Timing of precut procedure does not influence success rate and complications of ERCP procedure: a prospective randomized comparative study

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 473-479

  Cennamo, Vincenzo ^a   Fuccio, Lorenzo ^a   Repici, Alessandro ^a   Fabbri, Carlo ^a   Grilli, Diego ^a   Conio, Massimo ^a   D'Imperio, Nicola ^a   Bazzoli, Franco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADRENALIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CANNULATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMMON BILE DUCT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PANCREATITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STOMACH PERFORATION; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; VATER PAPILLOTOMY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CATHETERIZATION; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REMISSION INDUCTION; SPHINCTEROTOMY, ENDOSCOPIC; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 60149084894     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.037     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Cortas G.A., Mehta S.N., Abraham N.S., et al. Selective cannulation of the common bile duct: a prospective randomized trial comparing standard catheters with sphincterotomes. Gastrointest Endosc 50 (1999) 775-779
2. Schwacha H., Allgaier H.P., Deibert P., et al. A sphicterotome-based technique for selective transpapillary common bile duct cannulation. Gastrointest Endosc 52 (2000) 387-391
3. Larkin C.J., and Huibregtse K. Precut sphincterorotomy: indications, pitfalls, and complications. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 3 (2001) 147-153
4. Freeman M.L., Nelson D.B., Sherman S., et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 335 (1996) 909-918
5. Loperfido S., Angelini G., Benedetti G., et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 48 (1998) 1-10
6. Masci E., Toti G., Mariani A., et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 96 (2001) 417-423
7. Freeman M.L., and Guda N.M. ERCP cannulation: a review of reported techniques. Gastrointest Endosc 62 (2005) 669-674
8. Vandervoort J., Soetikno R.M., Tham T.C., et al. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 56 (2002) 652-656
9. Bruins Slot W., Schoeman M.N., Disario J.A., et al. Needle-knife sphincterotomy as a precut procedure: a retrospective evaluation of efficacy and complications. Endoscopy 28 (1996) 334-339
10. Dhir V., and Mallath M.K. Is precut papillotomy guilty as accused?. Gastrointest Endosc 50 (1999) 143-144
11. Cotton P.B., Lehman G., Venes J., et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 37 (1991) 383-393
12. Freeman M.L., Disario J.A., Nelson D.B., et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 54 (2001) 425-434
13. Masci E., Mariani A., Curioni S., et al. Risk factors for pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy 35 (2003) 830-834
14. Foutch P.G. A prospective assessment of results for needle-knife papillotomy and standard endoscopic sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 41 (1995) 25-32
15. Rabenstein T., Ruppert T., Schneider H.T., et al. Benefits and risks of needle-knife papillotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 46 (1997) 207-211
16. Binmoeller K.F., Seifert H., Gerke H., et al. Papillary roof incision using the Erlangen-type precut papillotome to achieve selective bile duct cannulation. Gastrointest Endosc 44 (1996) 689-695
17. Vandervoort J., and Carr-Locke D.L. Needle-knife access papillotomy: an unfairly maligned technique?. Endoscopy 28 (1996) 365-366
18. Huibregtse K., Katon R.M., and Tytgat G.N.J. Precut papillotomy via the needle knife papillotome: a safe and effective technique. Gastrointest Endosc 32 (1986) 403-405
19. Kaffes A.J., Sriram P.V., Rao G.V., et al. Early institution of pre-cutting for difficult biliary cannulation: a prospective study comparing conventional vs a modified technique. Gastrointest Endosc 62 (2005) 669-674
20. de Weerth A., Seitz U., Zhong Y., et al. Primary precutting versus conventional over-the-wire sphincterotomy for bile duct access: a prospective randomized study. Endoscopy 38 (2006) 1235-1240
21. Carr-Locke D.L. Is primary precut endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy safe and effective?. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 4 (2007) 364-365
22. Tang S.J., Haber G.B., Kortan P., et al. Precut papillotomy versus persistence in difficult biliary cannulation: a prospective randomized trial. Endoscopy 37 (2005) 58-65
23. Freeman M.L., and Guda N.M. Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a comprehensive review. Gastrointest Endosc 59 (2004) 845-864