Post-ERCP pancreatitis and hyperamylasaemia: The role of operative and patient factors

European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 423-428

  Dickinson, Richard J ^a   Davies, Sue ^a  

^a HINCHINGBROOKE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

ERCP; Hyperamylasaemia; Pancreatitis

Indexed keywords

AMYLASE; MEGLUMINE DIATRIZOATE PLUS SODIUM DIATRIZOATE;

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; HYPERAMYLASEMIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PANCREATITIS; PANCREATOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; VATER PAPILLOTOMY;

EID: 0031746059     PISSN: 0954691X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00042737-199805000-00012     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Sherman S, Lehman GA. ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis. Pancreas 1991; 6:350-367.
2. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Erigl J Med 1996; 335:909-318.
3. Cavallini G, Tittobello A, Frulloni L, et al. Gabexate for the prevention of pancreatic damage related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. N Engl J Med 1996; 335:919-923.
4. De Beaux AC, Carter DC, Palmer KR. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and acute pancreatitis. Gut 1996; 38:799-800.
5. Hamilton I, Lintott DJ, Rothwell J, Axon ATR. Acute pancreatitis following endoscopic cholangiopancreatography. Clin Radiol 1983; 34:543-546.
6. Johnson GK, Geenan JE, Bedford RA, et al. A comparison of non-ionic versus ionic contrast media: results of a prospective multicentre study. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42:312-316.
7. Bilbao M, Dotter C, Lee T, et al. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), a study of 10,000 cases. Gastroenterology 1976; 70:314-320.
8. Siegel JH, Veerappan A, Tucker R. Bipolar versus monopolar sphincterotomy: a prospective trial. Am J Gastroenterol 1994; 89:1827-1830.
9. Chen YK, Foliente RL, Santoro M, Walter MH, Collen MJ. Endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis: increased risk associated with non-dilated bile ducts and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Am J Gastroenterol 1994; 89:327-333.
10. Sherman S, Ruffola TA, Hawes RH. Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy. A prospective series with emphasis on the increased risk associated with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and non-dilated bile ducts. Gastroenterology 1991; 101:1068-1075.
11. Shakoor T, Geenan JE. Pre-cut papillotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1992; 38:623-627.
12. Huibregtse K, Katon KM, Tytgat GNJ. Pre-cut papillotomy via fine needle-knife papillotome: a safe and effective technique. Gastrointest Endosc 1986; 32:403-405.
13. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37:383-393.
14. Lee JG, Schutz SM, England RE, Leung JW, Cotton PB. Endoscopic therapy of sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology 1995; 21:661-667.
15. Deans GT, Sedman P, Martin DF, et al. Are complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy age related? Gut 1997; 41:545-548.
16. Huibregtse K. Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy and their prevention. N Engl J Med 1996; 335:961-963.
17. Targarona EM, Ayuso RP, Bordas JM, et al. Randomised trial of endoscopic sphincterotomy with gall bladder left in situ versus open surgery for common bile duct calculi in high risk patients. Lancet 1996; 347:926-929.
18. Majeed AW, Troy G, Nicholl JP, et al. Randomised, prospective, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus small incision cholecystectomy. Lancet 1996; 347:989-994.