A comparative study of standard ERCP catheter and hydrophilic guide wire in the selective cannulation of the common bile duct

Endoscopy

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 302-307

  Katsinelos, P ^a   Paroutoglou, G ^b   Kountouras, J ^c   Chatzimavroudis, G ^a   Zavos, C ^c   Pilpilidis, I ^a   Tzelas, G ^b   Tzovaras, G ^b  

^a AHEPA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF LARISSA   (Greece)

^c ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL PAIN; ACUTE PANCREATITIS; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT CANCER; BILE LEAKAGE; CANNULATION; CATHETER; CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMMON BILE DUCT DISEASE; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM PERFORATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FEVER; GLUCOSE 6 PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE DEFICIENCY; GUIDE WIRE; HEMOLYTIC ANEMIA; HUMAN; HYDROPHILICITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; NAUSEA; PANCREAS CANCER; PANCREAS DUCT; PANCREAS HEMORRHAGE; PANCREATITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VATER PAPILLA;

AGED; BILIARY TRACT DISEASES; CATHETERIZATION; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; COMMON BILE DUCT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PANCREATIC DISEASES; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 42149087651     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-995483     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Kumar S, Sherman S, Hawes RH, Lehman GA. Success and yield of second attempt ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 41: 445-447
2. Maydeo A, Borkar D. Techniques of selective cannulation and sphincterotomy. Endoscopy 2003; 35: S19-S23
3. Cotton PB. Income and outcome metrics for the objective evaluation of ERCP and alternative methods. Gastrointest Endosc 2002: 56(6 Suppl): S283-S290
4. Lehman GA. What are the determinants of success in utilization of ERCP in the setting of pancreatic and biliary diseases? Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56(6 Suppl): S291-S293
5. Kowalski T, Kanchana T, Pungpapong S. Perceptions of gastroenterology fellows regarding ERCP competency and training. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 345-349
6. Cotton PB. Precut papillotomy - a risky technique for experts only. Gastrointest Endosc 1989; 35: 578-579
7. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 909-918
8. Rubenstein T, Ruppert T. Schneider HT et al. Benefits and risks of needle-knife papillotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 46: 207-211
9. Baillie J. Needle knife sphincterotomy revisited. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 46: 282-284
10. Masci E, Mariani A, Curioni S, Testoni PA. Risk factors for pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2003: 35: 830-834
11. Freeman MI, Guda NM. Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a comprehensive review. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 845-864
12. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J et al. Endoscopic sphincterotorny complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37: 383-393
13. Lelia F, Bagnolo F, Colombo E, Bonassi U. A simple way of avoiding post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 830-834
14. Deviere J. Using the pancreas for common bile duct cannulation? Endoscopy 2003; 35: 750-751
15. Fazel A, Quadri A, Catalano MF et al. Does a pancreatic duct stent prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 291-294
16. Sivilotti ML. Oxidant stress and haemolysis of the human erythrocyte. Toxicol Rev 2004; 23: 169-188
17. Gerrah R, Shargal Y, Elami A. Impaired oxygenation and increased hemolysis after cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. Ann Thorac Surg 2003: 76: 523-527
18. Rossos PG, Kortan P, Haber G. Selective common bile duct cannulation can be simplified by the use of a standard papillotome. Gastrointest Endosc 1993: 39: 67-69
19. Cortas GA, Mehta SN, Abraham NS, Barkun AN. Selective cannulation of the common bile duct: a prospective randomized trial comparing standard catheters with sphincterotomes. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50: 775-779
20. Schwacha H, Allgaier HP, Deibert P et al. A sphincterotome-based technique for selective transpapillary common bile duct carmulation. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52: 387-391
21. Laasch HU, Tringali A, Wilbraham L et al. Comparison of standard and steerable catheters for bile duct cannulation in ERCP. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 669-674
22. Karamanolis G, Katsikani A Viazis N et al. A prospective cross-over study using a sphincterotome and a guidewire to increase the success rate of common bile duct cannulation. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11: 1649-1652
23. Maeda S, Hayashi H, Hosokawa O et al. Prospective randomized pilot trial of selective biliary cannulation using pancreatic guide-wire placement. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 721-724
24. Gyökeres T, Duhl J, Varsányi M et al. Double guide wire placement for endoscopic pancreatobiliary procedures. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 95-96
25. Fry LC, Barriga JA, Linder JD, Mönkemüller KE. Placement of a biliary catheter in the pancreatic duct to and common bile duct cannulation. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 97
26. Slivka A. A new technique to assist in bile duct cannulation. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 636
27. Goldberg E, Titus M, Haluszka O, Darwin P. Pancreatic duct stent placement facilitates difficult common bile duct cannulation. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 62: 592-596
28. Michopoulos S, Natsios A Manthos G et al. First intention of the biliary tree cannulation by means of a sphincterotome and hydrophilic guide wire is a low high-risk success rate ERCP method. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: AB201 (abstract)
29. Papachristou GI, Baron TH, Gleeson F et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography catheter and accessory exchange using a short hydrophilic guide wire: a prospective study. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 1133-1136