24:2670-2680.
37. Rabenstein T., Schneider H.T., Nicklas M., et al. The impact of skill and experience of the endoscopist on the outcome of endoscopic sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1999, 50:628-636.
38. Principles of training in gastrointestinal endoscopy. From the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy-ASGE. Gastrointest Endosc 1999, 49:845-853.
39. Lella F., Bagnolo F., Colombo E., et al. A simple way of avoiding post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 59:830-834.
40. Artifon E.L., Sakai P., Cunha J.E., et al. Guidewire cannulation reduces risks of post-ERCP pancreatitis and facilitates bile duct cannulation. Am J Gastroenterol 2007, 102:2147-2153.
41. Lee T.H., Park do H., Park J.Y., et al. Can wire-guided cannulation prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2009, 69:444-449.
42. Katsinelos P., Paroutoglou G., Kountouras J., et al. A comparative study of standard ERCP catheter and hydrophilic guide wire. Endoscopy 2008, 40:302-307.
43. Bailey A.A., Bourke M.J., Williams S.J., et al. A prospective randomized trial of cannulation technique in ERCP: effects on technical success and post-ERCP pancreatitis. Endoscopy 2008, 40:296-301.